Wikipedia talk:WikiProject University of Pennsylvania

This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject University of Pennsylvania and anything related to its purposes and tasks.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Shortcut

WT:UPENN

Penn SP2

I have a created an article for Penn SP2. Please help me improve the quality of the article so as to avoid the deletion of said article. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Pennsylvania_School_of_Social_Policy_and_Practice — Preceding unsigned comment added by JimBrown42 (talk • contribs) 19:00, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Article reviewing request

I have been tagging a lot of pages as part of WikiProject University of Pennsylvania. While doing this, I have been using the class ratings already listed on the article. I think a lot of the ratings are outdated and need to be changed. Specifically ones in the category Start-Class University of Pennsylvania articles. I would appreciate it if people could assist by assessing them according to this table. You can even post your articles assessed here if you would like some recognition. Ryan Vesey Review me! 01:08, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide examples of articles with outdated ratings? The most common situation is where the article gets improved from stub to start to higher ratings, but the templates do not keep pace. I have done ratings on thousands of Philadelphia and Pennsylvania articles, so I know that happens often. If justified, I remove the stub template on the article, and change the rating on the discussion page. --DThomsen8 (talk) 02:48, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Where should this project go?

Currently, the project only has 3 members. What should the primary goals of the project be? Ryan Vesey Review me! 01:08, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your first objective should be what you have already started to do, add the UofP template to the appropriate articles. Next, perhaps there is some article that can be improved to GA or even FA status. FA status would bring attention to the project. --DThomsen8 (talk) 02:44, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I am currently working on University of Pennsylvania. Hopefully, I will be able to bring it to FA status. Ryan Vesey Review me! 02:54, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not really sure that there's enough Penn material to require a WikiProject. Maybe some editors Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Universities might have some different opinions.--GrapedApe (talk) 03:14, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The project serves as an easy way to organize and coordinate University of Pennsylvania articles. Tagging has just begun and there are already 63 articles within the scope of the project. Ryan Vesey Review me! 03:47, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The University of Pittsburgh has 310 articles. This project will easily have more than that, just in Penn sports, Penn alumni, and Penn faculty, judging from those categories and sub-categories. As Ryan Vesey says, tagging has just begun. I am sure there are enough articles for a project, but whether there are enough participants to make much of a dent in the work to be done is an open question. --DThomsen8 (talk) 11:00, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Goal: 310 articles tagged

I suggest the goal of 310 articles tagged, with none without a quality or importance tag. Penn State has 485 and Pitt has 310.

Currently:

University of Pennsylvania articles by quality and importance
Quality	Importance
Quality	Top	High	Mid	Low	NA	???	Total
FA				3			3
GA		1	4	13		1	19
B	2	5	21	82		31	141
C	1	8	18	227		113	367
Start		12	88	835		661	1,596
Stub		1	25	259		427	712
List		2	3	5		1	11
Category					74		74
File					21		21
Project					2		2
Template					23		23
NA		1	2	6	22		31
Other					4		4
Assessed	3	30	161	1,430	146	1,234	3,004
Unassessed				7		28	35
Total	3	30	161	1,437	146	1,262	3,039
WikiWork factors (?)		ω = 14,181			Ω = 5.00

What do others think? --DThomsen8 (talk) 12:22, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Half way there! Others should help add UofP templates to articles. --DThomsen8 (talk) 01:29, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Now beyond the 324 total articles for the University of Pittsburgh. The large number of UofP Law School alumni will carry the number way beyond the initial goal. --DThomsen8 (talk) 02:40, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edgar Fahs Smith, Provost

Should the category Presidents of the University of Pennsylvania include Provosts, such as Edgar Fahs Smith? Until 1930, the title was Provost, and then the title was changed to President. The alternative would be to have a category Provosts of the University of Pennsylvania. Smith is the only Provost in the Presidents category now, but there are many others. --DThomsen8 (talk) 12:27, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The title wasn't actually changed in 1930; the position was split. There is still a Provost of the University of Pennsylvania (Vincent Price). I think two separate categories should be created. Ryan Vesey Review me! 12:31, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, better information! I will create the new category, put Smith in it, and also Vincent Price, if there is an article on him.

No article on Provost Vincent Price. --DThomsen8 (talk) 18:08, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of Ivy League university presidents

The List of Ivy League university presidents#University of Pennsylvania has a list of the Provosts (through 1930) and the Presidents (1930 on), but in several instances the links are incorrect, linking to the wrong man, or in some instances to a disambiguation page. Putting the Provosts into their category (see above section) is not easy when the links are wrong. I have created the category and added several provosts, but others should work on the list, correct the links, and create articles on those without articles. There is no article on the current Provost, Vincent Price, but Google shows plenty of information, sufficient to create an article. --DThomsen8 (talk) 17:04, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will attempt to work on some of this. My contributions have been relatively small because I am studying at the university right now. What should the title of the page be? Vincent Price (provost), Vincent Price (University of Pennsylvania), or something else? Ryan Vesey Review me! 18:12, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Following other examples, such as Frederick Augustus Muhlenberg (educator), I would say Vincent Price (educator). I see nothing urgent about this particular person, but you are closer to the situation as a student than I am. Since there are already two men named Vincent Price on Wikipedia, a disambiguation page is also in order. --DThomsen8 (talk) 21:57, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reassessment Request

It's not perfect yet, but a reassessment of Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania would be helpful. Also, it would be great if the individual that does this can also decide on removing the cleanup block at the top of the article. (As I've been doing much editing lately, I'm not sure I should be the one to remove it.) $The Haz talk$ 03:32, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of Wharton School alumni

On this page, I can see that under each category, an effort has been made to alphabetize alumni by their last names. But some contributors have detracted from this trend. I wondered if it would be okay and no one would be offended if I put the list back in order. Also, one of the categories in this article is "consulting." Since there is only one alumnus that falls under this list at the moment, I'm wondering if that category is even necessary. My thought is that "Consulting" is similar enough to "Finance," so we can just categorize it under that. If someone thinks otherwise, please let me know. Sharanth (talk) 09:17, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Elizabeth_Warren/GA2#GA_Reassessment - Youreallycan 21:35, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

James DePreist

The article for James DePreist, an alumnus, will be receiving a lot of traffic in the near future due to his death. The article needs work, as much of the text has been pulled from his Allmusic and NEA biographies. It appears to be incomplete and needs expanding, re-wording, sourcing, etc. Any assistance improving this article would be much appreciated. --Another Believer _(Talk) 17:49, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion on consolidating inactive and semi-active university WikiProjects

This project may be affected by a proposed consolidation of inactive and semi-active WikiProjects covering universities. The proposed consolidation is being discussed on the talk page of WikiProject Universities. We are seeking feedback from the projects that may be impacted before we decide on a course of action. Please drop by to participate in the discussion. Thanks! –Mabeenot (talk) 06:48, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

is there a U.Penn userbox?

If so, please add to User:LisaNiverRajna.Skookum1 (talk) 11:38, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Herbert Humphreys Hunter (? 1907)

See Herb Hunter (footballer): can anyone add any details of his athletic performances whilst at U.Penn? Also, any other information? Is his name listed on any sort of memorial? Lindsay658 (talk) 01:24, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-a-thon Invitation

Please join the Chemical Heritage Foundation Edit-a-Thon, June 20, 2013.
Build content relating to women in science, chemistry and the history of science.
Use the hashtag #GlamCHF and write your favorite scientist or chemist into Wikipedian history!

Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 19:54, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Penn Quakers softball

Hello, everyone. I've recently started the College softball task force, working to help expand Wikipedia's college softball coverage. One of the articles we are looking for is a Penn Quakers softball article. If anyone on this project would be willing to consider adopting it and writing a team article, please consider visiting the softball project. Thanks, Ejgreen77 (talk) 04:27, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ThatCampPhilly Edit-a-thon Invitation

Please join the Wikipedia Edit-a-thon at THATCamp Philly, September 27, 2013, held at the Chemical Heritage Foundation. Bring your own content to work on, or get an early start on Ada Lovelace Day with our resources about women in science, chemistry and the history of science. Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 20:25, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

College basketball team navigation templates

Please join the discussion at the College Basketball Wikiproject for forming a consensus on the creation of a basic navigation template for college basketball teams. CrazyPaco (talk) 09:33, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Leaflet for Wikiproject University of Pennsylvania at Wikimania 2014

Hi all,

My name is Adi Khajuria and I am helping out with Wikimania 2014 in London.

One of our initiatives is to create leaflets to increase the discoverability of various wikimedia projects, and showcase the breadth of activity within wikimedia. Any kind of project can have a physical paper leaflet designed - for free - as a tool to help recruit new contributors. These leaflets will be printed at Wikimania 2014, and the designs can be re-used in the future at other events and locations.

This is particularly aimed at highlighting less discoverable but successful projects, e.g:

• Active Wikiprojects: Wikiproject Medicine, WikiProject Video Games, Wikiproject Film

• Tech projects/Tools, which may be looking for either users or developers.

• Less known major projects: Wikinews, Wikidata, Wikivoyage, etc.

• Wiki Loves Parliaments, Wiki Loves Monuments, Wiki Loves ____

• Wikimedia thematic organisations, Wikiwomen’s Collaborative, The Signpost

The deadline for submissions is 1st July 2014

For more information or to sign up for one for your project, go to:

Project leaflets
Adikhajuria (talk) 14:41, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment on the WikiProject X proposal

Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:48, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject X is live!

Hello everyone!

You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!

Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.

Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC submission

See Draft:Friars Senior Society. Regards, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 23:39, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Auto-assessment of article classes

Following a recent discussion at WP:VPR, there is consensus for an opt-in bot task that automatically assesses the class of articles based on classes listed for other project templates on the same page. In other words, if WikiProject A has evaluated an article to be C-class and WikiProject B hasn't evaluated the article at all, such a bot task would automatically evaluate the article as C-class for WikiProject B.

If you think auto-assessment might benefit this project, consider discussing it with other members here. For more information or to request an auto-assessment run, please visit User:BU RoBOT/autoassess. This is a one-time message to alert projects with over 1,000 unassessed articles to this possibility. ~ Rob^Talk 01:28, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments on RfC Donald Trump requested

There is currently an RfC about the outcome of the presidential election here. Participation would be appreciated. This project is being contacted because it is listed as one of the projects on the Donald Trump talk page. Thanks. SW3 5DL (talk) 17:04, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Annenberg School history updates

Hello Wikipedia editors! Users editing University of Pennsylvania articles might be interested in my edit request at Talk:Annenberg School for Communication at the University of Pennsylvania. I proposed updates to add a History section to the article, giving readers historical background on the school. You can read my full edit request here. Are there any members of WikiProject University of Pennsylvania who can review my request and considering moving these edits to the main article if appropriate?

As an employee of the Annenberg School for Communication, I have a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, which is why I am proposing changes and discussing my suggestions on Talk pages rather than edit the article myself. Thank you. Julie at Annenberg (talk) 14:27, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GAN: Herman Vandenburg Ames

I've GAN'ed Herman Vandenburg Ames if anyone is interested in reviewing it. Chetsford (talk) 00:51, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: Philip A. Rea

If anyone is interested in reviewing/contributing to it, I've created a draft page for Dr. Philip A. Rea, Professor of Biology, School of Arts and Sciences, and Rebecka and Arie Belldegrun Distinguished Director of the Life Sciences and Management program. I'm new to wikipedia and think I fall under the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest so I should probably stop contributing to the page. Any edits/help would be greatly appreciated. LSM17 (talk) 20:13, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Annenberg School Notable Faculty Updates

Hello Wikipedia editors! Users editing University of Pennsylvania articles might be interested in my edit request at Talk:Annenberg School for Communication at the University of Pennsylvania. I proposed updates to the Notable Faculty section of the article, which is missing quite a few notable faculty, and also has one mistake. (Richard J. Stonesifer has never had an affiliation with the school.) You can read my full edit request here. Are there any members of WikiProject University of Pennsylvania who can review my request and considering moving these edits to the main article if appropriate?

As an employee of the Annenberg School for Communication, I have a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, which is why I am proposing changes and discussing my suggestions on Talk pages rather than edit the article myself. Thank you. Julie at Annenberg (talk) 20:27, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A new newsletter directory is out!

A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.

– Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discussions of interest

There are a number of discussions on Talk:James Martin (priest, born 1960) which may be of interest to the members of this group, in particular this RfC. Beyond My Ken (talk) 14:01, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request for information on WP1.0 web tool

Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:25, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rfc on James Martin (priest, born 1960)

There is an open RfC at Talk:James_Martin_(priest,_born_1960)#Request_for_Comment_2 that may be of interest to this community. --PluniaZ (talk) 21:57, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Move request

There is a move request you may be interested in at Talk:Stephen Hahn (oncologist)#Requested move 18 October 2020. Bait30 ^{Talk 2 me pls?} 05:53, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FLR notice

I have nominated List of Nobel laureates affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania for featured list removal. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Josefaught (talk • contribs) 19:42, August 9, 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of University of Pennsylvania Glee Club for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article University of Pennsylvania Glee Club is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University of Pennsylvania Glee Club until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Eastmain (talk • contribs) 08:38, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FAR notice

I have nominated William Henry Harrison for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Sahaib3005 (talk) 17:34, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User script to detect unreliable sources

I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like

John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)

and turns it into something like

John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.

It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.

The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.

- Headbomb {t · c · p · b}

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FAR for Hilary Putnam

I have nominated Hilary Putnam for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:17, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lia Thomas has an RFC

Lia Thomas, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Beccaynr (talk) 21:52, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge of inactive higher education wikiprojects

I'm proposing to merge this and other inactive higher education-related wikiprojects to WikiProject Higher education. Please see the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Higher education#Merge of inactive higher education wikiprojects. – Joe (talk) 18:06, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]