Talk:AI Overviews

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Google Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Google, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Google and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GoogleWikipedia:WikiProject GoogleTemplate:WikiProject GoogleGoogle

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Google To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Articles for most of the other products listed here and here.
Assess : All articles in the Category:Unknown-importance Google articles and Category:Unassessed Google articles using the project's assessment scale
Expand : Google Mapathon, Google Talkback
Maintain : This WikiProject
Merge : Google Mobile Services into List of Google products
Stubs : Category:Stub-Class Google articles and Category:Google stubs
Update : List of features in Android and Gmail interface#Product integration. Update logos of Google Marketing Platform products
Other :
- Add more stuff to this to do list if you like! (click here...)
- create:
- Help the Google article for a good article status
- Improve the Outline of Google
- Get more members using :
{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Google/Invite Members}}
- Infobox Images with transparent areas needing a different background color

Artificial Intelligence

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Artificial Intelligence, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Artificial intelligence on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Artificial IntelligenceWikipedia:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceTemplate:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceArtificial Intelligence

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology

"AI Overviews" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect AI Overviews has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 1 § AI Overviews until a consensus is reached. Jay 💬 06:45, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

math

An object that weighs 4 pounds on Planet Vulcan weighs 10 pounds on Planet Risa. Another object that weighs 10 pounds on Planet Andoria weighs 6 pounds on Planet Vulcan. How much does the object that weighs 10 pounds on Planet Andoria weigh on Planet Risa? A. 15 pounds B. 25 pounds C. 30 pounds D. 6 pounds 198.167.171.121 (talk) 13:58, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AI Overviews

An AI summary is perfect for when there is no existing article. BUT, the AI must to careful to only use trusted references for its summary. It must also refrain and redact opinion from it created articles and any re-occurring opinions which are not negated and contested by other opinions should be expressed in the last paragraph of the article.

Perhaps also or instead of "there is no article on the subject" there should be a generate article button that follows the guidelines above which is then vetted by a human for broad-viewing; meanwhile the person who generated the article can see it as a temporary entity that vanishes to all but any highly trusted human editor who decides to approve it or amend it or reject it. The user then optional rates the quality of the generated article, and if the rating is 8 or more out of then 10, it then becomes a permanent backdoor entity for the editors to moderate. Once the article is approved by the editor, the approved article also has a separate rating system this time out of 5, and should users bring the median to 3 out of 5, the article is backdoored again until further amendments are made. I feel like the the quality of most Wikipedia articles is above this rating system except for Biographies or otherwise summaries of a person, group or event; these I believe should have this rating system as well though the backdoor median should be 2 out of 5 as to keep most of these articles online and not cause chaos. Only logged in persons and person not behind a VPN should be able to vote. Therein are the Godfathers recommendations.

Tted3286 (talk) 14:56, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]