This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
The original document "Permission to reproduce" does not allow commercial redistribution without asking the "Public Works and Government Services Canada" first: "For permission to reproduce the information in this publication for commercial redistribution, please e-mail droitdauteur.copyright@tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca." Perhaps there is already an OTRS ticket for a similar case?
I have added the Copyvio template. Some of the copied content comes from the article's creator, but most comes from 192.197.178.2, so it seems unlikely a permission was obtained. In any case, that licence is GFDL-incompatible. User:Cybercobra has already removed some. --Chealer (talk) 05:07, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The article is clearly nothing other than a posting by the Canadian government, probably by the bureau itself. No history of the bureau, its founding, major rulings, and of course controversies, is supplied. To my understanding, Wikipedia was never intended to be a web billboard for free government self-promotion. 96.48.69.102 (talk) 07:17, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]