User talk:DaniloDaysOfOurLives
This page has archives. Sections older than 39 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
![]() | This user is busy at university and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
List of Emmerdale characters introduced in 1992
[edit]Hello there, I remember from a while back you said you had a list of 1992 Emmerdale characters. How's that going? I'm also interested to know what other characters you have drafts for from Coronation Street, Emmerdale, EastEnders and Hollyoaks. All the best! EmmerdaleFan2001 (talk) 09:45, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
- Hey, so sorry I missed this! I currently have a 100+ drafts - which characters did you want to know about? Regarding the 1992 list, it is in early stages - we are just collecting sources. How are you? How is your Dave draft going? DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 16:51, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- I have to admit that I haven't done much with my Dave draft yet. Gotta add a photo and the storylines, but I'm not sure how to add the photo. I'm alright, thanks for asking, are you? EmmerdaleFan2001 (talk) 17:24, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
Women in Red May 2025
[edit]![]()
Announcements (events facilitated by others):
Progress ("moving the needle"):
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 09:19, 29 April 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
New article for DYK
[edit]Thanks again for your offer to help. This is the article I am trying to get up to a DYK for the person's birthday on June 27. How best should I proceed? Remember (talk) 20:41, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
- So should I just post the article up now and you will help me get it through DYK by June 27, 1912? Remember (talk) 11:14, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hey, so sorry for the lateness, I did not see this! The thing is that articles cannot be requested for a date longer than six weeks, so I would recommend waiting a few weeks before publishing it so that it can then be set for 27 June. I look forward to reviewing it :D DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 18:17, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- Understood. I will wait until May 16 to make it live! Remember (talk) 19:18, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- Amazing! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 01:37, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
- Ok. I made the article here - Irve Tunick. Should I submit this for a DYK? Remember (talk) 19:54, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
- @DaniloDaysOfOurLives:, I created the DYK here - Template:Did you know nominations/Irve Tunick. Remember (talk) 13:17, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hey apologies, I have been so exhausted and I missed this. I have reviewed the article and made a comment :) DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 16:49, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- No need to apologize! Thank you for getting to this so quickly! I really appreciate it! Remember (talk) 17:47, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- @DaniloDaysOfOurLives So has the article been passed and will it appear on the main page? Remember (talk) 18:25, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- Whoops. I just saw your notice about your medical issues. Don't worry about responding to me. I hope you heal and get better soon. I will asks someone else to help out. Thank you. Remember (talk) 18:27, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- No need to apologize! Thank you for getting to this so quickly! I really appreciate it! Remember (talk) 17:47, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hey apologies, I have been so exhausted and I missed this. I have reviewed the article and made a comment :) DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 16:49, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- I'm so sorry, I was waiting for you to let me know. I will check it when I get home :) DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 20:17, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- @DaniloDaysOfOurLives:, I created the DYK here - Template:Did you know nominations/Irve Tunick. Remember (talk) 13:17, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- Ok. I made the article here - Irve Tunick. Should I submit this for a DYK? Remember (talk) 19:54, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
- Amazing! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 01:37, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
- Understood. I will wait until May 16 to make it live! Remember (talk) 19:18, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hey, so sorry for the lateness, I did not see this! The thing is that articles cannot be requested for a date longer than six weeks, so I would recommend waiting a few weeks before publishing it so that it can then be set for 27 June. I look forward to reviewing it :D DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 18:17, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
Tina Dingle
[edit]Hey Danilo, would you be able to move my draft User:JuneGloom07/Tina D to Tina Dingle, please? - JuneGloom07 Talk 00:43, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
- Yes of course! Just moved! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 03:23, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you! - JuneGloom07 Talk 04:33, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Charlie Suff
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Charlie Suff you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of It is a wonderful world -- It is a wonderful world (talk) 12:24, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
GAN television section
[edit]We are obliterating this section! Nice work. IAWW (talk) 18:13, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you so much! I love reviewing articles there and I like working with you - we make a great team :D DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 18:17, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- I agree! IAWW (talk) 20:57, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
Moved userpages
[edit]Hello. I notice that you have been tagging pages in your userspace under U1 when they were created outside of your userspace. Can you please use {{db-moved}} instead of {{U1}}? As Writ Keeper noted at User:DaniloDaysOfOurLives/Move1, pages that have previously been moved are only eligible if all previous titles were in the user's userspace, so U1 is inappropriate. Thanks, Sdrqaz (talk) 01:19, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
- Okay, I will do that from now on. Thank you for letting me know. I was unaware of this as I had used U1 hundreds of times over the past 9 or so months and there was never an issue until recently, and the pages were always deleted. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 01:38, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
- To give a bit more context, the prohibition on U1 for pages that were created outside of the requestor's userspace is a safeguard against someone moving a random page that they didn't like into their userspace so that it could be deleted without discussion. Anyways, thanks for the reply! Sdrqaz (talk) 01:49, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Charlie Suff
[edit]The article Charlie Suff you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Charlie Suff for comments about the article, and Talk:Charlie Suff/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of It is a wonderful world -- It is a wonderful world (talk) 07:43, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Andrew Still (actor)
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Andrew Still (actor) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of It is a wonderful world -- It is a wonderful world (talk) 10:44, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Andrew Still (actor)
[edit]The article Andrew Still (actor) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Andrew Still (actor) for comments about the article, and Talk:Andrew Still (actor)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of It is a wonderful world -- It is a wonderful world (talk) 23:23, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Metro discussion
[edit]Hi @DaniloDaysOfOurLives, you mentioned earlier that there was an ongoing discussion on the reliability of the metro for soap opera information, but I can't find it anywhere! Where is it? Also, I'm just checking you got my email? IAWW (talk) 15:16, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hey @It is a wonderful world! The discussion is at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Soap Operas#The use of Metro as source in articles related to soap operas. Also, I am so so sorry, I did not see your email! I just noticed it now - it had gone in my spam! I am about to go to sleep so I will reply to it later today - I was worried you had not replied! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 05:16, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
- Aha good job I checked about the email, and thanks for the link to the discussion. I noticed you are still doing so many GA reviews! How do you feel about both of us hard focusing the Television section to try and clear the whole section? IAWW (talk) 07:22, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hey, I have just sent my reply email! That seems like a great idea - I would love to clear the section with you! There a few articles that I would rather not review though because I struggle with the terminology and thus I would not be the most helpful though, but it should be fine - I have emailed you about it :) DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 16:47, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- Aha good job I checked about the email, and thanks for the link to the discussion. I noticed you are still doing so many GA reviews! How do you feel about both of us hard focusing the Television section to try and clear the whole section? IAWW (talk) 07:22, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
Articles for Creation backlog drive
[edit]
Hello DaniloDaysOfOurLives:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive in June!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 1 month of outstanding reviews from the current 3+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 June 2025 through 30 June 2025.
You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.
Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 3200 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Your GA nomination of Episode 6465
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Episode 6465 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 11:21, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
Duration
[edit]Hello, I was meaning to ask this yesterday but didn't get chance. About the duration on Bear Wolf's page, I'm now aware that this is allowed to be used but what exactly is the rule that allows it. I'm just asking for future articles I make. Thank you. EEfamilytrees (talk) 15:31, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hey no worries! Which articles are you thinking of creating? :) DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 04:19, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- I currently have a few drafts I've started. Some will never be added to mainspace, some will not be for a long time and some just need completing by me. These are available to see on my user page if you want to look which might qualify for the shortened duration. Thanks for the reply :) EEfamilytrees (talk) 17:18, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Episode 6465
[edit]The article Episode 6465 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Episode 6465 for comments about the article, and Talk:Episode 6465/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 04:02, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
Page swap/moves
[edit]Hi! Thanks for your work handling move requests, but ... could you kindly stop doing this? This is a purely selfish request – it takes considerably more time and effort to work out what you've done than it would have to perform the move. My thoughts: if someone lists a draft–>mainspace move at WP:RMTR, it's probably simplest to just ask them to tag the blocking redirect as WP:G6 (or indeed do so yourself), and then perform the move once it's been deleted. Oh, and please see WP:RDRAFT – redirects resulting from draft–>mainspace moves should be kept, apparently. Thanks, regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:01, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hey, I am quite confused... I can't see what you linked. How have I done selfish requests? DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 10:10, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, I mean that the request is pure selfishness on my part, not yours – it'd be so much easier to just perform the move that to sort out the history of the various moves that lead to a page such as that. Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:32, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
Soap character pages
[edit]Hi I noticed that a user has been changing soap character pages to have real world info before the storylines even though most pages have been the oppisite for many years now? should there of not been a consensus around this first as it is a major change Thanks James4pk James4pk (talk) 16:08, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
- That is simply not the case. Only EastEnders articles have the plot section first. All the other soaps have always followed a layout with the plot section after casting/development and before reception. Also you stated "for many years now" - I thought you are a new editor?Rain the 1 20:43, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
- Yes i am a new editor. But have seem wikipedia articles for years now. James4pk (talk) 21:10, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
- Seen James4pk (talk) 21:12, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
- I noticed. No acknowledgment that you got it wrong over the presumptions that plot comes first. I am bored of you feigning: "I'm a new editor, leave me alone." You are disrupting this project like a wildfire.Rain the 1 22:30, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
- Well, If i did make the mistake of saying about the plot I will apologize but to be fair, that is what i have seen throughout. The comment that i am disrupting this project seems a bit far fetched espicially when one of the main contrubutors to this project is nothing but a glorified sockpuppet but so be it if you see that way i wont stop you.
- Have a good day.
- James4pk James4pk (talk) 06:08, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- It was because you made numerous unexplained edits which is disruptive. Which is why I left a note about the edit summary. I am not sure which editor you are referring to in regards to sock puppetry.Rain the 1 22:18, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- I have been told i am not allowed to say, but they have been under investigation before. James4pk (talk) 18:55, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
- It was because you made numerous unexplained edits which is disruptive. Which is why I left a note about the edit summary. I am not sure which editor you are referring to in regards to sock puppetry.Rain the 1 22:18, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- Yes i am a new editor. But have seem wikipedia articles for years now. James4pk (talk) 21:10, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Queenie (Wilson novel)
[edit] Hello! Your submission of Queenie (Wilson novel) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 16:13, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
Women in Red June 2025
[edit]![]()
Announcements:
Progress ("moving the needle"):
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:03, 29 May 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Sabrina Adetiba
[edit]I was just reading through Sabrina Adetiba’s new article. At first, I was intrigued about her notability as she mainly felt like a background character, but now I’ve read it, it’s great and works very well, and just shows how good of an editor you are. Well done! EEfamilytrees (talk) 16:09, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
- That really means so much, thank you! 😊 A lot of characters may not seem notable from the storylines but they often receive a lot of coverage and exceed the criteria. I am glad you liked the article 😊 DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 19:00, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
- No problem. Yeah, it's really easy to underestimate how many future articles could currently be created using existing sources. I still can't believe that Mel Hutchwright, after only three weeks on-screen, has had an article for years. EEfamilytrees (talk) 20:16, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
DYK for Looking Glass Girl
[edit]On 1 June 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Looking Glass Girl, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the novel Looking Glass Girl was launched at Coventry Central Library to highlight the threat of 17 libraries in the city closing? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Looking Glass Girl. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Looking Glass Girl), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:03, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Cassie Plummer
[edit]Hi Danilo, I hope you're well. I know this may be a big ask (feel free to decline) but at some point when you're free, can you please have a look at my new draft for Coronation Street's Cassie Plummer? It is currently unfinished but I'd like to know if there's anything I can improve on as my past two articles weren't amazing as I was quite new to editing on Wikipedia and I'd like to do a better job at this one. I thought I'd ask you personally as I know you have made many great soap character articles. Thank you. EEfamilytrees (talk) 22:22, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- @EEfamilytrees Hey, thank you for your message. I have just looked at it and it is looking good so far, well done! Here are my suggestions for improving it:
- 1.) The casting and characterisation paragraph is extremely long and I would recommend cutting it into two or more paragraphs
- 2.) I would recommend removing Source #7 as it Daily Express is not considered reliable - though it is okay to use for reception if you would like to use it for that (Per WP:RSOPINION
- 3.) I would recommend adding a free images of Sweeney, Halsall and others and archiving the sources but that can be done later
- 4.) Right now it is very incomplete and missing the important reception section BUT I am aware that you have just finished so no worries about that :)
- 5.) There are a lot of quotes so far, so I would recommend paraphrasing some of them, especially to avoid potential copyright violations - this tool [1] shows the sources that have the most copied in the article so it could give you an idea of which quotes to trim or shorten.
- I am happy to have another look when it is more complete. Well done on your work so far! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 00:05, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you, I might take you up on that offer. I’ll quickly reply to all your much appreciated points.
- 1) Will do :)
- 2) That’s fine as it’s only used in one sentence.
- 3) I was already considering the pictures once I’ve wrote the content to build it around. And I didn’t think about the archiving so I’m glad you mentioned that.
- 4) Yeah, I’m going in chronological order. It’s the easiest way for me to find sources by searching for them one week or month at a time so I don’t miss anything important by mistake. Reception will be wrote soon, as well as Storylines. As I’m going in chronological order, I’ve got to the end of June 2023 in content so she’s just joined, not much reception available at that time. I can imagine a lot will be available throughout 2024 as that’s the only year she’s appeared in fully so far.
- 5) Thanks for the tool! One problem I’m aware I’ve got is I tend to quote a lot, but I’m happy to change that.
- Thanks again for your help. Now I know you’re happy to do these checks, I’ll be sure to come back to you closer to its completion and then we’ll eventually add it to main space! I do have one question though. What articles don’t require storyline sections? I’ve noticed most have them but there’s some like Daisy Midgeley and Claudette Hubbard that don’t. I’m guessing that’s as they have higher quality development sections that contain storylines in more depth. EEfamilytrees (talk) 00:31, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hello, I have another question. I've started early reception for Cassie. Would it be better to write in chronological order (which I would personally do) or split between critical response and viewer responses (via these sort of articles which I'm sure you've seen[2]) Thanks again for helping with this. EEfamilytrees (talk) 17:45, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Greetings. You emailed me, titled apology. But you don't need to apologize to me for anything. I'm not sure how or if I made you feel that way, but it was not my intent in any feedback I gave. I understand what you said and can relate. Thanks for coming to WP:BLPN. Cheers! JFHJr (㊟) 04:08, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hey, thank you so so so much, that really means a lot! I really appreciate it. I got really worried I had annoyed you or caused stress and misread tone, which is almost impossible to interpret via talk page messages, so I really appreciate you confirming it. Thank you so much for reassuring me and helping me with the whole situation with your feedback! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 05:15, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Hello?
[edit]Hi Danilo! Did you forget about the GA review you were doing on this page again? Pinged you a while back but you didn't seem to respond, so I'm just notifying you again on the talk page. Cheers! Yelps ᘛ⁐̤ᕐᐷ critique me 17:29, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hey, I am so sorry, I did miss it. I was waiting for your ping and assumed that since it was a long task and you had exams that it was just taking a while and did not want to add to your stress. I am so sorry - I did not realise you had pinged me. I will do the full review this week - it is a long article because of all of the edit summaries so it will take a few days but by Saturday it will be there. I am sorry again @Yelps DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 19:34, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter anymore, the exam is done and now there's a 15 day break for the upcoming "Eid-ul-Adjha", basically the second of the two big festivals in Islamic countries. So I've got more than enough free time :) Yelps ᘛ⁐̤ᕐᐷ critique me 08:14, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Thanks!
[edit]... for updating the Wiki Loves Pride pages! I didn't mean to step on your toes and I am pleased to see these pages being updated with past contributions in addition to the ongoing campaign. Thanks again and happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:41, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hey, you're very welcome! I really appreciate this message, thank you! I have been a part of the LGBTQ+ Wikiproject for years but was unaware of Wiki Loves Pride and so I added my LGBTQ+ articles to the Wiki Loves Pride year pages as I wanted them to be included and to make the lists more comprehensive etc. Thank you genuinely so much for all that you did on this campaign - you really are extremely inspiring! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 01:19, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Like ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:50, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Would you mind putting the {{Wiki Loves Pride talk}} template inside the Wikiproject banner shell, in future? Thanks — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 07:53, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hey @MSGJ, I initially did this as you can see in the history, but the message was not displaying correctly and I noticed that other pages had it outside of the shell and were displaying correctly so that's why I moved it ouf of the banner shell DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 09:59, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Can you explain what you mean by "not displaying correctly"? Give me an example? Thanks — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:41, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Sam Mitchell
[edit]My apologies for the edit on Sam's page that I noticed you reverted. For some reason I stupidly read the revision wrong and thought it was the character's duration that was changed and not Medcalf's duration. I just thought I'd explain but I'm glad you realised it was good faith :) EEfamilytrees (talk) 14:03, 5 June 2025 (UTC)