Wikipedia:Featured list candidates

Nominating featured lists in Wikipedia Welcome to featured list candidates! Here, we determine which lists are of a good enough quality to be featured lists (FLs). Featured lists exemplify Wikipedia's very best work and must satisfy the featured list criteria. Before nominating a list, nominators may wish to receive feedback by listing it at peer review. This process is not a substitute for peer review. Nominators must be sufficiently familiar with the subject matter and sources to deal with objections during the featured list candidate (FLC) process. Those who are not significant contributors to the list should consult regular editors of the list before nomination. Nominators are expected to respond positively to constructive criticism and to make an effort to address objections promptly. A list should not be listed at featured list candidates and another review process at the same time. Nominators who have previously successfully nominated a list may have two concurrent featured list nominations only if the first active nomination has gained substantial support and reviewers' concerns have been substantially addressed. The featured list director, Giants2008, or his delegates, PresN and Hey man im josh, determine the timing of the process for each nomination. Each nomination will typically last at least twenty days, but may last longer if changes are ongoing or insufficient discussion or analysis has occurred. For a nomination to be promoted to FL status, consensus must be reached that it meets the criteria. The directors determine whether there is consensus. A nomination will be removed from the list and archived if, in the judgment of the director who considers a nomination and its reviews: actionable objections have not been resolved in a timely manner; or consensus for promotion has not been reached after significant time; or reviewers are unable to judge whether the criteria have been met. It is assumed that all nominations have good qualities; this is why the process focuses on finding and resolving problems in relation to the criteria, rather than asserting the positives. Declarations of support are not as important as finding and resolving issues, and the process is not simply vote-counting. Once the director or a delegate has decided to close a nomination, they will do so on the nominations page. A bot will update the list talk page after the list is promoted or the nomination archived, typically within the day, and the {{FLC}} template should remain on the talk page until the bot updates or adds the {{Article history}} template. If a nomination is archived, the nominator should take adequate time to resolve issues before re-nominating.  – Table of contents – Closing instructions

Featured content: Featured articles Featured lists ← Featured pictures Featured topics Featured list tools: Featured list criteria Featured list candidates Featured list removal candidates Featured list statistics Wikipedians by promoted featured list nominations Today's featured list This month's queue TFL submissions TFL statistics Featured lists that have appeared as TFL Featured lists yet to appear as TFL Featured list log Random featured list Former featured lists Removal candidates log

Nomination procedure Before nominating a list, ensure that it meets all of the FL criteria and that any peer reviews are closed and archived. It is recommended that the list have no other open discussions. Place {{subst:FLC}} on the talk page of the nominated list. From the FLC template, click on the red "initiate the nomination" link. You will see pre-loaded information; leave that text. If you are unsure how to complete a nomination, please leave a post on the FLC talk page for assistance. Below the preloaded title, complete the nomination page, sign with ~~~~ and save the page. Finally, place {{Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/name of nominated list/archiveNumber}} at the top of the list of nominees on this page by first copying the above, clicking "edit" on the top of this page, and then pasting, making sure to add the name of the nominated list. When adding a candidate, mention the name of the list in the edit summary. Reviewing procedure Please read a nominated list fully before deciding to support or oppose a nomination. To respond to a nomination, click the "Edit" link to the right of the list nomination (not the "Edit this page" link for the whole FLC page). To support a nomination, write * '''Support''', followed by your reason(s). If you have been a significant contributor to the list before its nomination, please indicate this. Supports are weighted more strongly if they are given alongside justifications that indicate that the list was fully reviewed; a nomination is not just a straight vote. To oppose a nomination, write * '''Oppose''', followed by your reason(s). Each objection must provide a specific rationale that can be addressed. If nothing can be done in principle to address the objection, the director may ignore it. Please focus your attention on substantive issues or inconsistencies, rather than personal style preferences. Reviewers who object are strongly encouraged to return after a few days to check whether their objection has been addressed, and nominators are encouraged to use {{reply to}} or other templates to notify reviewers when replying. To withdraw an objection, strike it out (with <s> ... </s>), rather than removing it. If a nominator feels that an oppose vote has been addressed, they should say so, rather than striking out the reviewer's text. Nominators should not cap, alter, strike, or add graphics to comments from other editors; replies are added below the signature on the reviewer's commentary. If a nominator finds that an opposing reviewer is not returning to the nomination page to revisit improvements, this should be noted on the nomination page. Graphics (such as {{done}} and {{not done}}) are discouraged, as they slow down the page load time. To provide constructive input on a nomination without specifically supporting or objecting, write * '''Comment''' followed by your advice.

Nominations urgently needing reviews edit · history · watch · refresh The following lists were nominated almost 2 months ago and have had their review time extended because objections are still being addressed, the nomination has not received enough reviews, or insufficient information has been provided by reviewers to judge whether the criteria have been met. If you have not yet reviewed them, please take the time to do so: 1972 Summer Olympics medal table (FLC) 2024 Men's T20 World Cup qualification (FLC) List of Iowa tornadoes (FLC) List of Parks and Recreation episodes (FLC) List of awards and honours received by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie (FLC) List of Michelin-starred restaurants in Thailand (FLC) edit · history · watch · refresh The following lists were nominated for removal more than 14 days ago:

Nominations

List of governors of Anambra State

Nominator(s): Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:46, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

This is the list of governors of Nigeria's state of Anambra from when the region was called Eastern then splitted into East Central and two other states, then East Central was splitted into Anambra and Imo states. I have significantly worked on this and it now meets the criteria for FL. Feedback would be very much appreciated. Thank you already. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:46, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

List of Private Practice episodes

Nominator(s): TheDoctorWho (talk) 05:25, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

I'm back, this time with another Grey's Anatomy-related list! I noticed that the Grey's episode list was already of FL quality, and I brought the LoE for the second spin-off to FL earlier this year, so I thought that this would complete a nice set of lists. Private Practice is an American medical drama in which a doctor from the Seattle-based Grey's moved to Santa Monica for a fresh start. This list was in somewhat of a poor shape beforehand, but after a cleanup on sources, expansion of the lead, addition of viewing figures, and addressing all of the accessibility issues, I believe it's up to par with the similar lists I've brought here thus far. Thanks in advance for any reviews! TheDoctorWho (talk) 05:25, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Comments

• "another ABC medical drama created by Rhimes'." - no reason for the apostrophe on Rhimes
• "At the time, it was the second series from Shondaland" - the first three words are not needed and actually make the second clause of the sentence incorrect (it wasn't one of twelve at the time)
• "Rhime's production company" - apostrophe is in the wrong place
• "also crossed over into Sation 19" - title is spelt wrong
• "The series was broadcast internationally," - sentence ends with a comma
• That's what I got :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:29, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Source review by Bgsu98

User:ChrisTheDude seems to have caught the issues with the lead, so I figured I would do the source review for you. Sources appear to be properly formatted and archived.

Spot check

• No. 3 – Checks out.
• No. 5 – Checks out.
• No. 11 – Checks out.
• No. 15 – Checks out.
• No. 29 – Source identifies 10400 viewers, article states 10.36. I'm assuming 10400=10.40, but 10.40≠10.36.
• No. 35 – Source does not list Private Practice. The source also lists CBS programs, but PP was an ABC series.
• No. 43 – Source does not list Private Practice. Ditto.
• No. 51 – Numbers do not match.
• No. 66 – Checks out.
• No. 81 – Checks out.
• No. 99 – Checks out.
• No. 101 – Checks out.
• No. 113 – Checks out.
• No. 129 – Checks out.

User:TheDoctorWho: I am concerned that the numbers for seasons 1 and 2 are not matching up. I would recommend adjusting the figures in the article to match what's in the sources. Please let me know when these have been addressed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 12:56, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

OlifanofTennant

• "Private Practice featured several fictional crossovers" as opposed to real crossovers?
• "into Sation 19" spelt wrong
• "Other cast members... were introduced later in the series" It states that these cast memebers joined later but did cast member later leave the series?

Thats what I found ping me when done. Olliefant (she/her) 14:08, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Timeline of the Tumu Crisis

Nominator(s): Min968 (talk) 18:29, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

The chronological list presents one of the worst military defeats in Ming history. I would highly appreciate any suggestions to improve it. Thank you for your time. Min968 (talk) 18:29, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

Drive by comments from History6042

• The prose seems like it is overly trying to convince the reader that the topic is very important. It uses words such as "highly mobile and battle-hardened", "orderly withdrawal", "catastrophic defeat", "bold proclamation", and "not only". Please fix these per WP:EDITORIAL.
  • Done.
• Does "The T'u-Mu Incident of 1449" have an ISBN or similar identifier that could be added?
  • @History6042: Done.Min968 (talk) 01:12, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

List of South African Grammy Award winners and nominees

Nominator(s): dxneo (talk) 04:29, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

Coming from a failed nomination, the list is now polished. I believe that it is now ready. dxneo (talk) 04:29, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

• Comment: Per WP:CROSSCAT, Wikipedia is not for Non-encyclopedic cross-categorizations, such as "people from ethnic / cultural / religious group X employed by organization Y" or "restaurants specializing in food type X in city Y". Cross-categories such as these are not considered a sufficient basis for creating an article, unless the intersection of those categories is in some way a culturally significant phenomenon. The sources prove that these individuals received nominations/awards, but I don't really see sources in the list that discuss this group as a whole to demonstrate this is a "culturally significant phenomenon". Can you explain this? RunningTiger123 (talk) 15:31, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

  i have read this for like 8 times now, but i still don't get it. Would you please point out the errors so that i can fix them. dxneo (talk) 17:18, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

  What it means is basically that RunningTiger123 think that this list should not exist. The excerpt from WP:CROSSCAT means that just because all the winners on the list are South African, that doesn't mean that there is a set group talked about in RS called "South African Grammy Award winners and nominees". Members of this list just happen to be both, I don't think the Grammys actual care or keep track of the nationalities of their nominees. This is not a fixable issue unless you can find RSs talking about this group as a whole. History6042😊 (Contact me) 18:33, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

  Agreed, this is what I meant. Sources must show that "South African Grammy winners and nominees" is a notable topic or grouping to justify a list. (As an analogy: There have been Grammy winners with blond hair, but that is not enough to create List of blond Grammy Award winners and nominees, as there aren't sources about that group.) RunningTiger123 (talk) 01:46, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

  To compare this to "winners with blond hair" sounds very unfair. This is a list just like List of Billboard Hot 100 number ones of 2025 or any other musician's awards and nominations list, it's a compilation. Lists are rarely discussed in RS as a whole. Every country/region with multiple Grammy awards and nominations have a standalone list/article including the US, see Category:Lists of Grammy Award winners and nominees by nationality. As for RS about South African Grammy awards winners, there are plenty (Bona, Good Things Guy, The South African and more) but it's really not that necessary to cite all those sources. If this list "shouldn't exist", by all means, let's take it to AfD so that we can stop further production of such list. In conclusion, this is a very good list highlighting only South African winners and nominees. dxneo (talk) 07:38, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

  I spent half an hour trying to figure out how to better word things, but I couldn't find any clearer way to make my point – this is pretty clearly the type of list CROSSCAT is talking about and not like the other examples you offered. I agree my analogy was extreme, but I was trying to show why CROSSCAT exists to prevent us from synthesizing arbitrary list topics. That being said, since you found several sources that seem to show coverage of this grouping, you should incorporate those into the list's lead and let reviewers assess whether those prove the topic's notability. RunningTiger123 (talk) 03:06, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

  Maybe this helps: When a musician wins an award, sources covering that will list both the award and the musician; we don't have to synthesize a connection between the two. Similarly, when a single hits number one on the charts, the chart's date is given; we don't have to synthesize a connection between the year and the song. However, when an artist wins a Grammy, their nationality is (broadly speaking) not mentioned in sources – for instance, you won't see the Grammy nominations list mention nationality anywhere. So if you start connecting the winners to their nationality, you need sources to prove that the connection is meaningful. Does that help? RunningTiger123 (talk) 03:17, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Estonian Figure Skating Championships

Nominator(s): Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:55, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

Since Canada was just promoted, this is the next national skating championship article in line. The results are all sourced and documented, the tables are properly formatted, and the sources are properly formatted. This particular list has more in common with Ukrainian Figure Skating Championships, which was also promoted to FL. Special thanks to User:Estopedist1, who helped find the source for the very last competition installment that I could not locate. Please let me know if you have any suggestions or comments, and thank you! Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:55, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

Comments

• "to crown the national champions of Estonia" - I would suggest maybe "the country's national champions" to avoid saying "Estonia" three times in one sentence I'm really hesitant to change that, because it's the same format used on all of the other articles that have been promoted, settled after a lengthy discussion a few reviews back...
• "due in part to Estonia hosting a number of high-profile events" - maybe same here Fixed.
• A few competitors seem to only have their surname listed. Assuming that this isn't a typo, maybe add a footnote to the effect that their full names are not recorded in reliable sources Yeah, we're lucky we still have these records at all. Footnotes added.
• in the footnotes under the records table, why are some names bolded? These skaters don't have wikilinks.
  • OK, but why are they bolded? There is no guideline that says that if someone mentioned in an article doesn't have an article of their own then their name should be put in bold...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:33, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
  • Also, there are dozens of other people mentioned in this article who don't have articles of their own (eg Adolf Feldmann) and their names aren't bolded.....? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:35, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

    User:ChrisTheDude: That's fine; I can unbold them; it's no big deal to me. Bgsu98 (Talk) 18:38, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

• That's all I got - great work as ever! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:22, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

• User:ChrisTheDude, thank you as always for the feedback! Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:02, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:58, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

  Thank you so much as always for your feedback and support! Bgsu98 (Talk) 19:03, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

Comments by Alavense

• The reigning Estonian figure skating champions: Mihhail Selevko (men's singles); Niina Petrõkina (women's singles); and Solène Mazingue and Marko Jevgeni Gaidajenko (ice dance) - Commas would be enough here.

• Changed.

• the men's championship event - Isn't that redundant? I guess it would suffice to say either the men's championship or the men's event.
• while his younger brother Mihhail has won the event four times - while his younger brother Mihhail has won it four times

• Both are good points and have been fixed.

• Isn't it worth explaining somewhere why the events were held in 1961 in a city which is not in Estonia?

• It sure would be if there were an explanation to give. I'd guess it was a joint competition, but Latvian skating records prior to its independence from the USSR are nonexistent.

• I think it's weird to have text for the men's singles sections but not anywhere else.

• Unfortunately, there's not really been anything notable about the other events. The Selevkos are the only ones garnering any sort of press internally. Niina Petrõkina has garnered some press as well, but for her international results, not her national results. I could move that text up to the History section if you think that might be better.

That's what I saw. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 11:24, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

• User:Alavense: Thank you for your feedback. Please let me know if you have any other concerns or suggestions. Bgsu98 (Talk) 13:13, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

List of governors of Akwa Ibom State

Nominator(s): Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:42, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

This is the list of governors of Nigeria's state of Akwa Ibom from when the region was called Eastern then splitted into South-Eastern and two other states, then South-Eastern ranamed to Cross River and Akwa Ibom created out of Cross River. I have significantly worked on this and it now meets the criteria for FL. Feedback would be very much appreciated. Thank you already. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:42, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

History6042

• Please add archived to all online sources as they are already on some of the.
  • I've been told that this isn't part of the featured content criteria, which I why I stopped adding (if you watch my most recent FLcs).
• Why are some rows in the party columns merged while others are not? Please make this consistent.
  • The rows are merged because they have common contents across two or more columns. I think it makes sense to just merge the rows and put the content once instead of adding the contents over and over again.
• The free use rationale for File:Photo of Brigadier Udokaha Jacob Esuene.jpeg is incorrect, it says, "It will be used in only one article" even though it is used on two. It also says "for visual identification of the person in question, at the top of their biographical article", this use is neither at the top of the article nor is the article a biography.
  • Thanks, I fixed these.
• The purpose in the rational is also wrong for File:Joseph Adeusi.png.
  • Also fixed this.
• The alt text "Godswill Obot Akpabio portrait on suit" is not grammaticaly correct.
  • I rephrased.
• Some entries in the Deputy Governor column are missing citations.
  • I added citations
• Are the redlinked Deputy Govenors important enough to have an article? If not please remove the links.
  • Yes, they are; deputy governors are important and notable.
• In citation 13 is there an available link for "Nigeria National Assembly Senate"?
  • I linked to Senate of Nigeria
• In that same citation it should be publisher, not the author's surname.
• Ping when done.
  • @History6042: Thanks for taking a look and providing feedback. I have attended to all comments. --Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:26, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

  For the archiving, it is not technically part of the criteria, it is just helpful for accessing links when they stop existing. For the merging, I mean the 4 rows of PDP at the bottom can be merged. @Vanderwaalforces. History6042😊 (Contact me) 22:32, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

  @History6042 Merged, and it looks cool. Thanks! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:52, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

  Support. History6042😊 (Contact me) 23:08, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

Comments

• "After independence, Francis Akanu Ibiam (1960–1966) became the first Nigerian governor of the Eastern Region, while Michael Okpara served as its second premier (1960–1966)" - those date spans are the same, is this a typo?
• Note b needs a full stop -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:27, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude yeah; one is a governor and the other a premier. Period added, thanks for looking! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:39, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

  Gotcha. In that case why mention the second premier but not the first.....? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:24, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude The paragraph starts with "After independence..." and the first premier was before independence. Also, based on other reviews, I said that the first premier does not make sense to be mentioned originally based on the chronology of the events. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:58, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

  As the fact that the first premier was before independence isn't mentioned, it's still super unclear IMO. Maybe just remove "second" or say "first premier after independence".......? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:59, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude In fact, that's better! I removed "second". Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:15, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:17, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Comments by Alavense

• The South-Eastern State, comprising present-day Akwa Ibom and Cross River States, - I find that a bit weird. Wouldn't it be better to say The South-Eastern State, comprising the present-day states of Akwa Ibom and Cross River,?
  • thanks, fixed.
• Quotation marks should be straight, not curly.
  • fixed.
• the state reverted to military rule under administrators like Yakubu Bako, Joseph Adeusi, and John Ebiye - Does that mean there were other administrators?
  • rephrased, thanks!
• with leaders such as Edet Archibong (1984), Dan Archibong (1984–1986), and Ernest Attah (1986–1992) - Same here with such as.
  • for this, yes there were others, but based on the chronology and Cross River's relation to Akwa Ibom, it stops with Princewill since he was the one ruling as of when Akwa Ibom was created.
• And why is Attah mentioned there but not included in any of the tables?
  • thank you! I replaced Attah's name with Princewill here.

That's what I saw. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 11:17, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

@Alavense Replied, thank you very much for looking! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:26, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

List of insect orders

Nominator: Sophisticatedevening

I have decided to try my hand with the creepy crawlies recently, this is all extant orders in the class insecta. It is surprisingly diverse, and with this one class it represents around a half of all species (I was surprised to learn here that beetles account for a fourth of all species as well). Around half of these are able to be supported by lovely featured pictures, and some neat microscopic ones too.🐞 Sophisticatedevening🍷^(talk) 02:57, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98

I really enjoyed reading this article. I think it is well organized and well laid out. I will return later today to leave more detailed feedback. Bgsu98 (Talk) 14:03, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

• Primary image collage is good, with alt-text.
• I'm not sure you need a colon after "The most diverse orders are"
• I would spell out "two" in the last sentence of the lead. You also do not need to include the same source link twice; once at the end of the second sentence is sufficient.
• With regards to the tables, I would recommend wikilinking the common insect names in the second columns, as those are likely topics a reader might be interested in.
• What is the information underneath the Order? For example, Börner 1904. If this is additional information, it needs some kind of explanation.
• "Bodies are cylindrical, and do not have any scales. They are distributed globally, and prefer woodland areas. Their tails consist of three long structures, and can use them to jump up to 12 inches." No comma needed in any of these sentences.
• "Approximately" followed by a precise number seems kind of awkward.
• "The thoraxes are wide, and the surface is covered in small, dry scales." No comma needed after "wide".
• "Palaeoptera is an infraclass..." What is an infraclass?
• "Wings of Palaeoptera cannot be folded back when they are not being used, and species undergo particularly significant changes during metamorphosis." No comma needed.
• "Females lay their eggs in water, and do not feed during the adult stage." No comma needed.
• "They are most common in tropical climates, and can live as pests in human structures." No comma needed.
• What are cerci?
• "It is the smallest insect order, and was first described in 2002." No comma needed.
• "Orthoptera is an order of insects that consists of crickets, grasshoppers and locusts." I believe a comma is needed here after "grasshoppers".
• You should probably spell out "one" and "three".
• You should probably spell out "four".
• What is an "incomplete metamorphosis"?
• "It consists primarily of lice, and species are dorsoventrally flattened across their bodies" No comma needed. Also, is it "dorsoventrally" or "dorso-ventrally"?
• Unless "Thrips" is a proper noun, it shouldn't be capitalized in the middle of the sentence.
• You should probably spell out "two".
• "They are usually no more than 2 millimeters in length, and are attracted to bright colors." No comma needed.
• "Coleoptera (commonly known as "beetles") is the largest order of insects, and contains a fourth of all extant animals." No comma needed.
• "(a head, thorax and abdomen)" Comma needed after thorax.
• "bees, wasps and ants" Comma after wasps.
• You can wikilink "pollination".
• You should spell out "four".
• What are endoparasites?
• "Males have a single pair of wings, and females have none." Perhaps replace "and" with "while"?
• "...and only possess antennae, mouthparts and simple eyes" Comma after mouthparts.

Let me know once you have updated your article or if you have any questions. Bgsu98 (Talk) 23:59, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

@Bgsu98 All changes have been implemented/clarified, the information under the order name is the describing authority (last name/year of whoever discovered it) that is usually included whenever species are first mentioned. I have decided against doing anything with it since usually not a ton of information is there that I personally think is necessary to mention as most of them were described as a collection in a section of a book (I think like 5 or something were described in a part of 10th edition of Systema Naturae). For dorso-ventrally I switched to hyphen for consistency although I see both used sometimes. Sophisticatedevening🍷^(talk) 00:12, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

There needs to be some sort of note somewhere explaining what that information is, because as it is, it's just a random name and number. Also, some of them are separated with a comma and some are not. Personally, I would recommend a comma or the use of parentheses. Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:16, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

@Bgsu98 Thanks for the feedback, I have added a footnote to the first column header explaining what that is. Sophisticatedevening🍷^(talk) 00:35, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Just a minor quibble... The formatting is different on some of those notations. Some are separated with a comma and some are not. You pick which you prefer, but they should be uniform. Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:41, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Sorry I just fixed that here. Sophisticatedevening🍷^(talk) 00:42, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Okay, it's good, I'm happy to support.

While reviewing this article, I was reminded of the week I spent completing the Insect Study merit badge at summer camp one year when I was in Scouts. It was the last badge I needed to have earned all of the badges the ecology center offered. Anyway, I spent a week with a kill jar and a net, and then had to pin each insect to a foamboard and go through guidebooks to identify all of them. And I was just thinking today how completing that merit badge about an animal species involved killing animals. I wonder if the requirements have changed? Maybe instead of collecting insects, Scouts should be asked to photograph them. Sorry, that's got nothing to do with this review. Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:50, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

The comma is the standard way to format an author citation, as parentheses have a specific meaning there. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 01:09, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

List of Hot Adult Contemporary number ones of 1994

Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:37, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

Here's #34 in this series. This year the number ones included two songs from movies, one of them (the movies, not the songs) far better known than the other IMO. Feedback as ever will be most gratefully received. In roughly ten days I will be going on a two-week road trip and will not be as active on WP if at all. But I will address anything raised before I go before I go, and pick up anything else upon my return...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:37, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

Comments by Alavense

• Can 1993 be linked?

Nice job. Support. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 12:40, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

@Alavense: - done! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:14, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

Vestrian24Bio

@ChrisTheDude:

• According to link-dispenser,
  • 53 refs are marked as redirects, add a slash (/) at the end of those urls to avoid it (just a suggestion).
  • 3 refs need archive urls.

That's all I got. Vestrian24Bio 16:02, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

• @Vestrian24Bio: - addressed -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:22, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

  All good then, support. Vestrian24Bio 08:21, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

• All 4 images have proper licensing and alt texts, Image review: pass. Vestrian24Bio 16:09, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

Medxvo

• "retaining a position which the song had occupied" / "set by the song which it had displaced" - I think "that" would read better than "which"
• "in the top spot it was displaced" - perhaps a comma after "spot"?

That's all, great work as always! Medxvo (talk) 18:46, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

@Medxvo: - done! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:04, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Happy to support. Medxvo (talk) 19:09, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

List of municipalities in Córdoba

Nominator(s): Mattximus (talk) 21:02, 17 June 2025 (UTC) and Alavense (talk)

We are continuing to bring the list of municipalities of all Spanish provinces up to the standard seen in the other featured lists of municipalities. This is the 56th (!!!) nomination with consistent format for list of municipalities. This nomination is very similar nomination to the previous list of Spanish municipalities Alavense has made some excellent changes to this article reflecting the previous nomination. Formatting is similar to the others but of course, all comments are welcome and will be acted upon in a timely manner. Thanks for all your comments in advance! Mattximus (talk) 21:02, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Two brief comments:

• Is reference 2 also used for the land areas in the table footer? (Since there are separate references for population in those rows, I want to confirm if that should be the case for land area – but maybe ref. 2 addresses it.)

Yes, in this case, reference number 2 covers it. It provides information for the whole of the country, so basic sums allow one to get those figures. Alavense (talk) 10:12, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

• This is very nitpicky, but the sum of the municipalities' populations doesn't match the total provincial population. For 2024, I get a sum of 774,323 (vs. 774,313), and for 2011, I get 802,577 (vs. 802,575). If the numbers match the census, don't worry about it – just check the numbers again if you have time.

I did check and I found out that one of the municipalities had the wrong figure for 2024, so I fixed it. Anyway, I've checked the numbers once more and the total I get for 2024 is in fact 774,313. The sum for 2011 is indeed 802,577 as you say, so, given that I rely more on the individual population figures than on the sum, I regarded that as a mistake on their side and I went with 802,577 as suggested. Alavense (talk) 10:12, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Nothing major here, happy to support despite these small issues. RunningTiger123 (talk) 15:53, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the review, RunningTiger123. I replied above. Alavense (talk) 10:12, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Departments of the Central Committee of the Socialist Unity Party of Germany

Nominator(s): Maxwhollymoralground (talk) 22:05, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

There are very few articles on the SED's inner workings and I think this list addresses that gap. It also is a multi-month personal project of mine and I think it turned out very well, with a lot of detail for many of the SED's departments and how they operated Maxwhollymoralground (talk) 22:05, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Drive-by comment

"The approximately 40 departments of the Central Committee of the SED..." You use an acronym (SED) in the very first sentence without explaining what it is or what it stands for. Bgsu98 (Talk) 22:22, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Image review

• File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-FO427-202-001, Berlin, Gebäude des ZK der SED.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
• File:20190722 104402 DDR-Museum newspapers.jpg - CC0 (pub. domain)
• File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-1982-1210-404, Berlin, Sitzung der Vorsitzenden der Blockparteien.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
• File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-1989-0818-034, Berlin, Günter Sieber begrüßt Sam Nujoma (SWAPO, Namibia).jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
• File:Bezirksleitung-Halle.jpg - CC BY-SA 2.0 de
• File:Bezirksparteischule Erfurt.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-S97609, Berlin, Akademie der Wissenschaften.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
• File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-E0324-0013-001, Berlin, Zentralinstitut für sozialistische Wirtschaftsführung.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
• File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-N0416-0023, Dresden, Johannstadt, Kaufhalle.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
• File:Fotothek df roe-neg 0006181 010 Fachbesucher am Messestand des Dietz-Verlags Ber.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
• File:EINHEIT-Sonderheft März 1953 cropped.jpg - Public Domain
• Add an alt which says see caption for everything, after you do that Image review pass Easternsahara (talk) 01:13, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

History6042

• All images need alt text.
• Explain what the SED
• All tables need table captions.
• and row scopes.
• and column scopes.
• Please add archives to all online sources.
• Some tables need inline citations in them.
• Ping when done. If you don’t know what the captions or scopes are point me and I will elaborate. History6042😊 (Contact me) 03:25, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

List of World Heritage Sites in Bolivia

Nominator(s): Tone 14:04, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Bolivia has 7 WHS and 5 tentative sites. Standard style. The list for Côte d'Ivoire is already seeing some support so I am adding a new nomination. Speaking of, I have two really long ones ready, China and Mexico, let me know if you want to check one of these next of should I place some shorter ones first (for example Jordan). Tone 14:04, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Comments by Alavense

• Located at the altitude of 4,000 m - an altitude maybe?
• the small pre-Hispanic hamlet of Potosí developed into a major industrial complex by the Spanish colonists after 1572 - Having the by the Spanish colonists, I guess it would need to be was developed.
• Could the fight for independence be linked to Bolivian War of Independence?
• The carvings were interpreted to have ceremonial and ritual significance. They depict animals and geometric shapes - These two sentences could be merged: The carvings, which depict animals and geometric shapes, were interpreted to have ceremonial and ritual significance
• the area was occupied by the Inca who made it -> the area was occupied by the Inca, who made it
• from tropical rainforests, gallery forests, savannahs, swamps, semi-deciduous dry forests, and the cerrado habitats on the Huanchaca plateau that have been isolated for millions of years - Something's askew there.
• The region is inhabited mainly by the Aymara people who preserve - Add a comma there.
• and introduction of steam engines to the mining process -> and the introduction of steam engines to the mining process

That's what I saw. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 14:22, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Fixed all, thank you! Tone 06:12, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Happy to support. Alavense (talk) 09:27, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Easternsahara

• File:Potosí con la Catedral basílica al fondo.jpg|alt=Look at the city from above, with the prominent church towers|150px Change alt text "Look at the" → "View of the"
• File:20170805 Bolivia 1214 Sucre sRGB (26204168039).jpg|alt=Look at the city from above with many tiled roofs and a church tower|150px

Change alt text "Look at the" →"View of the"

• File:Huanchaca 1880.png|150px|center|alt= A historic b/w photo depicting miners in front of a mine entrance

Change alt text "b/w" → "black and white"

• Image review pass
• Stable article because last major edits were in October 2023

Comments

• In addition to what Alavense got, I also noted this:
• "Noel Kempff Mercado National Park is a natural site, other six sites are listed" => "Noel Kempff Mercado National Park is a natural site, the other six sites are listed" -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:26, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

  Fixed all of the above, thank you! Tone 06:12, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:55, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

List of Hot Adult Contemporary number ones of 1993

Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:05, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

With the list for 1991 just promoted, here's the 33rd entry in this particular series, covering the "middle of the road" number ones of 1993. In this particular year, Billboard changed/improved their data capture methodology, which (seemingly) led directly to the record for the longest run at number one being broken after 25 years. Feedback as ever will be gratefully received and swiftly acted upon..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:05, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Comments by Alavense

• In 1993, 13 songs topped the chart, which was compiled based on playlists submitted by radio stations through the issue of Billboard dated July 10, after which a new methodology was introduced which used airplay data compiled by Nielsen Broadcast Data Systems, which provided a more accurate reflection of the numbers of plays which songs were actually receiving - There are five which in that sentence. Maybe it can be split into two sentences, the first one ending with dated July 10?
• spending two weeks at number one "I Have Nothing" - Is a with missing?
• which had been held by Paul Mauriat's "Love is Blue" since 1968 - I think a link to 1968 there would come in handy.
• Same for 1994.

That's what I saw. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 12:55, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

• @Alavense: - done!

Thanks. Support. Alavense (talk) 11:30, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Medxvo

• "the numbers of plays which songs were actually receiving" - "the number of plays that songs were actually receiving"?
• "the longest run atop the AC chart which had been held" // "the record set by Joel's song which had preceded it" // "longest stay atop the chart which had stood for 25 years" - I think a comma can be added before "which"

That's all, everything else looks great to me! Medxvo (talk) 22:09, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

• @Medxvo: - done!

  Happy to support. Medxvo (talk) 08:59, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Vestrian24Bio

@ChrisTheDude:

• According to link-dispenser,
  • 51 refs are marked as redirects, add a slash (/) at the end of those urls to avoid it (just a suggestion).
  • Ref 53 gives 404.
  • 22 refs need archive urls.

That's all I got. Vestrian24Bio 11:49, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

• @Vestrian24Bio: - addressed -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:25, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

  All good then, support. Vestrian24Bio 08:21, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

• All 4 images have proper licensing and alt texts, Image review: pass. Vestrian24Bio 16:09, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

List of accolades received by Barbie (film)

Nominator(s): Birdienest81talk and Sgubaldo (talk) 08:11, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Barbie is a 2023 fantasy comedy film directed by Greta Gerwig from a screenplay she wrote with Noah Baumbach. Based on the eponymous fashion dolls by Mattel, film stars Margot Robbie as the titular character and Ryan Gosling as Ken, and follows the duo on a journey of self-discovery after the former experiences an existential crisis. This is my eleventh film accolades list to be nominated for featured list status, and I largely based the format off of the accolades lists for The Artist, The Big Short, CODA, Dune, Dunkirk, If Beale Street Could Talk, 1917, Oppenheimer, The Shape of Water, and Slumdog Millionaire. Note I added Sgubaldo as a co-nominator since he provided significant contributions into improving this list. Birdienest81talk 08:11, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Comments

• I would suggest that "as well as the highest-grossing release in Warner Bros. Pictures history" should be "and the highest-grossing release in Warner Bros. Pictures history"
• "received eight nominations for eight Academy Awards," - pretty sure one of the two "eight"s here is redundant
• "Its accompanying soundtrack album and score were further recognised" - US film so US spelling should be used ("recognized")
• "where it won the inaugural Cinematic and Box Office Achievement award" => "winning the inaugural Cinematic and Box Office Achievement award"
• The film's title should be linked each time it appears like in the table, like the other nominees
• None of the footnotes other than b are complete sentences so they should not have full stops
• That's what I got :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:52, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

• @ChrisTheDude: Done - I have read all your comments and have made corrections and changes based off of them. Can you also review 55th Academy Awards for featured list consideration, as well.

--Birdienest81talk 23:52, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:29, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Drive-by comment

There is something screwy with the Ref. header on the table. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:08, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

• @Bgsu98: Done - I fixed the error on the ref header. Apparently, there was an extra left bracket that made it appear as an extra bracket in the header. I removed it, and now it should be fine. ::--Birdienest81talk 06:52, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

History6042

• A table header is needed.
• A few archives are missing.
• One of the header templated is weird.
• If it is not a whole sentence it shouldn't have a period, this in in the notes.
• Why is Barbie in the table not linked?
• Note H should have a "(2023)"

Ping when done. History6042😊 (Contact me) 20:27, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

• @History6042: Done - I have read all your comments and have made corrections and changes based off of them.

--Birdienest81talk 06:50, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Support. History6042😊 (Contact me) 10:56, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Harushiga

• "Produced on a budget of $128–145 million,[11][12]Barbie" - missing space
• The Global Icon & Creator Tribute portion of the Gotham Awards has no source.
• The ceremony date for the Cinema for Peace Awards doesn't sort properly.
• Use |script-title=ja: for the original titles of Japanese refs.
• Ref 21 - link to Deadline Hollywood
• Ref 39, 44, 105 & 106 - add translations
• Ref 78 - link to IndieWire
• Ref 97 - add translation, add |language=ja, link to Nikkan Sports
• Ref 111 - link to The Hollywood Reporter
• Ref 134 & 135 - add translations, add |language=cs, link to Žebřík Music Awards in website parameter
• Some consistency issues:
  • Ref 21 & 95 use Deadline while the rest use Deadline Hollywood
  • Ref 65 has Penske Media Corporation as the publisher while other Variety sources do not.
  • Ref 111, 112 & 113 use |author= while the rest use |last= and |first=.
  • Some ref sections with two citations use line breaks while others do not. Harushiga (talk) 15:55, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

• @Harushiga: Done - I have addressed all your comments by making corrections you suggested.

--Birdienest81talk 09:23, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Support. Harushiga (talk) 13:39, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Medxvo

• "the United States, the United Kingdom and most other territories" - I suggest adding a comma before "and" for consistency with other similar incidents
• "performances, music and production values" - same here, I think
• "for its direction and screenplay, performances, music" - why not "for its direction, screenplay, performances, music"?
• "Barbie received a leading nine nominations at the 81st Golden Globe Awards" - I think a source is usually added here to confirm that a film received the most nominations because the table alone can't confirm that

I think that's all, everything else looks great to me! Medxvo (talk) 15:56, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

• @Medxvo: Done - I have read your comments and have made corrections and revisions based on them. Thank you for your feedback.

--Birdienest81talk 11:14, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Happy to support. Medxvo (talk) 11:20, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Vestrina24Bio

@Birdienest81: as of this rev

• According to link-dispenser,
  • 3 refs need archive urls.
• MOS:FILMACCOLADES says,
  • Awards included in lists should have a Wikipedia article to demonstrate notability. - Advanced Imaging Society Awards, EDA Awards, Tribute to the Crafts, Georgia Film Critics Association Awards, ICG Publicists Awards, Kansas City Film Critics Circle Awards, and SCL Awards - should be removed unless there's a reason for inclusion.
  • festival awards should be added with discretion, with inclusion subject to consensus. - Capri Hollywood International Film Festival, Palm Springs International Film Festival and Santa Barbara International Film Festival - were there any consensus for inclusion..?
  • Avoid accolades, especially listicles, that are mentioned only by the recipient and the awarding body. - Kansas City Film Critics Circle, African-American Film Critics Association, Dublin Film Critics Circle, IndieWire Critics Poll, and Žebřík Music Awards - ?
• Just "Best Edited Feature Film – Comedy" is enough for category in ACE Awards.
• Just "The Most Valuable Film of the Year 2024" is enough for category in Cinema for Peace Awards.
• Ref 22 only covers AARP noms, add a source for win.
• Ref 35 only covers Astra Film Awards, add a source for Astra Film Creative Arts Awards win.
• Ref 122 only covers Seattle Film Critics Society Awards nom, add a source for wins.
• Add tanslated titles to refs 40, 45, 99, 107, 108, 136 and 137.
• Add refs to notes as well.
• Replace WP:PRIMARY sources (refs 28, 36, 37, 44, 45, 52, 56, 57, 63, 74, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 85, 86, 91, 100, 101, 109, 110, 111, 131 and 133) with WP:INDEPENDENT sources wherever possible.
• Link work/publisher in ref 18 and 113.

Vestrian24Bio 13:24, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

List of awards and nominations received by Sherlock

Nominator(s): Medxvo (talk) 13:59, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

Sherlock is a mystery and crime television series based on Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's Sherlock Holmes detective novels and stories. It was created by Steven Moffat and Mark Gatiss, and stars Benedict Cumberbatch as Sherlock Holmes and Martin Freeman as Doctor John Watson. The series garnered 47 BAFTA nominations, 39 Primetime Emmy nominations, 12 Crime Thriller nominations, 9 Critics' Choice Television nominations, and 3 Edgar Allan Poe nominations.

I believe the list is consistent with the recently promoted accolades lists and ready for an FLC. Any comments from all editors are very much appreciated. Medxvo (talk) 13:59, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

Comments

• In the interest of finding something to pick up, I would suggest that "that were produced as four three-part series airing from 2010 to 2017, as well as a special episode" might be better as "that were produced as four three-part series airing from 2010 to 2017 and a special episode"
• That's all I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:14, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

@ChrisTheDude: Thanks a lot! I agree, and I've implemented your suggestion. Medxvo (talk) 20:50, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:24, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Comments by Alavense

• He is assisted by Watson, who had returned - Shouldn't it be He is assisted by Watson, who has returned?
• Una Stubbs plays Mrs Hudson - Should it be Mrs. Hudson?
• It won the Peabody Award in 2011 (for "A Study in Pink") - I don't think the parentheses are needed here.
• As per MOS:NUMNOTES: "Comparable values near one another should be all spelled out or all in figures, even if one of the numbers would normally be written differently". Maybe they are not near enough, but in the last paragraph I would have the tally of nominations all spelt out.

That's what I saw. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 14:37, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Alavense, I think the "Mrs" v. "Mrs." is a British English v. American English thing. As this is a British series, the prose should adhere to British English. Bgsu98 (Talk) 18:09, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Thanks so much for the comments, Alavense! I believe all have been addressed except for "Mrs". I agree with Bgsu98 that the period is usually omitted in British English. 20:52, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

I was only asking because I saw that the article for the character uses the period, but I'm happy with the explanation. Good job. Support. Alavense (talk) 05:03, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Comment by Birdienest81

For the 2011 edition of the British Academy Television Awards, the recipients of the award for Best Drama Series should mention Steven Moffat, Mark Gatiss, Sue Vertue, and Beryl Vertue as the credited winners of said award. According to the official BAFTA website, searching Sherlock in the awards database lists the four producers as winners of the award as seen here. You could use this article from The Guardian as a reliable source for the recipients.

That's about it. Could either review List of accolades received by Barbie (film) for its featured list candidacy or 55th Academy Awards for its own featured list nomination?

--Birdienest81talk 01:16, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Birdienest81: Thanks for this! I've added the credited winners and the source from The Guardian. I'll hopefully take a look at your nominations sometime tomorrow. Thank you again for your help! Medxvo (talk) 17:45, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

• @Medxvo: Support - The list looks very ready for featured list status. Hopefully you could review the Barbie accolades list as well. No rush yet though.

--Birdienest81talk 05:07, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Vestrian24Bio

@Medxvo: as of this rev

• Add refs to notes as well.
  • Done. Medxvo (talk) 16:16, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
• Replace WP:PRIMARY sources (refs 14, 17, 18, 19, 22, 23, 24, 35, 37, 38, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 56, 58, 59, 60, 61, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 97, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 109, 111, 113, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 130, 131, 132, 137, and 139) with WP:INDEPENDENT sources wherever possible.
  • Tried to replace some of them. Secondary sources sometimes do not mention the actual recipients (they only mention the series name, etc.), so I couldn't find replacements.... I think they are fine as they are supporting straightforward claims. Medxvo (talk) 16:16, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Vestrian24Bio 13:24, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

@Vestrian24Bio: Thanks so much for the comments! I've responded above. Medxvo (talk) 16:16, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

All good then, support. Vestrian24Bio 10:57, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

List of sciurids

Nominator(s): PresN 00:43, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Hey everyone, mammal list #57 in our perpetual series and rodent list #2: Sciuridae! Since we started the order off with a small list, lets follow it up with a big one: prairie dogs, marmots, chipmunks, and lots and lots of squirrels—if you're in Europe or North America you're probably thinking of squirrels as something that has a handful of varieties, but there's actually dozens and dozens of species in a variety of colors commingling in parts of southeast Asia and Africa. So here they all are: 284 species, which is the longest "species" list in our series to date with almost 5% of all mammal species in it, with only two lists (Old World/New World rats and mice) are expected to be longer. So enjoy all of our bushy-tailed friends; as always, the list reflects the scientific consensus as well as the results of prior FLCs. Thanks for reviewing! --PresN 00:43, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98

• "A few extinct prehistoric sciurid species have been discovered, though due to ongoing research and discoveries the exact number and categorization is not fixed." Same as before; you need a comma after "discoveries".

A lot more photos than the rodent list!

• You might consider wikilinking Borneo. Also "Island of Borneo" seems redundant.
• You have Indonesia wikilinked on the Aeromys table, even though it has appeared several times prior.
• The same with Philippines on the Hylopetes table.

User:PresN: Let me know when you've fixed that pesky comma. 😉 Bgsu98 (Talk) 01:34, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

@Bgsu98: All done! --PresN 02:08, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

I would replace "Island of Borneo" with just "Borneo" on all appearances, but that is probably just a personal preference. I enjoyed reading about squirrels more than rodents. 😉 Support. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:14, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Leading Ladies of Entertainment

Nominator(s): Erick (talk) 16:20, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

With Billboard Latin Women in Music now FL, my attention is now for a similar award presented by the Latin Recording Academy. Just like the previous nomination, I look forward to addressing any concerns. Erick (talk) 16:20, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

Easternsahara

• This looks like a drive-by nomination, you do not seem to have made any contributions to the article? I'm probably wrong though, could you clarify if this is true? I'm blind
• Add a short description of the article, the title is not self-explanatory
• File:Leilacobo2.jpg - CC BY 3.0
• File:Erika Ender pic by Raymond Collazo.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:Becky G.jpg - CC BY-SA 2.0
• File:Pamela Silva Conde by Gage Skidmore.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:Martha 2.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0 The "own work" looks suspicious here, it looks professional
• File:Tatiana Bilbao.jpg - CC BY-SA 2.0
• File:Joy Huerta (35822340346) (cropped).jpg - CC BY-SA 2.0
• File:Alondra de la Parra 2014.jpg - CC BY 2.0
• File:2018 MX TV CONCIERTO VOCES DE MUJERES (46290771292) (cropped).jpg - CC BY 2.0
• File:Dayanara Torres 2011.jpg - CC BY-SA 2.0
• File:191125 Selena Gomez at the 2019 American Music Awards (cropped).png - CC BY 3.0
• File:Goyo martinez.JPG - CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:Maria Elena Salinas on the Valder Beebe Show.jpg - CC BY 3.0
• File:Ivy Queen.jpg - CC BY 2.0
• File:Kany García cantando.jpg - CC BY 3.0
• File:Simone Torres (audio engineer).jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:VIVIR QUINTANA XXI FILZ.jpg - CC BY 2.0
• File:MX GL CONCIERTO DE JULIETA VENEGAS EN EL ZÓCALO - 53603011666 (cropped).jpg - CC BY 2.0
• Copyright looks good, will pass after you change alt-text.
• The alt text is redundant because you have the recipient section. For sighted readers, the images serve to show what the people look like. So could you instead provide a short description of the people?
• Should Gabriela Martinez be linked and should Rebeca León be redlinked?
• Link "galas"
• Add a notes section and put "^[I] With the exception of the 2019 Mexican edition, each year is linked to an article about the Latin Grammy Awards ceremony of that year. " into that section.
• Why do you have a "general" reference, can you cite it directly along with the other citations where it applies?
• Source 1 is primary but it is used for a definition and a quotation, which is acceptable use on Wikipedia. wp:primary, specifically the careful use and not all primary sources are bad section. Information on article matches what is cited,
• "a string of galas prior". The article that you have provided actually does not mention galas. The articles that do, right below it and the bottom one, are called "Raphael Named 2025 Latin Recording Academy Person Of The Year™" and "The Latin Recording Academy® Announces The 26th Annual Latin GRAMMY Awards® To Be Held On Nov. 13" could you cite whichever one you used for the gala information?
• "to Marcella Araica, Leila Cobo, Erika Ender, Rebeca León, and Gabriela Martinez", you don't mention Jessica Rodriguez?
• More comments after you respond to the currently outlined ones

Easternsahara (talk) 23:51, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

@Easternsahara: Their signature is misleading; "Erick" is Magiciandude, the editor who made nearly every edit to the list. --PresN 00:30, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

@Easternsahara I believe I got them all. Ready for the next batch of comments. Erick (talk) 20:14, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

I have no more, I pass source and image review and support the promotion of the list to fl. Easternsahara (talk) 23:54, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

I didn't catch that, thanks for notifying me. I have crossed that out.

History6042

• Alt texts could probably be more descriptive than repeating the table.
• The penultimate sentence does not accurately reflect the table.
• Why do some rows in the Occupation(s) column start with a capital letter and some do not?
• The note should use an EFN template.
• Is there a link for the 2019 (Mexican edition).
• Not sure about this but if "Leading Ladies of Entertainment" is plural, shouldn't it be "are an honor presented".
• Ping when done. History6042😊 (Contact me)

@History6042: Fixed everything brought up for the no link for the Mexican edition since the Latin Grammys have only been held once a year. Erick (talk) 20:15, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

Support^{History6042😊 (Contact me) 20:17, 8 June 2025 (UTC)}

Comments

• "The Leading Ladies of Entertainment are [plural] an honor [singular]" reads really oddly (to me at least). I would suggest maybe "The Leading Ladies of Entertainment is an annual event organized by the Latin Recording Academy, the same body that distributes the Latin Grammy Awards, at which awards are presented to women "excelling in the arts and sciences.....". This is consistent with the first reference, which describes The Leading Ladies of Entertainment as an event
• "Then-president of the Latin Recording Academy, Gabriel Abaroa explained" - when did this occur? No dates have been mentioned at this point so it's a bit vague
• In fact the lead should probably more generally mention that the event first took place in 2017
• That's it I think -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:42, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude Thanks as always for your comments! How does it look now? Erick (talk) 17:12, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:50, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Comments by Alavense

• Then-president of the Latin Recording Academy, Gabriel Abaroa explained - Wouldn't Gabriel Abaroa, then-president of the Latin Recording Academy, explained work better here?
• We have fortitude, and grace under pressure but Gabriela Martinez and Jessica Rodriguez. I think there should be consistency as to the use of the Oxford comma.
• {{ill}} could be used for those who have an article on Spanish Wikipedia but not here.

That's what I saw. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 05:19, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

@Alavense Thanks for bringing those up. I addressed everything brought up (I used the ill in sortname so it should work to link to the Spanish Wikipedia). Erick (talk) 15:30, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Support. Alavense (talk) 17:51, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Source review by LEvalyn

• I checked sources 2, 8, 9, and 12.
  • For 2, the explanation that "Latin Grammy Week" is a string of galas-- this source is fine reliability-wise as WP:ABOUTSELF, but it doesn't actually state that the Grammy Week involves multiple galas, it just mentions one gala. This is definitely a really basic/obvious fact about Latin Grammy Week so it might honestly be a little hard to find someone spelling out what the week in question is, but it would be better for verifiability to look for a source about the week in question.
  • For 8, I get a 500 error when I try to follow the link, so you should probably mark is as "dead" in the citation and let the archive take over. Otherwise, 8 looks good; appropriate WP:ABOUTSELF and verifies the info.
  • 9 and 12 look good, no notes.

Changing the source for 2 is the only "major" recommendation I have. Feel free to ping me when you've had a chance to revisit that and I'll be happy to pass the source review. The list overall looks appropriate, no red flags. A relatively large number of primary sources but that's to be expected for this kind of topic; they are the best sources for simply identifying who the honorees are. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 13:18, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

@LEvalyn Thanks for sources review! I changed from "galas" to "events" and changed refs 2 and 8 to another source. Source 2 now mentions what other events take place and Source 8 is now a live source. Erick (talk) 03:41, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

North American Figure Skating Championships

Nominator(s): Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:49, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

Since one of my articles has just been promoted to FL, here is another figure skating article for your consideration. This is a little-known competition that used to serve as a complement to the European Figure Skating Championships, but was really just a crosstown rivalry between the United States and Canada. Who emerged more victorious? The United States won more medals, but Canada won more gold medals, so... Anyway, I have personally verified all of the results and examined the sources, the tables are properly formatted, the history is thorough, I believe the sources are all properly formatted, and I have used a variety of photographs to showcase this competition. Please let me know if you have any suggestions or comments, and thank you so much! Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:49, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

Image review and other comments

• File:Montgomery Wilson.jpg - Public Domain
• File:Tenley Albright at the 1956 Winter Olympics (cropped).jpg - Public Domain
• File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-G0313-0018-001, Cynthia Kauffmann, Ronald Kauffman.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
• File:Montgomery Wilson.jpg - Public Domain
• File:ConstanceWilson.jpg - Public Domain
• All images add value to the article
• Alt text exists
• Image review pass
• Use comma before or don't, you have some instances which do and some which don't

• I don't follow; please clarify. Bgsu98 (Talk) 23:08, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

• "biennial figure skating competition and although they were " add comma after and

• Fixed. Thank you! Bgsu98 (Talk) 10:18, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Comment by Alavense

• Why do you have semicolons instead of commas for the Records section?
• What's the point in having a Works cited section if you already display the books in full in the References section. I think it would be better to have Works cited as-is, but then use {{sfn}} for references, with the very pages you are using to verify each statement.

That's all I could see. Excellent work. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 05:43, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Alavense: All fixed. I have never used that citation style before, so please let me know if there are any issues with it. Bgsu98 (Talk) 07:03, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

Happy to support. Alavense (talk) 11:12, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Alavense: I have also implemented this change at Canadian National Skating Championships, where I have a tangible book used as a source way more often than here. It is also up for FL review if you'd like to check it out here. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:09, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

Serie A Player of the Month

Nominator(s): Wikipediæ philosophia (talk) 10:44, 6 June 2025 (UTC), Mediocre Legacy, Chorus Guy

I'd already tried to bring the article to FL level but didn't due to lack of time in 2022–2023. Nevertheless, I am willing to return on this project again. I've nominated users Mediocre Legacy and Chorus Guy as they've been keeping the page updated, whereas I've written the most characters in the article (cf. XTools). Wikipediæ philosophia (talk) 10:44, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

Easternsahara

• "Serbia, Georgia and France" add a comma after Georgia → "Serbia, Georgia, and France"

Done

• "As of May 2025 award" what is this supposed to mean? Could you make it more clear. If you mean that the information is only till May 2025 then remove "award"

Done

• According to the MOS (forgot which page), links should not be bolded. So could you find a different way to phrase "known as the EA Sports FC Player of the Month

Done

• File:Franck Ribery 2019 (cropped).jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0

Didn't understand

• File:FC Salzburg gegen AS Roma (UEFA Euroleague play-off, 2023-02-16) 38 - Paulo Dybala (cropped).jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0

Didn't understand either

• • The image of Paulo Dybala looks unflattering, could you replace it, but it is okay if you can't.

Done

• All items need alt text, follow this guideline Help:Alt_text#Captions_and_nearby_text, will only take a minute or two.

Done

• Archive everything please, use internetarchivebot

I don't know if archiving source 3 would be sensible. As new players will be receiving new awards, the site will be updated with the new winners.

• Source one is good
• Add (in italian) disclaimer to source 2 as well. Otherwise, it is fine
• Source three is good
• Source four is good.
• The entire "Kalidou Koulibaly, Kim Min-jae, Alessandro Bastoni and Riccardo Calafiori are the only defenders to win the award, which has been given to 13 midfielders and 30 forwards. It has also been given to foreign players 41 times; the most represented foreign country is Argentina (nine titles), followed by Portugal (five), Serbia, Georgia and France (four each)." does not appear in the cited source for the paragraph (4).

Easternsahara, have a look and please, respond to my doubts.

Image review pass but the third paragraph isn't sourced at all, as well as table 2-4. Easternsahara (talk) 21:44, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

@Easternsahara, mathematical counting does not need to be sourced nor is it original research (I read it somewhere). Wikipediæ philosophia (talk) 21:46, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

Source review pass, but just put citation three on the end of that paragraph. I also think counting isn't original research, but you still need to provide the source that you are counting from. Also, why did you remove one of the citations? Easternsahara (talk) 22:03, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

@Easternsahara, put citation three on the end of the paragraph. Wikipediæ philosophia (talk) 22:05, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

Alright, that's good I already passed your source review though. Easternsahara (talk) 22:18, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

@Easternsahara, are there other things you need to review? Wikipediæ philosophia (talk) 10:55, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

No, everything else looks good to me. Easternsahara (talk) 00:01, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Comments

• "Paulo Dybala have won" => "Paulo Dybala has won"

Done

• "him, Khvicha Kvaratskhelia, and Rafael Leão" => "he, Khvicha Kvaratskhelia, and Rafael Leão"

Done

• That's all I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:19, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

ChrisTheDude, have a look. Wikipediæ philosophia (talk) 21:30, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 06:40, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Comments by Alavense

• Be consistent and either use the Oxford comma or don't. You've got, for example, he, Khvicha Kvaratskhelia, and Rafael Leão, but Hakan Çalhanoğlu, Dybala, Dušan Vlahović and Moise Kean. There are other instances of this.

That's the only thing I saw. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 05:27, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

@Alavense, done. Wikipediæ philosophia (talk) 19:33, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

Support. Alavense (talk) 04:11, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Accessibility review

The first table has rowscopes/colscopes/a caption, but none of the others do. Ping me if you need clarification. --PresN 15:49, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

@PresN fixed. Wikipediæ philosophia (talk) 16:30, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

List of Inkigayo Chart winners (2022)

Nominator(s): -- EN-Jungwon 11:29, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Another Inkigayo list, eight one in this series that I'm nominating for FL status. Similar format to the previous lists and as always looking forward to your comments. -- EN-Jungwon 11:29, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Orangesclub

Wow, I can't believe how long ago 2022 was by now!

• Mentions for "After Like" and "Love Dive" are missing quotation marks and capitalization in the caption for the Ive photo
• Is it necessary to include (pictured) in the caption when it's a single photo? Looks like other compatible lists do not have this
• "Triple crown for "INVU."" shouldn't have the period within the quote marks. Same for "Eleven." and "Attention."
• In the prose, Ive getting triple crowns for "Eleven" and "Love Dive" is mentioned twice, could probably cut the sentence "Their singles "Eleven" and "Love Dive" spent three weeks each at number one and achieved triple crowns."
• I would reorganize the second paragraph, as it jumps back and forth between acts who earned tripe crowns and acts who earned their first wins. I would recommend breaking it down into

• Triple crown earners
• Multiple trip crown earners (Ive, Blackpink etc)
• Other acts who earned more than 1 song at the top position (I-dle to note their high score, then NCT etc)
• First win (Nayeon)
• First Inkigayo wins

That's all for right now, though I might have another look later. orangesclub 🍊 12:06, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

• References 33, 38 and 40 are duplicates, so are 53 and 57
• Yeonjun can be wikilinked

No other comments from me. orangesclub 🍊 02:38, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Drive-by comments

• There's no need to have "(pictured)" in every caption, because obviously the named person or group is what is pictured. And why does the Nayeon caption say "(left)" when she is the only person in the photo......? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:01, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

More comments

• "In 2022, the chart measured digital performance in domestic online music services (5,500)," => "In 2022, the chart awarded points based on digital performance in domestic online music services (5,500),"
• "15 acts were awarded first-place trophy" => "15 acts were awarded first-place trophies"
• "Supergroup Got the Beat also achieved their first number one" - source?
• Also "Supergroup Got the Beat" is a WP:SEAOFBLUE issue. Maybe change to "Got the Beat, a supergroup consisting of [whoever]"?
• "Girl group NewJeans made their first appearance on the chart with their debut single "Attention"" - source?
• "Besides Ive, three other acts ranked more than one single at number one" => "Besides Ive, three other acts had more than one number one"
• "Both singles ranked number one for three weeks each" => "Both singles ranked number one for three weeks"
• "The only other artist to have two number one singles in 2022 is NCT Dream" => "The only other artist to have two number one singles in 2022 was NCT Dream"
• "and along with After like, they are the artist with the most weeks at number one in 2022." => "and along with After like, they were the artist with the most weeks at number one in 2022." -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:33, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

Image Review by ES

• I echo the other editors' feedback to remove (pictured) due to redundancy.
• Could you include a note about the image being clickable in the caption for all clickable images?
• File:00108 (여자)아이들 (G)I-DLE Gaon Awards (tweaked) (2).jpg - CC BY 3.0
• File:아이브 - 뮤직뱅크 출근길 직캠 IVE MusicBank Fancam 220624.jpg - CC BY 3.0
• File:"예쁨가득" 보아, 멀리서도 빛나는 물광 피부 BOA 보아 (디패짤) 02.png - CC BY 3.0
• File:220701 Nayeon(나연) of Twice MusicBank Fancam.jpg - CC BY 3.0
• File:220804 뉴진스(NewJeans), 비주얼 파티.jpg - CC BY 3.0
• File:Blackpink Born Pink Tour LA 01 (brightened) (cropped).jpg - CC BY 4.0
• Could you include citations for the statements that you are making on the captions? Any information that can be reasonably challenged should have a citation according to policy
• Alt text, please following this guideline for the captioned images Help:Alt_text#Captions_and_nearby_text

Comments by Alavense

• The group had two more singles rank number one in 2022; "Love Dive" and "After Like" - Go with The group had two more singles rank number one in 2022: "Love Dive" and "After Like"
• Member Taeyeon had one number one single on the chart in 2022 achieved with "INVU". The single also achieved a triple crown - Would Member Taeyeon had one number one single on the chart in 2022, "INVU"., which also achieved a triple crown be better?
• (G)I-dle had two singles rank number one in 2022; "Tomboy" and "Nxde". Both singles ranked number one for three weeks and achieved triple crowns - (G)I-dle had two singles rank number one in 2022, "Tomboy" and "Nxde", both of which ranked number one for three weeks and achieved triple crowns
• Blackpink also had two number one singles – "Pink Venom" and "Shut Down" – both of which - Commas would be better here to help with the flow.
• The only other artist to have two number one singles in 2022 was NCT Dream. They achieved this with their singles "Glitch Mode" and "Beatbox" - The only other artist to have two number one singles in 2022 was NCT Dream, who achieved this with their singles "Glitch Mode" and "Beatbox"
• Got the Beat earned their first ever music show win - first-ever?
• Same in the following image.

That's what I saw. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 11:36, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Older nominations

Swimming at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Qualification

Nominator(s): IAWW (talk) 12:32, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

I am currently working through the Swimming at the 2024 Olympics good topic, and this featured list is one of the only remaining hurdles. This is my first FL nomination. Any reviews would be very much appreciated. IAWW (talk) 12:32, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98

• "...through universality places to ensure a wide range of nations are included" That "are" should be "were".

Fixed

• "World Aquatics then considered athletes who had only qualified in a relay event, and then athletes qualifying through universality." There are too many uses of "then" in there. The first one should probably be "first".

I think this wasn't sufficiently clear, so I added "After accepting the two athletes from each NOC who achieved the OQT" to the start of the paragraph and cut the first "then".

• It's good that you have a wikilink for "universality" – a word I had never heard of before – but you should consider a brief explanation as well. Something along the lines of "that is, a system set up to ensure that blah blah blah..." offset with en-dashes or commas.

The post-semicolon clause was meant to do this, but I think the semicolon was not the correct punctuation to be used here, so I changed it to a dash

• I would alter the headings of the tables: {{Abbr|OQT|Olympic Qualifying Time}} and {{Abbr|OCT|Olympics Consideration Time}}.

Good point. Done.

• All tables need rowscopes. See MOS:DTAB for further information.

All done :)

• When you have two swimmers in one cell on the Qualifiers tables, how do you determine who is listed first and who is listed second? Without a good reason, I would list them alphabetically.

I believe it is in alphabetical order of last names, unless the names are from a culture where the first names are generally used like China

• On the Men's 200 m freestyle table, the Chinese swimmers should be reversed. Same with Japan. On the Men's 400 m freestyle table, the Chinese swimmers should be reversed. On the Men's 200 m backstroke table, Great Britain and Japan. Men's 100 m breaststroke: China, Individual Neutral Athletes. Men's 100 m butterfly: Australia. Men's 200 m individual medley: Great Britain. Men's 400 m individual medley: Australia. Women's 100 m freestyle: China, Great Britain. Women's 400 m freestyle: Australia, Canada. Women's 800 m freestyle: Australia. Women's 1500 m freestyle: United States. Women's 100 m backstroke: Australia. Women's 100 m butterfly: Canada, Italy. Women's 200 m individual medley: China. Women's 400 m individual medley: Australia.

• When you have multiple countries in one cell o the Relay events tables, how do you determine their order? Without a good reason, I would list them alphabetically.

These are in order of the fastest qualifying times, as in the source

• Without an explanation, the list looks random.

• You flip-flop between DM and MD formatting for dates. You should pick one, and since this event took place in France, I would recommend MD.

Changed to all use MDY

• I actually meant DM, but it doesn't really matter as long as it's consistent.

• On the 10km open water tables (by the way, was that in the Seine, because 🤢), I would just delete the rows where there were no qualifiers. You have already explained above the qualification process.

All done. Yes, it was in the Seine. The articles on the events explain some of the issues around water quality... the women's 10km winner deliberately drank some of the water because it was "nice" and "cold"!

• "Qualified through 800/1500m A Cut" What does this refer to? What is A Cut?

Fixed to use the same wording as in the qualification explanation section

User:It is a wonderful world: Overall, very nice, and not too many issues. Please let me know once you have addressed them or if you have any questions! 😃 Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:28, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

User:It is a wonderful world: I forgot that I wanted to welcome you to FL since you mentioned that this is your first FL nomination. It can be intimidating to bring your first nomination here and sometimes difficult to get others to examine your work. Please ask if you need anything, and good luck with your article! Bgsu98 (Talk) 19:40, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

@Bgsu98 Thank you so much for this review! IAWW (talk) 11:55, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

User:It is a wonderful world: Please see my follow-up comments above. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:40, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

@Bgsu98 I believe I fixed everything. Apologies for not checking the orders more thoroughly before. IAWW (talk) 21:03, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Support. Bgsu98 (Talk) 12:13, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Comments from Arconning

@It is a wonderful world: Here'll be my comments for now... Arconning (talk) 16:13, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

• The citation style of the references are inconsistent, some utilizing periods while some utilize commas. This needs to be uniform.
• Additionally, dates within the article have to have the same dating systems. Whereas in the article, some uses hyphens (citations) while some use the MDY system (lead). I suggest going for a DMY system as the article's subject is somewhat centered on France (host).
• The citations' titles need to be consistently title case or sentence case, you can choose which one.
• Misspellings of Ahmed Jaouadi as Ahmed Jaoudi can be seen, please fix.
• In the marathon swimming section, I am quite surprised the table is all gray as opposed to something similar with the table for the pool events. Additionally, the NOCs aren't separated with the athletes' names, though they're conjoined here as opposed for the tables for the pool events?

Additional comment

User:Arconning makes a good point. The formatting for the marathon swimming tables should match the formatting for the pool tables. Ergo, if the earlier tables featured the athletes in separate rows, then the marathon tables should as well (versus all of the swimmers bulked together into one cell and separated by <br>. I also apologize for not responding sooner; I must have missed your response. Bgsu98 (Talk) 18:19, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

@Arconning Thanks for these comments. I believe I have made all the improvements suggested, except the first part of the last comment by Arconning. I don't understand what you mean by "I am quite surprised the table is all gray as opposed to something similar with the table for the pool events"? IAWW (talk) 11:48, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

@It is a wonderful world The qualification table differs for both, why is that? I think they should be uniform on a visual perspective Arconning (talk) 16:30, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Sorry I'm probably being really thick here, but what specific two tables differ visually? I made one change to the visual of one of the tables, but I'm not sure that is what you are talking about. IAWW (talk) 16:36, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

I see now what (I think) User:Arconning was referring to, and I believe you've fixed it. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:48, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

I'll give my support. Arconning (talk) 12:27, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

List of Huntsville Stars seasons

Nominator(s): TBJ10RH (talk) 20:33, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello again, this will be my second nomination for promoting a list status to featured. I am nominating this for the featured list because the page itself is looking to meet the same standards as other season-by-season articles. I believe that majority of the article is already structured, detailed, and has an informative record of the Stars' season-by-season history. The list is easy to read, consistently formatted, and provides a comprehensive look at the team’s performance over the years. Wanted to thank a few editors who have taken some time to review the article. I think once I get feedback here again, I will work towards my second star.

TBJ10RH (talk) 20:33, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Self-Sourcing:

• Archived every Southern League seasons (1985-2014):TBJ10RH (talk) 21:13, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

If anyone has any suggestions to put in the page, do let me know. I will be completing these ideas after my examinations (6/18/25). TBJ10RH (talk) 18:59, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Just waiting for new comments. TBJ10RH (talk) 02:37, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

History6042

• One source is missing an archive, please add it.
• I don't think there should be a blank section, please summarize the article it points to and add that.
• Half the lede is unsourced, please fix, they are the first two paragraphs.
• Huntsville Stars Minor League Baseball is a WP:Sea of Blue violation.
• The note uses two tenses, please fix that.
• All Newspaper.com sources should have in the citation template "via = Newspapers.com".
• Double-A Southern League is another Sea of Blue violation.
• Ping when done. History6042😊 (Contact me) 00:04, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

  Don't reply to this until I say "Done" at the end of the page.

  • Point 1: if you are referring to the 1985 SL Championship source, I have fixed it, thanks for catching it.
  • Point 5: I fixed the tense to past tense.
  • Point 6: Yep, realized that early, thanks.
  • Point 4 & 7: Sea of Blue violations have been adjusted and fixed in the page, thanks.

  Working on Point 2 & 3. TBJ10RH (talk) 02:35, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

  @History6042 Done (ish). TBJ10RH (talk) 15:23, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

  Seems good, support. History6042😊 (Contact me) 20:15, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

  Thank you TBJ10RH (talk) 23:45, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

  (that was pretty quick, wow!) TBJ10RH (talk) 23:49, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

NatureBoyMD

• Archived URLs in references need to use the "url-status=" parameter. (See: template documentation.)
• There's some inconsistency in reference styles. Some have only the website or publisher, some have both, some style the website as "whatever.com" other as "Whatever", etc. Some use sentence case, some title case. Also, when the website and the publisher are the same (i.e. Minor League Baseball), you can just list it once as the website.
• Newspapers.com doesn't need an access-date, since you're citing the paper, not the website.
• The postseason record in the lede is uncited. It's probably in one of the Southern League Media Guides.
• There are number of unsourced statements in the history section. I'd recommend liberally using an SL Media Guide for most of these and more specific references in the table.
• Most of the half-season titles and some of the division championships in the table are unreferenced.
• The source for the 1985 1986 championship series erroneously says Columbus won 3–1, when it was actually 3–2.
• The source for the 2007 championship series makes no mention of the series score.
• NatureBoyMD (talk) 12:51, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

  Don't reply until I say "Done" at the end of all of these

  • Point #1: Working on that today, thanks.
  • Point #2: Alr, will begin that work soon, thanks.
  • Point #3: Fixed, thanks.
  • Point #4: Where can I place the Southern League Media Guide via postseason record?

  • Move the first instance of what is currently ref no. 5 ("League Records (1964–present)". 2019 Southern League Media Guide..." to the last sentence of the first lede paragraph. NatureBoyMD (talk) 14:17, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

  • Point #5: Got your feedback, thanks
  • Point #6: Working on that. I will work on it a bit more during my summer break (6/18)
  • Point #7: "TIM CASH HELPS COLUMBUS ASTROS WIN CHAMPIONSHIP Tim Cash of Newnan played a role in the Southern League championship won by the Columbus Astros. They defeated Huntsville, a farm team of Oakland, three games to one, in the best of five series for the title." Columbus seems to have won the title 3-1 according to the source.

  • According to the source, but the source is wrong. The SL Media Guide and other papers from the time say 3–2. NatureBoyMD (talk) 14:17, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

  Oh wow, you're right. I wonder if the Newnan Times-Herald wanted to make Huntsville look terrible lol. Anyways, I will be finding a better source for that TBJ10RH (talk) 14:50, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

  @NatureBoyMD I know I said I would ping once I am done but I am getting note from the Huntsville Times that it was 3-1

  https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/1184577791

  https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/854735498

  I am starting to think the SL Guide has a typo TBJ10RH (talk) 16:48, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

  I think you're right. Here's a clipping from The Huntsville Times: [1]. Don't forget to update postseason and composite totals when making the change. NatureBoyMD (talk) 18:11, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

  Alright. Reference #5 is now Reference #3. TBJ10RH (talk) 14:54, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

  • Point #8: For the 2007 SLCS, I will probably use newspapers.com for better sourcing.

  Work to begin from 10:15-11:30 & 12:50-3:30 pm ET today. TBJ10RH (talk) 14:08, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

  What is finished?

  Point #1, #3-#5, #8.

  Working on: #2, #6-#7 TBJ10RH (talk) 15:55, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

  1. 2 is done. #6 will take some time but #7 is odd because Southern League claims 3-2 series but many other outlets at the time only provide 4 game scores of the series, including The Huntsville Times. TBJ10RH (talk) 17:36, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

     Finished Point #7.

     Point #6: FINISHED.

     - TBJ10RH (talk) 19:22, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

     @NatureBoyMD I will finish this by next month due to final examinations. I hope that is alright with you. I will try and do it one day at a time to keep the consistency. TBJ10RH (talk) 03:38, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

     34/34 - 100% done. TBJ10RH (talk) 19:19, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

     @NatureBoyMD Done! (That took a while wow!) TBJ10RH (talk) 18:54, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

     • "This was followed by a 59–85 (.410) record in 1988, the lowest in franchise history." Needs a citation.
     • "The 1994 club set a franchise record with their 81–57 (.587) season." The reference is a list of league award winners and says nothing about their season result or it being a team record.
     • "Through 14 years with the Athletics, the Stars had amassed a record of 1,053–985 (.517)." Needs a citation.
     • Add sort keys to 1987 and 1998's postseason score so they will sort properly with other scores: {{sort|01|0–3}} (is what I'd use).
     • Everything else looks good. NatureBoyMD (talk) 12:55, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

       Don't reply until I ping you saying "Done" unless there is a question to be addressed.

       Things to do:

       Point #1: Done.

       Point #2: Done.

       Point #3: Done.

       Point #4: Done. TBJ10RH (talk) 13:16, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

       Re: #2; Yes, I'd use the "Huntsville, Alabama encyclopedia" from Baseball-Reference for that with no other additional reference. NatureBoyMD (talk) 17:04, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

       Alright, appreciate it. TBJ10RH (talk) 19:27, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

       Plan to finish these before the weekend. I have examinations on the 18th though. TBJ10RH (talk) 19:30, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

       @NatureBoyMD Take a look when you're available. Will try to reply during lunch period. TBJ10RH (talk) 02:59, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

• Lede: "Their lowest season record was 59–85 (.410), which they recorded in 1988." While the reference does support that record and it being their lowest, it was published in 1988. What's to say a lower record wasn't incurred later? I would use the same reference from the previous sentence, citing their best record here.
• Athletics section: "This was followed by a 59–85 (.410) record in 1988, the lowest in franchise history, resulting in the firing of manager, Tommie Reynolds." As with my previous comment, use the same Baseball-Reference citation here.
• Regarding the same sentence as above, the newspaper article referenced does not say their manager was fired because of the low record. It says he was unlikely to return. (See: WP:SYNTH.) Furthermore, I don't see any need to mention this one manager (or any managers at all).
• Athletics section: "The 1994 club set a franchise record with their 81–57 (.587) season." The second reference ("Stars score just enough to win") does not support this season record as the article was written before the end of the season. Again, it's not needed either. Just us the Baseball-Reference citation mentioned previously. Multiple references are not needed to support a claim where one will do.
• That's all. NatureBoyMD (talk) 12:24, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

  Don't reply until I say Done.

  • Point #1: Done?
  • Point #2: Done.
  • Point #3: Done.
  • Point #4: Done.

  TBJ10RH (talk) 13:33, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

  @NatureBoyMD Done. I just realized that you wanted me to remove the Tommie Reynolds section due to a wp:synth violation. Whoops TBJ10RH (talk) 13:44, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

  Support NatureBoyMD (talk) 15:10, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

  Thank you! TBJ10RH (talk) 16:59, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

  @NatureBoyMD Also Nature, I am planning to do the SL's Memphis Chicks seasons next candidacy. If you're interested in that topic, feel free to assist! :) TBJ10RH (talk) 19:30, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

Comments

• "The 1985 club defeated" - I would say the 1985 team. The team changed from year to year, the club did not.
• " crawling back from 2–0 down" - this sounds a bit like sports journalism and not very encyclopedic
• "were defeated in the finals,[12][13] however, by the Columbus Astros" - I think you can lose the "however"
• "Huntsville qualified via a wild card berth in 1992" - earlier you simply said that the winners of the two halves qualified. Had this changed by 1992?
• "in 2001 with the First-Half Western Division title" - are the capitals on First Half correct? You don't use them anywhere else.....?
• "defeating Chattanooga, for the Northern Division title" - that comma is not needed
• "The 2007 team returned to the playoffs after winning both halves of the season.[38] They proceeded to capture the division title over the Tennessee Smokies" - if they won both halves, why did they need to defeat another team to capture the division title? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:59, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

  Don't reply until I say "Done" to each point.

  • Point #1: Done.
  • Point #2: Reworded it as "as well as the Western Division title, after overcoming a 2–0 deficit,"
  • Point #3: Reworded it as "The 1986 Stars repeated with another first-half title and won the Western Division against Knoxville. However, they were defeated in the finals by the Columbus Astros."
  • Point #4 & 7: "The Southern League introduced a wild card format in 1982 to ensure that more deserving teams had a chance to compete in the postseason. In a split-season structure, if the same team won both halves, the wild card would be awarded to the team with the next-best overall record, allowing them to qualify for the playoffs despite not winning a half outright."
  • Point #5: Capitalized them all, thanks for pointing that out.
  • Point #6: Done.

  TBJ10RH (talk) 18:13, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude Done. TBJ10RH (talk) 18:26, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:36, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

  Another quick one, wow! Thank you boss! TBJ10RH (talk) 20:14, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

List of World Heritage Sites in Côte d'Ivoire

Nominator(s): Tone 11:14, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Côte d'Ivoire has 5 WHS and two tentative sites. Standard style. The list for Uganda is already seeing support, so I am adding a new nomination. As a side note, WP article is named Ivory Coast but UNESCO uses the French name, which this list follows. I am open to modifications if needed. Tone 11:14, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Comments

• "that once stretched West Africa" => "that once stretched across West Africa"
• "ombrophilous forest" - is there a link for that first word? I have literally no idea what it means and I doubt many other people will know either........
• "a Nzema fishing village which indicate " => "a Nzema fishing village which indicates" -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 06:43, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

  Fixed, thanks. I suppose a wiktionary link does the job. Tone 07:42, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:18, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Easternskibidi

• File:Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve-123989.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0 igo
• File:Taï National Park (24148248710).jpg - CC BY-SA 2.0
• File:Comoe river with wetlands.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:800px-Grand-Bassam.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0 quality is good enough, i personally like the old feeling
• File:Kong4.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:Parc National des Iles Ehotilé .jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Ahouakro 4.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Côte d'Ivoire adm location map.svg - Creative Commons by-sa-3.0 de
• Good alt-text
• Images add to the quality of article
• Image review passed
• Lead is standard for these types of articles.
• Article is stable
• Covers all tentative and actual world heritage sites in IC
• Cant find any issues with the prose.
• All sources are official UNESCO.
• All sources are archived.
• Citations are also standard for these types of articles
• Source review pass
• add dmy template
• Why do you not have the blue color to indicate transnational sites as is standard? is because there is only one transnational site in ivory coast?

Easternsahara (talk) 13:22, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Thanks! You mean Mount Nimba? It is both transnational and endangered, so I picked that one. I added the * to indicate both. Tone 07:43, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Oh okay, I understand now. Easternsahara (talk) 02:18, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Comments by Alavense

• The most recent listing were
• The park spreads along the Komoé River which supports - Add a comma: The park spreads along the Komoé River, which supports
• From 2003 and 2017
• got adapted to a more humid climate of West Africa - Maybe to the more humild climate?
• There are several villages on the islands, the main activity of people is fishing - Those two statements seem rather disconnected, so I guess it would be better to link them with an "and": There are several villages on the islands and the main activity of people is fishing. What do you think?

That's what I saw. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 06:37, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Fixed all, thanks! Tone 11:46, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Great work, once again. Support. Alavense (talk) 12:26, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

List of glirids

Nominator(s): PresN 03:11, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Alright, we're back! Mammal list #56 in our perpetual series and... rodent list #1! It's been a long journey, y'all, but we're finally done with bats and have arrived at the last mammal order that's big enough for lists. Unfortunately for me, rodents have... 40% of all mammal species, and a projected 30% of all lists in this series. So, with ~2300 species and a projected 25 lists, get comfortable, because we're going to be here for a while. This one starts us off small: the 29 species of Gliridae, or dormice. Confession: before I started this list, I thought a "dormouse" was a cute British name for a mouse wearing a waistcoat, like in Alice in Wonderland. But no, they're actually their own thing, cute little cousins to squirrels, little mice-like creatures with big eyes and bushy tails. In any case, as always, the list reflects the scientific consensus as well as the results of prior FLCs. Thanks for reviewing! --PresN 03:11, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

• Support - always hard to find anything to pick up with these lists of yours, and on this occasion I failed completely :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:24, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

  • Support, same, I really couldn't find anything of note. Good job.

  History6042😊 (Contact me) 12:43, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98

This is the 56th list of mammals you've sent through FL? Wow! Based on the comments above, I'm sure by now you've honed these articles based on previous FL comments since you know what people are expecting.

• "...though due to ongoing research and discoveries the exact number" There should be a comma after "discoveries".
• I take it "genera" is the plural of "genus"? I haven't forgotten everything from high school biology.
• I take it not every species has an available photo?
• Some of the ranges on the tables are very broad, but there are not maps available? (for example, "west-central Asia")

User:PresN: Really, that missing comma is the only problem I found. The others are just general questions, but I'm guessing that if there were photos or maps available, you'd have included them. I will go ahead and add my Support on the assumption you'll add that comma. 😉 Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:46, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

@Bgsu98: Comma added. Yep, genera is the plural, and I dug through commons and inaturalist for free photos but a lot of species don't have one (and consensus is that we can't use non-free photos on these lists). Maps are also often not available; one day I'll find a way to make them but for now I just use what's available already. The IUCN cites do have more precise maps if needed. --PresN 17:02, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Source review

Since User:PresN was kind enough to do the source review for my last two submissions, I figured I would return the favor. And to be honest, I don't really expect to find any problems, especially if this is his 56th mammal list to undergo the FL process.

• No. 1 – I'm not sure how much of the lead this source is meant to verify, but it does verify the longest rodent at 190mm (19cm), while it says nothing about the shortest rodent. However, the tables below also have citations, so it's likely everything is covered. If it's meant to only apply to the one sentence – "The desert dormouse feeds primarily on insects and spiders" – then it checks out.
• No. 6 – Checks out.
• No. 13 – Checks out.
• No. 27 – Checks out.
• No. 33 – Checks out.

Source review passed Bgsu98 (Talk) 21:36, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

List of municipalities in Cádiz

Nominator(s): Mattximus (talk) 01:51, 29 May 2025 (UTC) and Alavense (talk)

A very similar nomination to the previous list of Spanish municipalities. We are trying to bring up the list of municipalities of all Spanish provinces up to the standard seen in the other featured lists of municipalities. Alavense has made some excellent changes to this article reflecting the previous nomination. Formatting is similar to the others but of course, all comments are welcome and will be acted upon in a timely manner. Thanks for all your comments in advance! Mattximus (talk) 01:51, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Image review by Arconning

• File:Cadiz in Spain.svg - CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:Karte Gemeinden und Gerichtsbezirke Provinz Cádiz 2022.png - CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:(Jerez de la Frontera) DSC 0560 (6271831479) (cropped).jpg - CC BY 2.0
• File:Puerto de la bahia de Algeciras.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Cadiz Quay and Cathedral edited.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:San Fernando - Panteón de Marinos Ilustres.JPG - CC BY-SA 3.0
• All images have proper captions, have alt-text for accessibility, and are relevant to the article.
  • Don't see any issues, shall pass the image review. :) Arconning (talk) 07:54, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the review, Arconning. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 11:19, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

History6042

• Why is National Statistics Institute in English but Instituto Geográfico Nacional is in Spanish, when both official names are in Spanish?

Simply because there's an article on this Wikipedia for the first, so I guessed it would be the correct name to refer to it in English. Same answer as here. Alavense (talk) 05:15, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

• Some sources online are missing archives.

Everything that could be archived (data from both the Centro Nacional de Información Geográfica and the Instituto Geográfico Nacional, pieces of news for the new municipalities and all four laws) was archived. I'm afraid that the data from INE cannot be archived: it all comes from the landing pages for both the 2024 and 2011 censuses, but then the specific links are selections of data I made myself to show only the municipalities from this very province and make it easier to check the information, and it's not possible to archive those. Anyway, I hope that won't be a problem, as providing archives is not compulsory.

• In the table could conversions to miles be added for land area?

I believe that would overpopulate the table. Spain only uses square kilometres, not miles, so I think having the conversions in the lede for comparative purposes is enough. Alavense (talk) 05:15, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

• Same with population density.

Replied above. Alavense (talk) 05:15, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

• The first sentence is somewhat confusing, is Spain split into 45 municipalities or is Andalusia, or is Spain.

It's the province that is divided into 45 municipalities: "Cádiz is a province [...] which is divided into 45 municipalities".

• Spanish seems to be overlinked.

Done. Alavense (talk) 05:15, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

• Why is square kilometres written about but sq mi is abbreviated.

The abbreviation comes form the {{convert}} template - I guess that's the way it works. Alavense (talk) 05:15, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

• Ping when done.

Thank you very much for the review, History6042. I replied above. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 05:15, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Seems good, support. History6042😊 (Contact me) 12:37, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Source Review by Easternsahara

• The prose is good, you use em dash correctly and it is engaging.
• First source is good, it is a government agency, matches what is cited, calculating that it is the eighth largest in population is basic arithmetic
• The second source is a link to a downloader, which doesn't actually have any relevant information. Could you cite the PDF instead, with page number? But the provider of the source itself is reliable.

If I'm not wrong, the second link leads to a page where there's only one possible thing to download. I tried to directly point to the download link, but I couldn't. Anyway, one only has to download the "Nomenclátor Geográfico de Municipios y Entidades de Población" document, as specified in the reference, and then one finds a document for "Municipios" (municipalities), with all the relevant information for each municipality. Alavense (talk) 05:26, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

• Third source provides approximately the same data for land area, population is different but due to date, good publisher.
• Fourth citation checks out
• 5 good
• 6 checks out
• Citations 7 to 9 need page numbers, the cited pdf is massive, I will check these after you provide page numbers. After seeing comments made by Alavense, you do not need page numbers for 7 and 8.

Agreed for citation number 9: we are dealing with a general law there, so it makes sense to point to the exact place where the relations between the regional government and the municipalities are dealt with - I did, added the page. However, for the other two, we are speaking about general facts ("The organisation of municipalities in Spain is outlined in a local government law" and "finalised by an 18 April 1986 royal decree"), so there's nothing specific about those two documents that needs to be pointed at. That's why I believe that providing the source itself already verifies those two statements. Alavense (talk) 05:26, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

• 9 also checks out
• 10 checks out
• 11 is good
• 12 is good
• 13 is good, but you cite 64-65. From my screen, it looks like all the relevant information is found on page 65. Not a big deal, just clarify why this is or remove and merge with 14.

Easternsahara: Well spotted. Now reference 13 (page 65) verifies both sentences. Alavense (talk) 06:24, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

• Just a question but is it possible to include quotes of text for your citations? If not that's perfectly fine and the current page citations suffice but I have seen other pages which do include quotes. Easternsahara (talk) 23:46, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

I'd rather keep it the way it is now. Alavense (talk) 06:24, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the review, Easternsahara. I replied to your queries above. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 05:26, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Alright, I will complete the source review later today or perhaps the weekend, thank you for your feedback. Easternsahara (talk) 11:25, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, Easternsahara. Is there anything else we can do here? Thanks in advance. Alavense (talk) 06:44, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Source review pass, nice work increasing coverage of non-English speaking countries. Easternsahara (talk) 19:29, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Judy Blume bibliography

Nominator(s): Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 02:45, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

Judy Blume is known for books such as Tales of a Fourth Grade Nothing, Summer Sisters, and Are You There God? It's Me, Margaret. After my previous FLC at Barbara Park bibliography, I decided to work on another bibliography for a similar author. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 02:45, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

Comments

• "predominantly-white neighborhood" - I don't think that hyphen is needed there
• "Blume wrote the book when divorce was becoming more common and accepted by American society, and reflected her own marital trouble at the time" => "Blume wrote the book when divorce was becoming more common and accepted by American society, and it reflected her own marital trouble at the time"
• "Michael and Katherine are a couple who decide have sexual intercourse" => "Michael and Katherine are a couple who decide to have sexual intercourse"
• "Blume wrote the book on the advise of her teenager daughter" => "Blume wrote the book on the advice of her teenaged daughter"
• "the aftermath of three different airplanes crash" - that doesn't sound right.....
• There's quite a few descriptions which consist only of a sentence fragment eg "A television series adaptation of the Fudge books." These shouldn't have full stops.
• That's all I got - great work! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:25, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

  ChrisTheDude Thank you! All changes made. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 20:24, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:02, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

Comments by Alavense

• Deenie is a teenage girl who wants to become a model until she is diagnosed with the spine disorder scoliosis and must wear a brace, only for Deenie's mother to make her feel that she no longer met her expectations - Why is the tense switched there?
• A television series adaptation of the Fudge books. - You can lose that full stop as well.

That's what I saw. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 05:54, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Alavense, is there a specific wording you have in mind? The sentence is written in present tense. I've removed the full stop. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 15:15, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Maybe I got it all wrong here, but wouldn't it make more sense to have Deenie is a teenage girl who wants to become a model until she is diagnosed with the spine disorder scoliosis and must wear a brace, only for Deenie's mother to make her feel that she no longer meets her expectations? Alavense (talk) 16:05, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Good point. Fixed. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 16:35, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Nice work. Support. Alavense (talk) 18:28, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

List of Michelin-starred restaurants in Thailand

Nominator(s): History6042😊 (Contact me) 23:47, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because it is a similar status to other Michelin FLs. History6042😊 (Contact me) 23:47, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

• Comment: I am not familiar with FLC, so this is not a review, but I think the article as it stands is less than comprehensive in its background coverage. For example, it fails to mention how the Michelin Guide expanding to Thailand was sponsored by the Tourism Authority of Thailand, and how the inaugural Bangkok guide was part of of Michelin's effort expand its coverage to include street food in Asia. --Paul_012 (talk) 15:02, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

  @Paul 012, I added those two facts. History6042😊 (Contact me) 20:19, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

• Comment - Just a few quick comments:

• Why are some restaurant links blue, some red, and some not even linked? For consistency they should all be linked, or just the blue ones linked.
• You mention in the lead that Nakorn Ratchasima was added, as well as other provinces, but this does not appear in the list. Was the province added but no restaurants given a star? This needs to be made clear and match the table.
• The location in the table is a bit confusing, as it follows city-district? Or province-district? Is that true for places outside of Bangkok? I clicked on Phang Nga - Khok Kloi but could not find what Khok Kloi is from the link. Some clarification here on this column is needed. I'm quite confused.

• Mattximus (talk) 01:31, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

  @Mattximus,  Done. History6042😊 (Contact me) 01:34, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

• This is better, if you think people may want to make pages of these restaurants in the future, I wouldn't be opposed to red linking them as well, but your choice! I added a few more comments above. Mattximus (talk) 01:39, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

  @Mattximus,  Done the rest. History6042😊 (Contact me) 00:22, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

• I noticed some errors, for example Aulis restaurant is in Phang Nga but you wrote Phuket? I wonder if there are other errors? Mattximus (talk) 14:29, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

• Oppose for now until the locations are double checked for accuracy. Mattximus (talk) 14:29, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

  @Mattximus, the example you gave was the only one I could find, I fixed it. History6042😊 (Contact me) 16:35, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Support Mattximus (talk) 20:41, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Easternsahara

• File:Jay Fai, bangkok 20180406.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• The single image has alt text.
• Image Review pass
• Many sources are not archived, please archive them.
• Please be consistent with dates, some are in prose but some are all in digits. Sometimes you use ymd and sometimes dmy. Choose one, use it in both date accessed, date archived and date published, add the template for it.
• In the location column, please add parentheses and the subdivision that you are using. Be consistent with the subdivision, ie. (Governorate)
• "about which eateries they should to visit."→"about which eateries they should visit." remove to from should to.
• "In 2023, 4 more provinces; Nakorn Ratchasima, Ubon Ratchathani, Udon Thani, and Khon Kaen, were added" link all of the provinces.
• Change dark gray "Reference" section at the bottom of the table to "References"
• Please add template of whatever english you are using in the article, american i believe, so it deters article deterioration
• first source checks out, added all the numbers
• source two is reliable and represented correctly
• Although source three isn't independent of michelin, it mostly only affirms what source two says.
• source 4 is good.
• Source 5 is cited twice in a row, since it is redundant you can remove it. However, after i inspected source 5, it doesn't mention anything about " Tokyo, Hong Kong and Macau, Osaka and Kyoto, Singapore, Shanghai and Seoul", so just remove the second instance.
• source 6 checks out

ill check the other ones out once you fix the issues i named Easternsahara (talk) 21:05, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

All  Done, except archiving which I will do when the archive bot starts working again. History6042😊 (Contact me) 21:17, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

@Easternsahara,  Done, I ran IA bot. History6042😊 (Contact me) 12:24, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

I have no idea about the comprehensiveness, but source review pass. Also, the list says that some restaurants, which have merely moved, have closed, is this worth mentioning? This doesn't affect my source review pass but source 12, source 19 to 24 could have better publishers. They seem to be parroting the information from michelin guide, so could you try to find the Michelin sources for these? You can keep all of these in as additional verification though. Easternsahara (talk) 00:21, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

• List seems generally compliant and consistent with similar Michelin-related FLs. I support promotion as long as the concerns by other editors are addressed. Thanks! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 18:28, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

List of awards and honours received by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie

Nominator(s): Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 07:59, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I have worked on it and it meets FL criteria. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 07:59, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

• Drive-by commment - why does the article title use the UK English spelling "Honours" but the section heading uses the US English spelling "Honors"? I don't know which form of English is used in Nigeria but whichever it is should be applied consistently -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:10, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

  I think Nigerian English is based on British English. Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:27, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude, I have changed them to Nigerian English spellings. Any other comment? Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:00, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

  Probably. I will take a proper look later -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:19, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude, any comment yet? Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 09:08, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

History6042

• Please add row and column scopes.
  • Done!
• Why are some category rows just not filled in?
  • Some awards doesn't have categories.
• Alt text of the second image need to be fixed.
  • Done!
• The dashes in the table should be centred.
• Please archive the sources.
  • So many sources are diddicult to arch9ve but I don't think it is that necessary.
• The last sentence of the second paragraph needs a citation.
  • I already cited it in the article. I wouldn't think it is still necessary
• More categories could probably be added.
  • I don't have any at hand, do you? Please suggest
• Are there any things that you missed adding in Academic distinctions or Other accolades. I think this because there is not just one sources, you have one for each.
  • All academic distinctions are listed there. While I used the one source for reference, I still saw online sources about the distinctions and I added them.
• The Harvard University award can be expanded to a full date.
  • I have expanded the date.
• Ping when done. History6042😊 (Contact me) 21:07, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

  Also please add row and column scopes. History6042😊 (Contact me) 13:12, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

  Please an example would be ok.@History6042. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:28, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

  See WP:Accessibility. History6042😊 (Contact me) 15:30, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

  Support. History6042😊 (Contact me) 12:07, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

@History6042: There's a reason I have an entire block of text to copy-paste for these, lol, it's hard to describe and some people need more direct instruction than the stuff at ACCESS/DTAB. @SafariScribe:

• Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. ! Year becomes !scope=col | Year. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroup instead.
• Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. ! 2002 becomes !scope=row |2002. If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead (so, !scope=rowgroup rowspan="4" |2002).
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. This is not a full review, and does not result in a support vote. --PresN 19:21, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

  @PresN and @History6042, I have fixed per above. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 09:09, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

Easternshara

• no problems with lead or prose.
• File:Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie (2015).png-CC BY 3.0
• just a question but are there any usable pictures of Adichie receiving the awards? if not that's fine.
• image review pass
• source 1 checks out
• source 2 good
• source 3 good
• source 4 good
• "reported that it had sold only 187000 copies" remove "only" this is a weasal word
• Source 5 good
• Can you format the "Academic distinctions" and "Other accolades" tables like the previous ones.
• Source 15 is good, doesn't look independent but it is.

Full source review coming soon Easternsahara (talk) 22:29, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

@Easternsahara Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 08:50, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

I am sorry, but I can not finish this review Easternsahara (talk) 22:45, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Comments

• "Her short stories has" => "Her short stories have"
• "including O. Henry Award" => "including the O. Henry Award"
• "and BBC National Short Story Award " => "and the BBC National Short Story Award "
• "in 2005 won the Best First Book category of the Commonwealth Writers' Prize,[3] and the Hurston/Wright Legacy Award for Best Debut Fiction" => "won the Best First Book category of the Commonwealth Writers' Prize,[3] and the Hurston/Wright Legacy Award for Best Debut Fiction in 2005"
• "Since the paperback publication of the second novel" => "Since the paperback publication of her second novel"
• "reported that it had sold only 187000 copies" => "reported that it had sold only 187,000 copies"
• "where it competed against a book" => "for which it competed against a book"
• "Along Ernest Hardy, Harryette Mullen, and Alberto Ríos" => "Along with Ernest Hardy, Harryette Mullen, and Alberto Ríos"
• "won National Book Critics Circle Award for Fiction in 2013" => "won the National Book Critics Circle Award for Fiction in 2013"
• "was nominated for Dayton Literary Peace Prize" => "was nominated for the Dayton Literary Peace Prize"
• "was longlisted for Women's Prize for Fiction in 2025." => "was longlisted for the Women's Prize for Fiction in 2025."
• "Time named her as in its 100 Most Influential People in 2015" => "Time named her in its 100 Most Influential People in 2015"
• "fashion magazine, Vanity Fair listed her" => "the fashion magazine Vanity Fair listed her"
• "to receive the United Nations Global Leadership Award citing her as using" => "to receive the United Nations Global Leadership Award, for which she was cited as using"
• "in September, she was awarded the "Prism of Reason"" - September of which year?
• "She has received honourary degrees" => "She has received honorary degrees"
• "among them, the Eastern Connecticut State University; Yale University; Johns Hopkins University; University of Edinburgh; Duke University; Georgetown University; University of Johannesburg" => "among them, the Eastern Connecticut State University; Yale University, Johns Hopkins University, the University of Edinburgh, Duke University, Georgetown University, and the University of Johannesburg"
• "In 2022, Adichie was awarded W. E. B. Du Bois Medal," => "In 2022, Adichie was awarded the W. E. B. Du Bois Medal,"
• In the literature table, titles starting with a " should sort based on the first actual word
• ....and anything starting with "The" should sort based on the next word
• Some of the years are centred and bolded and others are left-aligned and not bold - why is this?
• Awards starting with "the" should sort based on the next word
• "Academic distinctions" is a vague heading. Were they all honorary degrees? If so, just call the section "honorary degrees"
• That's what I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:37, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

Done. @ChrisTheDude. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 23:41, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

Also, Nigeria uses British English, and honorary becomes "honourary". Thanks. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 23:42, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

I am British, so I am fully familiar with British English, and I can confirm 100% that in British English the word is not spelt "honourary". "Honour" has a U but "honorary" does not...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:33, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

@ChrisTheDude done. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 13:04, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

List of Parks and Recreation episodes

Nominator(s): Olliefant (she/her) 07:35, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

I just finished a rewatch of Parks so I decided to work on the list so over the past few days I've been planning an FLC for this and now its done. Note that I belive most sources are archived as for the non archived sources IAbot is down so :( Olliefant (she/her) 07:35, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

Comments by Alavense

• The follows - Something's missing there.
• the series waswas
• for a half season-worth of episodes - Shouldn't this be something like for a half-season's worth of episodes?
• The second season which aired from September 17, through May 20, 2010. On January 30, 2010.

There are a few like these. I'll have another look when the list has been carefully copyedited. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 09:11, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

@Alavense: done Olliefant (she/her) 16:02, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

History6042

• Please archive the rest of the sources.
  • Can’t do this because of IAbot being down. Although like I said in the nom I’m fairly certain all sources are archived. Do you know which are

missing? (Also note that archived sources aren’t need for FLCs.)

• What is rank in the overview table, I don't see it anywhere else.
  • it’s another metric for the show’s ratings. Showing that the season was the X highest viewed of the X year
• Is an episode view graph available like in List of My Name is Earl episodes?
  • It wouldn’t work as Parks and Rec is over the 100 episode limit for the graph
• Since citation cite a whole row they should be their own column
  • They don’t they just cite the viewship, the other stuff is covered by the episodes credits in MOS:PLOTCITE
• The Aubrey Plaza link is wrong. Fixed
• Could the ratings columns be made sortable.
  • No
• Ping when done. History6042😊 (Contact me) 19:49, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

@History6042: Olliefant (she/her) 20:15, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

Support, the un archived sources are 1 to 12, 16, and 17. History6042😊 (Contact me) 20:26, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

Comments from TheDoctorWho

• This needs a short description per WP:SDLIST Done
• Add {{Use American English}} Done
• The NPR ref is missing an author and a date, NPR can also be linked here Done
• "Parks and Recreation stars Poehler alongside Aziz" ---> "Alongside Poehler, Parks and Recreation stars Aziz [...]"; we already know that it stars Pohler from the preceding paragraph Done
• "after having a recurring role in season one." --- anything better for this source as a WP:VALNET post-Mid 2023? The other VALNET's should be fine since they were published prior to that
  • I don't think VALNET is all that justified but i've replaced it anyways
• "During the course of the series, 126 episodes of Parks and Recreation aired over seven seasons." --- is this supported in the list by a source anywhere? I believe this falls outside of WP:CALC because the list could arguably be missing episodes
  • The only source that explicitly lists 126 is a Screen Rant one, so I used an Amazon listing for the 125 episodes and then to confirm the special.
• "Following season one, the series was originally renewed for a half-season worth of episodes, before being picked up for a full season in October 23." ---- not supported by the ref. It only mentioned a full season pick up, not what the initial order was for, a lot of times early orders were only for 6-8 episodes (i.e. season 1), which isn't "half". That's also easily a perspective issue because some shows only regularly produce 13, 8, or 6-episode seasons, etc. This should also be "on October 23" Fixed
  • removed the part about the early renewal
• "The first season of the show aired from April 9, 2009, through May 14." --- source?
  • Episode table
• "The fourth season ran from September 22, 2011 to May 10, 2012." --- the attached source was published in 2012 and is discussing a mid-season slate, the only mentioned date for Parks & Rec is January 17, this is likely referring to season 5, episode 10. Even if this was supporting season 4, no episode aired on January 17, and it doesn't support a September or May date.
  • that was a mistake from when I copied over the prose from the community list. The information is sourced in the table
• "which ran from September 20, through May 2, 2013" --- source?
  • Table
• Ref 13 appears to be a source about Community? I didn't read the whole thing, but a quick ctrl+f of "park" returned nothing
  • The ref 13 title is "NBC picks up "Community," "Parks and Recreation" and "Mercy" for season""
• "It ran from September 26 to April 14, 2014." --- source?
  • Table
• "the series was renewed for a seventh and final season" --- "final" isn't supported by the source, was this decided later/cancelled after it had aired?
  • The fact that it was the last one was announced later, sourced to THR
• IndieWire can be linked in the ref Done
• "which aired from January 13, 2015 to February 24." --- source?
  • Table
• Some of the ranks in the overview seem to be unsupported by the references. For example, in the 2015 season Deadline actually has it at 65 and 95, depending on the timeslot and for 2013-2014, there's just no rank mention of Parks & Rec altogether
  • I used the TV series finale for the average for season seven. As for the ranks, I just decided to remove the column all together because there is alot of conflicting sourcing regarding some and some have no sourcing
• "Average episode runtime" --> "The average episode runtime [...]" Done
• None of the air dates in the "Episode" section have a source
  • They are sourced alongside the viewership info, I have added an additional source
• In Ref 140 (the ratings table), the first three sources don't support the numbers for the individual episodes
• It also doesn't appear that you have the average column enabled (at least that's what I'm assuming the intention was considering every row has an additional number than there are episodes in the season)
  • Cut the excess number
• I would honestly suggest splitting the ratings graph like I did in List of Station 19 episodes to make the graph viewable, otherwise it's useless since the numbers are already in the episode table Done
• Refs 22 and 23 (in this version) are duplicates and can be merged
  • They shouldn't be dups (they use the same link for some reason) i've fixed it
• The usual date and CQ scripts need ran Done

TheDoctorWho (talk) 19:19, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

@TheDoctorWho: For the ratings table at the end of the article, I haven't been able to find a ref to cite all the episodes together, do you think that adding something like "for the first three seasons refer to the relevent listing above" as the table is a summary? Olliefant (she/her) 04:46, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

I'm not really sure honestly, do you know if there's a guideline/policy/essay or any precedent that covers that method? If not, I would also suggest enacting something similar to what I did in the My Name Is Earl LoE page. If the references are the same name, and exact copies of each other, they'll group together, so that you're not flooding the sources. TheDoctorWho (talk) 21:00, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

I think it’s the same principle as MOS:leadcite Olliefant (she/her) 08:43, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Except that this isn't in the lead section... this would be like saying if you were writing a television season article, the viewing figures don't need to be cited in a reception section if they're also cited in the episodes section of that same article. TheDoctorWho (talk) 16:35, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

I see your point. I’ll try and have individual citations soon hopefully Olliefant (she/her) 08:12, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

@TheDoctorWho: done Olliefant (she/her) 08:07, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Regarding what was ref 13, the changes made prior to that shift its number. It's currently ref 16, the title is "‘Community’ Revived To Air On Yahoo In Fall With 13 Episodes", still no mention of Parks & Rec. TheDoctorWho (talk) 16:34, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

@TheDoctorWho: done Olliefant (she/her) 22:59, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Support, nice work! TheDoctorWho (talk) 19:02, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Notice

• Note for future reviewers. I will be away from my computer for the next week or so, meaning I won’t be able to immediately get to your feedback. Olliefant (she/her) 14:57, 7 June 2025 (UTC) I'm back

List of Iowa tornadoes

Nominator(s): ActuallyElite (talk) 21:04, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because there are other tornado lists that are featured articles like List of California tornadoes and List of Connecticut tornadoes. I feel like the article for List of Iowa tornadoes has good enough quality to be nominated to be a featured list. ActuallyElite (talk) 21:04, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

History6042

• Map needs alt text.
• "An old brick college had its roof gone and major damage to it’s walls in Grinnell, Iowa" is not acceptable alt text. It should describe the image not the story, "had its roof gone" is also not correct.
• Units of measurement should be spelled out on the first time with the acronym in brackets. Them used as just acronyms.
• All sources should be archived, if IA bot doesn't get them you must do them manually.
• I do not think the source "Only In You State" is reliable and should be replaced.
• The acronym "KCCI" should be expanded, as with all other acronyms in references.
• PS: I peer reviewed this article.
• Ping when done. History6042😊 (Contact me) 20:32, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

  @History6042:Finished everything. I manually archived all the sources that were able to be archived on Internet Archive. ActuallyElite (talk) 16:29, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

  Support History6042😊 (Contact me) 11:31, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

Drive-by comment

• Three sentences is far too short for the lead of a potential FL. It needs to be significantly expanded -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:45, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude:I expanded the lead to more than 3 sentences. Is this expanded enough? ActuallyElite (talk) 16:30, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98

This was originally a drive-by comment:

• This sentence – "The deadliest tornado that killed the most amount of people in Iowa was the Camanche tornado which killed 72 people from Iowa." – reads super awkwardly. Perhaps "The deadliest tornado was the Camanche tornado which killed 72 people in Iowa." Also perhaps remove the previous sentence since it only resulted in 9 deaths in Iowa and this article is about Iowa. Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:35, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

  @Bgsu98:Changed the sentence to the one you recommended.

Lead:

• "he deadliest tornado was the Camanche tornado which killed 72 people in Iowa." You need a comma after tornado.
• Is there a wikilink for 2024 Greenfield tornado? If so, adding it to the first image is appropriate.
• "Northeastern" is this case does not need to be capitalized.
• I would spell out "one".

Climatology:

• You might consider adding a one- or two-sentence boilerplate definition of a tornado at the beginning of this section.
• Great Plains should be capitalized. Apparently, so does Tornado Alley. Capitalized it and wikilink it Tornado Alley on the map caption as well.
• "These are the most ideal conditions for tornadoes to form with Iowa being caught..." I would put a comma after "form".

Intense tornadoes:

• You might consider adding a brief explanation of the F-rating system for tornadoes, as readers won't necessarily be expected to know how it works. You could insert the text before the Pre-1900 subheading, especially since you already have a chart.
• "the deadliest of which being on June 3, 1860..." This should be "...of which was..."
• No apostrophe needed in 1950s.
• This sentence – "This caused tornadoes before the 1950's to be more dangerous because people wouldn't realize a tornado would be headed right towards them." – reads kind of awkwardly. You need a comma after "dangerous"; instead of "wouldn't realize" perhaps "had no way of knowing"?; instead of "would be headed" perhaps "was heading"?; instead of "right towards them" perhaps "toward them"?
• "39 in Grinnell and 10 in Malcolm" You need a comma after Grinnell.
• Northwest should not be capitalized.
• I'm not quite sure what the difference is between "toward" and "towards", but I think "toward" sounds better.
• On the table, "location" does not need to be capitalized in Start location. The rest of the table looks fine.

1900–1949:

• Use an en-dash (–) between 1900–1949.
• "There were 43 intense F4+, or 2 or more fatalities, tornadoes, the deadliest of these tornadoes would be the 1913 Easter tornado that hit Omaha, Nebraska, making its way over the border into Iowa, killing a total of 103 people, and injuring 350 others." Super awkwardly written. I would remove ", or 2 or more fatalities," since it would be explained at the beginning of this section. Probably should reword to "the deadliest of which was the 1913 Easter..." No comma needed after 103 people.
• "9 of which being in Iowa" should be "9 of who were in Iowa."
• "got caught" should be "were caught".
• On the table, "location" does not need to be capitalized in Start location. The rest of the table looks fine.

1950–present:

• Use an en-dash (–) between 1950–present.
• "A total of 3,117 recorded tornadoes have touched down in Iowa since 1950 causing 101 deaths and injuring 2,400 others." You need a comma after 1950. You don't need "others". I would also put something in there such as "As of [month/year], because articles cannot be expected to stay updated with exact figures with each new tornado.
• "There has been 20 (E)F5 tornadoes, or 2 or more fatalities..." Should be "There have been". Why is there an (E) in front of F5?
• "the 1968 Hansell-Charles City tornado, killing 13 and injuring 462 others." Should end with "...which killed 13 and injured 462."
• "a multi-vortex tornado hit the communities of Hansell, Hampton, Charles City, Elma and Aredale, all located in the state of Iowa." You need a comma after Elma. You can also rephrase the ending with "all in Iowa".
• Should be "All of the deaths".
• You don't need "Iowa" after New Hartford. It's an article about Iowa.
• "in damages across in its approximately 43 mile path..." You don't need "across".
• "The tornado killed 7 in Parkersburg, and 2 in New Hartford." You don't need a comma.
• You don't need a wikilink Iowa.
• It should be "All of the fatalities..."
• What is a "doppler on wheels"?
• "before the El Reno tornado, and the Bridge Creek tornado" You don't need a comma here.
• On the table, "location" does not need to be capitalized in Start location. The rest of the table looks fine.

Tables have appropriate column and row scopes.

User:ActuallyElite: Please let me know if you have any questions, or once you've addressed these issues. Bgsu98 (Talk) 22:24, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

2024 Men's T20 World Cup qualification

Nominator(s): Vestrian24Bio 03:19, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

Here's the final FLC in the 2024 Men's T20 World Cup topic; I might take an extended break from en-wiki after this closes, so cheers to the last one (for now).Not anymore... Vestrian24Bio 03:19, 5 May 2025 (UTC) – 13:06, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

Source review and additional notes.

It's been 15 days and no reviews, I think you might have poisoned you nomination by advertising your exit, anyways I'll be the first to put the knife in your tenure.

• Alot of inconsistency weather a source is linked or not
• Alot of inconsistency weather sources use DMY or slash dates
• Refs 31 and 58 have MOS:DASH violations
• Some sources are showing up as dead despite being alive (56-58) for example, they need to be marked as being alive.
• Spots checks flag nothing
• Why is "Emerging Cricket" reliable?
• Why is "Czarsportz" reliable?

That's what I found ping me when done, and if you do plan to take a wikibreak after this, thanks for all the fish. Olliefant (she/her) 02:43, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

@OlifanofmrTennant: Hi! thanks for the review, I was going to take a break but, things have changed now for good..

• Emerging Cricket is a reliable site for Associate Cricket news; not sure if it has been discussed in WP:RSN though.
• Czarsportz is the highest reliable independent source we have for associate cricket.

All else done..! Vestrian24Bio 13:06, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

Support Olliefant (she/her) 14:37, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Comments from Z1720

Image review: No concerns.

Prose review:

• What reference is verifying the information in the "Summary of the qualification process" table? This should be made clear somewhere.
• What reference is verifying the information in the "Details of the teams qualified for the T20 World Cup" table?
• Suggest archiving sources using IA Bot.

Those are my thoughts. Z1720 (talk) 18:43, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

1968 Winter Olympics medal table

Nominator(s): Hey man im josh (talk) 12:53, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

This is the second last Winter Olympic medal table that is not featured status, and it's a relatively short one. What's interesting about this one is that Morocco competed for the first time, and East and West Germany entered separate teams for the time. This will be Olympic medal table #12 and Winter medal table #4 for me and I aimed to match the formatting of the other previously promoted lists. As always, I'll do my best to respond promptly and to address any and all feedback that is brought up. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:53, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Bgsu98

Just one general comment to start. This article seems awfully short. Are the others in this series as short as this one? The only other article I've seen is another one you put forward recently – 1972 Summer Olympics medal table – and it looks like it has more meat. Maybe the 1968 Winter Olympics were just relatively uneventful?

More specific comments:

1. "The 1968 Winter Olympics, officially known as the X Olympic Winter Games, was a winter multi-sport event..." "was" should be "were".
2. "This included first-time entrants Morocco" "entrants" should be "entrant".
3. "including the team relay event in biathlon" I would say "in the biathlon".
4. "Norway won the most medals overall, with 14, and the most gold medals, with six." This may be personal style preference, but I would put the "with x" in parentheses (ie. Norway won the most medals overall (with 14), and the most gold medals (with six).) But either way is probably fine.
5. "French alpine skier Jean-Claude Killy had the most gold medals with three." I would use "won" instead of "had".
6. In the infobox: "Swedish cross-country skier Toini Gustafsson (pictured) won three medals (two gold, one silver) at the 1968 Winter Olympics..." I don't think the "(pictured)" is needed, and I would use the phrase "two gold and one silver" rather than just separating them with a comma. Ditto with that same scenario in the second paragraph.

Just a personal note: I never liked the purple shading of the host nation on these tables, but this is most definitely not the forum for that discussion. :)

Please let me know if you have any questions. Bgsu98 (Talk) 19:43, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the review @Bgsu98! I implemented your feedback, with the exception of 4 and the a part of number 6 (the medals in brackets). I feel these are stylistic choices and I wanted to remain consistent with other lists that have been done already. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:38, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

I agree they are personal preferences and I also understand wanting to maintain consistency among articles that are in a series. I'm happy to support. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:42, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Thanks! Hey man im josh (talk) 16:46, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Comments

• I have nothing to add to the above. I will be happy to support once those points have been addressed -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:11, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

  Noting that they've been addressed to Bgsu98's satisfaction, and hopefully to yours as well @ChrisTheDude. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:47, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:31, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Source review

• Refs 18, 19, and 20 all spell the name of the host city as "Gronoble" in stead of "Grenoble."

• I went ahead and fixed those; those were obvious typos. Bgsu98 (Talk) 18:47, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

Fine...  ;) MikeVitale 18:55, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

• All references have archive links, and spot-checked archive links go to the same place as the original article.
• Date formats are consistent.
• Spot-checked references (both original and archived) support the material in the article they purport to support.

That's all from me. --MikeVitale 18:22, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

Since the Gronoble typos have been fixed... Support. --MikeVitale 18:56, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

Woops, those are embarrassing typos! Thanks for the source review and fixing those @MikeVitale! Hey man im josh (talk) 12:07, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

While I'd love to take credit, I only pointed out the typos. It was @Bgsu98 who actually fixed "Gronoble".  :) --MikeVitale 02:49, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

Comments by Alavense

• Norway won the most medals overall, with 14, and the most gold medals, with six - As per MOS:NUMBER: "Comparable values near one another should be all spelled out or all in figures, even if one of the numbers would normally be written differently". I would go with Norway won the most medals overall, with fourteen, and the most gold medals, with six.
• Killy (three gold), along with Swedish cross-country skier Toini Gustafsson (two gold, one silver) and Finnish cross-country skier Eero Mäntyranta (one silver, two bronze), tied - Does this sentence really work? Wouldn't it be better to say Killy (three gold), Swedish cross-country skier Toini Gustafsson (two gold, one silver) and Finnish cross-country skier Eero Mäntyranta (one silver, two bronze) tied?
• As noted in another review, I believe there should be something at the beginning of the second paragraph of the section Medal table that brings the reader back from the general explanation of how the table works to the 1968 Games.

That's what I got. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 13:57, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for the feedback, and I'd like to again apologize for the delay in response @Alavense. I've been rather demotivated from Wikipedia activities due to some on wiki conflict.

I made the changes in your second bullet point, but I'm not quite sure what you're referring to in the third bullet point. I view it as rather straight forward, and I'd love an explanation on what could be improved upon so that I can improve the article. Lastly, as for the first bullet point, I went with changing "six" to "6", based on the first sentence using numbers instead of the words. Please let me know if there's any further improvements that can be made. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:08, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

No problem, Hey man im josh. As far as I can see, you've made the changes suggested in both my first and third bullet points, but the second one has not been addressed yet. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 10:16, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Shame on me for not properly incorporating that point, thanks for pointing that out @Alavense. I've made the change. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:12, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

Happy to support. Alavense (talk) 06:01, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Pinging Hey man im josh just in case. Alavense (talk) 13:40, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

I'm sorry I've been away for as long as I have @Alavense, I was dealing with some personal motivation issues. I'm intending to work on and finish this now. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:31, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

• Image review – The lead photo (the sole one used in the article) has appropriate licensing, caption and alt text. I have no concerns on this front. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:17, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Doechii discography

Nominator(s): Elias 🦗🐜 ^{[Chat, they chattin', they chat]} 14:42, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Picture this: you're at the mall, shopping for groceries at 8PM. The radio is blasting the 100th top 40 song released within the past three years. And suddenly, you hear the opening tune of a timeless classic: "Somebody That I Used to Know". You're relieved, knowing that for once, no new songs are terrorizing the mall at the moment.

...except that isn't the voice of Gotye in the airwaves. You have been tricked; that's actually "Anxiety" (2025) by one of the fastest-rising stars of this decade, Doechii. She's a rapper who's been labelmates with SZA and Kendrick Lamar, already a legendary duo in their own right. And at this year's Grammys, she recently won a Best Rap Album Grammy for her latest mixtape.

Having witnessed Doechii's slow rise to stardom since 2023, I recently endeavored to bring this discography list to FL status as one of my latest content-creating projects. There aren't a lot of discography FLs for black women musicians out there, so I hope this is a step further into filling this particular niche. I hope you enjoy what I have to offer. Elias 🦗🐜 ^{[Chat, they chattin', they chat]} 14:42, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

History6042

• Image needs alt text.
  • It has alt text now
• All sources should be archived.
  • I chose not to archive some sources (e.g. chart history pages) because those are updated on a regular basis.
• In guest appearances, references should be their own column.
  • Done
• Same with the other tables.
  • I am not sure about this because some titles on those tables are directly followed by a citation and others do not. I don't want things to be inconsistent
• Music video count should be added to the first lede sentence.
  • Done
• Ping when done please. History6042😊 (Contact me) 00:35, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

  Thanks for the comments, @History6042. Replies above. Elias 🦗🐜 ^{[Chat, they chattin', they chat]} 03:48, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

  Support History6042😊 (Contact me) 12:04, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Orangesclub

• References 5 and 70 are duplicated
  • Merged - Elias
• Some columns have widths defined but some don't, so one EP title is wrapped meanwhile titles for guest appearances have unexplained empty space. I would encourage consistency, especially seeing as her discography is still small enough that the tables aren't getting squished (see Michael W. Smith discography for an example).
  • I think I got it handled - Elias
• Can the intro prose be expanded a little, so that the summary table isn't cramped next to the infobox? Alternatively use of {clear} would be good, again so information isn't unnecessarily squished. This is perhaps more of a preference for me as I'm a Vector 2022 user but seeing as its a default it'll probably affect many readers.
  • I'm a bit apprehensive about this comment because I firmly believe the lead is already a proper summary of the list's contents, and there are no squishing issues on my laptop and desktop screens. I think in this scenario any possible issues with squishing are just dependent on what device is being used so I don't think it's one that needs addressing. - Elias
• All references should be archived - these chart websites have a way of rebranding and wiping all the old links
  • See my reply to a similar comment above + given Doechii's music is still charting and rising in many countries, archiving them may be a bit too soon. - Elias
• Is there a reason "Wat U Sed" is in the lead artist section? It seems to be described as a feature
  • I must have misplaced it, my bad! - Elias

That's all I have for now, it's great to see how much love she is getting! orangesclub 🍊 03:42, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

@Orangesclub, thank you! I appreciate these replies. It's indeed nice to see the former weed-smoking storytime vlogger finally get her flowers as the artist she is responses above Elias 🦗🐜 ^{[Chat, they chattin', they chat]} 04:31, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Following up to see if all your concerns have been addressed @Orangesclub. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:30, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

I'm happy with your changes, but I won't be able to support it without the archives. The live website will and should still be the source of truth, but chart websites change without any notice and if they haven't been archived they are just lost forever. I feel like this is the perfect time to capture an archive, ie when promoting to featured list, because too many of these charts will void out before anyone takes the care to preserve them. I will note that other featured discography lists of artists that haven't peaked yet have the archives in place. orangesclub 🍊 21:52, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

@Orangesclub, well I did the best I could. Certification references cannot be archived because they are template-generated and there is no parameter for archives. That aside, please check if everything is in order. Elias 🦗🐜 ^{[Chat, they chattin', they chat]} 04:14, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Perfect, happy to support! All good on the certifications, I'm aware of that (and so many certification websites don't support archiving anyway 🥲) but the rest looks good. orangesclub 🍊 04:49, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Comments from TheDoctorWho

• A short description needs added per WP:SDLIST
  • Per WP:SDNONE the short description "none" will suffice. In this page, the "entirety of the title will be reasonably clear to English-speaking readers worldwide."
• Not a requirement by any means, but this is one place where {{sronly}} would come in handy if you wanted to use it
  • Apologies, but I am unsure how this template can be used in the article. May you give an example?
• Alligator Bites Never Heal is missing a reference (which I assume is supposed to support a release date, label, etc.)
  • In discography pages, it's customary for album entries with their own articles to not require citations
• Any particular reason why this same album has two refs for the peak in the Irish column, which appear to list different peaks? If the one in the header is outdated, it can be removed and the Official Charts one moved up.
  • Not sure, I'm not the one who updates these peaks. I moved the Official Charts citation up, though I'd imagine someone will replace that citation months down the line when Doechii releases more albums.
• Ref 8 (currently Rolling Stone for me) needs |url-access=subscription
  • Added the parameter (though it should be "limited" because RS shows a limited amount of free articles before the annoying paywall)
• "The AV Club" --> "The A.V. Club" (official name; currently ref 22 for me)
  • Done

I think that's all I have! Wish you could've seen the pure shock on my face when I first heard Anxiety on the radio and thought it was gonna be Somebody That I Used To Know 😅 TheDoctorWho (talk) 06:40, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

Don't worry, I had the same feeling while I was shopping in some gaudy upscale mall :^) more on-topic, I have replied to all of your comments above. Thanks for stopping by @TheDoctorWho! Sorry this took a bit. Elias 🦗🐜 ^{[Chat, they chattin', they chat]} 07:28, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

A few responses:

1. {{sronly}} essentially makes a table caption visible to screen readers only when nearby text (such as prose or headers) sufficiently describe the table being presented to avoid a duplication of text. So for example, with the first table, you could use {{sronly|List of mixtapes, with selected details and chart positions}}, this would still meet accessibility requirements by providing a caption, but would hide it from those that don't need it. (Like I said, using this isn't a requirement, and I wouldn't oppose if it isn't used. I just like to provide alternatives sometimes.)

I think the tables are already fine on their own. Elias 🦗🐜 ^{[Chat, they chattin', they chat]} 01:55, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

1. "In discography pages, it's customary for album entries with their own articles to not require citations I'm not convinced this is the case, Ithaca discography, Kittie discography, Tages discography, and Bini discography are all recent FL's that have sourced release dates despite album articles existing.

Not something I usually do (and not something that happens for discography pages of way more popular artists)... but I guess adding a citation here won't hurt... Elias 🦗🐜 ^{[Chat, they chattin', they chat]} 01:55, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

1. I also have to slightly disagree with the absence of a short description, because not all English speakers worldwide will know who Doechii is. SDLIST gives an example of this with the sitcom Friends, a good short description for List of Friends episodes would be "Episodes of American television sitcom". It should not be "none", since the term "Friends" – no matter how well known to readers familiar with American TV – will not necessarily be clear to other English-speaking readers worldwide. While "Discography" is clear, Doechii could easily be a British pop artist or an Australian country singer

Looking at a sample of entries on Wikipedia:Featured lists#Discographies, I see that SDNONE is consistently applied. I do not think this needs changing. Elias 🦗🐜 ^{[Chat, they chattin', they chat]} 01:55, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

TheDoctorWho (talk) 07:50, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

@TheDoctorWho, responses above. I do not know how to respond to individual comments on a numbered list so apologies that the numbering format got messed up. Elias 🦗🐜 ^{[Chat, they chattin', they chat]} 01:55, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

Unfortunately going to oppose on lack of a proper short description then. The instructions laid out at WP:SDESC are pretty clear to me, and I don't feel comfortable saying that this is one of Wikipedia's best lists with one that doesn't describe the contents of the list. WP:SDEXAMPLES is pretty clear on this too, in the entry for Burt Reynolds filmography where it says "Even very famous American celebrities may not be well known to all English speakers: a proper short description helps readers of different cultures as well as those who fall outside the person's usual fan demographic." and gives the example "Performances by American actor" an SD. TheDoctorWho (talk) 04:19, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

@TheDoctorWho: hm alright... I can see where you are coming from with your rationale so I changed the shortdesc. Looks like someone has to change all the other shortdescs on those discography FLs then; maybe someone can run AWB on those? Though I am unsure if such a massive change will face some opposition... Regardless your suggestion seems convincing enough and I respect the way you stand your ground at least. Elias 🦗🐜 ^{[Chat, they chattin', they chat]} 04:57, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

In that case I'm happy to support! This should definitely be changed on the other articles mentioned, but one article at a time (as done here) is a start. Nice work on this list by the way, apologies if I was a pain 😅. 06:12, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

Comments by Alavense

• with Janelle Monáe; Katy Perry; and Tyler, the Creator - Make it with Janelle Monáe, Katy Perry, and Tyler, the Creator
• On the Notes section, why are some charts linked while others aren't? Billboard Hot 100, for example, could be linked as well. This should be checked for consistency.

That's what I saw. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 05:33, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

• @PSA: Reminder about this. --PresN 15:30, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

• Image review – The lead image, the sole one in the article, has proper free licensing, caption and alt text. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:24, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi, sorry about this, I had to say away from enwiki work because of college enrolment. @Alavense, re. the notes section, I have linked the first mention of each chart (except NZ Hot Singles because it links to the same article as NZ Top 40). Hope this addresses your concerns. Thanks, Elias 🦗🐜 ^{[Chat, they chattin', they chat]} 02:20, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

Happy to support. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 10:18, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

1972 Summer Olympics medal table

Nominator(s): Hey man im josh (talk) 16:31, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

After a brief intermission for NFL seasons lists, I'm back to nominating the series of Olympic lists! This would be Olympic medal table #11 and Summer Olympic medal table #8. As for what was notable about these individual games, Mark Spitz won SEVEN golds! Which was a record for 36 years until Phelps won eight at the 2008 Summer Olympics. There was also 11 new competitors, which is a lot for this late into the Olympics. As always, I'll do my best to respond promptly and to address any and all feedback that is brought up. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:31, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

Bgsu98

I enjoyed reading this article and only have a few comments.

1. In the infobox, I would put the flag before the city. ( Munich, West Germany)
2. There should be an and between Togo and Upper Volta.
3. "The games featured 195 events in 21 sports across 27 disciplines." What is the difference between a sport and a discipline?
4. You have several sports wikilinked, but not archery.
5. "In response, athletes from other African nations protested this invitation and again threatened to boycott the games over those policies." I would maybe say "In response, athletes from other African nations protested this invitation and again threatened a boycott."
6. "Four days before the opening ceremonies the IOC voted to rescind their invitation..." You need a comma after ceremonies.
7. "North Korea and Uganda won their nations' first Summer Olympic gold medals, which was the first medal of any kind for North Korea.[7][22] Colombia and Niger also won their nations' first Olympic medals of any kind." Just as a point of interest, you might specify in what sport these nations won their first medals.
8. "16-year-old American swimmer Rick DeMont had originally won gold in the men's 400 metre freestyle event but was disqualified..." You need a comma after event.
9. "Events in judo used a repechage system which also resulted in two bronze medals being awarded." You need a comma after system.
10. "In women's uneven bars..." I would put a the in front of women's uneven bars.
11. On the table of medal changes, I would probably left justify the first column.
12. "Biddle had tried to get tested following the race, at the advice of the team's manager, just in case of a disqualification, but he was turned away." – I would use the following: "Biddle had tried to be tested following the race on the advice of his team's manager, in the event of a disqualification, but this request was denied."
13. "The Belgian team finished fourth, but did not receive the bronze medal..." I would pluralize medal.
14. One doped athlete caused the entire team to lose their medals? *stares in 2022 figure skating team event*
15. "DeMont had declared... leading to the situation which resulted in his gold medal being stripped." The end of that sentence sounds awkward. Maybe "leading to his (or the) gold medal being stripped from him"

Please let me know if you have any questions. Bgsu98 (Talk) 21:32, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

Thank you very much for the review @Bgsu98!

1 – So, for whatever reason, it's apparently been common practice to do so before the country instead of the city name. Honestly this isn't something I had ever considered actually.

• I think it looks weird as hell, and some of the formatting of these Olympic articles baffles me, but it should probably follow whatever the precedent is for similar Olympic articles.

• I'm not opposed to changing them, and I could do it for all of them. Do you have an example of any series of events where it is shown at the beginning instead, just so I can point to that if questioned?

2 – Done.

3 – A good example would be "aquatics", which is defined as an Olympic sport. It has 5 sub disciplines, artistic swimming (synchronized swimming), diving, marathon swimming, swimming (the regular sprint or regular swim races), and water polo. Cycling as another example has BMX freestyle, BMX racing, mountain biking, road biking, and track racing. They're essentially sub sports of a large classification of sport.

4 – Done.

5 – So, I wanted to be clear when I wrote that that it was over the policies, as opposed to simply being upset that Rhodesia was invited in generic.

• There could still be a better way of wording it. Perhaps: "In response, athletes from other African nations protested this invitation due to Rhodesia's racist policies and again threatened a boycott."

• I'm not sure that would be an improvement though, I'm trying to highlight that they're doing so again. I've found that sources also specifically stated "racial policies" as opposed to "racist policies".

6 – Done

7 – I've considered it, but applying that consistently across these types of lists would actually end up being surprisingly difficult. There's often difficulties pinpointing which athlete won a NOC's first Olympic or gold medal, based on people winning on the same day but exact time keeping for when the medals were won being difficult to iron out. I think it would also make some of these lists far too large in prose and run on sentences.

• I do understand what you're saying, but in the case of North Korea, Uganda, and Niger, there is no question as they each only won one medal. Colombia is hazier.

8 – Done.

9 – I feel like this actually isn't a necessary comma, there's no pause or break up of the sentence. It's rather straight forward from my perspective.

• It's a relative clause and needs a comma.

• Done.

10 – Done.

11 – Unfortunately this is a preexisting template which I'm not comfortable modifying for this. Additionally, I think the rank being centered actually makes more sense.

• I thought this was a simple table and did not realize it was a template. Edited to add: I just looked and this is a regular table. If it were me, I would left-justify everything except the numbers, but it is not something I would hold up a FL promotion over. Bgsu98 (Talk) 19:00, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

12 – So, I was specific in the phrasing of "turned away", as that's what sources say. Oddly the phrasing denied didn't come up when I was working on this one. I've mostly implemented this suggestion though.

13 – Done.

14 – That is correct, the entire team was disqualified as a result. After looking at what you're referring to... Damn it! I wish it happened then as well to get Canada a bronze!

• I was heated for multiple reasons. I did want to see the Canadian team receive the bronze medals. Roman Sadovsky got yoked into the team event at the last minute after the original men's competitor was quarantined with COVID, didn't exactly have a great performance in front of the largest audience of his life, got tons of cyber-BS from the armchair critics, and I would have loved to see him become an Olympic bronze medalist by default.

15 – Done.

Most of what you've suggested has been implemented, but there's a few points for you to reply to. Thanks again for the solid review! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:35, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

Bgsu98 (Talk) 18:54, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply Bgsu98, I believe I've responded to everything that needed a response. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:04, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Support. Bgsu98 (Talk) 23:10, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Image review from Arconning

• File:Mark Spitz 1972.jpg - Public Domain
• File:Ri Ho-jun 1972 (cropped).jpg - Public Domain, source link needs to be fixed for WP:V
• File:Rick DeMont 1972.jpg - Public Domain, source link needs to be fixed as well.
• All images have alt text.
• All images have appropriate captions, and are all relevant to the article.
  • @Hey man im josh: Here shall be my short comments. Arconning (talk) 13:32, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

  Unfortunately I'm unable to fix the links, but I'm going to ping [[User:|]], who appears to have originally uploaded the Ri Ho-jun image at File:Ri Ho-jun 1972.jpg in 2017, as well as File:Rick DeMont 1972.jpg, also in 2017. I'm not an expert with images, so hopefully they'll be able to help out with this. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:50, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

  Well that sucks, my ping failed clearly. Lets try to ping Materialscientist again. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:54, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

  Hey @Materialscientist, hate to be a bother, but any chance you can help me with this? Hey man im josh (talk) 12:06, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

  I apologize for the delay @Arconning, I was hopeful that Materialscientist would come by and provide a source for the original images. Since we cannot verify them beyond what was listed on Commons, I've gone ahead and removed them. Unfortunately, there's no quality image of any first time winners, so I'll be leaving it at one image for the article. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:36, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

  Materialscientist has pings turned off. If you want their attention you will have to post to their talk page. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:56, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

  Shall pass this image review. Arconning (talk) 05:47, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

Comments by Alavense

• Rhodesia had been barred from participating at the 1968 Games - Can the 1968 Games be linked?
• Among individual participants, American swimmer Mark Spitz won the most medals at the game with seven - At the game or at the games?
• In the paragraph about Spitz, wouldn't it make sense to also state that Phelps is American. Given that one's nationality is mentioned, I believe the other one's should as well.
• The medal table is based on information provided by the IOC and is consistent with IOC conventional sorting in its published medal tables. The table uses the Olympic medal table sorting method. By default, the table - Five table(s) make this a bit weird to read. For starters, the last one can easily become an it, I think.
• Events in boxing resulted - In the previous paragraph, you are referring to conventions about medal tables in general, so it would be worth stating that we are now speaking about these games. Maybe add At the 1972 Games, at the beginning, or whichever formula you prefer.
• Neither athlete who finished third was awarded the silver, which is considered vacant - Is this vacant thing important? I think it's the same for the two events mentioned above, isn't it? The way it's written, at least to me, makes it seem like it's something different.

That's what I got. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 06:31, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

Pinging Hey man im josh just in case. Alavense (talk) 13:40, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

I'm sorry I've been away for as long as I have @Alavense, I was dealing with some personal motivation issues. I'm intending to work on and finish this now. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:31, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

@Alavense: I've implemented all of your suggestions, with the exception of the fourth and sixth bullet points. I'm not sure what you're meaning by the fourth bullet point, and as for the last bullet point, I think it is important to mention this, yes. It explains why the medal count is the way it is, in that, it's not even and there's an "unaccounted for" medal in a sense. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:05, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

Hey man im josh: The fourth point's goal was to point out that the sentence reads a bit weird with as many as five table(s) on it, but if you think it's fine, that's all right. Regarding the last point, I see it's important to mention it - the thing I don't understand is why it doesn't get a mention for the other cases. It makes the reader (at least it made me) wonder if there's a difference between one and the others. Alavense (talk) 10:23, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply @Alavense. Regarding the vacancy, there is a difference, yes. This is different than an instance in which two silvers were won and no bronze was issued, there's no "vacancy" in those cases, as the top 3 are considered properly awarded. In this instance, the two athletes who receives a bronze medal received it as part of the repechage system (mentioned in the second paragraph of the medal table section). As such, because both of the athletes who received bronze received it because they lost in the quarter finals, there wasn't a way to determine who deserved silver more than the other. As such, the IOC treats it as "vacant". This is simply the manner in which they've classified the medal. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:09, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

Oh, sorry, it makes perfect sense. Happy to support. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 06:02, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Source review by MikeVitale

As one would expect from someone with currently over 40 FLs, I can't find anything wrong here. All links are archived, all references check out, consistent date formatting, etc. Yeah...Support. --MikeVitale 18:54, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Surprised I hadn't replied to this, but thank you very much for your source review @MikeVitale! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:05, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

Comments

• "11 teams making their Olympic debut at the Summer Games" - does this mean they were only making their summer Olympic debut (i.e. they had previously competed at the winter games) or their overall Olympic debut, which happened to take place at the summer games? If the latter then you can simply lose "as the Summer Games"
• "In response, athletes from other African nations protested this invitation" - given that you specify what they were protesting, I don't think you also need "in response"
• "North Korea and Uganda won their nations' first Summer Olympic gold medals" - were they their first summer golds specifically, or their first olympic golds period? It seems unlikely that Uganda in particular would have previously won winter gold but I suppose it's possible.......
• That's what I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:22, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

• @Hey man im josh: Reminder about this. --PresN 15:29, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude: Thank you for the feedback, and I apologize for the delay. I've implemented all of your suggestions, but to be clear, North Korea won a medal at the 1964 Winter Olympics, while Uganda had never won a gold medal prior to the 1972 Olympics. See List of first Olympic medalists by National Olympic Committee. Please let me know if there are any other issues. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:58, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:24, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

Nominations for removal

Seinfeld season 2

Notified: Music2611, WikiProject Television, WikiProject Comedy

Following discussions here and here, there seems to be agreement that TV seasons should go through GAN/FAC instead of FLC. The latter discussion suggested bulk nominations to remove season lists. This is the first such nomination; it covers Seinfeld season 2 and season 3 (FLRC link). The FLRC nomination for both lists will be contained here.

Aside from the shift away from FLC, these season articles are heavily reliant on primary sources, raising issues with WP:NOT and WP:INDISCRIMINATE, and the season 3 reception section should be expanded. If these issues are addressed, I see a reasonable path to GA for these articles. RunningTiger123 (talk) 02:40, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Delist per the usual reasons. TheDoctorWho (talk) 04:19, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Seinfeld season 3

Notified: Gman124, WikiProject Television, WikiProject Comedy

The discussion for this nomination is happening here. Do not leave comments on this page. RunningTiger123 (talk) 02:44, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

List of counties in Maine

Notified: Wikipedia:WikiProject Maine, Wikipedia:WikiProject United States, User talk:Tompw

Article was promoted to FL in 2007 and seems to have been all but abandoned since.

• Begins with "this is a list", which has been discouraged in lists for ages.
• Multiple {{page needed}} issues throughout.
• Census.gov link is not formatted properly, and population data do not appear to have been updated for the 2020s.
• Is seven footnotes enough for a FL?

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:07, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

• Delist A lot of issues. There isn't even a date for the population numbers. Subjectively I think the FIPS code is not worth the space for the column and should be removed. Wording is overall poor (see the sentence: "...created was York County, created as..."). Unsourced columns (all the etymologies and origins), and missing a density column which would be very insightful. It would be a lot of work to get this up to standard. Mattximus (talk) 14:45, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

• Delist per User:TenPoundHammer and User:Mattximus. This could be a very interesting list, but clearly needs a lot of work, as large parts of the table appear to be unsourced. The prose is also awkward and should go through a few rounds of editing. Bgsu98 (Talk) 21:55, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

30 Rock season 4

Notified: ThinkBlue, Staxringold, Courcelles, WikiProject Television

I am nominating this for featured list removal because not only does it not meet the current MOS:TVPRODUCTION standards (namely the omition of the Production and development sections), but season articles also not really considered FLs. See also the related FLRCs for seasons 1, 2 and 3. Please note that this is the final remaining 30 Rock season FL. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 01:35, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

Comment – While not stated anywhere definitively (see here), maybe this should wait to prevent too many active nominations by one person at one time? Otherwise, anyone who might object to these nominations might not get a fair chance to respond. I typically restrict myself to the FLC guidelines (two nominations, and only after one has significant support). RunningTiger123 (talk) 02:22, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

That could work. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 05:23, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

I'm going to make a talk page post about this to get a consensus, since this episode list thing is a little different than most removals in that it looks to be a long series of removals for the same reason. --PresN 21:42, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Given the delisting of seasons 2 and 3, this nomination should now proceed. I support delisting due to the lack of a solid production section, on top of the fact that season articles should go to GAN/FAC. RunningTiger123 (talk) 02:57, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Delist, per the usual reasons. TheDoctorWho (talk) 04:18, 17 June 2025 (UTC)