Jump to content

User talk:71.78.136.213

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 2025

[edit]

Please do not add links to nonexisting articles as you did in Reversed ge. --Altenmann >talk 19:35, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. So that's why the lin- wait, why do people not care about the template for Cyrillic letters having many nonexistent links then? 71.78.136.213 (talk) 19:39, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
First of all, existence of something incorrect does not allow addition of more incorrect. Second, I do not know what you are talking about, so I cannot answer. You must provide wikilinks. A genetric answer is that redlinks are allowed for things notable enough so that articles may be written in the future, see WP:REDLINK. This is often seen in navigation templates: people know that things exist, but there is insufficient workforce; see, eg.,

One may be pretty that there is racism in Laos, but <sigh>. OK; I found some reports; and I will write up a sentence or two there.--Altenmann >talk 20:02, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop repeatedly adding imnpoper info into 'Reversed ge'. This is a disruption of wikipedia and if you continue, you may be blocked for this. --Altenmann >talk 00:01, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your question

[edit]

Good morning. You asked about a draft article that you (correctly) nominated for deletion. You can see the deleted page here[1]. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:31, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Self-nomination

[edit]

Proposed deletion of Draft:Voiceless glottal plosive

[edit]
Notice

The article Draft:Voiceless glottal plosive has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Duplicate of an already made redirect

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 71.78.136.213 (talk) 18:42, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shidinn (February 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:
Very unready.

This draft can't even decide whether its subject is "Xdi8" or "Shidinn".

Quote 1: saying that "Shidinn" often refers specifically to the established phonology and vocabulary, similar to the concept of absolute geometry in mathematics.

Who says this? How is this similar to absolute geometry?

Quote 2: It's important to note that "Shidinn" often refers specifically to the established phonology and vocabulary, similar to the concept of absolute geometry in mathematics.

Who says that noting this is important? (And is so much repetition necessary?)

Quote: grammar is largely missing. Quote: the lack of a finalized grammar. So is it mostly missing, or is it mostly in place? Either way, who describes its state of completion, and where do they say it?

Separate references from mere notes. (Notes can use Template:Efn.)
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Hoary (talk) 00:35, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, 71.78.136.213! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hoary (talk) 00:35, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I tried my best to remove all of the unneccessary stuff and changed most mentionings of Xdi8 to Shidinn, in order to comply with your decline message. 71.78.136.213 (talk) 02:47, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for block evasion.
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Acroterion (talk) 14:54, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am not affiliated with Visaa11, and you shouldn't remove stuff from someone else's talk page. 71.78.136.213 (talk) 14:57, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
Talkpage access revoked and redacted per BLP. Acroterion (talk) 15:40, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:71.78.136.213&oldid=1274657813"