Jump to content

Talk:Non-cooperation movement (2024)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Removal of R&AW of India from Infobox

[edit]

I said this in 2024 Bangladesh quota reform movement article talk page and I'll say it here. Let me preface this by saying that I'm an Indian so the accusations and counter-accusations can be avoided. Now coming to the point So far only one source supports R&AW being involved on behalf of Hasina. The Source itself is nowhere to be found on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources. We should either cite more high quality reliable sources or drop R&AW altogether. DataCrusade1999 (talk) 10:40, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the reference to R&AW in the article as I believe it needs (probably more than one) reliable national/international sources. Thanks! Wrzedn (talk) 13:24, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just for clarification, I removed this before I saw your post here. If other editors are interested, they can use this space to discuss whether to keep that info out or bring it back. Wrzedn (talk) 13:30, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disinformation by Indian media section is biased.

[edit]
Blocked socked. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 01:43, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

I think the section Disinformation by indian media is totally biased. Here is my point:

1. According to Prothom alo, Communal violence: 1068 houses and business establishments attacked Accoding to Bangladesh Hindu Buddha Christian Okiya Prarishad, Attacks on minority communities: At least 9 killed from Aug 4 to 20 Means attack on Bangladeshi hindu happened.

Hindus in Bangladesh feel betrayed by attacks after government's ouster

Mob violence in Bangladesh after Hasina's ouster stirs fear within the country's Hindu minority

2. The BBC Verify, AFP fact-checker said some attack is real. But many are fake. Far right & indian social media spreading misinformation. But there is no mention of indian media spreading disinformation. Accusing Indian media mainly mainstream spreading misinformation need to verify by multiple reputable source.The far-right videos distorting the truth of Bangladesh minority attacks Fact check: False claims fuel ethnic tensions in Bangladesh

3. About Prothom Alo news report, It said misinformation by Republic TV. We all know Republic TV have right wing biases. Only one channel don't represent county media. Like in us, Fox news have right wing biase. If fox news spread misinformation doesn't mean whole american media spreading misinformation.বাংলাদেশে হিন্দু সম্প্রদায়ের ওপর হামলার ঘটনা নিয়ে কিছু অপতথ্য ও ভুয়া ভিডিও ছড়ানো হচ্ছে। কোনো কোনো ক্ষেত্রে সেই ভুয়া ভিডিও ভারতীয় সংবাদমাধ্যমেও প্রচারিত হচ্ছে

4. Gobinda Pramanik & Gayeshwar Chandra Roy have history of speaking against Hindus. Gobinda Pramanik expelled from the organisation, become the president of the same organisation again after the fall of Sheikh Hasina's government.হিন্দু মহাজোটের মহাসচিব গোবিন্দ চন্দ্রের বিরুদ্ধে জামায়াত সংশ্লিষ্টতার অভিযোগ গোবিন্দ প্রামাণিকের বক্তব্য ‘রহস্যজনক’ Minority leaders castigate BNP leader Gayeshwar’s recent claim on Hindus Minority community leaders slam Gayeshwar’s recent claim on Hindus

5. Talking about Al Jazeera report, ‘Islamophobic, alarmist’: How some India outlets covered Bangladesh crisis

Al Jazeera is funded by Qatar government. Qatar government & Al Jazeera both are accused for supporting islamic brotherhood & islamists.Muslim Brotherhood#:~:text=The Brotherhood itself claims to,and the AKP-ruled Turkey. Also qatar government also accused supposing terrorist by many countries including US, UAE, Saudi Arabia. Qatar and state-sponsored terrorism

Read this article, Al Jazeera controversies and criticism#:~:text=The Bangladesh Federal Union of,Egypt, Jordan and the UAE. In Bangladesh section article say, "The news channel is often accused of downplaying the 1971 Bangladesh genocide, in which Islamist militias assisted the Pakistan Army in targeting Bengalis who sought independence from Pakistan." In India section it say, "Columnist Seema Sirohi has accused Al Jazeera of spreading an ignorant anti-India narrative in its coverage of the country." Al-Jazeera network have islamist bias. Islamists attack Bangladeshi hindus and you confirming news in islamist channel? According to the BBC in 2013, "Al-Jazeera network remains the standard bearer for the Islamist position."

[1]https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-25551518 [2]https://www.hindustantimes.com/opinion/al-jazeera-good-bad-and-a-little-ugly/story-vVuTOJQjR9K6q4n3MUmevJ_amp.html [3]https://www.firstpost.com/opinion-news-expert-views-news-analysis-firstpost-viewpoint/why-al-jazeera-is-silent-on-qatars-dubious-human-rights-records-but-gets-vocal-on-india-and-its-democracy-11750351.html/amp [4]https://www.voanews.com/amp/egyptian-court-bans-aljazeera-affiliate-proislamist-channels/1742134.html [5]https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/mideast-journalists-allege-bias-in-al-jazeeras-reporting-on-morsi-and-muslim-brotherhood/2013/07/08/9166c364-e80e-11e2-aa9f-c03a72e2d342_story.html [6]https://www.economist.com/middle-east-and-africa/2017/07/01/why-al-jazeera-is-under-threat [7]https://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/jun/11/al-jazeera-america-accused-bias-non-arabs-women [8]https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2017/06/23/why-saudi-arabia-hates-al-jazeera-so-much/ [9]https://theprint.in/opinion/the-growing-hypocrisy-of-al-jazeera-is-getting-harder-to-ignore-now/1857376/ [10]https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/al-jazeera-qatar-saudi-arabia-diplomatic-freedom-of-journalism-arab-journalism-existence-important-a7938871.html

So disinformation by indian media section should rewritten with neutral view. AmitKumarDatta180 (talk) 11:28, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a similar discussion going on on the 2024 Bangladesh anti-Hindu violence talkpage, you may find editors who agree with you there. ThatBritishAsianDude (talk) 14:40, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bias editing

[edit]

@2409:4060:e85:d06e::aa49:9406, Can someone check this ip's edits in the article. It seems like he provided citation, but, majority of the citation doesn’t even talk about what was written there. In my opinion, we should revert or rewrite those edits following WP:P&G

Pinging:@Mehedi Abedin@Ahammed Saad@ApurboWiki2024@Stranger43286 Bruno pnm ars (talk) 18:46, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support for revert. Primary sources can't be used to provide any opinion. It's clearly personal judgement of these sources. Such can't be kept in Wikipedia. Ahammed Saad (talk) 13:21, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]