Jump to content

Red-tagging in the Philippines

Edit links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In the Philippines, red-tagging is the labeling of individuals or organizations as communists, subversives, or terrorists,[1] regardless of their actual political beliefs or affiliations.[2] It is a type of harassment and has pernicious effects on its targets.[3] Red-tagging has been practiced by security forces,[4][5][6][7] government officials and shills.

The practice is a relic of the Cold War and has had a long history in the former American colony.[8] Cause-oriented groups including the United Nations,[9] Amnesty International,[10] and Human Rights Watch[11] warn that its use as a political tactic undermines Philippine democracy by stifling dissent, producing a chilling effect on general discourse and, more insidiously, encouraging assassinations and retaliations.[12][13]

Definitions

[edit]

Commonly defined as the harassment or persecution of a person because of "known or suspected communist sympathies,"[3] the extensive history of red-tagging in the Philippines has led to the recognition of several formal definitions by the Philippine government.

The Commission on Human Rights follows the definition laid down by the International Peace Observers Network (IPON), which defines it as:[3]

An act of State actors, particularly law enforcement agencies, to publicly brand individuals, groups, or institutions as… affiliated to communist or leftist terrorists.

Additionally, the term has been defined in Philippine jurisprudence through the dissenting opinion of Supreme Court Associate Justice Marvic Leonen in the 2015 court case Zarate vs. Aquino III (G.R. No. 220028 J. Leonen Dissenting Opinion, November 10, 2015), in which Leonen adopted a 2011 journals' definition of red-tagging:[3]

the act of labelling, branding, naming and accusing individuals and/ or organizations of being left-leaning, subversives, communists or terrorists (used as) a strategy… by State agents, particularly law enforcement agencies and the military, against those perceived to be 'threats' or 'enemies of the State.'

Effects

[edit]

Human rights violations

[edit]
Further information: Human rights in the Philippines

Red-tagging impinges on the right to free expression and dissent according to media and rights groups.[14] The Philippine Commission on Human Rights (CHR) also noted that red-tagging threatens the lives or safety of individuals.[15] The act of red-tagging human-rights defenders constitutes a grave threat to their lives, liberty, and security. It creates a distortion to the nature of their work and makes them susceptible to attacks and a number of violations as emphasized by the CHR.[16] The killing of four activists in June 2015 in Sorsogon City may have been the result of the activists's membership in groups that were red-tagged by the Philippine government, according to Amnesty International.[17] Security forces have raided the offices of these red-tagged organizations and arrested members of these organizations.[18] The raids have been described as a crackdown on dissent.[18]

The Philippine independent news organization Vera Files notes that since President Rodrigo Duterte declared the Communist Party of the Philippines and the New People's Army terrorist organizations under the Human Security Act of 2007, individuals and organizations who have been red-tagged are vulnerable to interception and recording of communication, detention without charges, restricted travel and personal liberties, examination of bank records, and the seizure and sequestration of their assets.[3] Reporters Without Borders notes that red-tagged individuals are vulnerable to death threats and violence.[19] In some instances, targets of red-tagging are also harassed by accusations of terrorism.[14]

According to CHR Spokesperson Jacqueline de Guia, this kind of labeling may have serious consequences on the security of the groups or individuals that are being tagged. Additionally, Karapatan states that this jeopardizes the initiatives of human rights organizations and defenders to inform the public about the violation of rights in the Philippines.[20]

Karapatan Deputy Secretary General Roneo Clamor said that human rights defenders who are red-tagged are not only illegally arrested, some are also killed. According to him, the National Task Force (NTF) was made to hinder the human rights defenders to get justice for the victims.[21]

Extrajudicial killings

[edit]

The CHR stated that red-tagging needs to be seen in the context of the increasing extrajudicial killings in rural Philippines and the government's counterinsurgency program.[15][22] From July 2016 to November 2019, Karapatan documented 293 victims of extrajudicial killings perpetrated in line with the counterinsurgency program, with 167 defenders killed or an average of one to two HRDs killed every week. At least 429 were victims of frustrated killings.[23] They also documented at least 14 massacres and hundreds of victims of extrajudicial killings (including 28 children) under President Aquino's term.[24]

After redtagging of various personalities by Lt. Gen. Antonio Parlade in October 2020, Senator Panfilo Lacson ordered the general summoned to senate hearing.[25] Defense Secretary Delfin Lorenzana had also warned against making baseless accusations, indirectly referring to Parlade's statements and double-downs.[26]

Affected groups

[edit]
Protest in front of DILG, Quezon City against NTF-ELCAC on its second anniversary, December 4, 2020.

Organizations frequently subject to red-tagging in the Philippines include civil-rights groups,[27] religious institutions,[28][29] health worker unions,[30] academia,[31][32] and the mainstream and alternative media.[33] Workers' and farmers' groups[2][34] and land and environmental defenders[35] are also frequently red-tagged. Some of these organizations and institutions are branded as fronts, supporters or mere sympathizers of the New People's Army.

Human rights organizations and advocates

[edit]

Human rights advocates and human rights organizations in the Philippines, whether civil society, intergovernment, and even governmental in nature, have often been the subject of "defamatory and intimidating public statements" as a result of their human rights monitoring work.[27]

Karapatan

[edit]

Karapatan is one of the progressive organizations that is continuously targeted by anonymous people, military and police, and the Duterte administration. In March 2019, the group filed complaints concerning the alleged practice of branding and labeling organizations as terrorists by the Duterte administration. The attacks were in different forms, such as a direct tagging from President Duterte in his previous speech as well as tarpaulins and flyers that label them as such.[36] Thus, in June 2019, Amnesty International called on the Philippine government to stop branding similar organizations like Karapatan as "communist fronts." According to the organization, two of its staff were gunned down by unidentified people last June 15. Similarly, on the next day, Nonoy Palma, a farmer activist, was also gunned down by an unidentified person in Naga City, Camarines Sur. Amnesty International called for the fulfillment of the protection of human rights by human rights defenders and activists.[37] However, in December 2019, Cristina Palabay, Karapatan's Secretary General of Human Rights, received death and rape threats from anonymous texters. Another anonymous sender texted her various slurs and defended the Duterte administration.[38] In August 2020, two Karapatan officers, as well as other activists, received death threats. This came a week after Zara Alvarez was gunned down by an unidentified man in Bacolod City on August 17.[39]

In criminal and administrative suits filed before the Office of the Ombudsman on December 4, 2020, Karapatan asserted that red-tagging "can be considered a violation of the principle of distinction" under international humanitarian law."[40]

Gabriela Women's Party

[edit]

The feminist group Gabriela Women's Party and its supporters have also been red-tagged.[41]

Ethnic-rights activists

[edit]
An anti-redtagging banner in a protest against the closure of Lumad schools, December 3, 2020.
See also: Internal colonialism, Imperial Manila, and Negros killings

In 2018 a United Nations Human Rights Council report[42][43] counted "at least 80 recognized human rights defenders, indigenous peoples' representatives, and representatives of community-based organizations," which the administration of President Rodrigo Duterte had labeled as terrorists in connection with their work, some of which was part of their "cooperation with the United Nations." This included UN Special Rapporteur Victoria Tauli-Corpuz, who was falsely listed as a senior member of the NPA.[44]

In January 2019, indigenous Lumad leaders Datu Jomorito Guaynon and Ireneo Udarbe were arrested after being accused by police and state elements of being communist rebel recruiters. Both have frequently organized protests against ancestral land encroachment and mining.[45]

In August 2019, Brandon Lee, an American ancestral-domain paralegal and Cordillera Human Rights Alliance volunteer, was shot four times outside his home in Ifugao province, putting him in a coma. Since 2015, posters claiming Lee and other IPM members as "enemies of the state" and members of the NPA had been circulating in the province.[46]

The Negrense ethnic group has also been subject to a disproportionate amount of red-tagging in the decades since Philippine independence,[47][48] from the usual sacadas dumaans to legal professionals, celebrities and even call-center labor-rights advocates.[49] The persistent attacks have led to the steady growth of the #DefendNegros movement among a broad section of Negrenses resident both in Negros and the diaspora.[50][51]

Lumad school volunteer teacher Chad Booc has been continuously red-tagged by state forces even after his demise during the New Bataan massacre.[52]

Labor unions

[edit]
See also: Anti-union violence, Operation Condor, and 2021 Calabarzon raids

The Commission on Human Rights stated that the administration's red-tagging has endangered the lives of a lot of members of Philippine labor unions, that "branding any group as a communist front without proper trial violates their constitutional guarantee of presumption of innocence."

In 2018, Victor Ageas, labor union leader of the Nagkahiusang Mamumuo sa Suyapa Farm (NAMAFUSA-NAFLU-KMU), who stood against the Japanese giant Sumitomo Fruit Corp. (Sumifru) in Compostela Valley province survived an assassination attempt by motorcycle-riding gunmen who ambushed him while on his way to work. Labor union leader, Melodina Gumanoy, secretary of Namafusa-Naflu-KMU, was also targeted when motorcycle-riding gunmen attempted to kill her while she was on her way for work in Packing Plant 250 owned by Sumifru at Osmeña village, Compostela town.[20][53][54][55]

Moreover, labor organizations were also labelled as legal fronts of an underground armed struggle movement and arrested activists were routinely accused of possessing firearms and ammunition.[56]

The National Federation of Sugar Workers (NFSW), established by Negrense sugarcane workers in La Carlota, Negros Occidental in 1971,[57] had been denounced as a front for the Communist Party of the Philippines as well as accused of profiteering on privately owned land.[58] This then became the ex post facto justification for the Sagay massacre in which nine NFSW members were killed.[58] Violent socioeconomic conflict has been a plague on a heavily stratified Negrense society since the 1850s.[59][60]

In the same month of October 2018, the government released a matrix of names involved in what it alleged to be a "Red October" plot. The list included names of activists from the Liberal Party, the Catholic Church, universities, and various human rights and labor groups. Transportation strikes organized against the rapid modernization of jeepneys were swept up by the Department of Transportation as a communist plot.[61]

José "Jerry" Catálogo of the NFSW had also reportedly been placed under taxpayer-paid surveillance before his subsequent assassination in Escalante by unidentified gunmen.

In October 2019, the management of the Coca-Cola plant in Bacolod City revealed that a man called Ka Tom Mateo, who was allegedly a former armed insurgent now reporting directly to the president, denounced the recognized union of the plant as a subversive organization and attacked the union's collective agreement and dues structure, which urged their members to terminate their membership and disaffiliate from the labor union.[56]

The Coca-Cola Company has distinguished itself in recent years for an incapacity to document labor-rights violations at its own operations and those of its bottlers in Haiti, Indonesia, Ireland and the USA.[62][63]

At the start of 2020, the Defend Jobs Philippines stated that the Philippine National police (PNP) and Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) used black propaganda against union leaders and labor unions by holding such a forum and orientation through the Task Force to End Local Communist Armed Conflict (TF-ELCAC), which was organized through President Duterte's Executive Order 70, and organizing it at the National Housing Authority Office in Quezon City, Philippines.[64][65]

The Defend Jobs Philippines spokesperson Thadeus Ifurung explained that such moves to deal with the dissent of the workforce present red-tagging and maliciously identifying union leaders and members among the public sector as 'communists' and endangers their safety and right to self-organization as workers.[64]

The Pagkakaisa ng Manggagawa sa Timog Katagalugan (Pamantik-KMU), a labor federation, was accused by the police and military in February 2020 of being the "front organizations of the CPP-NPA" after a July surrender ceremony where the officials claimed that 131 "surrenderees" came from the labor sector in various parts of Laguna, where allegedly 94 were members of the Pamantik-KMU.[66]

Along with presenting the 131 "surrenderees," the police also presented what they claimed as surrendered arms and propaganda materials used by the so-called surrenderees, which included books, pamphlets, Mao caps, and election materials for national-democratic party Bayan Muna.[66]

Devout Christians and anticommunists, such as labor organizer Johnny Tan and his colleagues in the Federation of Free Workers, were themselves not spared from being "tagged as communists" as early as the 1950s.[67]

The red-tagging of labor unions as subversive organizations is believed to be an attempt to legitimize and incite violence and repression in order to undermine union organization, spread fear among workers, and discourage them from forming independent unions.

Lawyers and judges

[edit]

Lawyers and judges have also been red-tagged.[68][69] In January 2021, the AFP falsely accused human rights lawyers Roan Libarios, Alexander Padilla, and Rafael Aquino of having been armed rebels who have been captured or killed.[70] The Integrated Bar of the Philippines called the allegations "ridiculous" and pointed out that red-tagging endangers not just the wrongfully accused but also their families and friends. The IBP also said that "red-tagging is unfair, illegal and disregards due process and the rule of law."[70] The AFP Information Exchange later apologized and said it was conducting an internal investigation regarding the Facebook post where the accusations were published.[71]

The red-tagging of a Mandaluyong regional trial court judge was condemned by human rights' groups, law professors,[69][72] the Commission on Human Rights,[73] and the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court in a statement condemned "in the strongest sense every instance where a lawyer is threatened or killed and where a judge is threatened and unfairly labelled."[74] The red-tagging of the judge was condemned in both the House of Representatives and in the Senate.[72][75]

The Supreme Court of the Philippines in a 51-page judgment by Marvic Leonen promulgated on February 29, 2024, fined Badoy PHP 30,000 for indirect contempt of court per publication of vitriolic statements and outright threats. She was found guilty of online red-tagging Manila RTC, Branch 19 Judge Judge Marlo A. Magdoza-Malagar calling him an “idiot judge” who lawyered for the CPP-NPA (A.M. No. 22-09-16-SC and G.R. No. 263384, Re: Statements made by Lorraine Marie T. Badoy allegedly threatening Judge Marlo A. Magdoza-Malagar and Atty. Rico V. Domingo, et al. v. Lorraine Marie T. Badoy-Partosa, August 15, 2023).[76]

Journalists

[edit]
See also: Freedom of the press in the Philippines

The Facebook page of National Task Force to End Local Communist Armed Conflict (NTF-ELCAC) posted a series of infographics that incorrectly said media giant ABS-CBN's franchise was not renewed because "they have issues with the law." Verified pages of the Presidential Communications Operations Office (PCOO) and Radio Television Malacañang (RVTM) shared NTF-ELCAC posts pertaining to ABS-CBN's franchise. This act of NTF-ELCAC and the involved government pages were condemned by journalists, academics and media groups as "black propaganda offensive" and an abuse of authority of NTF-ELCAC that endangers ABS-CBN's workforce and Maria Ressa.[77]

Journalists have raised concerns over worsening attacks against the press after the red-tagging of veteran journalist Froilan Gallardo and a former National Union of Journalists of the Philippines (NUJP) director Leonardo Vicente "Cong" Corrales who received a death threat. Journalists and artists are tagged as supporters of "communist terrorists" and active members of the Communist Party of the Philippines or the New People's Army.[78]

Pampanga TV manager Sonia Soto, who is also the president of the media arm of the LausGroup of Companies, was red tagged by National Intelligence Coordinating Agency (NICA) regional director, Rolando Asuncion, during a forum at Don Honorio Ventura State University in Bacolor town. The director identified her as among the 31 radio broadcasters in the country who had links to communist and terrorist groups.[79]

After "Ang Iskul kong Bakwit," a documentary by Atom Araullo, aired on GMA News TV's i-Witness, alleged Indigenous people leaders described the documentary as "blatantly propagandistic" and accused Araullo of being "biased." Said IP leaders went as far as linking journalist Araullo to the communist insurgency through his mother, Carol Araullo, chairperson of Bayan. NUJP condemned the NTF-ELCAC for using the same "incredulous tactic" used by the government to vilify critics by linking them to the communist insurgency.[80][81][82]

Teachers

[edit]

According to the Alliance of Concerned Teachers (ACT), there have been 37 incidents of red-tagging and terrorist-tagging of teachers from 2018 to January 2023.[83] In April 2023, ACT filed a complaint before the International Labour Organization against Vice President Sara Duterte and the NTF-ELCAC for allegedly red-tagging teachers.[84] The Philippine Commission on Human Rights advised Sara Duterte and other government officials to refrain from red-tagging teachers, students, and activists.[85] The commission also launched an investigation into allegations of red-tagging of teachers committed by the Philippine National Police and National Intelligence Coordinating Agency.[86]

Writers and authors

[edit]
See also: Lualhati Bautista

On August 11, 2020, private Filipino citizen Jefferson Lodia Badong accused novelist and Duterte-critic Lualhati Bautista of being a member of the New People's Army (NPA), an allegation that endangered Bautista's personal safety.[87] Bautista posted a screenshot of the comment on her Facebook wall. The post trended and commenters admonished Badong for harassing Bautista and red-tagging, an act that endangers its target and is used to curtail free speech.[87] Badong wrote a public apology and made his account private. Badong later deleted the apology minutes after posting it. In another post, Bautista threatened to sue Badong for cyberlibel along with a screenshot of his profile. Bautista later said that she will not be proceeding with the case as Badong has sent her a private apology, which Bautista posted. In the aftermath, Badong deactivated his account after he was continually shamed by supporters and friends of Bautista.[88][87]

Religious organizations

[edit]

The National Council of Churches in the Philippines, the World Council of Churches and the Society of Jesus have also been red-tagged.[89][90] The University of San Carlos of the Catholic Church has been tagged as an active CPP supporter as well as being affiliated with a "satanic cult", referencing the cultural Marxism conspiracy theory and Karl Marx's family's alleged "satanic" Sabbateanism.[90]

Humanitarian activity

[edit]
See also: Community pantries in the Philippines

Humanitarian organization Oxfam has been accused by the Philippine Department of National Defense of being a communist and terror front.[18] Security forces raided the offices of other red-tagged organizations and arrested 57 individuals.[18]

Practical bottom–up efforts rooted in the traditional and precolonial spirit of bayanihan have been threatened with glib accusations of sympathizing with causes condemned by the NTF-ELCAC.[91] Community pantries,[92][93] set up in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic,[91] had been denounced by state officials as being fronts for the Communist Party of the Philippines.[94] Antonio Parlade disapproved of the widely circulating narrative that the state had been inadequate in responding to the effects of its own measures in containing COVID-19.[95] Lorraine Badoy-Partosa also slammed the National Democratic Front of the Philippines for allegedly setting up community pantries for seditious purposes.[95] Karapatan, in an official statement, hit back, stressing, "Having already been the cause of hardship in the first place, they now have the gall to intimidate?"[96] Panfilo Lacson has also praised the mutual-aid efforts of pantry organizers.[97]

Entertainers

[edit]

In 2020, actress Angel Locsin was allegedly accused by Lt. Gen. Antonio Parlade of being a member of the NPA.[98] Foreign Secretary Teodoro Locsin Jr. retaliated by slamming the actress' slanderers, tweeting "Anyone [who] messes with her will get it. I am not allowed to threaten on Twitter."[99]

In October 2020, Lt. Gen. Antonio Parlade Jr. of the National Task Force to End Local Communist Armed Conflict (NTF-ELCAC) urged supporters of the government to refrain from "red tagging" actress Liza Soberano after she appeared on a webinar of GABRIELA, but appeared to have done it himself anyhow. Parlade warned her that engaging with activist groups like GABRIELA would make her end up like activist Josephine Lapira, who allegedly joined the NPA and was killed in an armed encounter with government troops. He also mentioned several other celebrities who are vocal against the government such as beauty queen Catriona Gray and actress Angel Locsin.[100] Soberano's camp denounced the "red tagging" of the actress.[101] GABRIELA, with senators Risa Hontiveros and Francis Pangilinan defended Soberano and criticized Parlade's "red tagging," while the Concerned Artists of the Philippines (CAP) urged the general to retract his statement and apologize to the actress.[102][103]

State institutions and public servants

[edit]

One of the most prominent targets of red-tagging by what had then been the Committee on Un-Filipino Activities (CUFA), modeled after the Committee on Un-American Activities, had been Claro M. Recto.[104] A fervent nationalist, he dared to oppose US national interests in the Philippines, as when he campaigned against its military bases in his country. During the 1957 presidential campaign, the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) conducted black-propaganda operations to ensure his defeat, including the distribution of condoms with holes in them and marked with "Courtesy of Claro M. Recto" on the labels.[105][106] Other luminaries such as Arsenio Lacson, José P. Laurel and Lorenzo M. Tañada had also been made targets.[107]

The Philippine Commission on Human Rights, a constitutional agency independent of the three branches of government, mandated to monitor human rights abuses by state actors, has also received various threats from the government.[108][failed verification][109] On Christmas Eve of 2021, COMELEC was similarly tagged as "infiltrated",[90] as well as likened to Marcus Junius Brutus.[110]

In October 2020, Lt. Gen. Antonio Parlade accused Manila Mayor Isko Moreno of "fear[ing]" and "welcoming … terrorist[s]" to the city.[111][112] Moreno had earlier ordered the taking down of unauthorized tarpaulins that declared CPP members, NPA fighters and national democrats as personae non gratae in the city. Cavite Governor Jonvic Remulla backed the Manila mayor on the issue, saying that the general "should be ashamed of himself,"[113] adding, "Are you out of your mind, Parlade?"[114] Meanwhile, Pamalakaya, which represents fisherfolk and coastal communities in Cavite, have retaliated against Parlade in defense of Remulla, urging the governor to instead declare the general as persona non grata in their province.[115] Some commentators have satirized the banality and meaninglessness that has come to characterize, on the one hand, red-tagging and, on the other, false accusations leading to tokhang; for instance, by pointing out the absurdity in tagging the likes of Bongbong Marcos and economic liberal and declared NTF-ELCAC supporter Leni Robredo red.[116][90]

Government response to the concept

[edit]

Duterte administration

[edit]

Government officials and former press secretary Rigoberto Tiglao said that it was Sison himself who had unwittingly "tagged" specific groups red,[117] including by identifying them online.[118][119] Sison disputed this by stating that, "I differentiated the legal forces of the National Democratic movement from the armed revolutionary movement."[120]

On October 27, 2020, Parladé clarified that, "Communism per se … if it's just belief in communism and that belief isn't paired with violence, I think everyone would get along. … In fact, in Europe … there are still many communist parties, but that's okay since they don't maintain armed wings. Their societies have come to accept them. But over here, it's different: [the CPP-1968] has an armed wing. And that's why we're having this problem."[121] Likewise, on March 16, 2021, he said that, "It's the same with the right: if you're far right, and you [cross the line] by taking up arms and trying to overthrow the [government], that's a whole other story."[122]

Human rights organizations denounced the government for red-tagging, profiling, and surveillance.[123]

In 2019, United Nations rapporteurs said that the "criminalizing discourse used by Philippine public officials undermines the value of the vital work of human rights defenders, denigrates them in the eyes of the public and may put them at risk of threats, violence or other forms of harassment", adding that threats and harassment hinder the groups from doing their work.[124]

In a 2020 report, the Commission on Human Rights called on members of the executive branch of government to desist from red-tagging and labelling defenders as terrorists or enemies of the state and to prohibit the practice.[125]

Marcos administration

[edit]

In an interview on June 9, 2022, incoming National Security Adviser Clarita Carlos expressed a strong disapproval of red-tagging, stating that under the incoming presidency of Bongbong Marcos, the administration will focus on the lack of opportunities and injustices that are not being addressed that are at "the roots of insurgency".[126] This was echoed by outgoing Department of Justice (DOJ) secretary and incoming Solicitor General Menardo Guevarra, who stated at a forum on June 15 that the DOJ does not condone labeling individuals and groups as those with links to armed insurgency groups, saying that if there is concrete evidence, it should be filed according to the legal process.[127] Guevarra also discouraged tagging individuals solely for being vocal about their political views as doing so would put them in danger.[127] In response to some NTF-ELCAC officials that have publicly red-tagged individuals and groups, Guevarra also stated that the DOJ has expressed its position to the NTF-ELCAC, but is unaware if his advice has been followed. Furthermore, Guevara reminds that the NTF-ELCAC must follow its main mandate of a "whole of nation approach" to the communist insurgency problem, which must attract insurgents to return to the "folds of the law" and not to openly engage them in combat.[127]

In July 2023, the Supreme Court of the Philippines ruled in Siegfred D. Deduro Vs. Maj. Gen. Eric C. Vinoya, in his capacity as Commanding Officer of the 3rd Infantry Division, Philippine Army that a writ of amparo may be issued against acts of red-tagging, vilification, labeling, and guilt by association, declaring that the aforementioned acts threatens a person's right to life, liberty, and security.[128][129]

In February 2024, United Nations Special Rapporteur for freedom of expression and opinion Irene Khan appealed to the Philippine government to end red-tagging, saying that the vilification is often "followed by threats, unlawful surveillance, attacks or even unlawful killing."[130]

After the Supreme Court ruled in May 2024 that red-tagging threatens a person's right to life, liberty, or security, Human Rights Watch and Karapatan called on President Bongbong Marcos to abolish the NTF-ELCAC. Marcos rejected the calls for abolition, saying the task force was instrumental in reducing the country's internal security threat.[131][132]

Media coverage

[edit]

While there is some coverage of red-tagging as a practice in Filipino mainstream news coverage, media watchgroups such as the Center for Media Freedom and Responsibility have noted that this is typically limited to reportage regarding the statements of the groups involved, and few news outlets add "the necessary explanation why the profiling of the two organizations is dangerous".[33] In a January 2019 statement, they said:[33]

Dissent is essential to a working democracy. The independent press has to remind its audience of that fact as attempts to discredit various groups critical of the current regime continue, rather than just report statements of public officials condemning the politics of the Left and publicly naming those they see as "Red".

On March 3, 2022, Clarita Carlos urged precision when using the term 'communist' in political discourse,[133] in which it is often conflated with the CPP-1968 and affiliated groups. She strongly insisted on dropping the term 'communist insurgency' in favor of 'insurgency',[133] the latter which would underscore its illegality rather than its ideological thrust, which itself is not prohibited under law.[121][122][134]

[edit]
See also: Lawfare

Human Security Act of 2007

[edit]
Main article: Human Security Act of 2007

The Human Security Act of 2007, passed by the Philippine Congress in February and signed by President Gloria Arroyo in March, took effect on July 15. It was amended with the Anti-terrorism Act of 2020.[135]

This act has been heavily criticized by Human Rights Watch due to its "vague and overbroad" definition of terrorism.[136] The definition, according to Human Rights Watch,[136]

...could allow the government to transform less serious offenses, such as vandalism, or legitimate acts of protest, into crimes punishable by a mandatory 40-year sentence. Under this definition, for example, a political protestor demanding that the president resign, who sets fire to an effigy (committing arson or destruction of property), could conceivably be charged with terrorism and, if convicted, sent to prison for 40 years.

The Anti-terrorism Act of 2020

[edit]
Main article: Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020

On June 11, 2020, Malacañang, through Presidential Spokesperson Harry Roque, dismissed claims that the government is out to red-tag opposition groups as a matter of policy, contradicting observations made by the United Nations Human Rights Office. Roque said that safeguards are in place to prevent such abuses in the proposed Anti-Terrorism Act.[137]

In contrast, the UN took note of "serious human rights violations" in the country, noting that the filing of charges against political opponents and labeling persons who appear to have communist sympathies as suspected criminals are among the lapses.[137]

Additionally, under the law, a suspect could be detained for 14 days without charge – a period that can be extended to 24 days. Human rights attorneys say that violates a constitutional provision that a person must be charged within three days of detention. The law also allows wiretaps and lengthy surveillance, which raises privacy concerns, according to rights activists. The new law also includes a possible punishment of life imprisonment without parole, which rights advocates say leaves no chance for rehabilitation.[138]

Defenders of the law say that the 2020 Anti-Terrorism Act puts the Philippines at par with other countries in the world in legal action against terrorism. The government has also reassured that "activism is not terrorism" and that the law contains language protecting advocacy, protest, dissent, industrial action, and strikes that do not create "a serious risk to public safety." National Security Adviser Hermogenes Esperon defended the maximum of 24-day detention by saying that criminal cases against arrested suspected terrorists need more than three days of case build-up, which was the limit previously set in the Human Security Act of 2007. This new limit on the detention period is one of the most limited in the Asia-Pacific region, according to Esperon.[138]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Haynes, Oliver (February 18, 2021). "Deadly 'Red-Tagging' Campaign Ramps Up in Philippines". Voice of America. Archived from the original on November 28, 2021. Retrieved May 31, 2024.
  2. ^ a b Torres, Jose (May 8, 2019). "Religious, rights groups fight 'red tagging' in Philippines". Union of Catholic Asian News. Retrieved December 6, 2020.
  3. ^ a b c d e "VERA FILES FACT SHEET: Why 'red-tagging' is dangerous". Vera Files. October 11, 2018. Retrieved September 24, 2022.
  4. ^ P. Reyes, Miguel Paolo; F. Ariate, Joel (August 16, 2020). "Named Enemies, Hidden Targets: The Precursors to the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020". Vera Files. Retrieved September 24, 2022.
  5. ^ Tarriela, Jay Tristan (September 24, 2020). "Why the Philippines Needs to Revise Its National Defense Act". The Diplomat. Retrieved September 24, 2022.
  6. ^ C. Capistrano, Zea Io Ming (February 7, 2017). "Duterte to Reds: Do Not Coerce Me; Military Might Not Like It". Davao Today.
  7. ^ Castañeda, Jason (November 3, 2021). "Why Duterte Couldn't Beat the Communists". Asia Times. Retrieved September 24, 2022.
  8. ^ Pagusara y J., Don [in Cebuano] (November 11, 2015). "Foreign Colonial Ideology". Davao Today. Retrieved September 24, 2022.
  9. ^ Robles, Nathalie (May 3, 2019). "UN experts urge PH gov't to stop red-tagging". Asian Journal. Retrieved September 24, 2022.
  10. ^ "Philippines: Stop 'Red-Tagging', Investigate Killings of Journalists". Amnesty International (Press release). June 24, 2019.
  11. ^ "Human Rights Watch expresses 'deep concern' over red-tagging in Cagayan de Oro". Rappler. February 23, 2019. Retrieved September 24, 2022.
  12. ^ Ayalin, Adrian (October 4, 2018). "Red-tagging schools may embolden military to suppress rights, freedom – CHR". ABS-CBN News. Retrieved September 24, 2022.
  13. ^ Hart, Michael (May 26, 2021). "Duterte's 'Red-Tagging' Risks Igniting the Philippines' Maoist Insurgency". Geopolitical Monitor. Retrieved September 24, 2022.
  14. ^ a b "How red-baiting undermines truth-telling in the Philippines". IFEX. September 27, 2019. Retrieved May 7, 2020.
  15. ^ a b Gavilan, Jodesz (February 20, 2020). "Lives in danger as red-tagging campaign intensifies". Rappler. Retrieved May 7, 2020.
  16. ^ Lalu, Gabriel Pabico (August 20, 2020). "CHR says recent activist killings prove dangers of red-tagging". Inquirer.
  17. ^ "Philippines: Stop 'Red-Tagging', Investigate Killings of Activists" (PDF). June 24, 2019.
  18. ^ a b c d Santos, Ana (November 29, 2019). "Philippines targets Oxfam, other rights groups, as 'communist fronts'". DW -GB. Retrieved June 4, 2020.
  19. ^ "Philippine army "red-tagging" leads to threats, violence against journalists | Reporters without borders". RSF. August 14, 2019.
  20. ^ a b "CHR warns red-tagging has 'serious implications' on security of groups". Rappler. April 17, 2019. Retrieved November 5, 2020.
  21. ^ Kravchuk, Max. "UN Report Cites Serious Human Rights Violations in Phl". OneNews.ph. Retrieved November 5, 2020.
  22. ^ "CHR warns of grave implications of red-tagging groups". Philippine Star. April 17, 2019. Retrieved May 7, 2020.
  23. ^ Umil, Anne Marxze (December 11, 2019). "Groups submit 1st wave of human rights reports to UN". Bulatlat. Retrieved November 5, 2020.
  24. ^ Ellao, Janess Ann J. (December 30, 2015). "Bloodstained 'daang matuwid' claims lives of hundreds, including children". Bulatlat. Retrieved November 5, 2020.
  25. ^ Perez-Rubio, Bella. "Lacson: Senate to summon military officials, Gabriela over red-tagging". Philstar.com. Retrieved November 30, 2020.
  26. ^ Valenzuela, Frances Mangosing, Julie M. Aurelio, Nikka G. (October 24, 2020). "Just keep quiet if you have no evidence, Lorenzana tells Parlade, military". INQUIRER.net. Retrieved November 30, 2020.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  27. ^ a b Navallo, Mike (May 30, 2019). "SC grants rights groups' bid for protection from 'red-tagging'". ABS-CBN News.
  28. ^ Orellana, Faye (April 9, 2019). "Religious leaders slam government for red-tagging missionaries". Inquirer.
  29. ^ Esmaquel II, Paterno (March 13, 2019). "Christian group slams red-tagging of Aglipayan bishops". Rappler.
  30. ^ Carreon, Jire (May 31, 2019). "Stop red-tagging of health workers". ABS-CBN News.
  31. ^ "UST condemns AFP's 'red-tagging'". varsitarian.net. October 3, 2018.
  32. ^ "Xavier University slams red-tagging of its faculty, immersion program". Rappler. March 2, 2019.
  33. ^ a b c "Against "Red-tagging": Media Provide Needed Context | CMFR". cmfr-phil.org. January 18, 2019. Archived from the original on September 5, 2019.
  34. ^ Cutin, Monica (March 15, 2020). "Church, farmers say TF-ELCAC behind red-tagging spree". Nordis Dispatch. Retrieved December 6, 2020.
  35. ^ "Red-tagging, attacks on rights and environmental defenders intensify amid looming enactment of terror bill | Karapatan". Karapatan. June 29, 2020. Archived from the original on November 25, 2020. Retrieved December 6, 2020.
  36. ^ Galvez, Daphne (March 12, 2019). "CHR asked to probe red-tagging of human rights groups". INQUIRER.net. Retrieved November 5, 2020.
  37. ^ "Philippines: Stop 'red-tagging', investigate killings of activists" (PDF). Amnesty International. June 24, 2019.
  38. ^ Paris, Janella (December 19, 2019). "Rights group leader gets death and rape threats on Human Rights Day". Rappler. Retrieved November 5, 2020.
  39. ^ Robertson, Phil (August 24, 2020). "Philippine Rights Group Under Attack". Human Rights Watch. Retrieved November 5, 2020.
  40. ^ "In unique suit, Karapatan says red-tagging a crime against humanity by persecution". Rappler. December 4, 2020. Retrieved June 9, 2021.
  41. ^ Ferrera, Vince (November 6, 2019). "Gabriela, NGOs slam red-tagging by AFP, Defense Dept". CNN. Archived from the original on June 5, 2020. Retrieved June 4, 2020.
  42. ^ Gavilan, Jodesz (September 13, 2018). "Human rights groups face 'alarming, shameful level' of gov't retaliation – UN report". Rappler.
  43. ^ "Alarming level of reprisals against activists, human rights defenders, and victims – new UN report". UN News. September 12, 2018.
  44. ^ Perper, Rosie. "The Philippines added a UN human rights worker to the country's 'terror hit list'". Business Insider.
  45. ^ "In the Philippines, activists increasingly face a "living hell"". www.lowyinstitute.org. Retrieved September 27, 2020.
  46. ^ Fonbuena, Carmela (August 8, 2019). "Philippines: US rights volunteer branded 'enemy of state' shot outside home". The Guardian – via www.theguardian.com.
  47. ^ Steeled by Decades of Struggle, the Negrenses Keep the Revolutionary Fire Ablaze – Liberation
  48. ^ Umil, Anne Marxze (April 1, 2019). "14 peasants killed, 12 arrested in a day in Negros Oriental". Bulatlat. Retrieved November 30, 2020.
  49. ^ "Pooled editorial | Community journalism is not a crime: Stop disinformation on Negros 57, free Anne Krueger!". Bulatlat. November 2, 2019. Retrieved December 3, 2020.
  50. ^ "Tell It to SunStar: 'Defend Negros Network' launched". Sunstar. June 24, 2019. Retrieved December 3, 2020.
  51. ^ Burgos, Nestor P. Jr (June 25, 2019). "Stop killings, Negros human rights group asks gov't". INQUIRER.net. Retrieved December 3, 2020.
  52. ^ "HINDI TOTOO: Ni-recruit ni Chad Booc ang mga kabataang katutubong kasama niya sa Cebu". RAPPLER. March 25, 2022. Retrieved April 27, 2022.
  53. ^ "Labor unions to take legal action against AFP threats". National Trade Union Center of the Philippines. February 3, 2018. Retrieved November 5, 2020.
  54. ^ "Union leader escapes from assassination attempt". Davao Today. September 5, 2018. Retrieved November 5, 2020.
  55. ^ "Duterte's Red tagging intensifies attacks vs labor union workers –KMU". Davao Today. September 12, 2018. Retrieved November 5, 2020.
  56. ^ a b "Coca-Cola's attack on unions in the Philippines invites violence against workers | IUF UITA IUL". IUF / UITA / IUL. Retrieved November 5, 2020.
  57. ^ Gonzaga, V. L. (1988). Agrarian reform in Negros Oriental. Philippine Studies, 36(4), 443–457.
  58. ^ a b "PNP claims slain Negros farmers' org is Red legal front". ABS-CBN News. October 23, 2018. Retrieved December 3, 2020.
  59. ^ Gonzaga, V. L. (1990). Negros in transition: 1899–1905. Philippine Studies, 38(1), 103–114.
  60. ^ Billig, M. S. (1992). The rationality of growing sugar on Negros. Philippine Studies, 40(2), 153–182.
  61. ^ "2018 blockbuster: Red October plot vs Duterte". Rappler. December 19, 2018. Retrieved September 27, 2020.
  62. ^ "Coca-Cola continues to violate the rights of workers throughout the world!". Workers Revolutionary Party -GB. November 16, 2019. Retrieved November 5, 2020.
  63. ^ "Coca-Cola is becoming a serial human rights offender – in Haiti, Indonesia, Ireland, the Philippines and the United States | IUF UITA IUL". IUF / UITA / IUL. Retrieved November 5, 2020.
  64. ^ a b "'Hands off gov't worker unions': Labor group slams alleged red-tagging campaigns". Philstar.com. Retrieved November 5, 2020.
  65. ^ "Duterte creates task force to address causes of communist insurgency". Rappler. December 11, 2018. Retrieved November 5, 2020.
  66. ^ a b Umali, Justin (July 29, 2020). "Labor group denounces red-tagging, fake surrenderees". Bulatlat. Retrieved November 5, 2020.
  67. ^ "A Man of God, a Man for Others" (PDF). Department of Labor and Employment. 2005. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 13, 2021. Retrieved December 13, 2021.
  68. ^ Robertson, Phil (February 10, 2021). "Philippine General Should Answer for 'Red-Tagging'". Human Rights Watch. Retrieved March 16, 2021.
  69. ^ a b "ALS issues statement on red-tagging lawyers, judges, and members of the legal profession". Ateneo de Manila University. March 19, 2021. Retrieved June 11, 2021.
  70. ^ a b Patag, Kristine Joy (January 25, 2021). "IBP calls out military's 'ridiculous red-tagging' of lawyers". Philstar. Retrieved March 16, 2021.
  71. ^ Nonato, Vince (January 25, 2021). "AFP Apologizes For Falsely Branding UP Alumni as NPA Rebels; IBP Says Red-Tagging 'Illegal'". One News. Retrieved March 16, 2021.
  72. ^ a b Navallo, Mike (March 17, 2021). "SC urged to act on red-baiting of lawyers; judge gets red-tagged". ABS-CBN News. Retrieved June 11, 2021.
  73. ^ Vital, Emily (March 17, 2021). "Groups condemn red-tagging of judge who freed journo, labor organizer". Bulatlat. Retrieved June 11, 2021.
  74. ^ Patag, Kristine Joy (March 23, 2021). "'A threat on a lawyer is an assault on the Judiciary,' SC says amid rise in lawyer killings". Philstar. Retrieved June 11, 2021.
  75. ^ Bordey, Hana (April 28, 2021). "Drilon urges Duterte to certify bill criminalizing "red-tagging" as urgent". GMA News Online. Retrieved June 11, 2021.
  76. ^ Torres, Tech (February 29, 2024). "Lorraine Badoy is guilty of indirect contempt for red tagging judge – SC". Philippine Daily Inquirer. Retrieved February 29, 2024.
  77. ^ "Gov't platforms being used to attack, red-tag media". Rappler. May 12, 2020. Retrieved September 27, 2020.
  78. ^ "[NEWS RELEASE] Journalists fear worsening attacks amid red-tagging". September 2019.
  79. ^ Orejas, Tonette (September 20, 2019). "Pampanga TV manager fears for life after Red-tagging". INQUIRER.net. Retrieved September 27, 2020.
  80. ^ "NUJP slams red-tagging of Atom Araullo over Lumad school docu". Rappler. August 20, 2020. Retrieved September 27, 2020.
  81. ^ "Surigao Sur IP leaders decry 'biased' TV documentary". www.pna.gov.ph. Retrieved September 27, 2020.
  82. ^ "NUJP backs I-Witness docu 'Ang Iskul Kong Bakwit'". GMA News Online. August 19, 2020. Retrieved September 27, 2020.
  83. ^ Umil, Anne Marxze (May 9, 2024). "Progressive groups welcome SC's ruling on red-tagging". Bulatlat. Retrieved May 18, 2024.
  84. ^ Chi, Cristina. "VP Duterte's 'red-tagging' of teacher group reported to ILO". Philippine Star. Retrieved May 18, 2024.
  85. ^ Subingsubing, Krixia (May 16, 2023). "CHR to gov't execs: Stop red-tagging teachers, students, groups". Philippine Daily Inquirer. Retrieved May 20, 2024.
  86. ^ Marcelo, Elizabeth (May 16, 2023). "CHR probes red-tagging of teachers". Philippine Star. Retrieved May 20, 2024.
  87. ^ a b c "Author Lualhati Bautista hits back at Facebook user over red-tagging post". Rappler. August 11, 2020. Retrieved August 12, 2020.
  88. ^ "Facebook user deletes apology, changes profile name after drawing flak for red-tagging Filipino novelist". #PressOnePH. August 12, 2020. Retrieved August 12, 2020.
  89. ^ Robles, Alan (November 10, 2019). "Why has the Philippines named Oxfam a front for communist terror?". South China Morning Post. Retrieved June 4, 2020.
  90. ^ a b c d Gumba Parladé, Antonio (December 24, 2021). "53 Years of a Satanic Cult in This Christian Country". The Manila Times.
  91. ^ a b Del Mundo, R. (April 21, 2021). Mutual aid, community pantries bring out the best in Filipinos and the worst in Duterte's inhumane regime. Philippine Revolution Web Central. https://cpp.ph/statements/mutual-aid-community-pantries-bring-out-the-best-in-filipinos-and-the-worst-in-dutertes-inhumane-regime/
  92. ^ Sadongdong, M. (April 20, 2021). Parlade: Community pantry could be used to urge public to revolt vs gov't. Manila Bulletin. https://mb.com.ph/2021/04/20/parlade-community-pantry-could-be-used-to-urge-public-to-revolt-vs-govt
  93. ^ Chúa, A. (April 21, 2021). "Communist" tag halts community pantry for a day. Manila Standard. https://www.manilastandard.net/news/top-stories/352408/-communist-tag-halts-community-pantry-for-a-day.html
  94. ^ Yuvallos, A. (April 20, 2021). The gov't's response to the community pantry movement? Policing and bureaucracy. Philippine Daily Inquirer. https://nolisoli.ph/96642/opinion-maginhawa-community-pantry-ayuvallos-20210420/
  95. ^ a b Cayabyab, M. J., Mateo, J., Tupas, E., Hallare, K., Macaíran, E., & Romero, A. (April 21, 2021). Palace, DILG, PNP, DOJ, mayors say community pantries should continue as NTF–ELCAC red-tags, profiles organizers. One News. https://www.onenews.ph/palace-dilg-pnp-doj-mayors-say-community-pantries-should-continue-as-ntf-elcac-red-tags-profiles-organizers
  96. ^ Karapatan. (April 20, 2021). Karapatan hits red-tagging of community pantries. https://www.karapatan.org/karapatan+hits+red+tagging+of+community+pantries
  97. ^ Torregoza, H. (April 18, 2021). Community pantries a sign of people's desperation amid COVID-19 pandemic —Lacson. Manila Bulletin. https://mb.com.ph/2021/04/18/community-pantries-a-sign-of-peoples-desperation-amid-covid-19-pandemic-lacson/
  98. ^ Severo, Jan Milo (November 16, 2020). "Angel Locsin, Parlade make peace over red-tagging issue". The Philippine Star. Archived from the original on November 16, 2020. Retrieved May 31, 2024.
  99. ^ Marquez, Consuelo (October 24, 2020). "DFA's Locsin to Angel Locsin's critics: 'Anyone who messes with her will get it'". INQUIRER.net. Retrieved December 3, 2020.
  100. ^ Sadongdong, Martin (October 22, 2020). "Did an NTF-ELCAC exec just 'red-tag' Liza Soberano?". Manila Bulletin. Retrieved October 22, 2020.
  101. ^ "Liza Soberano's camp denounces red-tagging: 'She remains apolitical'". Rappler. October 22, 2020. Retrieved October 22, 2020.
  102. ^ Ku, Russel (October 22, 2020). "Gabriela hits Parlade for red-tagging Soberano: 'Why be afraid of women defending other women?'". Rappler. Retrieved October 22, 2020.
  103. ^ Gotinga, JC (October 22, 2020). "Senators defend Liza Soberano, Catriona Gray vs general's 'red-tagging'". Rappler. Retrieved October 22, 2020.
  104. ^ Tan, Michael (May 12, 2021). "The Roots of Red-Tagging".
  105. ^ The Worst Book of 2002. Review of The Savage Wars of Peace: Small Wars and the Rise of American Power Archived December 8, 2008, at the Wayback Machine, by Max Boot. 2003 Retrieved March 17, 2009
  106. ^ Simbulan, Roland. Covert Operations and the CIA's Hidden History in the Philippines. August 18, 2000. Retrieved March 17, 2009.
  107. ^ Buan, Lian (December 9, 2020). "Duterte Administration Sparks New Legal Offensive vs. Red-Tagging". Rappler.
  108. ^ "Panelo: Duterte can't abolish CHR, but 'biased' Gascon should resign". GMA News Online. July 27, 2017.
  109. ^ Revita, Juliet C. (July 26, 2017). "Eastmincom exec says CHR mandate doesn't serve all". Sunstar. Archived from the original on September 20, 2020. Retrieved March 8, 2021.
  110. ^ Gía Samonte, Mauro (March 26, 2022). "Et tu, Comelec?". The Manila Times.
  111. ^ Lalu, Gabriel Pabico (October 23, 2020). "Parlade asks: Is Mayor Isko welcoming 'terrorist' CPP-NPA in Manila?". INQUIRER.net. Retrieved December 3, 2020.
  112. ^ Lalu, Gabriel Pabico. "Moreno: Remove 'Persona Non Grata' Banners vs. CPP-NPA-NDF in Manila City". Philippine Daily Inquirer.
  113. ^ Ramos, Christia Marie (October 26, 2020). "He 'should be ashamed of himself': Remulla scores Parlade". INQUIRER.net. Retrieved December 3, 2020.
  114. ^ "Remulla kay Parlade: Ok ka lang? | Abante TNT Breaking News". tnt.abante.com.ph. October 26, 2020. Retrieved December 3, 2020.
  115. ^ "Cavite's Remulla urged: Declare Parlade persona non grata instead". Philstar.com. Retrieved December 3, 2020.
  116. ^ V. Manalo, Charlie (November 25, 2021). "After Red-Tagging and Cocaine Blitz, What's Next?". The Manila Standard.
  117. ^ Kabagani, Lade Jean (December 12, 2020). "Government Never Red-tagged Anyone; Sison Did". Philippine News Agency.
  118. ^ D. Umil, Anne Marxze (September 13, 2019). "Rights Defenders Decry Red-Tagging as Form of Rights Violation". Bulatlat.
  119. ^ Dikit Tiglao, Rigoberto (September 14, 2020). "Sison, with His Huge Ego, Red-Tagged His Communist Fronts Long Ago". Manila Times.
  120. ^ Aguilar, Krissy (November 4, 2020). "Joma Sison Denies Red-Tagging Claims, Receiving Extortion Money from NPA". Philippine Daily Inquirer.
  121. ^ a b Bóbila Javellana, Rodolfo; Abad-Santos Valdés, Antonio; Gonzales Casiño, Edmundo Vicente (October 27, 2020). "Talakayang Bayan". Katipunan ng Demokratikong Pilipino.
  122. ^ a b Bóbila Javellana, Rodolfo; Abad-Santos Valdés, Antonio; Gonzales Casiño, Edmundo Vicente (March 14, 2021). "Talakayang Bayan". Katipunan ng Demokratikong Pilipino.
  123. ^ Gavilan, Jodesz (April 11, 2019). "Groups slam 'dangerous' red-tagging of health workers". Rappler. Retrieved October 13, 2022.
  124. ^ Gavilan, Jodesz (May 1, 2019). "U.N. experts to PH gov't: Stop red-tagging Corpuz, human rights groups". Rappler. Retrieved October 13, 2022.
  125. ^ "Report on the Situation of Human Rights Defenders in the Philippines" (PDF). Republic of the Philippines Commission of Human Rights. July 2020. Retrieved October 13, 2022.
  126. ^ Rita, Joviland (June 9, 2022). "Incoming Security Adviser Carlos on red-tagging: Let's not use labels". GMA News Online. Retrieved June 19, 2022.
  127. ^ a b c Torres-Tupas, Tetch (June 15, 2022). "Red-tagging puts lives in danger, file cases instead, Guevarra says". INQUIRER.net. Retrieved June 19, 2022.
  128. ^ "SC: Red-Tagging Threatens Right to Life, Liberty, and Security". Supreme Court of the Philippines. May 8, 2024. Retrieved May 8, 2024.Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  129. ^ G.R. No. 254753 (July 4, 2023), Siegfred D. Deduro vs. Maj. Gen. Eric C. Vinoya, in his capacity as Commanding Officer of the 3rd Infantry Division, Philippine Army (PDF)
  130. ^ Gomez, Jim (February 2, 2024). "UN expert says more needs to be done to address human rights abuses in the Philippines". AP News. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
  131. ^ Romero, Alexis (May 17, 2024). "NTF-ELCAC won't be abolished, says Marcos". The Philippine Star. Archived from the original on May 31, 2024. Retrieved May 31, 2024.
  132. ^ Mangaluz, Jean (May 16, 2024). "Marcos says no plan or reason to abolish NTF-Elcac". Philippine Daily Inquirer. Archived from the original on May 16, 2024. Retrieved May 31, 2024.
  133. ^ a b Sino po ba ang nagsabi ng 'communist insurgency'?. SMNI News. March 3, 2022.
  134. ^ O. Arguillas, Carolyn (February 15, 2022). "Former Defense Secretary: 'If You're a Communist and You Love Your Ideology Come Out, Express It'". MindaNews.
  135. ^ "Republic Act No. 9372". March 6, 2007.
  136. ^ a b "Philippines: New Terrorism Law Puts Rights at Risk". Human Rights Watch. July 17, 2007. Retrieved February 1, 2021.
  137. ^ a b "Malacañang says no policy on red-tagging amid controversial anti-terrorism bill". cnn. Archived from the original on October 16, 2021. Retrieved February 1, 2021.
  138. ^ a b "Why Rights Groups Worry About The Philippines' New Anti-Terrorism Law". NPR. Retrieved February 1, 2021.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Red-tagging_in_the_Philippines&oldid=1263884411"