User talk:Wikifixer559

February 2024

Hello, Wikifixer559. I noticed that your recent edit to The Other Russia of E. V. Limonov added a link to an image on an external website or on your computer, or to a file name that does not exist on Wikipedia's server. For technical and policy reasons it is not possible to use images from external sources on Wikipedia. Most images you find on the internet are copyrighted and cannot be used on Wikipedia, or their use is subject to certain restrictions. If the image meets Wikipedia's image use policy, consider uploading it to Wikipedia yourself or request that someone else upload it. See the image tutorial to learn about wiki syntax used for images. Thank you. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 00:34, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wikifixer559! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of History of Rwanda several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:History of Rwanda, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you.

Also, please note that infoboxes are generally only placed in the lead of an article. See MOS:INFOBOX. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:59, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Emirate of Sicily, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. R Prazeres (talk) 19:25, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello, Wikifixer559. I noticed that your recent edit to Movimiento Nacional added a link to an image on an external website or on your computer, or to a file name that does not exist on Wikipedia's server. For technical and policy reasons it is not possible to use images from external sources on Wikipedia. Most images you find on the internet are copyrighted and cannot be used on Wikipedia, or their use is subject to certain restrictions. If the image meets Wikipedia's image use policy, consider uploading it to Wikipedia yourself or request that someone else upload it. See the image tutorial to learn about wiki syntax used for images. Thank you. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 23:13, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kingdom of Abemama (October 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ktkvtsh was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Zero sources still.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kingdom of Abemama and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ktkvtsh (talk) 00:44, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikifixer559! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ktkvtsh (talk) 00:44, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Hello, I'm Cerebral726. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to LGBTQ seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Cerebral726 (talk) 17:17, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

LGBTQ is an anti-Christian movement. Wikifixer559 (talk) 17:18, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RS needed. I can see the argument that Truth Wins Out opposes (some) Christian sects based on sourcing on the page, but for the other pages I don't think that argument works. lizthegrey (talk) 00:25, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Religious cults has been nominated for deletion

Category:Religious cults has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Hemiauchenia (talk) 18:23, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:CULT

Stop adding this category to things that are not strictly labeled cults. UFO religions are not strictly cults. Some of the things you’re adding aren’t even religions. Or cults. Some articles don’t even have the word cult. The category is probably also going to be deleted so if I were you I would stop adding categories to it altogether. PARAKANYAA (talk) 15:37, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Again, this is a warning, stop doing this. The categories do not verify. PARAKANYAA (talk) 19:01, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Categories, removing stuff because you consider it biased without proof. Stop PARAKANYAA (talk) 19:04, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please be careful about what you say to people. Some remarks, such as your addition to American Nazi Party can easily be misinterpreted, or viewed as harassment. Wikipedia is a supportive environment, where contributors should feel comfortable and safe while editing. Thank you. ButlerBlog (talk) 18:42, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This notice is specific to your edit summary in this edit: [1]. All of your actions on Wikipedia are expected to abide by the WP:CIVILITY policy - that includes edit summaries. ButlerBlog (talk) 18:43, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I won’t make that mistake again. Wikifixer559 (talk) 18:44, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Graham87 (talk) 04:35, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your continued addition of Category:Religious cults to articles such as The Family (Australian New Age group), despite the categories for deletion discussion being closed as delete, shows either unawareness or disrespect of Wikipedia process. Please stop trying to do any editing relating to categories; your category edits are disruptive here. Graham87 (talk) 04:35, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Leftists do not interact" - really?

I would advise you remove this from your user page. It creates a hostile environment and is likely to lead to unnecessary conflict. While you just saying you have right-wing political views is not an issue, you can't prohibit other editors from interacting with you, and especially in this way I would say it is close to violating WP:POLEMIC ("material that can be viewed as attacking other editors"). And this is coming from someone who is right-wing. PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:38, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I removed it, now what do I have to do? Keep submitting to lefties? Wikifixer559 (talk) 13:21, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]