Draft talk:Adamchik transformation
 | This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Feedback from New Page Review process
[edit]I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: First, the equation format is wrong, please correct. Second, I don't think you can use StackExchange as a source, or the user generated page (last ref). Third, all the sources are primary. Fourth, your further reading has format errors. Fifth, this reads like a textbook essay. Last, the only refereed source has 66 cites. While this is not bad, it does not convince me that this is notable enough.