User talk:Elias Ziade

Your GA nomination of Mseilha Fort

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mseilha Fort you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:03, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

@Hawkeye7 Thank you very much for taking the time to review the article, I am ready to address any concerns. Best wishes for the new year! el.ziade (talkallam) 21:51, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mseilha Fort

The article Mseilha Fort you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mseilha Fort for comments about the article, and Talk:Mseilha Fort/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:03, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Baalbek has a 1R restriction

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article: You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive) You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

And that edit clearly shows lack of good faith Doug Weller talk 12:26, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

I also note you've had the contentious topic alert for this area. Doug Weller talk 12:27, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

@Doug Weller Oh, thanks for letting me know. didn't know about the 1RR. So what is the proper procedure to challenge this addition? Since talk pages are being blanked and erased? Please advise? el.ziade (talkallam) 12:56, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

WP:RSN as that's what your complaint is about. Doug Weller talk 12:58, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

@Doug Weller yes, that and the practice of active silencing, censorship and actively hounding users, newcomers, veterans, unregistered users and anyone who edits that bit, into despair or actively seeking to get them blocked. el.ziade (talkallam) 13:06, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

DYK for Mseilha Fort

On 11 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mseilha Fort, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Mseilha Fort is strategically located to overlook the crossing of the Jaouz River near Ras ash-Shaq'a, a promontory in Lebanon? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mseilha Fort. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mseilha Fort), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

– 🌻 Hilst (talk | contribs) 00:03, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Phoenician shipwrecks of Mazarrón

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Phoenician shipwrecks of Mazarrón you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LastJabberwocky -- LastJabberwocky (talk) 18:02, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

@LastJabberwocky@LastJabberwocky much appreciated. el.ziade (talkallam) 17:38, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
42		History of ancient Lebanon (talk)	Add sources
972		Canaanite religion (talk)	Add sources
561		Sidon (talk)	Add sources
490		Canaanite languages (talk)	Add sources
78		Names of the Levant (talk)	Add sources
100		Carthaginian Iberia (talk)	Add sources
426		Canaan (son of Ham) (talk)	Cleanup
10		Azuli Records (talk)	Cleanup
77		AMD K6-III (talk)	Cleanup
2,545		Ancient Carthage (talk)	Expand
88		Classical demography (talk)	Expand
138		History of Tunisia (talk)	Expand
212		History of Carthage (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
186		Phoenicianism (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
9		Kudassanad (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
44		Long-term impact of alcohol on the brain (talk)	Merge
249		Wi-Fi calling (talk)	Merge
18		River Subdivision (CSX Transportation) (talk)	Merge
3		Abram B. Olin (talk)	Wikify
8		Disability and women's health (talk)	Wikify
7		Chilmark Quarries (talk)	Wikify
2		Ahmed Benzelikha (talk)	Orphan
4		Battle of the sexes in science fiction (talk)	Orphan
3		Atmah (yacht) (talk)	Orphan
11		Phoenicia under Hellenistic rule (talk)	Stub
17		Azemilcus (talk)	Stub
3		1851 in Siam (talk)	Stub
6		Pwales (talk)	Stub
4		1896 Furman Baptists football team (talk)	Stub
4		1550 in Scotland (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 08:08, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Phoenician shipwrecks of Mazarrón

The article Phoenician shipwrecks of Mazarrón you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Phoenician shipwrecks of Mazarrón and Talk:Phoenician shipwrecks of Mazarrón/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LastJabberwocky -- LastJabberwocky (talk) 23:02, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi @LastJabberwocky is there anything else I should do? el.ziade (talkallam) 11:13, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi! The article is in a really nice shape and I'll promote it right. But I keep finding new information that can be added (maybe as an improvement for featured article)! I really out of my depth with Phoenician history and mostly look through one published work. Moreover, sometimes more details means watering down and confusing an article, so I don't think it's necessary to add them. I leave a couple of quotes from this article that covers: 1. the lead ingots we mention to be a part of the cargo was local to Mazarron area (from the local ancient mines) 2. more details on the changes in the bay that led to their discovery

• "The lead isotope analysis of the Mazarrón 2 cargo suggests that it comes from the mining districts of Carta-gena and Mazarrón. The Mazarrón mining region covers an area of 7 km around the city of Mazarrón. Since ancient times, this region has been rich in metal deposits, copper, iron, silver, lead, and alum. The area includes three main mining sites, San Cristobal-LosPerules, Pedreras Viejas, and Coto Fortuna, exploited during various periods and separated by phases of inactivity from antiquity to the 1960s."
• "Mazarrón 2 is located some 500 m away from Santa Elisa's lead-smelting factory", which discarded its "by-product slags at the Rincón de la Isla, 200 m away from Mazarrón 2, and gradually formed an embankment called El Gachero. The central area slowly eroded, while loose sand accumulated in the coastal shelter formed in El Gachero, located in the eastern sector of the beach."
• The nearby marina we mention in the article was constructed "in the 1980s, in the western area of Playa de la Isla. It contributed to the increased erosion of the central part of the beach where Mazarrón 1 and Mazarrón 2 are located."
• The study of biochemical study of the sediment around the wreck proved its notable impact on the ships' conservation state. [the study goes into really deep, deep depth about why and how, but I have no clue how to decipher their hypertechnical language :)]
• Additionally, the geotechnical measurements figured out that "the depth of the rock bed beneath the shipwreck area exceeded 1.2 m", which informed the archeologist that they can raise the wreck "in block or without significant fragmentation, contrary to another proposal of extraction on portions".

Women in Red February 2025

Women in Red | February 2025, Vol 11, Issue 2, Nos. 326, 327, 330, 331 Online events: New: Black women | Alphabet run C & D Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements from other communities: Wiki Loves Ramadan begins on 25 February - a great opportunity to focus on women from Islamic history Tip of the month: Looking for an image? Sometimes you can find openly licensed ones on Creative Commons search Suggestion: Consider helping to promote women under In the news and On this day on Wikipedia's main page Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:57, 26 January 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Your GA nomination of Phoenician shipwrecks of Mazarrón

The article Phoenician shipwrecks of Mazarrón you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Phoenician shipwrecks of Mazarrón for comments about the article, and Talk:Phoenician shipwrecks of Mazarrón/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LastJabberwocky -- LastJabberwocky (talk) 14:43, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Museiliha inscription

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Museiliha inscription you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of UndercoverClassicist -- UndercoverClassicist (talk) 19:43, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Thank you @UndercoverClassicist, much appreciated. el.ziade (talkallam) 15:44, 31 January 2025 (UTC)