User talk:Ainares

This is Ainares's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Badagalapura Nagendra (January 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fancy Refrigerator was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Badagalapura Nagendra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 13:36, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ainares! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 13:36, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Badagalapura Nagendra has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Badagalapura Nagendra. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:52, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Badagalapura Nagendra moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Badagalapura Nagendra. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. bonadea contributions talk 12:28, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Badagalapura Nagendra

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Badagalapura Nagendra, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bobby Cohn (talk) 18:59, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 20:09, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I hope this message finds you well. I recently discovered that my account, Ainares, has been blocked for "abusing multiple accounts." I believe this may be a misunderstanding, as I have not created or used any other accounts on Wikipedia.

I value Wikipedia as a platform and have always tried to follow its guidelines to the best of my understanding. If there is any activity that has raised concerns or been flagged as suspicious, I kindly request more information so I can address it.

It is possible that this issue arose from something beyond my control, such as:

Shared IP address usage (e.g., public Wi-Fi, shared internet).
Unintentional connection with another account if I used a device that others have access to.

I assure you that I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia's policies. I kindly request a review of my case and would be grateful if you could let me know how to resolve this matter.

Thank you for your time and understanding. Please let me know if you need any additional information from me to assist with your review.

Best regards,

Ainares Ainares (talk) 12:47, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal for Block Review of My Account (Ainares)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ainares (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia Administrators, I hope this message finds you well. I recently discovered that my account, Ainares, has been blocked for "abusing multiple accounts." I believe this may be a misunderstanding, as I have not created or used any other accounts on Wikipedia. I value Wikipedia as a platform and have always tried to follow its guidelines to the best of my understanding. If there is any activity that has raised concerns or been flagged as suspicious, I kindly request more information so I can address it. It is possible that this issue arose from something beyond my control, such as: Shared IP address usage (e.g., public Wi-Fi, shared internet). Unintentional connection with another account if I used a device that others have access to. I assure you that I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia's policies. I kindly request a review of my case and would be grateful if you could let me know how to resolve this matter. Thank you for your time and understanding. Please let me know if you need any additional information from me to assist with your review. Best regards, Ainares

Decline reason:

We do not consider AI-generated requests. GPTZero score: 100%. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 16:11, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ainares (talk) 12:59, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal for Block Review of My Account (Ainares)

Dear Wikipedia Administrators, How do you do? To my dismay, I found out that my account: Ainares has been disabled for “abuse of multiple accounts”. I am quite sure that this is a mix up since if anything, I would have no need to create or use other accounts on Wikipedia. I appreciate and hold Wikipedia in great esteem and always endeavored to comply with its policies as far as I understand. If in any case, there is some matter or issue which is of concern and has been flagged, I would appreciate more details so that I could work towards a solution. It is possible that this problem stems from other usOtherwise I might have accidentally formed a link with another account if I had used a shared device. . I assure you that I am fully committed towards adhering to the rules of the Wikipedia community. I kindly request that this case be reviewed and that I be provided with steps on how this issue can be rectified. Your patience and understanding are deeply appreciated. In case you need any help with re-examining the case, please let me know what else I can do. Kindest regards, Ainares Ainares (talk) 21:54, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]