Jump to content

Talk:Kaitlin Bennett

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Infobox image changed

[edit]

The original image could be construed as intentionally unflattering. I inserted the image from Commons, along with a link to Commons at the bottom. Outdatedpizza (talk) 08:44, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted a change. The previous image is so unflattering it could be considered a BLP violation.Outdatedpizza (talk) 02:00, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Can this be done again and have the display picture changed? It appears the same unflattering photo is being used again, what a coincidence... /sarcasm 142.186.16.25 (talk) 01:17, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Pants shitting incident"

[edit]

Should there be a section dedicated to this alleged incident and how it is often used against her in internet discussions? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C8:8B16:2D01:5419:E776:6CA4:CCB2 (talk) 09:51, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is already a paragraph on it.Outdatedpizza (talk) 22:50, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It honestly shouldn't be relevant, social media gossip isn't what Wikipedia should involve. The rumor/incident has nothing to do with her relevance (to be clear it's her advocacy for gun rights). And what was thrown at her doesn't need to be explained either, just the fact items were thrown is fine enough, everything thrown at someone in any event doesn't need an explanation as to why it's one item and not another. 142.186.16.25 (talk) 01:20, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As this person has been met with protesters who chant things about the incident, a short description of the event is justified to explain the protests. ValarianB (talk) 13:01, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
But the protests weren't due to the "event" so that's honestly irrelevant. The protest is about her political beliefs but the protesters just use the event as an ad-hom attack to use as additional verbal ammunition. 142.186.88.120 (talk) 22:32, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

conversion to Christianity?

[edit]

the citation does not support the assertion that Bennett was non-Christian before marriage, and that theirs was a Catholic wedding. i read though the cited source several times and amidst the gay-baiting that distractify.com does of her husband, i can see no mention of his religious denomination. ValarianB (talk) 16:25, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bing/Bong ?

[edit]

C'mon guys this is obvious satire on what she sees as 'woke pronouns' she actually does not use pronounce to refer to herself... i propose to remove it since this isnt her actual pronouns LuanLoud (talk) 15:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

She's never confirmed those aren't her pronouns though... Bronx Langford (talk) 16:18, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pronouns

[edit]

Reflected pronouns listed in Bennett's Instagram page. Although it's possible that this is intended as some sort of commentary on the proliferation of people putting their preferred pronouns in their online biographies, I want to err on the side of caution and ensure that a Wikipedia page isn't misgendering a living person. Lots of people use "neopronouns" (pronouns other than "he," "she," or "they") for a myriad of reasons, and there's no reason to think Bennett wouldn't; there is no other context added. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bervnka (talkcontribs) 04:01, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]