User talk:PEPSI697

This is PEPSI697's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2: 30 days

PLEASE NOTE BEFORE LEAVING A NEW TOPIC OR REPLY ON MY TALK PAGE: This user has ASD, so this user can be very sensitive to certain things, this means no swearing, commenting on me, abuse or a impolite way another user talks out to this user, all of those don't(s) are NOT tolerated here, if it happens, they will not be archived and will be removed from here by me. I would request users to be civil on this talk page. Also, in this user talk page Please also keep this talk page for Wikipedia related content only. Warnings or if you want to let me know something, that is totally accepted here. Thank you for noticing!

Archives

Archive 1

Archive 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by when more than 1 section is present.

Temporary return on patrolling RC notice

Hi, if you all notice that I've been patrolling RC today and question why, here is why. The reason is because that I would like to test out using UltraViolet that I've installed yesterday (13 February 2025) and experimented both Twinkle and UltraViolet in the sandbox for user warnings. The reason why I have not used Twinkle to notify/warn users is because I was using the mobile version of Wikipedia and there was no drop down menu, since around 20 January 2025, I have been using my computer to do the edits on Wikipedia. I have discovered that mobile may not be the best for patrolling RC due to limited features on an iPhone. I only plan to patrol RC for 1 hour today then will not be back at patrolling RC for a little while yet after that. Thanks. PEPSI697 💬 | 📝 05:59, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Since it's been very successful for me on patrolling RC, had no recorded problems since 14 February 2025, now have UltraViolet and started using desktop to patrol RC, this is no longer a temporary return and will now be patrolling full time between normally 06:00-06:55 (UTC); 08:00-9:30 (UTC). A 1 month break from RC was really worth it and got myself reset. I have been very calm in patrolling recent changes since 14 February 2025. Thanks. PEPSI697 💬 | 📝 10:55, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please look carefully

You reinstated negative BLP info based on YouTube. Drmies (talk) 16:01, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the revision provided you've added was a month ago by me when I've mistakenly reverted it due to hastiness. I'm currently not very active on patrolling RC at the moment (haven't patrolled since 15 January 2025 as a response to this ANI discussion which is now solved). Thanks. PEPSI697 💬 | 📝 05:46, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Error

Hi @PEPSI697, I think there was a mistake about the page Nhật Lâm, and it has something to do with his birth place.

Saigon was the name given before it was renamed to Ho Chi Minh City in 1976, four years before he was born. Buddy731 (talk) 09:02, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if I made a mistake, I checked carefully and appeared that you didn't add a reliable source, do you want me to revert it?

I've only returned to patrolling recent changes after a 1 month hiatus due to making too many mistakes between December 2024-January 2025. PEPSI697 💬 | 📝 09:07, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

Hello, and thank you for removing vandalism from Wikipedia. We appreciate this, but unfortunately your edit was not successful in restoring the article to its pre-vandalised state. For future reference, it is better to deal with vandalism by checking the article's page history to determine how it appeared before it was vandalised. You can then restore the whole article, or the relevant part of it, to an appropriate earlier version. If you simply delete the visible vandalism then any content removed or overwritten by the vandal is lost. See How to deal with vandalism for details. Thank you. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 09:23, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you please tell me which article this occurred at so I can have a second look at the revision? PEPSI697 💬 | 📝 09:24, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Concord_High_School_(Sydney)&oldid=1277380661 is the revision you left. If you read, the infobox and the main body of the article have issues. Be sure to check what you are reverting to in future. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 09:37, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I see that I've left that vandalism behind, I do remember checking all the revisions before reverting it (not the article revision history, from RC) but I didn't notice that the IP changed while editing. Thanks. PEPSI697 💬 | 📝 05:51, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jeanette Nolan

Hi Pepsi, in case you did not see my reply (as you asked me to go to your talk page), I was not experimenting. The reason for the edits is 'This section may contain excessive or irrelevant examples. Please help improve the article by adding descriptive text and removing less pertinent examples. (November 2023)'

That is from Wikipedia at the start of the Jeanette Nolan page, and I was following that instruction. All of these entries are worth noting, but almost all of should only be seen as listings in Jeanette Nolan's Filmography, not in the biography section. There is also a grammatical error at the start which I fixed, but that you have restored, with the error included. I would be happy to help you with it if you will let me.

Glm1 Glm1 (talk) 06:15, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I was patrolling RC (recent changes) at the time. Now I did check the revision carefully and confirmed that you didn't leave an edit summary. I suggest that maybe next time edit summaries may be helpful for all contributors on Wikipedia. Take care. PEPSI697 💬 | 📝 06:19, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]