Jump to content

User talk:AlanM1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The WikiEagle - January 2022

[edit]
The WikiEagle
The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter
Volume I — Issue 1
Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle
Announcements
  • After over a decade of silence, the WikiProject Aviation newsletter is making a comeback under the name The WikiEagle. This first issue was sent to all active members of the project and its sub-projects. If you wish to continue receiving The WikiEagle, you can add your username to the mailing list. For now the newsletter only covers general project news and is run by only one editor. If you wish to help or to become a columnist, please let us know. If you have an idea which you believe would improve the newsletter, please share it; suggestions are welcome and encouraged.
  • On 16 December, an RfC was closed which determined theaerodrome.com to be an unreliable source. The website, which is cited over 1,500 articles, mainly on WWI aviation, as of the publishing of this issue.
  • Luft46.com has been added to the list of problematic sources after this discussion.
  • The Jim Lovell article was promoted to Featured Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Hawkeye7.
  • The Raymond Hesselyn article was promoted to Good Article status on 4 December after being nominated by Zawed.
  • The Supermarine Sea King article was promoted to Good Article status on 22 December after being nominated by Amitchell125.
  • The William Hodgson (RAF officer) article was promoted to Good Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Zawed.
Members

New Members

Number of active members: 386. Total number of members: 921.

Closed Discussions

Featured Article assessment

Good Article assessment

Deletion

Requested moves

Article Statistics
This data reflects values from DMY.
Aviation pages by quality
Quality
Total
FA 142
FL 15
A 56
GA 505
B 4,573
C 11,878
Start 15,082
Stub 18,754
List 2,539
Category 11,638
Disambig 653
File 2,713
Portal 629
Project 89
Redirect 1,518
Template 2,489
NA 66
Assessed 73,339
Unassessed 1
Total 73,340
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 251,791 Ω = 4.92
New/Ongoing Discussions

On The Main Page

Did you know...

Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagle at The WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the mailing list.
Newsletter contributor: ZLEA

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year from Wikimedians of Los Angeles!

[edit]

Happy New Year from Wikimedians of Los Angeles!


We're beginning to plan in-person and virtual events for 2022, and your support is needed as we re-launch the LA User Group.
Please get involved! If you have ideas, or if you're interested in helping to lead the group, leave a note at Ideas for 2022 on our talk page.


Join our Facebook group here.

To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list.

--JSFarman (talk) 02:07, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

LA to FA 2022

[edit]
LA to FA 2022

Dear AlanM1,

You're invited to a zoom call, taking place on February 11, with the goal of improving the article on Los Angeles to Featured article status! I often find it daunting to approach the Big Subjects on my own—so if you, like me, want a time to sit down with fellow dedicated editors and tackle something important and complex, this is the zoom for you! I, unfortunately, have no way to transmit snacks over zoom; but I trust you to exercise good judgement and discretion in selecting snacks of your own. Hope to see you there—if you're interested, add your name here!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 00:19, 10 January 2022 (UTC) To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list.[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:HexColorToLum

[edit]

Template:HexColorToLum has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:09, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox U.S. county/TZ row

[edit]

Template:Infobox U.S. county/TZ row has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 11:11, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply

[edit]
Thanks for your reply
Re my comment of 2020-Aug-24 at " talk: Wayne Roberson, Austin, Texas", you asked about errors I mentioned but did not correct…these were minor, but nobody likes loose ends. Before I elaborate to you or proceed to fix those errors, I’ve tried to learn more about entering. But finding where to go within Wikipedia to learn how to do many things eludes me.

Much of my prior editing has been desultory: rephrasing for clarity, etc. Often I simply look into an "edit" screen to see how things are done.

Your experience as an editor is far beyond my knowledge, and you replied to me, so I am asking for help. I have an example problem that pertains to many things I would like to enter:

I cannot learn how to add to or revise the "References" section of an article. An example is "Fort Lancaster": all I see is on the "edit" screen is "==References==" then "{{Reflist}}". [I corrected this to show the template instead of substituting it, using {{Tlx|Reflist}} instead of just {{Reflist}}. – AlanM1]

I’ve entered several times to this article (in 1974-1976, I was head of field archeology at that site). I want to comment on a recent statement about a "model" of the site in a local (Ozona TX) museum, which museum’s Wikipedia article has a photo of a cute but fanciful little construction with no data to support it. There is no illustration in Federal or State of Texas data showing what was above ground, only archeological ephemera such as foundation stones and soil differences are evident. The supposed "ruins" of a building in the article itself is the work of late 1960’s architects who had little more than a few scattered stones to guide them, and the "restoration" is imaginative and embarrassing, to say the least, but I would not eliminate the photo or criticize the "restoration" — which precedes my time at Texas Parks and Wildlife.

How should I proceed with my learning. And how may I avoid being obtrusive? Wayne Roberson, Austin, Texas (talk) 23:33, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Wayne Roberson, Austin, Texas: Hi. I'm afraid I've no idea what it was about to begin with, being such a long time ago. I'm pretty inactive on Wikipedia for some time now, so I can't be of much help, except to say that, if you're looking for a primer on references, I believe WP:REFBEGIN is a decent starting point and will point you to additional resources if needed.
The key is that the reference code is placed between <ref>...</ref> tags at the point in the text where you want the [#] to appear. The wiki software then assembles them all at the point where the {{Reflist}} template is found (usually in the References section), doing additional formatting and setting up the links back and forth to the [#] in the article text.
Two good places to ask for help are WP:Teahouse and WP:Help desk. I hope this helps. —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 21:29, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

[edit]

Your edit to revert on Kirksville, MO was not made by me. I believe I was logged into my Wiki account and a student took over and inserted the 'god forsaken wasteland' edit. Sorry to have caused that trouble and good looking out. I'll be more careful to log out of my account in the future. From an embarrassed Kirksvillian. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Toka248 (talk • contribs) 16:29, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:SCOTUS term for US volume

[edit]

Template:SCOTUS term for US volume has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 11:59, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Features for new users coming soon (and mentors wanted)

[edit]

Hello.

Although you've not been very active at all there recently, I see you're still currently listed as a host at the Teahouse. So I wanted to make sure you're aware of the imminent rollout of new Growth Team Features which every new account will be getting by default. Each users will soon see a new 'Homepage' tab next to their User page. It contains two main elements which might impact on your involvement - and you'd be welcome to get involved and help out directly with one of them.

  • Firstly, they will be offered a range of 'suggested edits', and encouraged to make simple improvements to pages that interest them. (Being aware of this feature would be helpful for all Teahouse hosts if you're likely to offer advice on tasks for them to start out doing.)
  • There's also a 'Your impact' box to show them how many people have seen the pages they've just edited.
  • Finally, each new user is randomly assigned a 'mentor' from a list of friendly, experienced editors, like yourself. If they get stuck, they can ask a question directly to them via a Your mentor box, and hopefully get a swift, friendly answer from that mentor. Currently, this feature is given to 2% of new users, but it's set to increase to around 10% in the very near future.

To spread the load on our current list of around 65 mentors, I'm reaching out to ask if you'd like to help out and sign up as one? The workload is relatively small; User Panini! reports receiving four questions a month, on average, all of which were simple ones of the type we already get at the Teahouse, whilst I've had just one in the last 3 weeks. To view a list of every question asked of all mentors over the last 14 days, click here.

If becoming a mentor and being available to help new users on their first few days here interests you - just as have done at the Teahouse in the past - then please consider signing up at Growth Team features/Mentor list. But please only do so if you are genuinely willing to be available to help. Existing users can already 'opt-in' to seeing the Newcomer Homepage features via their Preferences.

Thank you! Nick Moyes (talk) 11:30, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info, @Nick. Unfortunately, after some time away from the help platforms and editing in general (due to interference from Real LifeTM), I don't feel particularly qualified to help any more, as it seems I need to go look up some of the simplest things, and don't really have a feel for what's going on in the project like I used to. I applaud the new features and hope they lead to more/better engagement by new users. —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 00:13, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No worries. Thanks for letting me know. Hope you’ll be back once you get your feet under the table again. Cheers Nick Moyes (talk) 00:26, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Color list row

[edit]

Template:Color list row has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 07:19, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Color list top

[edit]

Template:Color list top has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 07:19, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:ColorToLum

[edit]

Template:ColorToLum has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 07:20, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:RM row name

[edit]

Template:RM row name has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:38, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Color redirects

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Color redirects indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Steel1943 (talk) 06:18, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Drake's recent certifications

[edit]

Hey, have you noticed differences on RIAA's website? When we check the database of each song, RIAA has updated the singles equal to 27M. But on their list of highest digitally certified artists, they have only added 20M. TheWikiholic (talk) 01:54, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@TheWikiholic: When I've run those down in the past, I usually find it's related to some idiosyncracy in the way they add up the individual awards. I.e., either there are awards in the detailed search that are not included in the total for some reason, or there are awards missing from the detailed search, usually because of a slight difference in the artist name, collaboration, etc.. I'd expect the totals and detailed search have to come from the same underlying data – I don't think they are manually tallied – so there is usually an explanation, and I just let it work itself out in time. I've occasionally emailed them about a problem. Though I've never gotten a direct response, they fix it eventually. :) —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 16:20, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
(more at Talk:List of best-selling music artists § RIAA's recent certifications of Drake) —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 07:31, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi I noticed that you haven’t included many artists like Bob Marley, Oasis, Robbie Williams, Jimi Hendrix, Jamiroquai and many more, is there a reason for this? If you want some more bands contact me at 78.147.230.39 (talk) 19:49, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry I haven’t spoken on Wiki before and should have started a new topic so I hope this reaches AlanM1 :) 78.147.230.39 (talk) 19:51, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No worries. As you no doubt know, there are lots of different ways to look at music certifications. List of highest-certified music artists in the United States is specifically about just two of the RIAA lists, as published on their website, and cited in the article. The criteria for inclusion are simple, based on the top 100 "Artists (albums)" and top 50 "Artists (digital singles)" ranks in the two lists. There are (or can be) other articles about other top-n lists by RIAA and others. I hope this helps. —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 03:04, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also note that the artists you cited have certs below the top 100 rank (currently 23 MM certs). Bob Marley & The Wailers, for example, have 21.5 MM album certs and Jimi Hendrix has 23 MM, while Oasis, Robbie Williams, and Jamiroquai have less than the 10 MM certs that is apparently the criterion to appear on the RIAA list. —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 03:22, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar?

[edit]

In March 2022, you edited Boron Air Force Station, including "grammar" changes. One was to change "inactivate" to "deactivate" in connection with the operating squadron. USAF units are not deactivated, they are inactivated. (Citations available upon request) Lineagegeek (talk) 23:50, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Lineagegeek: Re: this, both terms seem used according to "de" vs. "in", which even shows a 7:5 preference, though that's not at all scientific. Google's Oxford Languages dictionary entries even specifically mention the specific military use of the term at "deactivate", but not "inactivate". Still, I probably wasn't referring to that change when I put "grammar" in the comment, and I'm a little surprised I made the change anyway; must have been on auto-pilot. I can understand it being either way if inactivate is the preferred military term, though we are supposed to eschew jargon (and words like eschew, for that matter) in favor of more general terminology and usage. —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 18:32, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
For USAF units "inactivate" is proper and has a different meaning from similar terms, like "disband", "discontineu", and the older "demobilize". So, I view it more as accuracy than jargon. Lineagegeek (talk) 00:03, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wayside Theatre

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Wayside Theatre requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

I wrote an article in my sandbox and need to move it to this title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. APK whisper in my ear 14:09, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wins-losses-pct in table

[edit]

Hi, I've recently been using Template:Wins-losses-pct in table, which I've found very helpful, and I see you created some years ago. I'm writing to ask if there is any variant that would do the same for wins-losses-ties? I looked but could not find one. Thanks. Dmoore5556 (talk) 07:28, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. See Template talk:Wins-losses-pct in table#Overlap in functionality. —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 17:49, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

LA Meetup: February 17, 2024

[edit]
Edit-a-thon and Wikipedia Day Celebration

Please join Wikimedians of Los Angeles on Saturday, February 17 from 12:00 to 4:00 pm for a Los Angeles and West Hollywood-themed edit-a-thon at the West Hollywood Library. (For the details and to sign up, see Wikipedia:Meetup/Los Angeles/February 2024.)

We'll also be celebrating Wikipedia's 23rd birthday/Wikipedia Day. (There will be cake!)

We hope to see you there! JSFarman via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:03, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Join our Facebook group here.
To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list.

Glad to hear :P

[edit]

Hello old friend! Hope you're doing well - FlightTime (open channel) 19:02, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 8, 2024

[edit]
The Return of the LA Wiknic
Eat, drink, and bask in the glory of Los Angeles in early June at the 9th not-annual Wiknic!

Saturday, June 8 from 11:30 to 2:30 pm
Pan Pacific Park
7600 Beverly Blvd, Los Angeles CA 90036
Get the details and RSVP here.
(It's a potluck. There's a wish list on the meetup page.)
Get the details and join WikiLA here.
To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:21, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-a-thon August 24

[edit]
August 24: Not just an edit-a-thon, an edit-a-thon in Manhattan Beach.

Please join WikiLA at an edit-a-thon to improve and create articles related to marine life and the ocean in the Los Angeles area. Inspiration courtesy of the public library in Manhattan Beach, one of SoCal's most beautiful coastal communities.
Saturday, August 24 from 10:00 AM - 2:00 PM
Manhattan Beach Public Library, 1320 Highland Ave., Manhattan Beach 90266
Get the details and RSVP here
To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups remove.your name, from this list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:55, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 Missouri Valley Conference baseball tournament

[edit]

@AlanM1: Currently I am working on the draft for the 2024 Missouri Valley Conference baseball tournament, but I am hitting some unexpected troubles with the way I want to go about the bracket template. You see there is a play-in round for the No. 5 vs No. 8 seeds and the No. 6 vs No. 7 seeds, but the losers of the play-in round play each other. That's where I am running into trouble. The winner of that game then play the losers of the No. 3 vs No. 4 matchup, who the winner then plays to winner of No. 1 vs the lowest play-in seed. I know this seems confusing but you can see a visual reference here. I am very confused on how I can make all of the games show while also making it easy to read. Thank you for your time. MarqueesCalaway (talk) 14:24, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MarqueesCalaway: Looks really complicated, though I'm sure they had a reason to structure it that way :) I'm afraid I have been away from WML too long now to be of any immediate use in this. I'd suggest contacting some of the editors that worked on NCAA tourneys in the last year, who might have more current expertise. Best of luck. —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 22:29, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@AlanM1: Do you have any recommendations? MarqueesCalaway (talk) 03:58, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@MarqueesCalaway: How about Billcasey905, who created 2022 Missouri Valley Conference baseball tournament? —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 20:27, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Aero blue" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect Aero blue has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 20 § Aero blue until a consensus is reached. ... discospinster talk 16:40, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Its never lupus" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect Its never lupus has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 2 § Its never lupus until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 21:36, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AlanM1&oldid=1249045752"