User talk:Xcentaur

This user may have left Wikipedia. Xcentaur has not edited Wikipedia since 28 April 2011. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Discourtesy is - unspeakably ugly to me. Whatever you would like to say, please be civil about it.
Whatever reason you are here for, I welcome you with open arms! Ask me anything, I promise I'll do my very best to help you out!
- Please post your new topic at the bottom of this page.
- Please sign and date your entry by inserting "~~~~" at the end.
- Please use a new ==Descriptive heading== for new topics.
- Please indent your posts with ":" if replying to an existing topic (or "::" if replying to a reply).
- I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your Talk page (or the article Talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to Watch this page until you are responded to, or specifically let me know where you'd prefer the reply.
I am busy in real life and may take a while to get back to you. But I will make sure to get in touch with you as soon as possible, I promise! Thank you for understanding.

⇒ Start a new Talk topic.

Archives

What is Troo?

Hi there, I have declined your speedy request for What is Troo? because the page did not constitute patent nonsense, in the Wikipedia sense of the word. Please keep in mind that the sorts of articles that can be deleted using the CSD G1 criteria are intentionally quite narrow, and that you need to be careful when you're CSD tagging to make sure that you use an applicable criteria. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 08:40, 16 June 2010 (UTC).[reply]

I also went through Wikipedia:Speedy_deletions and the section on Non-criteria, specifically Neologisms.

This particular article - it starts with "Troo is a word that originated from two friends, Kevin Perrini and Jonathan Canales, that can be used as a noun, verb, or adjective. There is no actual definiton to "troo", but it mainly means either something gangster as fuck, or something awesome as hell."

Surely noone would mind speedy deleting *this*?

Thanks for the note on CSD, I'll keep it in mind. -xC- 03:40, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, I certainly wouldn't mind the article being deleted, but at the same time we need to stay within the procedures that the community has come to a consensus on about what we can speedy delete. For better or worse, "articles" like that one aren't on the list of things that can be summarily deleted. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 08:41, 18 June 2010 (UTC).[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:47, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks -xC- 07:25, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1-why in fix  bias base collector junction is reverse bias ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.215.223.206 (talk) 23:05, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Main Page appearance: Rani Mukerji

This is a note to let the main editors of Rani Mukerji know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on March 21, 2014. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask Bencherlite (talk · contribs). You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/March 21, 2014. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. The blurb as it stands now is below:

Rani Mukerji (born 1978) is an Indian film actress. Through her successful Bollywood (Hindi film) acting career, she has become one of the most high-profile celebrities in India. Mukerji has received seven Filmfare Awards from fourteen nominations, and her film roles have been cited as a significant departure from the traditional portrayal of women in mainstream Hindi cinema. Mukerji began a full-time career in film in 1997 and had her first major success with the 1998 romance Kuch Kuch Hota Hai. In 2002 she was acclaimed for her role in the relationship drama Saathiya, and by the year 2004 she had established herself as a leading actress of Bollywood with roles in the romantic comedy Hum Tum and the dramas Yuva and Veer-Zaara. She achieved further success for her leading roles in Black (2005) and Kabhi Alvida Naa Kehna (2006). After starring in a series of unsuccessful films, she featured in the successful thrillers No One Killed Jessica (2011) and Talaash: The Answer Lies Within (2012). In addition to acting in films, Mukerji has been actively involved with several humanitarian causes and is vocal about issues faced by women and children. (Full article...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 23:02, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, My Name is ravi kumar.I Am from alwar (Rajasthan) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ravi kuamr verma (talk • contribs) 17:06, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of In-N-Out Burger products for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article In-N-Out Burger products is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In-N-Out Burger products until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 01:09, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]