Draft talk:BUSY Infotech
Appearance
![]() | This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Help me
[edit]![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
this is the article we have submitted https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:BUSY_Infotech all the references added are authentic, in-depth, reliable, secondary and independent of the subject. Still the draft has been rejected. What else is required to get the article published? 14.141.59.106 (talk) 07:48, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
- The draft has not been rejected (which would mean it cannot be resubmitted), only declined (which means it can be, once the decline reasons have been addressed). The decline was for lack of evidence of notability; you therefore must show that the subject is notable, by citing sufficient sources which meet the WP:NCORP guideline. This draft currently cites only routine business reporting and/or press release content, which does not establish notability.
- If you have further questions, please come by the WP:AFCHD or WP:Teahouse.
- Finally, if you have a user account, please remember to log into it whenever editing. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:27, 18 March 2025 (UTC)