Talk:One Wonderful Day

One Wonderful Day has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 3, 2008	Articles for deletion	No consensus
November 8, 2011	Peer review	Reviewed
June 30, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

Current status: Good article

Television: Desperate Housewives / Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Desperate Housewives task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Fair use rationale for Image:Desp ep23.jpg

Image:Desp ep23.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:17, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:One Wonderful Day/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Status (talk · contribs) 05:31, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry for the wait. After looking through the article, I am confident in passing it. It is well written and sourced. Keep up the great work! Statυs (talk) 07:34, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on One Wonderful Day (Desperate Housewives). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090516042311/http://www.abcmedianet.com/web/dnr/dispDNR.aspx?id=052405_04 to http://abcmedianet.com/web/dnr/dispDNR.aspx?id=052405_04

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:40, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 3 April 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved -- JHunterJ (talk) 19:51, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

– Dab not needed. Unreal7 (talk) 22:05, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support. No other article uses this title. This will revert an undiscussed move from 2014. Station1 (talk) 05:58, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
support, use a hatnote instead. © Tbhotch^™ (en-3). 18:04, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support, use a hatnote instead per WP:2DABS. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:41, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.