Talk:The Time (band)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Minnesota Mid‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Move? (2010)

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. Jafeluv (talk) 16:23, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Time (band) → The Time — Over redirect. There is no need to disamiguate. There are already a hatnote at the top of the page anyway as well. Mhiji (talk) 01:10, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To most people The Time is the time is (1) the time for some coming important event, (2) what they look at their watches and clocks for, not some routine pop music band. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 07:02, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Therefore surely The Time should redirect to Time? Mhiji (talk) 15:52, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - Or Time (disambiguation)? Mhiji (talk) 15:53, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    - "The Time" used to be a disambiguation page: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Time&oldid=120752536 76.66.203.138 (talk) 08:09, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The Time should redirect to Time (disambiguation) 76.66.203.138 (talk) 08:05, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Move (2015) back to The Time (band)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The run as "The Original 7ven" is clearly over and the band is still best known as "The Time". Per WP:NAME, this page should revert to The Time (band). Rhindle The Red (talk) 13:28, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Requested move 24 April 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. We have consensus that the band is more commonly known as "The Time". — Cúchullain ^t/c 14:14, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Original 7ven → The Time (band) – The name of an article should reflect the name by which its subject is best known. This article was renamed to "The Original 7ven" because that was the band's current name. But currency isn't the criterion. That's moot in any case, since they aren't active as The Original 7ven. User:Rhindle The Red makes both these points above. TypoBoy (talk) 01:53, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom and User:Rhindle The Red's comments above. Note that the title was The Time (band) until this undiscussed move in 2013. — AjaxSmack 14:53, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Trump inaug

Didn't this group play at the Trump inauguration? — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 04:40, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism January 2025

Reverts adding irrelevant content are vandalism and becoming an edit war. — 104.173.25.23 (talk) 04:14, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any edits that rise to the level of vandalism. —C.Fred (talk) 04:19, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Adding content that is irrelevant and continuing to revert it back is vandalism — 104.173.25.23 (talk) 04:21, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, it is not. This is a content dispute. —C.Fred (talk) 04:21, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Earlier editor explained the edits. They are valid edits. — 104.173.25.23 (talk) 04:24, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So you agree that the other editors are making valid edits and not vandalizing? —C.Fred (talk) 04:25, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Editors contributing work that improves the article, yes. Those intent on reverting accurate edits and inserting inaccurate and irrelevant content are vandals. — 104.173.25.23 (talk) 04:29, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What a joke. You are the one who edit warred. The people who patroll recent changes or saw this edit warring incident are not vandals. Time to get off Wikipedia and do other hobbies. PEPSI697 💬 | 📝 04:23, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]