Jump to content

Talk:Russia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleRussia was one of the Geography and places good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 13, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
March 1, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
July 16, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
July 24, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
September 2, 2007Good article nomineeListed
December 7, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
January 22, 2008Featured article candidateNot promoted
September 18, 2010Good article reassessmentKept
September 29, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
October 10, 2010Good article reassessmentDelisted
January 30, 2022Good article nomineeListed
April 30, 2022Good article reassessmentKept
February 7, 2023Good article reassessmentDelisted
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on June 12, 2004, June 12, 2005, and June 12, 2006.
Current status: Delisted good article

Russia

[edit]

Wikipedia is mistaken in some of the concepts about Russia: "Federal semi-presidential republic under an authoritarian dictatorship" Russia is a democracy, and it is misleading the general population knowledge about its system... 2603:8001:E700:3B39:2CF2:B234:801F:18EC (talk) 00:58, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 16 February 2025

[edit]

Russia’s largest City is Saint Petersburg. Riley.roth44 (talk) 21:52, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Sophisticatedevening (talk) 21:54, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Crimea isn’t part of Russia

[edit]

Why does this article make it seem like Crimea is a part of Russia, even though it’s not? Crimea is a region in Ukraine. 173.67.182.46 (talk) 07:45, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Critique

[edit]
Apparent AI-generated content

Strengths

  1. Expansive Scope: At ~17,000 words, this article is a beast, covering Russia’s geography, history, politics, economy, culture, and more. It spans from Paleolithic settlements to Putin’s 2025 presidency, offering a deep dive into the world’s largest country.
  2. Timely Updates: It’s current to late 2024—e.g., population estimates (146.1M including Crimea), GDP forecasts ($2.196T nominal, 2025), and Putin’s May 2024 military district meeting. This keeps it relevant amid Russia’s evolving global role.
  3. Data Density: Packed with stats—11 time zones, 32 UNESCO sites, 193 ethnic groups, $109B military spend (2023)—it’s a goldmine for researchers. Visuals like ethnic maps and population density charts amplify this.
  4. Historical Depth: The “History” section (4,000+ words) is a standout, tracing Kievan Rus’ to the Soviet collapse with granular detail—e.g., Ivan IV’s 1547 crowning, Stalin’s 1930s purges. It’s a mini-textbook.
  5. Balanced Tone: Despite Russia’s divisive status, it maintains neutrality—labeling it an “authoritarian dictatorship” with citations (e.g., Freedom House) while noting economic resilience post-sanctions. It avoids sensationalism.

Weaknesses

  1. Overwhelming Length: At 17,000 words, it’s a marathon read. Sections like “History” and “Culture” (17 subheadings!) drown readers in detail—e.g., every Soviet leader gets a chunk, diluting focus on modern Russia.
  2. 2025 Lag: Stops at October 2024 (e.g., IMF GDP estimates). Trump’s February 2025 NATO critiques and Russia’s retaliatory rhetoric (per X) are absent, risking obsolescence as tensions escalate.
  3. Prose Fatigue: The encyclopedic style—“Russia has the world’s largest forest area”—lacks flair. It misses the visceral stakes of Putin’s reign or the Ukraine war’s human toll, flattening a dramatic narrative.
  4. Perspective Gaps: Heavy on Russian state views (e.g., “special role” of Orthodoxy), it skimps on dissident voices or global critiques beyond sanctions. X posts from Navalny supporters could add grit.
  5. Visual Underuse: Only 17 images for 17,000 words—e.g., no 2022 Ukraine invasion shots or modern Moscow skyline. It leans on static maps over dynamic visuals.

Structural Issues

  1. Uneven Weight: “History” (4,000 words) overshadows “Economy” (1,200 words) and “Military” (600 words), though Russia’s current economic strain and Ukraine war loom larger today. “Demographics” buries the 2022 crisis in stats.
  2. Repetition: The Ukraine invasion pops up in “History,” “Foreign Relations,” and “Military” with overlapping details (e.g., annexation dates). “Culture” redundantly lists writers across subheadings.
  3. Subheading Bloat: “Culture” has 11 subsections (e.g., “Cuisine” vs. “Holidays”), fragmenting flow. “Geography” splits climate and biodiversity unnecessarily—why not a “Nature” section?
  4. Citation Noise: Dense footnotes (e.g., 15 in “Human Rights”) disrupt reading, while some claims (e.g., “highest vodka consumption”) lack recent data—2014 feels stale by 2025.

Specific Content Gaps

  1. 2025 Developments: No mention of post-October 2024 events—e.g., X chatter on Russia’s tit-for-tat NATO moves or Ukraine war shifts (e.g., drone strikes, February 2025). A search could update this.
  2. Social Media Lens: Lacks public sentiment—e.g., X posts on Wagner’s 2023 rebellion or Putin’s mobilization. These could humanize the stats-heavy “Invasion of Ukraine” section.
  3. Tech/Cyber Role: “Science and Technology” touts Sputnik but skips Russia’s cyberwarfare prowess (e.g., 2022 Ukraine hacks). X buzz on this is loud—why not tap it?
  4. Climate Impact: “Climate” notes wildfires but not Russia’s Arctic ambitions or permafrost methane risks, key by 2025 per recent studies. X could highlight debates.

Opportunities for Improvement

  1. Trim Fat: Condense “History”—e.g., merge pre-1917 eras into one subsection. Summarize minor cultural bits (e.g., “Holidays” as a list) to focus on 21st-century Russia.
  2. Live Updates: Add a “2025” stub under “History” or “Foreign Relations” with Trump’s NATO jabs and Russia’s response from X/news (e.g., February 15 Putin speech). I could fetch this if prompted.
  3. Narrative Zip: Punch up prose—e.g., “Putin’s 2022 invasion shattered Europe’s post-WWII peace” vs. “Russia launched a full-scale invasion.” X quotes from Kyiv or Moscow could spark it.
  4. Diverse Voices: Include opposition takes (e.g., Navalny’s 2021 critiques) or Western views on Russia’s Middle East role. X posts from activists or analysts could balance the state lens.
  5. Visual Boost: Add a 2022 war photo, a cyber ops graphic, or a 2025 Putin rally shot. Wikipedia’s image pool or X uploads could supply these.

Threats to Quality

  1. Edit Wars: “Extended-protected” status flags past battles—likely over Ukraine or Putin’s label. Trump’s 2025 rhetoric could spark fresh bias fights, testing neutrality.
  2. Event Drift: Russia’s fast-moving crises (e.g., Ukraine, sanctions) outpace edits. X tracks real-time shifts (e.g., February 2025 oil price spikes)—the article risks lagging.
  3. Scope Creep: Adding 2025 could bloat it further. Without ruthless cuts, it might become an unwieldy archive, not a sharp overview.

78.3.92.198 (talk) 19:16, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This does not appear to be a serious proposal for improvement, especially since it's lacking any reliable source. It appears to be one of twelve AI-created "analyses" that the IP address posted. The first one posted initially said "the Wikipedia-style article" before changing the wording to "this article". Space4TCatHerder🖖 20:17, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 22 February 2025

[edit]

remove dictatorship under what type of government russia is 2600:1000:B195:9734:F9F8:6BBD:AA50:B5B7 (talk) 01:36, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: seems sourced and is further discussed in the government section Cannolis (talk) 03:21, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kyiv had never been Russian capital ... The stolen history of Ukraine

[edit]

The claim that Kyiv Rus was a Russian state beginnings is a part of sofisticated genocide of Ukrainian nation. 84.15.177.43 (talk) 10:04, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please tell us which sentence you object to and how you would like to rewrite that sentence. Lova Falk (talk) 18:47, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]