User talk:Ulysses54

Welcome!

Hello, Ulysses54, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Eyrian 11:06, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weegie/Weedgie

Do you have an opinion on the best spelling? See here: Talk:Weedgie Kernel Saunters 22:34, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

John Magee

The statistics you mention on vocations would need to be sourced. In the meantime, the original edit has been restored on the basis of the official statistics published by the Vatican in the Annuario Statistico for 2005.

Only part of that edit was mine i.e. I changed the reference to " bishop's sore knee" to "medical problem with the bishops knee". At no time did I make any reference to statistics. Is it possible that someone else could have done this? Ulysses54 11:37, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

West Bromwich Albion

Cheers for your update to West Bromwich Albion F.C.. I'd never thought about the official terminology for the crest/coat of arms before. I guess the description on the image page itself (Image:Westbromcrest.jpg) should also be updated? Regards. --Jameboy (talk) 21:48, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request

{{helpme}}

(Ulysses54 (talk) 11:42, 27 October 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Hi Ulysses54 what specifically do you need help with? Ϣere Spiel Chequers 11:59, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Is this just a problem you have with Wikipedia articles or generally with other Internet things? I find I have to reboot my PC occasionally simply to clear out the memory of various Wikipedia pages that I've been editing - so rebooting your PC might fix this. Paisley is a fairly large article at 31k so if you are on a slow line you will find it takes time to open and save Philip Tartaglia should be quicker. Ϣere Spiel Chequers 12:48, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ulysses, did those problems go away or are you still having difficulty editing articles? Ϣere Spiel Chequers 18:02, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No improvement, thanks - I think it's my server. Ulysses54 (talk) 11:21, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ulysses, if you are still having problems there are two workarounds worth trying. firstly instead of editing the whole article by clicking the edit this page button at the top of the screen, you can edit individual sections by clicking wherever the word edit appears in blue. Secondly each of those articles will have a talk page, if you explain what changes you want to make there you may have someone else come along and help you. Ϣere Spiel Chequers 12:44, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ulysses, I've noticed you've edited the Bishop, so hope all is OK now. Ϣere Spiel Chequers 15:05, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Donald Mackintosh VC

Hi Ulysses, its always a good precaution when linking names to check who the article is about, Donald Mackintosh is a chap who died before your Donald Mackintosh became Archbishop. What we normally do in those circumstances is leave the name with the first article, create other articles with names such as Donald Mackintosh (Archbishop) and then "pipe" them in articles by doing this [[Donald Mackintosh (Archbishop)|Donald Mackintosh]] so they appear as Donald Mackintosh. We also have some messages to put on the first article to make clear that there are other people with the same name - if you've got the info to write an article for the Archbishop I'll put the appropriate note on Donald Mackintosh linking to it. Ϣere Spiel Chequers 14:46, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi WereSpielChequers. Not sure what happened there. When I clicked on Donald Mackintosh on the Archbishop of Glasgow page I got Donald Mackintosh VC. I attempted to edit but was foiled by the slowness of my server again. Ulysses54 (talk) 09:44, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ulysses, I suspect your server is picking up an old copy of Wikipedia and then not letting you edit if there has been a more recent edit. Have you tried editing sections? If I'm right you should be able to edit a section of an article such as Archbishop of Glasgow#List of bishops of Glasgow if that section hasn't been edited in the last few days. If you have info to create a bio for the Archbishop just click on the redlink on your page and you should be able to create the article. Also while we're talking about Archbishop of Glasgow is beneficies a Scottish Ecclesiastical term or a typo for benefices? Ϣere Spiel Chequers 11:23, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,WereSpielChequers. I suspect that "beneficies" is a typo. Ulysses54 (talk) 09:57, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ϣere Spiel Chequers is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate the Winter Solstice or Xmas, Eid, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hannukah or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec08}} to your friends' talk pages.

Happy Xmas Ulysses Ϣere Spiel Chequers 09:43, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ulysses how are you doing. Thank you for your contributions on WikipediaBlack Reign 56 (talk) 00:48, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gallagher

The article before didn't cite one reference, so i added refs and removed the stuff that wasn't in my sources. Remember wikipedia is only as good as its sources. It is pretty easy to do, don't be afraid to show where you get your information. If you don't know where your info comes from then it shoulnd't be added (WP:RS, WP:V). I think the article should make a distinction between the 'sept' and the surname - you've kinda blended them into the same thing again. Not every "Gallagher" today is going to be a descendent of founder of the sept; and the article is really about the surname ("Gallagher (surname)"). So i think a section on the surname (etymology/stats and stuff) a separate one on the sept (geneagical origins and history and stuff). Anyway that's what i think.--Celtus (talk) 04:49, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gerry Rafferty edit

I wanted to say you were correct about the "lifelong alcoholic" sentence being incorrect, and I should have thought of that before changing your edit. Cheers, Trista (cannot log in at work) 24.176.191.234 (talk) 20:56, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 14

Hi. When you recently edited John Reid (music), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joe Egan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:28, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Leo Cushley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hamilton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve John Keenan (bishop)

Hi, I'm Epparadox. Ulysses54, thanks for creating John Keenan (bishop)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hi, I have added some tags to your recently created page. These will help improve the overall quality of the article, they can be removed at any point once the issues have been corrected.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Epparadox (talk) 14:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bishop of Paisley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Episcopal

John Keenan (bishop) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Episcopal

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gallagher (surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vatican (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 16 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Patrick Doyle page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:33, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Glasgow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brythonic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ulysses54. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ulysses54. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ulysses54. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Justin Currie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Currie. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]