Talk:Conservation and restoration of illuminated manuscripts

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Libraries Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Collections Care (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Collections Care, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Collections CareWikipedia:WikiProject Collections CareTemplate:WikiProject Collections CareCollections Care articles

Proposed merge

I originally proposed that this article be merged into Illuminated manuscripts, but at present I think it is too large for that. What about writing one paragraph that is a sort of sum-up of this article, and posting that in Illuminated manuscripts, with one of those "Main article:Preservation of Illuminated Manuscripts" links at the top? Dr bab 09:55, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tone of voice

This article does not seem to be written encyclopedically. The introduction seems advocative and POV, and later on it seems discussive rather than stative. TwelveBaud (what? ↹ what'd I do?) 03:49, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]