User talk:Yuezhi Huang

December 2024

Hello, I'm Ivebeenhacked. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Comac C919, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 23:04, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ivebeenhacked, thanks for the reminder, I’m now adding sources to each line of changes I’ve made in the past hours. Happy to invite you to check again in a few minutes! Yuezhi Huang (talk) 23:18, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. If you have any further questions to ask, please do so. Cheers. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 23:21, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Yuezhi Huang. Hello there, it's me again (yay!). So today, I was scrutinizing the sources you added at the Comac 919 article and I noticed that you added a citation called "SimpleFlying". However, SimpleFlying's reliability has been discussed by editors multiple times at WP:RSN and it was deemed unreliable. I hope you understand and if you have further questions, feel free to ask me. Cheers! Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 22:34, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hi there! Thanks for reaching out! I’ve corrected the source to an article on Shanghai Daily wrote by Xinhua, the Chinese state owned media. Hope this will work out! Merry Xmas and happy holidays!

Yuezhi Yuezhi Huang (talk) 02:56, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You too! Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 03:00, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Siemens Viaggio Next Level (December 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lemonaka was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Siemens Viaggio Next Level and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Lemonaka 03:53, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yuezhi Huang! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Lemonaka 03:53, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: China Railway CR450AF has been accepted

China Railway CR450AF, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tesleemah (talk) 09:38, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is the CR450AF is expected to enter into service on the Second Chengdu–Chongqing high-speed railway in 2025 or 2027?

The article Second Chengdu–Chongqing high-speed railway says the expected opening of this line is 2027, but in the article CR400AF you wrote that it was expected to enter service on this line in 2025. I was wondering, which of these is correct? 219.89.39.67 (talk) 13:30, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry for the lack of source to this sentence, indeed the opening date of the second Chengdu-Chongqing HSR is described as 2027 on Wikipedia, but recently it changed to the end of 2025, the source of this message is quite unreliable in my opinion, I'm looking for a more reliable source at the moment. Till that happens, I'll delete the information regarding to the HSR from the article.

Best wishes and happy new year! Yuezhi Huang (talk) 13:42, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No need to be sorry. Thanks for the clarification, hopefully you can find a good source for that. Happy new year, and nice work on the article! 219.89.39.67 (talk) 13:47, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited China Railway CR450AF, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CARS. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:59, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: China Railway CR450BF has been accepted

China Railway CR450BF, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Beachweak (talk) 18:28, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited China Railway CR450BF, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CARS.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Lufthansa

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Lufthansa, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:44, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Lufthansa fleet, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Theicys (talk) 16:54, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: HNA Aviation (January 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:HNA Aviation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 04:41, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lufthansa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CCO.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

Please make yourself more familiar with our style and content guidelines before damaging even more articles, e.g. we do NOT place aircraft images in airline infoboxes as per longstanding concensus and you cannot change that at will. 2001:A61:1212:8701:407E:F4E8:9F60:C89B (talk) 08:49, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) so far, you’re the only user actively claiming such a consensus exists. Therefore, it is up to you to provide evidence that this consensus exists - and if it doesn’t, then it is up to you to start the necessary discussion to get consensus. However, edit warring will not help your cause. Danners430 (talk) 09:33, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Violation of style guidelines

Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. 2001:A61:1212:8701:407E:F4E8:9F60:C89B (talk) 08:56, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Violation of content guidelines

Hello, I'm 2001:A61:1212:8701:407E:F4E8:9F60:C89B. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks.
Please refrain immediately from adding or changing content without stating valid sources and adding corresponding citations. 2001:A61:1212:8701:407E:F4E8:9F60:C89B (talk) 08:57, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aircraft images in infoboxes

Please refrain immediately from adding random aircraft images to airline infoboxes. There has been longstanding concensus in the aviation portal to NOT do this - there is a reason why no airline articles have them and you are damaging our well-maintained articles by ignoring our style manual which other users try to keep up. 82.135.81.179 (talk) 16:31, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I still have heard no consensus about this. Please provide a consensus about this. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 16:32, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry to hear that, can you please link the related talk page or discussion page for the “consensus” here? Many thanks. Yuezhi Huang (talk) 16:34, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you think of all the airline articles you edit exactly none have an aircraft image in their infoboxes? There is widespread agreement within regular editors to not do so. Feel free to open a new discussion about that at the aviation portal, the last discussion about this was several years ago, i'll provide a link if I find it in the archive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.135.81.179 (talk) 16:36, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide the link to that consensus. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 16:39, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’m sorry, but “why do you think” is not a solid proof to this topic. It’s YOUR job to start a discussion in the portal to REMOVE or NOT REMOVE those pictures that me and other people added to the infobox. Personally I find no reasons to remove a beautiful image that represents the airline and it proves a cover image to the page, of course we can discuss these in the topic and get a common conclusion. Before that happens, please do not remove other people’s contribution without a solid proof of common sense, many thanks. Yuezhi Huang (talk) 16:43, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]