Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates

Skip to:

Table of contents
Current nominations
To be closed
More input needed
Recently closed
Suspended candidates

This star, with one point broken, symbolizes the featured candidates on Wikipedia.

Featured pictures are images that add significantly to articles, either by illustrating article content particularly well, or being eye-catching to the point where users will want to read its accompanying article. Taking the adage that "a picture is worth a thousand words", the images featured on Wikipedia:Featured pictures should illustrate a Wikipedia article in such a way as to add significantly to that article, according to the featured picture criteria.

Promoting an image

If you believe an image should be featured, create a subpage (use the "For Nominations" field, below) and add the subpage to the current nominations section.

For promotion, if an image is listed here for ten days with five or more reviewers in support and the consensus is in its favor, it can be added to the Wikipedia:Featured pictures list. Consensus is generally regarded to be a two-thirds majority in support, including the nominator and/or creator of the image; however, anonymous votes are generally disregarded, as are opinions of sockpuppets.

All users may comment. However, only those who have been on Wikipedia for 25 days and with at least 100 edits will be included in the numerical count. If necessary, decisions about close candidacies will be made on a case-by-case basis. Nominations started in December are given three extra days, due to the holidays slowing down activity here.

The archive contains all opinions and comments collected for candidate nominations and their nomination results.

If you nominate an image here, please consider also uploading and nominating it at Commons to help ensure that the pictures can be used not just in the English Wikipedia but on all other Wikimedia projects as well.

Delisting an image

A featured picture can be nominated for delisting if you feel it no longer lives up to featured picture standards. You may also request a featured picture be replaced with a superior image. Create a subpage (use the "For Delists" field, below) and add the subpage to the current nominations section.

Please leave a note on the talk page of the original FPC nominator (and creator/uploader, if appropriate) to let them know the delisting is being debated. The user may be able to address the issues and avoid the delisting of the picture.

For delisting, if an image is listed here for ten days with five or more reviewers supporting a delist or replace, and the consensus is in its favor, it will be delisted from Wikipedia:Featured pictures. Consensus is generally regarded to be a two-thirds majority in support, including the nominator. Note that anonymous votes are generally disregarded, as are opinions of sockpuppets. However, images are sometimes delisted despite having fewer than five in support of their removal, and there is currently no consensus on how best to handle delist closures, except for one point: If the image to be delisted is not used in any articles by the time of closure, it must be delisted. If it is added to articles during the nomination, at least one week's stability is required for the nomination to be closed as "Kept". The nomination may be suspended if a week hasn't yet passed to give the rescue a chance.

Outside of the nominator, all voters are expected to have been on Wikipedia for 25 days and to have made a minimum of 100 edits. If necessary, decisions about close candidacies will be made on a case-by-case basis. As with regular nominations, delist nominations are given three extra days to run if started in December.

Note that delisting an image does not mean deleting it. Delisting from Featured pictures in no way affects the image's status in its article(s).

Shortcuts

Featured content:

Featured picture tools:

Step 1: Evaluate

Evaluate the merit of a nomination against the featured picture criteria. Most users reference terms from this page when evaluating nominations.

Step 2: Create a subpage

For Nominations

To create a subpage of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates for your nomination, add a title for the image you want to nominate in the field below (e.g., Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Labrador Retriever) and click the "Create new nomination" button.

For Delists

To create a subpage for your delist, add a title for the image you want to delist/replace in the field below and click the "Create new delist nomination" button.

For Delist and replace

To create a subpage for your delist and replace, add a title for the image you want to delist/replace in the field below and click the "Create new delist nomination" button.

Step 3: Transclude and link

Transclude the newly created subpage to the Featured picture candidate list (direct link).

How to comment for Candidate Images

Write Support, if you approve of the picture. A reason is optional.
Write Oppose, followed by your reasoning, if you disapprove of the picture. All objections should be accompanied by a specific rationale that, if addressed, would make you support the image. If your concern is one that can only be addressed by the creator, and if they haven't nominated or commented on the image, and if they are a Wikipedian, you should notify them directly.
You can weak support or weak oppose instead, so that your opinion will be weighed as half of a "full" opinion.
- To change your opinion, strike it out (with <s>...</s>) rather than removing it.
If you think a nominated image obviously fails the featured picture criteria, write Speedy close followed by your reasons. Nominations may be closed early if this is the case.

Recommendations added early in the process may be disregarded if they do not address concerns and/or improvements that arise later in the debate. Reviewers are advised to monitor the progress of a nomination and update their votes accordingly.

Prior to giving an opinion, the image should be assessed on its quality as displayed at full size (high-resolution) in an image editing program. Please note that the images are only displayed at thumbnail size on this page. The thumbnail links to the image description page which, in turn, links to the high-resolution version.

How to comment for Delist Images

Write Keep, followed by your reasons for keeping the picture.
Write Delist, followed by your reasons for delisting the picture.
Write Delist and Replace if you believe the image should be replaced by a better picture.
You can weak keep, weak delist or weak delist and replace instead, so that your opinion will be weighed as half of a "full" opinion.
- To change your opinion, strike it out (with <s>...</s>) rather than removing it.

Please remember to be civil, not to bite the newbies and to comment on the image, not the person.

You may find the glossary useful when you encounter acronyms or jargon in other voters' comments. You can also link to it by using {{FPCgloss}}.

Editing candidates

If you feel you could improve a candidate by image editing, please feel free to do so, but do not overwrite or remove the original. Instead, upload your edit with a different file name (e.g., add "edit" to the file name), and display it below the original nomination. Edits should be appropriately captioned in sequential order (e.g., Edit 1, Edit 2, etc), and describe the modifications that have been applied.

Is my monitor adjusted correctly?

In a discussion about the brightness of an image, it is necessary to know if the computer display is properly adjusted. Displays differ greatly in their ability to show shadow detail. There are four dark grey circles in the adjacent image. If you can discern three (or even four) of the circles, your monitor can display shadow detail correctly. If you see fewer than three circles, you may need to adjust the monitor and/or computer display settings. Some displays cannot be adjusted for ideal shadow detail. Please take this into account when voting.

Displays also differ greatly in their ability to show highlight detail. There are light grey circles in the adjacent image. If you can discern three (or even four) of the circles, your monitor can display highlight detail correctly. If you see fewer than three circles, you may need to adjust the monitor and/or computer display settings (probably reduce the contrast setting). Some displays cannot be adjusted for ideal highlight detail. Please take this into account when voting.

On a gamma-adjusted display, the four circles in the color image blend into the background when seen from a few feet (roughly 75–150 cm) away. If they do not, you could adjust the gamma setting (found in the computer's settings, not on the display), until they do. This may be very difficult to attain, and a slight error is not detrimental. Uncorrected PC displays usually show the circles darker than the background. Note that the image must be viewed in original size (263 × 68 pixels) - if enlarged or reduced, results are not accurate.

Note that on most consumer LCD displays (laptop or flat screen), viewing angle strongly affects these images. Correct adjustment on one part of the screen might be incorrect on another part for a stationary head position. Click on the images for more technical information. If possible, calibration with a hardware monitor calibrator is recommended.

To see recent changes, purge the page cache.

FPCs needing feedback view edit

Current nominations

US striking Houthi positions in Yemen

Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2025 at 00:30:55 (UTC)

Original – US striking Houthi positions in Yemen on March 15 during the Operation Rough Rider, the largest military operation in the Middle East of President Donald Trump's second term.

Reason: High EV
Articles in which this image appears: March–May 2025 United States attacks in Yemen and 2025 United States–Houthi ceasefire
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/Others
Creator: CENTCOM

Support as nominator – ArionStar (talk) 00:30, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support as uploader. Nice high-resolution video short enough for the modern attention span. Jay Cubby 00:51, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:25, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ariel Sharon

Voting period ends on 19 Jun 2025 at 03:05:32 (UTC)

Reason: High EV and quality for the time.
Articles in which this image appears: Ariel Sharon
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Political
Creator: Yaakov Saar

Support as nominator – ArionStar (talk) 03:05, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Question - Where is the license in the source? — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:09, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Here. ArionStar (talk) 20:47, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ArionStar, I've adjusted the curves and removed a couple of blemishes. Thoughts on this version? Jay Cubby 00:54, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Christ Church, Amherstburg

Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2025 at 14:03:57 (UTC)

Reason: High technical quality, shows the historic facade as well as subsequent additions
Articles in which this image appears: Christ Church, Amherstburg (new article) +2
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator: — Chris Woodrich (talk)

Support as nominator – — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:03, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Haigerloch

Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2025 at 09:46:55 (UTC)

Reason: Unanimously featured on Commons. Headline image.
Articles in which this image appears: Haigerloch
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Urban
Creator: Roman Eisele

Support as nominator – MER-C 09:46, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:05, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Idyllic, great detail. – Sca (talk) 15:52, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Such a nice, relaxing place, and a very good picture indeed! — Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:43, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Harlequin duck

Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2025 at 09:37:06 (UTC)

Reason: Unanimously featured on Commons. Headline image.
Articles in which this image appears: Harlequin duck
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Chuck Homler

Support as nominator – MER-C 09:37, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:07, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
support - Thank you! --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 01:53, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:43, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lili Elbe

Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2025 at 00:13:14 (UTC)

Reason: High quality scan of a painting used in many articles
Articles in which this image appears: Lili Elbe, Gerda Wegener, Transgender history, Lili Elbe (opera)
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Artists
Creator: Gerda Wegener

Support as nominator – ―Howard • 🌽³³ 00:13, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Question - What's the copyright on the painting? Wegener died well before CC was a thing, so the current tag can't be correct. If this is supposed to be PD-70, unfortunately the URAA would have affected the status of the painting in the United States and this would be non-free. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:06, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The painting appears to have been first exhibited in 2014. c:COM:US says "Life + 70 years" is for works published since 1978 or unpublished works, so I think the artwork would be in the public domain. ―Howard • 🌽³³ 00:02, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
They were both Danish, however, which means we're not using the Hirtle chart but rather referring to Danish copyright. If the work was "published" in c. 1928 (the date claimed as the date of painting) then the point is moot, as anything published prior to 1930 is PD in the US. It's an excellent portrait; I just want to be sure we have this under the correct license. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:15, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I've fixed the licensing now, I think. ―Howard • 🌽³³ 19:23, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If the painting wasn't exhibited until 2014, in what way was it published before 1930? hinnk (talk) 22:33, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
My bad, I have now updated it again. I think now it should be acceptable. ―Howard • 🌽³³ 04:49, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
oppose unremarkable painting. 'High quality' means about 10x more pixels than what this has, for a scan of such size. Jay Cubby 01:00, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lithobius forficatus

Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2025 at 23:18:12 (UTC)

Reason: An excellent image – possibly the best we have of any centipede – of one of the world's most common species. High EV.
Articles in which this image appears: Lithobius forficatus
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Others
Creator: Alexis Tinker-Tsavalas (iNaturalist)

Support as nominator – Cremastra (u — c) 23:18, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Very regretful ~~oppose~~ on resolution grounds -- this is barely above 2MP. @Cremastra:, the photographer is still active on iNaturalist, if you want to mail him. I would happily support the full-resolution photo. Jay Cubby 23:33, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Good point about the size, striking my vote to support. Jay Cubby 01:14, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is very small animal, so it should be OK. It is very sharp. – Yann (talk) 19:47, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:46, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support small, but good EV Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:20, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Hounaam (talk) 18:24, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Schleswig-Holstein Opening Fire

Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2025 at 20:46:01 (UTC)

Reason: Widely used historical photograph that also meets the size requirements for FPs (at 2,379 × 1,772)! Highly used on Wikimedia Projects, with extremely high EV.
Articles in which this image appears: Battle of Westerplatte (GA-class), Timeline of the 1939 invasion of Poland, Gdańsk, History of Gdańsk, Timeline of Gdańsk, Pomerania, Liberation Route Europe, 34 other language Wikipedia articles
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/World War II
Creator: The Associated Press

Support as nominator – The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 20:46, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Quite blurry for 1939 (and early '40s era). Also, locale is not apparent. – Sca (talk) 14:45, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@WeatherWriter, what are your thoughts on this version I sharpened (to deblur, no AI used in this case)? Jay Cubby 04:58, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose technical quality unfortunately. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:22, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose; per Charles' vote and also Sca's comment. Sorry! — Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:06, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Donald Trump official portrait

Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2025 at 21:28:45 (UTC)

Reason: High def official presidential portrait. Looks similar to other featured pictures of US presidents.
Articles in which this image appears: Donald Trump
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Political
Creator: Daniel Torok

Support as nominator – JJARichardson (talk) 21:28, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request close as nominator – unfortunately the new cropped version does not meet the criteria. But this could be resolved if someone could make a 1500x1500 version. JJARichardson (talk) 12:43, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Nomination is now high def jpg. JJARichardson (talk) 22:32, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
NPOV political promo. -- Sca (talk) 14:10, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is an image of a US president similar to those already featured. The fact he is the current president does not change that. JJARichardson (talk) 15:02, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support More interesting than most of the presidential/judicial portraits already featured. Jay Cubby 04:48, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Meh. Many of images of subj. extant on a daily basis. -- Sca (talk) 14:48, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
But not many high resolution portraits with encyclopedic value. JJARichardson (talk) 15:15, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural oppose - Per WP:Featured picture criteria, It is preferable to wait a reasonable period of time (at least 7 days) after the image is added to the article before nominating it, though this may be ignored in obvious cases, such as replacing a low-resolution version of an image with a higher resolution of the same image which isn't the case at all here. Was uploaded June 2, two days ago, so this is not met. ^EF⁵ 01:08, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural close and renominate at a later date. JJARichardson (talk) 10:51, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy close Does not currently meet criteria. JJARichardson (talk) 13:33, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose close just wait a few days and push the 10-day mark back accordingly. Jay Cubby 00:55, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2nd Infantry Division, E-1 draw, Easy Red sector, Omaha Beach, D+1, June 7, 1944

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2025 at 18:31:00 (UTC)

Reason: High quality, historic photo, high EV, good composition. Original nomination by TheFreeWorld received 4 supports, 1 oppose.
Articles in which this image appears: Omaha Beach, Military history of the United States during World War II, 2nd Infantry Division (United States)
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/World War II
Creator: U.S. Army Signal Corps, restored by Bammesk

Support as nominator – Zeete (talk) 18:31, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support as I did on commons – UnpetitproleX (talk) 14:24, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't remember making this vote at all. I thought I was having an episode of early onset dementia, but I think I never made this vote. Considering the timestamp of my vote is before this nomination was even made, did you copy paste my vote from another nomination? UnpetitproleX (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I see, @Hamid Hassani: you must have mistakenly done so. Please be more careful in the future! UnpetitproleX (talk) 12:52, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have struck out the vote, which I never made, for now. UnpetitproleX (talk) 12:53, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@UnpetitproleX: Hi. Yes, that was my mistake. I’m sorry for what happened. — Hamid Hassani (talk) 10:17, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
~~Weak~~ Support; the resolution of the picture is just 2,640 x 1,824 pixels (1.85 MB in volume). — Hamid Hassani (talk) 06:36, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This was the best I could find, but it's not restored and isn't higher real quality (higher pixel count doesn't mean higher quality) Jay Cubby 04:53, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I just saw your message and looked at the picture you mentioned, Jay. You're right. Thank you indeed. — Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:31, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Iconic photo with strong EV. This image is often used by historians to demonstrate the success of the Normandy landings - note that this was the most fiercely contested beach on 6 June, but a day later it's pretty orderly and huge numbers of troops are being brought ashore. Nick-D (talk) 08:43, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support High historic value for the photo. Photo is high quality and shows the organized march, the day after D-Day. Kalyan (talk) 17:36, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Yann (talk) 11:47, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:08, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Paro Taktsang, Bhutan

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2025 at 14:19:14 (UTC)

Reason: good quality image of the monastery; FP at Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Paro Taktsang
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator: Nina R (edited by UnpetitproleX)

Support as nominator – UnpetitproleX (talk) 14:19, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Hamid Hassani (talk) 06:38, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:02, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Striking panorama of an area little-known in the West. – Sca (talk) 14:15, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support Great landscape photo. Great value for subject. Weak support because there is small blur in the photos at full resolution. The golden 'pagoda' is blurry. If it is fixed, will convert to full support. Kalyan (talk) 17:40, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Yann (talk) 19:50, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Hounaam (talk) 18:24, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

USS Jack H. Lucas

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2025 at 10:45:01 (UTC)

Reason: Unanimously featured on Commons. Headline image.
Articles in which this image appears: USS Jack H. Lucas etc.
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Vehicles/Water
Creator: United States Navy

Support as nominator – MER-C 10:45, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support as I did on commons – UnpetitproleX (talk) 14:24, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Hamid Hassani (talk) 06:30, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:03, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great photo. Kalyan (talk) 17:41, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Hounaam (talk) 18:23, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Warbling vireo

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2025 at 10:41:45 (UTC)

Reason: Unanimously featured on Commons. Headline image.
Articles in which this image appears: Warbling vireo
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Rhododendrites

Support as nominator – MER-C 10:41, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Hamid Hassani (talk) 06:24, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:04, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Well composed. Kalyan (talk) 17:47, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Yann (talk) 19:51, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Hounaam (talk) 18:23, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Burst of Joy

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2025 at 20:11:15 (UTC)

Reason: 1974 Pulitzer Prize for feature photograph
Articles in which this image appears: Burst of Joy, 1974 Pulitzer Prize, Pulitzer Prize for Feature Photography
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/War
Creator: Slava "Sal" Veder, restored by Yann

Support as nominator – Yann (talk) 20:11, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – UnpetitproleX (talk) 14:25, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Hamid Hassani (talk) 06:24, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:04, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is a famous image and has very strong EV. Nick-D (talk) 08:44, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee ^talk 13:16, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support Photo is too noisy. But great EV & historical context. Kalyan (talk) 17:43, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Hounaam (talk) 18:23, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Helen of Troy

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2025 at 14:52:02 (UTC)

Reason: High EV
Articles in which this image appears: Helen of Troy
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Religion and mythology
Creator: Unknown

Support as nominator – ArionStar (talk) 14:52, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- The photo has great historical context. However, the fresco is very distracting because of the poor quality. Hoping that there are other frescos from the region which are better preserved and submitted for FP voting. Kalyan (talk) 17:46, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations — to be closed

Nominations in this category are older than ten days and are to be closed. New votes will no longer be accepted.

Older nominations requiring additional input from users

These nominations have been moved here because consensus is impossible to determine without additional input from those who participated in the discussion. Usually this is because there was more than one edit of the image available, and no clear preference for one of them was determined. If you voted on these images previously, please update your vote to specify which edit(s) you are supporting.

Closing procedure

A script is available that automates the majority of these tasks: User:Armbrust/closeFPC.js

When NOT promoted, perform the following:

Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/subpage:
{{FPCresult|Not promoted| }} --~~~~
Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
If the nominator is new to FPC, consider placing {{subst:NotpromotedFPC|Image name}} on their talk page. To avoid overuse, do not use the template when in doubt.

When promoted, perform the following:

Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/subpage:
{{FPCresult|Promoted|File:FILENAME.JPG}} --~~~~
Replace FILENAME.JPG with the name of the file that was promoted. It should show up as:

Promoted File:FILENAME.JPG

Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
Add the image to:
- Template:Announcements/New featured content - newest on top, remove the oldest so that 15 are listed at all times.
- Wikipedia:Goings-on - newest on bottom.
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures thumbs - newest on top.
Add the image to the proper sub-page of Wikipedia:Featured pictures - newest on top.
The caption for a Wikipedian created image should read "Description at Article, by Creator". For a non-Wikipedian, it should be similar, but if the creator does not have an article, use an external link if appropriate. For images with substantial editing by one or more Wikipedians, but created by someone else, use "Description at Article, by Creator (edited by Editor)" (all editors involved should be clear from the nomination). Additionally, the description is optional - if it's essentially the same as the article title, then just use "Article, by Creator". Numerous examples can be found on the various Featured Pictures subpages.
Add the image to the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Featured pictures - newest on left and remove the oldest from the right so that there are always three in each section.
Add the Featured Picture tag and star to the image page using {{Featured picture|page_name}} (replace page_name with the nomination page name, i.e., the page_name from Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/page_name). To add this template you most likely will have to click the "create" button on the upper right if the "edit" button is not present, generally if the image originates from Commons.
If an edited or alternative version of the originally nominated image is promoted, make sure that all articles contain the Featured Picture version, as opposed to the original.
Notify the nominator or co-nominators by placing {{subst:PromotedFPC|File:file_name.xxx}} on each nominator's talk page. For example: {{subst:PromotedFPC|File:Blue morpho butterfly.jpg}}.
If the image was created by a Wikipedian, place {{subst:UploadedFP|File:file_name.xxx}} on the creator's talk page. For example: {{subst:UploadedFP|File:Blue morpho butterfly.jpg}}.

Then perform the following, regardless of the outcome:

Move the nomination entry to the top of the "Recently closed nominations" section. It will remain there for three days after closing so others can review the nomination. This is done by simply moving the line {{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Page name}} to the top of the section.
Add the nomination entry to the bottom of the June archive. This is done by simply adding the line {{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Page name}} from this page to the bottom of the archive.
If the nomination is listed at Template:FPC urgents, remove it.

Delist closing procedure

Note that delisting an image does not equal deleting it. Delisting from Featured pictures in no way affects the image's status in its article/s.

If consensus is to KEEP featured picture status, and the image is used in at least one article, perform the following:

Check that the image has been in the article for at least one week. Otherwise, suspend the nomination to give it time to stabilize before continuing.
Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/delist/subpage:
{{FPCresult|Kept|}} --~~~~
Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
Optionally leave a note on the picture's talk page.

If consensus is to DELIST, or the image is unused (and consensus is not for a replacement that is used), perform the following:

Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/delist/subpage:
{{FPCresult|Delisted|}} --~~~~
Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
Replace the {{Featured picture}} tag from the image with {{FormerFeaturedPicture|delist/''Image name''}}.
Remove the image from the appropriate sub-page of Wikipedia:Featured pictures and the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Featured pictures thumbs.

If consensus is to REPLACE (and at least one of the images is used in articles), perform the following:

Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/delist/subpage:
{{FPCresult|Replaced|}} with File:NEW_IMAGE_FILENAME.JPG --~~~~
Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.

Replace NEW_IMAGE_FILENAME.JPG with the name of the replacement file.
Replace the {{Featured picture}} tag from the delisted image with {{FormerFeaturedPicture|delist/''Image name''}}.
Update the replacement picture's tag, adding the tag {{Featured picture|delist/image_name}} (replace image_name with the nomination page name, i.e., the image_name from Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/delist/image_name). Remove any no longer applicable tags from the original, replacement and from any other alternatives. If the alternatives were on Commons and no longer have any tags, be sure to tag the description page with {{missing image}}.
Replace the delisted Featured Picture in all articles with the new replacement Featured Picture version. Do NOT replace the original in non-article space, such as Talk Pages, FPC nominations, archives, etc.
Ensure that the replacement image is included on the appropriate sub-page of Wikipedia:Featured pictures and the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Featured pictures thumbs. Do this by replacing the original image with the new replacement image; do not add the replacement as a new Featured Picture.

Then perform the following, regardless of the outcome:

Move the nomination entry to the top of the "Recently closed nominations" section. It will remain there for three days after closing so others can review the nomination. This is done by simply moving the line {{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image name}} to the top of the section.
Add the nomination entry to the bottom of the archived delist nominations. This is done by simply adding the line {{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image name}} to the bottom of the appropriate section of the archive.
If the nomination is listed at Template:FPC urgents, remove it.

Recently closed nominations

Nominations in this category have already been closed and are here for the purposes of closure review by FPC contributors. Please do not add any further comments or votes regarding the original nomination. If you wish to discuss any of these closures, please do so at Wikipedia talk:Featured picture candidates. Nominations will stay here for three full days following closure and subsequently be removed.

Wolf spider

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2025 at 20:54:40 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image. FP on Commons
Articles in which this image appears: Aglaoctenus
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Arachnids
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:54, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:41, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:27, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Yann (talk) 20:00, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Redthreadhx (talk) 16:45, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Hounaam (talk) 18:23, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Wolf spider (Aglaoctenus castaneus) on web Rio Napo.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:57, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Spur-throat toothpick grasshoppers

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2025 at 20:51:22 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image. Adds EV to article. FP on Commons
Articles in which this image appears: Tetrataenia surinama, Tetrataenia
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:51, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:41, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:27, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 10:50, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jay Cubby 00:38, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Hounaam (talk) 18:23, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Spur-throat toothpick grasshoppers (Tetrataenia surinama) Sumaco.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:53, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Black caracara

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2025 at 20:48:04 (UTC)

Reason: High quality image. Adds value to article. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Black caracara
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:48, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:40, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:19, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Yann (talk) 19:59, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 10:51, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Hounaam (talk) 18:23, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Black caracara (Daptrius ater) Rio Napo.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:51, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Roundabout interchange

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2025 at 17:23:03 (UTC)

Reason: Good quality, bird's eye view for better understanding
Articles in which this image appears: Roundabout interchange
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Engineering and technology/Others
Creator: PetarM

Support as nominator – Petar Milošević (talk) 17:23, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support ArionStar (talk) 01:50, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Acroterion (talk) 12:33, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:41, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:28, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support well composed, excellent symmetry. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 17:56, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 10:46, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:04, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Roundabout interchange.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:09, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Added image to Places/Others instead. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:09, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Green Line (Israel)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2025 at 22:25:43 (UTC)

Reason: High EV
Articles in which this image appears: Green Line (Israel), 1949 Armistice Agreements, Two-state solution and Palestine Grid
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Diagrams, drawings, and maps/Maps
Creator: United Nations

Support as nominator – ArionStar (talk) 22:25, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Scan is quite poor. Parts of the letters and the grid lines are fading out if you look closely ―Howard • 🌽³³ 06:53, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose; per Howard. It seems that the scan isn't standard. — Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:35, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above Easternsahara (talk) 22:33, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 23:19, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Man Who Laughs (1928)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2025 at 10:34:50 (UTC)

Original – The Man Who Laughs is a 1928 American synchronized sound romantic drama film directed by the German Expressionist filmmaker Paul Leni.

Reason: Unanimously featured on Commons. Notable film, inspired The Joker.
Articles in which this image appears: The Man Who Laughs (1928)
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Film
Creator: Universal Pictures

Support as nominator – MER-C 10:34, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:58, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:02, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jon698 (talk) 10:56, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:41, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Yann (talk) 20:01, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:The Man Who Laughs (1928).webm --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 10:36, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orange cup coral

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2025 at 10:27:51 (UTC)

Reason: Unanimously featured on Commons. Headline image.
Articles in which this image appears: Orange cup coral
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Cnidaria
Creator: Diego Delso

Support as nominator – MER-C 10:27, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:09, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:03, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Acroterion (talk) 12:33, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:42, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Yann (talk) 20:02, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Coral sol (Tubastraea coccinea), Cabo Pulmo, Baja California, México, 2024-12-19, DD 22.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 10:31, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Greta Thunberg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2025 at 20:43:17 (UTC)

Reason: High quality image which I believe shows EV and is used in several articles
Articles in which this image appears: Greta Thunberg, Fridays for Future, Climate change in Sweden, Women in climate change, List of school climate strikes +2
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Political
Creator: Anders Hellberg

Support as nominator – ―Howard • 🌽³³ 20:43, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - This pic of a 15-year-old Ms. Thunberg might be a tad dated for someone who's now 22. – Sca (talk) 14:41, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. This is a very good picture; but, I'm gonna agree with Sca's comment. A 15-year-old growing Greta is an adolescent, whereas she (b. Jan. 2003) is now an adult (as Sca mentioned and gave a portrayal file). — Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:54, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Aside from the picture being out of date, as HH mentioned above, I honestly don't consider it that great of a picture. Her face is in somewhat of a shaddowy area of the picture (making the brighter white sign stand out more than the subject herself), and there's not so much color contrast between her skintone and the pinkish stone wall behind her....To be clear, I mean no offense to the photographer, Anders Hellberg. I don't consdier it a bad photo, and much of what I find lacking in this particular shot is due to its setting, rather than any error or lack of skill on the photographer's part. But, IMO, if a picture is to be a featured one, then it should be truly great, not just a decent or okay photo. -2003:CA:870B:9FB1:4CF4:D16:6E6A:85EC (talk) 12:21, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Above user not eligible for voting, only 2 edits... --Janke | Talk 12:59, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It's a dynamic IP, so the address is periodically changed slightly by the ISP. In any event, they're !votes, so it's the substance of the argument which matters, not the number. -2003:CA:870B:9FB1:4CF4:D16:6E6A:85EC (talk) 14:12, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you create a user name, then you can access & edit Wikipedia regardless of IP. --Janke | Talk 14:41, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It actually doesn’t matter how many edits are under this IP address, because unregistered users can’t vote in this process at all. Regards, Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:11, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Good photo with excellent EV - a large part of Thunberg's notability is her activism from an early age. This depicts her in August 2018, a week after she started the school strikes that made her famous, with one of the signs she used to advocate for her cause. See Greta Thunberg#Strike at the Riksdag. Nick-D (talk) 10:52, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- the crop is too tight and there's prominent chromatic aberration. The IP above puts it better than I. Jay Cubby 01:48, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I usually only support images as lead, but this is an exception. — Yann (talk) 20:05, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:44, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Suspended nominations

This section is for Featured Picture (or delisting) candidacies whose closure is postponed for additional editing, rendering, or copyright clarification.