Talk:Grotesque

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Aesthetics

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 September 2021 and 31 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Vansybil, Jiffy98, FloppyCrow, Everwind30, Soulkiley, Meg's Goldfish, AnnieCarlson09, Sunbess.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:47, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

pumpkins

WHat do pumpkins have to do with the Grotesque?

They're grotesque. --Jupiter Optimus Maximus (talk) 13:14, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Czech "groteska"

The Czech (and also Polish?) "groteska" is silent comedies (Chaplin, for example, with a lot of slapstick) and also puppet theatre. What is the origin of this usage of the term? Sladek 14:04, 26 April 2007 (UTC)—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sladek (talk • contribs) 16:14, 25 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

why this

How is this helpful or even meaningful? Sherwood Anderson, in his 1919 short story collection Winesburg, Ohio, included a prefatory chapter titled "The Book of the Grotesque" in which he established the idea of the grotesque character as an overarching principle in his book. So what, his book has something grotesque? Or is he defining it, and if so, how and why?--Flammingo^Hey 22:06, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it was relevant to a discussion of the grotesque in literature that a major work of American literature explicitly defined itself as "grotesque." I think it's worth keeping in. Ellisjudd (talk) 20:35, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is relevant, but its gone now. Someone should put it back in. Sherwood Anderson coined the phrase as we use it to refer to American lit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.39.105.11 (talk) 23:38, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Darth Vader

Could Darth Vader be considered a grotesque in fiction? After all, he does inspire both empathy and disgust. --Jupiter Optimus Maximus (talk) 13:14, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Grotesque. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140102201041/http://typenstuff.com/help/4_22%20status%20books.pdf to http://typenstuff.com/help/4_22%20status%20books.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:48, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why is Rémi Astruc particularly relevant to this article?

"Rémi Astruc has argued" really seems to come out of nowhere. --Leon-alms (talk) 13:54, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Subject of article

Not clear what this article is actually about. It reads like a dictionary entry. Richard New Forest (talk) 19:53, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Which definition?

The lead to this article is confusing, as it conflates two different notions of "groteque", even though they are related. It would seem to me that both notions are distinct and notable and worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, but it is distracting to have distinct ideas competing for focus within this article, with ambiguity as to which the focus of the article is on. Maybe it's even worth having three articles, one describing grotesque (ornamentation), one describing grotesque (repugnance), and one describing grotesque (dissonant theme), where the thematic description could be an encompassing article, giving an overarching continuity between the other notions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.139.254.117 (talk) 20:56, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Grotesque. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:37, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]