Talk:Cocoa Crater

Cocoa Crater has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 21, 2025. (Reviewed version).

Volcanoes: Canada Low‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Volcanism of Canada task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Mountains Low‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: British Columbia / Geography / The 10,000 Challenge Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada.
	This article was created or improved during The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada, which started in November 2016 and is ongoing. You can help!!

GA Review

Passed. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:15, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cocoa Crater/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Volcanoguy (talk · contribs) 22:58, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Crisco 1492 (talk · contribs) 20:47, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this review. Please note that I may make recommendations that are not strictly part of the GA criteria; these are recommendations only and do not affect the pass/fail decision. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:47, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A note for transparency, this article was brought to my attention as something I may be interested at looking at. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:47, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Image review

File:Cocoa Crater.jpg - Correctly licensed.
File:Cocoa Crater black and white.jpg - Seems to be correctly licensed. Odd that a user became active for all of a day, uploaded several decade-old images, then disappeared, but the only online source of a similar age is on Instagram attributed to the same individual and dated the day after the local upload. (Shame the uploader didn't stick around... there are some excellent images).
Not a GA criterion, but it would be nice to have ALT text for visually impaired readers.

Prose review

in Cassiar Land District - feels like it should be "the Cassiar Land District", as it's followed by "of" (x2)
I've never seen "the" used before "Cassiar Land District" in sources. Volcanoguy 21:51, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
provincial parks in British Columbia - perhaps List of British Columbia Provincial Parks would be a more high-value link?
Done. Volcanoguy 21:51, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
just southwest of Mount Edziza - "just southwest" is relative. Do we have any solid figures for distance? A couple similar items further below.
No, just BC Geographical Names which says "Just SW of Edziza Peak in Mount Edziza Provincial Park, SE of Telegraph Creek (community), Cassiar Land District". Volcanoguy 21:51, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
a volcanic crater which are a common feature among cinder cones - the "are" seems out of place. Both your subject and "common feature" are singular. Maybe "a volcanic crater; such features are common among cinder cones"?
How about "a volcanic crater which are common features among cinder cones"? Volcanoguy 21:51, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Your subject is still singular though. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:15, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Your suggestion was fine so I used that. Volcanoguy 01:57, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It includes not only the Mount Edziza area but also the Spectrum Range to the south from which it is separated by Raspberry Pass. - You are changing referents in this sentence; your first "it" is the provincial park, while the second "it" is the Mount Edziza area. This may be misconstrued as the park being separated from the Spectrum Range.
I don't know how else to word it. Volcanoguy 21:51, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps "It includes not only the Mount Edziza area, but also the Spectrum Range across the Raspberry Pass."? — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:15, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Would this work: "It includes not only the Mount Edziza area, but also the Spectrum Range to the south, which are separated by Raspberry Pass"? Volcanoguy 02:06, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That works! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:12, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Spotcheck

Based on this revision

2b: Checks out
2f: Supports southwest of Mount Edziza and Cassiar Land District
3d: Supports southern end of Ravel Plateau
7c: Supports area and establishment
12: Technically the source says it's the largest single flow, but as a lay person I believe that should be okay paraphrasing
19: Supports one of the largest provincial parks in BC.

Not a GA criterion, but some references appear to be out of order (i.e., [19][7])
Done. Volcanoguy 21:40, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not a GA criterion, but some of your works cited are out of order (i.e., Souther 1988, Souther 1992, Souther 1990)
Done (I think). Volcanoguy 21:40, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusion

Article is basically there. Just a few nitpicks. Good work! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:47, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Alright, looks like everything got hammered out. Congratulations! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:13, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.