User talk:AkilVigneshJr

May 2025

Hello AkilVigneshJr. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Deltin, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:AkilVigneshJr. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=AkilVigneshJr|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. scope_creep^Talk 13:47, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am not paid or do not have financial gain with the deltin group. I have been studing about the hosipitality infrastructure in Goa, specially the gaming and offshore gaming in Goa recently. I came to know that Deltin is publicly traded and hence was able to gather more reports and data points from reputed sources. That's how and why I felt that a Deltin Hotels and Casino wiki might be of use, since the compay is listed in BSE & NSE.

Apart from the motivation on recent research work on the industry, I am not financially or monetarily motivated by any player in the casino industry, for which I have published the article. I have gone over the Wiki regulations and ensured a balance in the article, enabling references from public media sources like TOI, Economic times etc. If there is a concern in the way the article was written, please feel free to highlight so I can work it out in this any future articles / changes that I might make in the open-source platform. AkilVigneshJr (talk) 08:21, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong article

The Casino Goa article is about a single casino ship and should remain specific to that one venue. Your recent edits may contain valid information, but they should be part of a more general article about casinos in Goa or perhaps added to the current Gambling in India article. I reverted your edits mainly because of the damage they caused, rather than any view of the information itself — GhostInTheMachine ^{talk to me} 10:58, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @GhostInTheMachine, the vessel you are talking about is called King's Casino (formerly Caravella). It was and is never refered as Casino Goa. I have been reading over the casino infrastructure and the properties. Casino Goa does not refer to any active or past casinos AkilVigneshJr (talk) 11:12, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If Casino Goa never existed, then we should probably delete the article. If the casino existed but traded under another name, then the article should be renamed to match. Was there a specific name for the casino itself or was it just the casino on the ship? Should the article be called M.V. Caravela or M. V. Caravela? — GhostInTheMachine ^{talk to me} 11:29, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This vessel is also planned to be removed by end of the year. Delta Corp is planning to replace the licence of this ship. The same I have referenced to TOI & Economic Times. It's better to remove the page. I thought of repurposing the page into the Casinos in Goa, instead of creating a fresh page, as Casino Goa while it may have been writen under context of a Vessel, also can apply and mean the Casinos in Goa. (MV Caravela is the Vessel name, King's Casino is the current casino name | Casinos have a name and the vessel / ship will have a name registered with the Captain of Ports) AkilVigneshJr (talk) 11:34, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/goa/delta-corp-readying-rs-150cr-vessel-to-replace-caravela/articleshow/81251658.cms#:~:text=PANAJI%3A%20Delta%20Corp%20continues%20to,in%20Mandovi%20by%20mid%2D2022. AkilVigneshJr (talk) 11:35, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/goa/deltin-to-replace-river-casino-with-new-ship-2-5-times-its-capacity/articleshow/91242416.cms AkilVigneshJr (talk) 11:36, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe the current article needs to be renamed to Deltin Caravela. That is the name used in the Times of India news items. Do you know how to access info from the Captain of Ports to check if that is the official name? — GhostInTheMachine ^{talk to me} 11:43, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]