Wikipedia:Press coverage 2025
Appearance
Wikipedia in the press |
---|
Since its inception in 2001, Wikipedia has garnered substantial media attention. The following is a list of the project's press coverage received in 2025, sorted chronologically. Per WP:PRESS, this page excludes coverage exclusively on a single WP-article, coverage of (some aspect of) the project overall is wanted.
January
[edit]- Kredo, Adam (January 2, 2025). "Wikipedia Declares Hamas the Victor in Nearly Every Battle Against Israel Since 10/7—Then Quietly Deletes Section". The Washington Free Beacon. Retrieved January 3, 2025.
Joe Truzman, an expert on Palestinian militant groups with the Foundation for Defense of Democracies think tank, said the latest online controversy highlights the often inaccurate nature of Wikipedia's entries about Israel.
- Krymalowski, Sarah (January 6, 2025). "Meet the Nunavut grandpa who has made over 250,000 Wikipedia edits". CBC.ca. Retrieved January 6, 2025.
His first project was to try and add a Wikipedia page for every airport in Canada, no matter how small. Then he moved on to weather monitoring equipment. He was made an administrator after just months as an editor. He said that now, the process is quite rigorous, but at the time, it was pretty informal.
- Rosenfeld, Arno (January 7, 2025). "Scoop: Heritage Foundation plans to 'identify and target' Wikipedia editors". The Forward. Retrieved January 7, 2025.
The Heritage Foundation plans to 'identify and target' volunteer editors on Wikipedia who it says are 'abusing their position' by publishing content the group believes to be antisemitic
- Hampton, Daniel (January 7, 2025). "Right-wing think tank plans to target Wikipedia editors via malicious links: report". Raw Story. Retrieved January 8, 2025.
"The slideshow says the group's 'targeting methodologies' would include creating fake Wikipedia user accounts to try to trick editors into identifying themselves by sharing personal information or clicking on malicious tracking links that can identify people who click on them. It is unclear whether this has begun," according to the Forward.
- Kaplan, Josh (January 7, 2025). "We can't let anti-Israel activists poison the well of Wikipedia". The Jewish Chronicle. Retrieved January 8, 2025.
This is how you get every Wikipedia article vaguely mentioning Israel becoming a catalogue of anti-Zionism.
- Jones, Marcie (January 8, 2025). "Wikipedia Won't Let Elon Musk Fluff His Resume. Heritage Foundation Will Help By Terrorizing The Editors". Wonkette. Retrieved January 8, 2025.
Whatever would they do with editors' personal information? Send them fruit baskets, surely!
- Gault, Matthew (January 8, 2025). "The People Behind Project 2025 Want to Reveal the Identities of Wikipedia Editors". Gizmodo. Retrieved January 8, 2025.
What did Wikipedia do with that $31.2 million? It gave much of it out as grant money. In the Middle East, it funded the Arab Reports for Investigative Journalism, which helps train journalists in Arab countries. In Brazil, it funded the InternetLab which spent the money researching racial disparities and internet access in the country. In North America, it gave money to the Racial Equity in Journalism Fund, which helped fund local newsgathering.
- Zeisloft, Ben (January 9, 2025). "Group Behind Project 2025 to Target Rogue Wikipedia Editors, Hold Them Accountable: Report". The Western Journal. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
The Heritage Foundation launched a new effort to track down volunteer editors on Wikipedia who are publishing what they believe to be antisemitic content.
- "Finding hidden biases in Wikipedia's multilingual content". Johns Hopkins University. January 9, 2025. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
By creating and deploying a new tool called INFOGAP, the researchers used artificial intelligence to look at how biographical information about LGBT people is presented across the English, Russian, and French versions of Wikipedia and found inconsistencies in how they are portrayed.
- Rabey, Steve (January 9, 2025). "Heritage Foundation antisemitism effort recycles conspiracy theories". Baptist News Global. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
The pressure on Wikipedia comes as the online, user-generated encyclopedia has been under fire from some Jewish organizations for its coverage of the war in Gaza and for labeling the Anti-Defamation League a "generally unreliable source" on the war. Wikipedia says the ADL is a pro-Israel activist group that declares nearly any criticism of Jews or Israel antisemitic.
- O'Cearbhaill, Muiris (January 10, 2025). "Most of the Irish-language Wikipedia was written by editors who did not speak Irish". TheJournal.ie. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
Speaking to The Journal, Uí Ríordáin – who is full-time employee at Wikipedia Community Ireland – said that Vicipéid has helped to boost the confidence of students and other non-native speakers in their ability to use Irish.
- Богудан, Назар (January 12, 2025). "Wikimedia Ukraine has published a list of the most visited articles on the Ukrainian Wikipedia for 2024". Baltimore Chronicle. Retrieved January 12, 2025.
The leader of the rating was an article about Oleksandr Syrsky, the commander of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, which was viewed over 1.1 million times. In second place is an article about Ukraine, and the top three is an article about Ukrainian boxer Oleksandr Usyk.
- Montgomery, Blake (January 14, 2025). "How to politicize the truth on Facebook, Instagram, and Wikipedia". The Guardian. Retrieved January 14, 2025.
The differences between Facebook, Instagram and Wikipedia are as vast as the Gulf of America, though: the goal of Wikipedia is to compile and spread accurate information. That is not the aim of Facebook, Instagram, or any other social network, and has never been one of its strong points.
- Morrow, Allison (January 14, 2025). "In a minefield of glitchy AI search and social media, Wikipedia becomes one of the most reliable places on the internet". CNN. Retrieved January 14, 2025.
...the first non-sponsored, non-AI search result: an entry from one of the most reliable places on the internet, Wikipedia. If I'd written that last sentence at the start of my career, no editor would have allowed it into print. You can't trust something that anyone can edit, the thinking went, and so it became a bad word in journalism and academia. Don't cite it; don't even look at it. Or if you do, for God's sake, don't let anyone see you.
- "AI giant's Desi CEO says 'pretty clear Wikipedia is biased'; wants to build 'neutral and unbiased: Wikipedia rival". The Times of India. January 15, 2025. Retrieved January 15, 2025.
Aravind Srinivas criticizes Wikipedia's neutrality, urging for unbiased alternatives.
- "Wikipedia Turns 24: Here's How The People's Encyclopedia Has Evolved Over The Years". ABP News. January 15, 2025. Retrieved January 15, 2025.
Beyond its functional value, Wikipedia has become a cultural phenomenon. It has inspired memes, informed countless debates, and even become a trusted companion for breaking news. Its transparent editing history also provides a unique window into how society's understanding of events evolves over time.
- Chakraborty, Rajarsi (January 15, 2025). ""How? They've been asking for $1 for 84 years"- Internet reacts as Wikipedia turns 24". Sportskeeda. Retrieved January 15, 2025.
Users on X were quick to react to the website turning 24.
- Purdy, Kevin (January 16, 2025). "The Editors weaves Wikipedia's volunteers into a global suspense tale". Ars Technica. Retrieved January 17, 2025.
It's always fascinating to me how, by and large, every page is so much better than I think it will be. Really high-energy, maybe "truth optional" pages for topics like cryptocurrencies. It's a small miracle that they're as orderly and reasonable as they end up being.
- Bussigny, Nora (January 17, 2025). "Nous avons infiltré une formation d'Urgence Palestine pour influencer Wikipédia" [We infiltrated a Palestine Emergency formation to influence Wikipedia]. Le Point (in French). Retrieved January 28, 2025.
According to Bader, so far, no structured French group is working on Palestine, unlike the "other side" namely Israel, which is said to be "organized." On the English Wikipedia, the pro-Palestinians are "more numerous, they have been attacked, they have been targeted, but they are successful," Bader specifies. [Google translate]
- Bandler, Aaron (January 18, 2025). "Wikipedia's Supreme Court On the Verge of Topic Banning 8 Editors from Israel-Palestine Area". The Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles. Retrieved January 19, 2025.
Wikipedia's Arbitration Committee (ArbCom), which is the site's version of the Supreme Court, is on the verge of issuing indefinite topic bans to eight editors involved in the Israel-Palestine topic area, most of them of being anti-Israel editors.
- "Anti-Israel Wikipedia editors face bans after spreading hate, misinformation". The Jerusalem Post. January 20, 2025. Retrieved January 20, 2025.
Multiple anti-Israel Wikipedia editors are likely to be topic-banned after spreading misinformation and hate across the site, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) announced on Friday.
- Sugy, Paul (January 21, 2025). "«La majorité des contributeurs sont de gauche» : comment Wikipédia a cessé d'être neutre" ["The majority of contributors are left-wing": How Wikipedia stopped being neutral]. Le Figaro. Retrieved January 30, 2025.
On the side of Wikimedia France, whose ideological orientations Le Figaro has already reported , murky links have existed for several years between members of the board of directors and the association " les sans pagEs " which pays employees to produce Wikipedia content on people belonging to groups identified as minorities and underrepresented in the encyclopedia.[Google translate]
- Mannen, Amanda (January 22, 2025). "21 Wikipedia Pages We Can't Believe Are Real". Cracked.com. Retrieved January 22, 2025.
You could just hit "random page" and not get bored for at least as long as it takes to convince your boss that you're working.
- Sherratt, Madeline (January 22, 2025). "Elon Musk furious after Wikipedia page calls his controversial gesture a 'Nazi salute'". The Independent. Retrieved January 22, 2025.
"Since legacy media propaganda is considered a "valid" source by Wikipedia, it naturally simply becomes an extension of legacy media propaganda!", he wrote on X.
- Thompson, Sophie (January 22, 2025). "Elon Musk is now demanding action against Wikipedia following inauguration gesture fallout". Indy100.com. Retrieved January 22, 2025.
"Wikipedia is completely ideologically captured. Deserves $0 in donations until they re-balance", the author wrote. After seeing the post, Musk chimed in demanding action taken against Wikipedia. "Defund Wikipedia until balance is restored!", he wrote.
- Burman, Theo (January 22, 2025). "Wikipedia Fires Back at Elon Musk". Newsweek. Retrieved January 22, 2025.
"Defund Wikipedia until balance is restored!" Musk wrote on X. "Stop donating to Wokepedia until they restore balance to their editing authority." However, Wales replied to Musk, defending the site and criticizing the tech CEO for stirring up anger.
- "Wikipedia could ban eight editors accused of anti-Israel bias indefinitely". Allisrael.com. January 22, 2025. Retrieved January 22, 2025.
The editor of the blog "The Wikipedia Flood," however, said the topic bans are barely enough, especially given the large number of editors involved, and the fact that so many of those involved were not part of the disciplinary action.
- Fung, Katherine (January 22, 2025). "Why Is MAGA Setting Its Sights on Wikipedia?". Newsweek. Retrieved January 22, 2025.
The emerging coalition of MAGA supporters and Silicon Valley's tech bros and venture capitalists has found a new shared target to set its sights on: the world's largest free encyclopedia.
- Becca, Milfeld (January 23, 2025). "Musk calls for defunding of Wikipedia over description of gesture". The Japan Times. Retrieved January 23, 2025.
While Musk's animosity towards Wikipedia may focus outwardly on the hand gesture, Wikipedia's goal of factual neutrality makes it a natural adversary to X — a platform increasingly synonymous with heated culture wars, hate speech and disinformation. Wikipedia and the media at large — which Musk has increasingly criticized — also pose a threat by holding him accountable as he thrusts himself into the center of U.S. politics.
- Elia-Shalev, Asaf (January 23, 2025). "Edit wars over Israel spur rare ban of 8 Wikipedia editors — from both sides". Jewish Telegraphic Agency. Retrieved January 24, 2025.
Eight Wikipedia editors accused of disruptive behavior have been barred from making changes to articles on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, following a a ruling issued Thursday by the crowd-sourced encyclopedia's highest oversight body.
- Lewis, John (January 27, 2025). "Redressing the gender imbalance on Wikipedia". Otago Daily Times. Retrieved January 27, 2025.
She said her Wikipedia editing journey began back in 2018 with learning about what was considered notable on the site and identifying where there were gaps which really needed to be filled.
- Bandler, Aaron (January 27, 2025). "French Journalist Exposes Anti-Israel Club Training French Wikipedia Editors". The Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles. Retrieved January 28, 2025.
Bussigny told me ... "However, I was keen to reveal and prove through this immersion that fiercely anti-Zionist organized networks are targeting the online encyclopedia, which is extremely popular in France, especially among pupils and students who may be unknowingly influenced."
- "Wikipedia bans eight editors, six of them anti-Israel". Jewish News Syndicate. January 28, 2025. Retrieved January 28, 2025.
The behavior of anti-Israel Wikipedia editors has been in the news lately.
- Leloup, Damien (January 29, 2025). "Why Elon Musk is calling for a boycott of Wikipedia". Le Monde. Retrieved January 30, 2025.
Yet Wikipedia remains one of the few major platforms where political debates can take place in a way that is both intense and calm, even on the most controversial subjects, Vermeirsche noted.
- Minhas, Shahid; Salawu, Abiodun (January 29, 2025). "Wikipedia and indigenous language preservation: analysis of Setswana and Punjabi languages". Frontiers in Communication. Retrieved February 7, 2025.
However, both languages benefit from the visibility and preservation opportunities provided by the platform. Qualitative content analysis demonstrated that both Wikipedia editions contain a mix of cultural, historical, and contemporary topics.
- Grevy Gotfredsen, Sarah (January 30, 2025). "The Right Takes Aim at Wikipedia". Columbia Journalism Review. Retrieved January 30, 2025.
Might Wikipedia, the ever-evolving online compendium of human knowledge, become the latest target in the new administration's crackdown on public sources of information?
February
[edit]- Schneider, Dan; Cornelio, Luis (February 3, 2025). "Wikipedia's Blacklist: Smearing Trump, Conservatives, And The GOP". The Daily Wire. Retrieved February 3, 2025.
The bottom line: 84% of Left-leaning outlets have Wikipedia's stamp of approval, while 0% of right-leaning outlets even get a wink from the tech giant.
- Cornelio, Luis (February 3, 2025). "EXCLUSIVE: Wikipedia Effectively Blacklists ALL Right-Leaning Media; Smearing Trump, GOP and Conservatives". NewsBusters. Retrieved February 3, 2025.
Wikipedia warns that if "no such source exists, that may suggest that the information is inaccurate." In other words, the only media reports that are considered trustworthy are those reported by leftist, legacy media.
- Joseph, MacKinnon (February 4, 2025). "Wikipedia blacklists Blaze News and other right-leaning sources, ensuring it's a one-stop liberal propaganda shop". Blaze Media. Retrieved February 5, 2025.
It's no secret that Wikipedia's volunteer editors are predominantly ideological myopes favorable to leftist causes, ideas, and personalities and antipathetic to conservatives of various stripes.
- Harrison, Stephen (February 5, 2025). "Project 2025's Creators Want to Dox Wikipedia Editors. The Tool They're Using Is Horrifying". Slate. Retrieved February 5, 2025.
It seems that both the CCP and Heritage believe that if you can't win an argument in the digital space of Wikipedia, it's fair game to destroy that person's life offline.
- "Big Tech must block Wikipedia until it stops censoring and pushing disinformation". New York Post. February 5, 2025. Retrieved February 6, 2025.
The source blacklist has zero to do with accuracy and everything to do with shutting down any journalist who doesn't bend the knee to the left. And stifling any discourse not approved by progressive would-be overlords in biz and government and the NGO sector. In other words, Wikipedia is engaged in an actual disinformation op.
- Carroll, Tobias (February 5, 2025). "How Long Can Wikipedia Hold On?". InsideHook. Retrieved February 6, 2025.
I think that there's this political-industrial complex right now where everything is being politicized, right? And the right wing has an interest in portraying Wikipedia as left-wing and a kind of liberal media. ... But if I had to guess, I think it's going to get worse before it gets better in terms of partisan rhetoric about Wikipedia.
- Shroff, Lila (February 5, 2025). "Elon Musk Wants What He Can't Have: Wikipedia". The Atlantic. Retrieved February 6, 2025.
Wikipedia is certainly not immune to bad information, disagreement, or political warfare, but its openness and transparency rules have made it a remarkably reliable platform in a decidedly unreliable age. Evidence that it's an outright propaganda arm of the left, or of any political party, is thin.
- Hurley, Bevan (February 6, 2025). "Wikipedia accused of blacklisting conservative US media". The Times. Retrieved February 7, 2025.
The Media Research Center, a conservative organisation, released a report on the free online encyclopedia's list of "reliable sources". The report said that all the US news sites the centre categorised as right-leaning had failed to meet Wikipedia's criteria as a trusted resource for administrators.
- Kanevskaya, Sofya (February 6, 2025). "Online lifeline". Novaya Gazeta. Retrieved February 9, 2025.
Even Wikipedia recognises the gravity of the situation its contributors in Belarus now face, to the extent that they have overridden their own protocols and deleted the entire edit history for Belarus-related articles that could land its users in trouble.
- Prosser, Jordan (February 10, 2025). "Want to know how the world ends? Try this Wikipedia page". The Guardian. Retrieved February 14, 2025.
As you scroll through the 2020s, though, you'll notice that the pages keep going: 2026, 2027, 2028 and so on. The reliably dull Wikipedia interface remains unchanged, even as recorded history cedes to speculative history.
- Koebler, Jason (February 11, 2025). "Wikipedia Prepares for 'Increase in Threats' to US Editors From Musk and His Allies". 404 Media. Retrieved February 15, 2025.
In a series of calls and letters to the Wikimedia community over the last two weeks, Wikimedia executives have told editors that they are trying to figure out how to keep their users safe in an increasingly hostile political environment.
- Rao, Devika (February 13, 2025). "Elon Musk and Wikipedia are feuding". The Week. Retrieved February 15, 2025.
Elon Musk has started a war on Wikipedia after the outlet made reference to his gesture at Trump's inauguration, which many have compared to the Nazi salute. While Wikipedia did not directly accuse Musk of doing a Nazi salute, he still flagged the organization for being far-left, previously calling it "Wokepedia."
- "Elon Musk, Heritage Foundation accused of targeting Wikipedia editors". Moneycontrol.com. February 13, 2025. Retrieved February 15, 2025.
In response, Wikimedia is rolling out new security measures. One major change is the temporary accounts program, which will prevent unregistered editors' IP addresses from being visible to the public.