User talk:Wikidrone20000

Please keep your edits as accurate as possible, if you are unsure of the facts please leave the editing to those who do.

Rochfortbridge Community Worldwide

Once again you tamper with a website that you have no authority to edit or amend, why do you insist in this editing when it is quiet obvious by now that it is mallicious or vandalous. webmaster rochfortbridge community worldwide http://rochfortbridge.wetpaint.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.165.165.14 (talk) 01:25, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Response

I didn't do anything malicious. I changed the category as since april there have been no new threads and only 3 people have added to it Since March. The www.rochfortbridge.com website gets messages from many many countries thus making it a more international website. I did give acknowledgement of your skills in tracing roots. Having looked back through the Wikipedia website edits on this article, I would think that you should understand more what a malicious edit/change was. Keep your link inaccurate if you wish. If it makes you a happy person in your world. All the best, WD --Wikidrone20000 (talk) 18:39, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yet another edit of website descriptions that was unauthorised

- can you explain your actions this time????

also - have you noticed that this website has its own e-mail address, why post threads for all to see when an e-mail address is available - why not e-mail me on the website e-mail address and we can discuss the problems you seem to have with the position my site takes on search engines and/or the problems you have with the content or its description, or is it just a problem you have with the site management??? - if you have any complaints with any aspect of the website or any of its content contact me and let me know where the problem lies.

perhaps now I can delete the site meter as you seem to be tracking all the edits on all my sites 194.125.34.233 (talk) 23:08, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I thought I had come to a happy medium by putting all links in together? I only reverted because you deleted specific links (They wern't all to the same place)... Good luck with your website... nothing against it but you seem to have something against Wikipedia and anyone that disagrees with you... Good luck with getting over that too!! ;)--Wikidrone20000 (talk) 23:05, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Response

I just wondered why you paid so much attention to my website and the edits made to same, I also wondered who made you the mediator to come to any happy medium, perhaps you should take a look at all the edits I reverted,they all come from you, so if there is a problem you have with me or my site then let me know and we can resolve it. I have no problem with competition and I do agree that there is another website covering the area but that is no grounds to demeen my site with descriptions that undermine its content. why not browse my site and maybe add some content, after all, if two sites exist on the same topic, why do you dedicate all your edits to the one you try to promote rather than the one you constantly ridicule? 194.165.180.30 (talk) 00:27, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair point. Didn't actually mean to do that. I understand your point... Can we agree to call a truce and just represent the area as best we can... I'll respect you if you respect me? How's that sound? WD --Wikidrone20000 (talk) 15:37, 23 August 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Another editor has "modified" the site last night and I have wrote on his discussion page with the following.. Rochfortbridge

Hi, I know you are trying to tidy up the articles and fair play, but, you have removed some census data and historical data from the Rochfortbridge Article... This Cencus data is accurate and actually important to those of Rochfortbridge as it has been the victim of planning abuse and this info assists them in their argument... Also, the links to development plans were put in to help find them as the county council website changed it's format and it's nearly impossible to find these files through browsing.. Also, a local historian put a lot of work into the history of the area which, as far as I can well is accurate and not disputed. Can we add this info back in and between us we will endevour to cite sources etc. Any ideas or help with this would mean a great deal to us!

Kind regards, --Wikidrone20000 (talk) 15:45, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Let me know if you agree?

TRUCE - BUT INFORMATION REQUIRED

I have no problems with any site on the subject of Rochfortbridge and I often visit the other sites and indeed welcome the fact that Rochfortbridge is so well documented on the net. My only problem is when my site link is deleted, moved to another section or renamed without my consent. If that day is over then perhaps I wont need to keep checking it every five minutes. On the matter of a truce - well I can only agree to a truce with someone I know, You know my name, address, phone number and several e-mail addresses - contact me on one such media and I will accept a truce face to face and move on from this rediculas over editing for no reason. - D.O'N. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.125.34.99 (talk) 23:06, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Truce Hi, I'd rather keep my ID private but you won't be getting any more reverts/changing of links or anything like that from me. I can see what your site is about and have no more issues... life's too short... keep up the good work... --Wikidrone20000 (talk) 19:28, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FAIR ENOUGH

well that fair enough for me and i respect you wish of privacy - thanks for the good wishes. Denis. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.125.34.241 (talk) 22:50, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Island in the British Isles

Hi. Did you know that you appear in the category "Islands in the British Isles" alongside Ireland and Britain? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Islands_in_the_British_Isles Hughsheehy 16:32, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit or Rochfortbridge is wrong, Queen Ann didnt give permision for a monthly market to be held from "then on" as you state but "Therein" as previously stated and wrongly edited by you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.125.179.225 (talk) 02:10, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

By A Local

why did you edit the rochfortbridge community website to read "By A Local", this site has editors from Austraila, USA, South America, UK, Mainland Europe to mention but a few.

please revert this edit to its original form and bear in mind that edits of this nature show that you are in some way afraid to admit that the site has an international audience. please revert this edit now and kindly refrain from editing out the bits you dont agree with. this is an act of editing for the sake of downgrading this site and will be treated as a hostile edit by the site officials. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.125.179.225 (talk) 02:31, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rochfortbridge changes by ArglebargleIV

Hello.

It's probably best for a spirit of overall inclusive discussion if we have this conversation over at the Rochfortbridge article talk page, so I'll respond to your comment on my talk page over there. -- ArglebargleIV (talk)