Talk:Saraswati enthroned

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts

Hinduism Low‑importance

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Saraswati enthroned

... that Saraswati enthroned (pictured) has been described as "a pinnacle of Indian art"?

Source: Haidar, Navina Najat (2011). "The Kitab-i Nauras: Key to Bijapur's Golden Age". In Haidar, Navina Najat; Sardar, Marika (eds.). Sultans of the South: Arts of India's Deccan Courts, 1323-1687. Metropolitan Museum of Art. p. 34. ISBN 978-1-58839-438-5.

ALT1: ... that Navina Najat Haidar described Saraswati enthroned (pictured) as "a pinnacle of Indian art"? Source: Haidar, Navina Najat (2011). "The Kitab-i Nauras: Key to Bijapur's Golden Age". In Haidar, Navina Najat; Sardar, Marika (eds.). Sultans of the South: Arts of India's Deccan Courts, 1323-1687. Metropolitan Museum of Art. p. 34. ISBN 978-1-58839-438-5.
Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Bronze Age necropolis of Byblos
Comment: Indian art may or may not be wikilinked

Created by AmateurHi$torian (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 21 past nominations.

AmateurHi$torian (talk) 15:39, 12 February 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: I slightly prefer Alt1 but think either hook could work. Zeromonk (talk) 16:25, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]