Jump to content

User:Doug Weller

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
User:Doug Weller
User:Doug Weller
User talk:Doug Weller
User talk:Doug Weller
User:Doug Weller/Workshop
User:Doug Weller/Workshop
Special:Prefixindex/User:Doug Weller
Special:Prefixindex/User:Doug Weller
User:Doug Weller/Userboxes
User:Doug Weller/Userboxes
Special:Contributions/Doug Weller
Special:Contributions/Doug Weller
Special:Emailuser/Doug Weller
Special:Emailuser/Doug Weller
home
Talk Page
Workshop
Site Map
Userboxes
Edits
Email


IP Rangeblock Calculator IP Range Edit Check Checkusers Oversighters

User:Blablubbs/How to file a good SPI

User:Spicy/SPI admin guide

Noticeboards
Administrators' noticeboard (18 threads)
Administrators' noticeboard: Incidents (35 threads)
Administrative action review (2 threads)
Edit warring noticeboard (7 threads)
Bureaucrats' noticeboard (3 threads)
Bots noticeboard (5 threads)
Arbitration Committee noticeboard (4 threads)
Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard (10 threads)
BLP noticeboard (27 threads)
Fringe theories noticeboard (20 threads)
Original research noticeboard (10 threads)
Reliable sources noticeboard (26 threads)
Neutral point of view noticeboard (13 threads)
External links noticeboard (9 threads)
Conflict of interest noticeboard (17 threads)
Dispute resolution noticeboard (10 threads)
Help desk (55 threads)
Media copyright questions (9 threads)
Teahouse (59 threads)
Village Pump (policy) (5 threads)
Village Pump (technical) (25 threads)
Village Pump (proposals) (16 threads)
Village Pump (idea lab) (15 threads)
Village Pump (WMF) (7 threads)
Village Pump (miscellaneous) (11 threads)

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 1
...from administrators 1
Requests for unblock 92
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 142
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests 92
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 8
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 0
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 194
Requested RD1 redactions 3
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 1
Candidates for speedy deletion 14
Open sockpuppet investigations 65
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

Purge the cache of this page

Administrative backlog

All Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons
Copy to Wikimedia Commons with hidden file revisions
Requests for unblock
SPI cases awaiting administration
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons as of unknown date
Wikipedia pages tagged for copyright problems
Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion
Wikipedia:Closure requests
Wikipedia:Copyright problems
Wikipedia:Files for discussion
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion
Wikipedia:Requested moves
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/AutoWikiBrowser
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations
Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention/Bot
Wikipedia:WikiProject History Merge

WP:AIV

Reports

Bot-reported

User-reported

CSD / PRODs

Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
Attack pages 0
Copyright violations 1
Hoaxes 0
Vandalism 0
User requested 1
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 3
Importance or significance not asserted 0
Possibly contested candidates 0
Other candidates 10
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
Deletion backlog

This box:
Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 1 item

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 292 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – 58 items

Requested RD1 redactions – 3 items

Proposed deletion – No backlog currently

WP:UAA / WP:RFPP

Usernames for administrator attention


Bot-reported

User-reported

Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Shortcuts

Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Britain's Got Talent series 18

Reason: Unsourced edits by an IP address PawPatroler (talk) 16:59, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2A06:61C0:A195:0:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 22:52, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Émile P. Torres

Reason: Repeated addition of dubiously sourced critiques and attacks on a BLP. Would need full protection for a time - David Gerard (talk) 18:55, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Since the recent outburst was the first one in a couple months, I am unsure how long full protection would be desirable and without a broad consensus to do so I am not going to impose it for longer than three days if it has not previously been imposed. Daniel Case (talk) 22:12, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Treaty of Balta Liman

Reason: Sock puppetry and in addition a lot of misinformations. 37.167.148.21 (talk) 22:29, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: @37.167.148.21: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:37, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 03:17, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

International Villager

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued recreation of an article redirected through AfD. Onel5969 TT me 22:44, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: Shink77 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. From the page indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 03:24, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

National Movement (Poland)

Temporary semi-protection: IP edit-warring PawPatroler (talk) 22:55, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:08, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
    Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. The most recent IP to disrupt has not returned to the article since their last warning. Daniel Case (talk) 03:29, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
    Left CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 03:30, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

2025 Pearl Street Mall attack

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Involves a demonstration covered by WP:ARBPIA. Entranced98 (talk) 23:23, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Declined Moved to 2025 Boulder fire attack. Re-request under that name. Daniel Case (talk) 03:32, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Britain's Got Talent series 18

Reason: IP range disruption-one IP address got blocked, then evaded their block. I've given them warnings of un sourced information, which doesn't seem to be working. PawPatroler (talk) 00:52, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 03:21, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Cait Sith (Final Fantasy)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Single vandal keeps returning on various IPs or accounts. Think will benefit from a short lock. grapesurgeon (seefooddiet) (talk) 00:54, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 03:20, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:24, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Dollar General

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Single vandal that's been blocked on a number of IPs and accounts keeps returning. Think would benefit from a short lock. grapesurgeon (seefooddiet) (talk) 00:55, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 03:19, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:24, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Sándor Nemes

Reason: High level of IP vandalism PawPatroler (talk) 01:01, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 03:19, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Abu Layla

Reason: Vandalism 114.166.200.79 (talk) 02:48, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Done Materialscientist (talk) 03:18, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Jonathan Joss

Reason: There have been ongoing rumors about his passing on other parts of the web. Could you please protect the page until this rumor is confirmed or if it turns out to be another death hoax? Pahiy (talk) 03:19, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 03:28, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

BBC (sexual slang)

Reason: High level of vandalism, will likely continue due to subject of page. I request auto-confirmed protection, not just semi-protected because some of the vandals have accounts. Thanks. Easternsahara (talk) 03:25, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 03:28, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

2025 Boulder fire attack

Reason: WP:ARBPIA. Page has changed name a few times, please expedite protection. Mikewem (talk) 03:47, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Shortcuts

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Shortcuts

2010 FIFA World Cup

Reason: It has been 11 years since this page was semi protected. The tournament itself held 15 years ago, so I don't think the page will be very popular or vandalized. Also, articles about the next two editions—2014 FIFA World Cup & 2018 FIFA World Cup—are not protected. Therefore, I suggest we cn try to remove the protection and see what happened. The Seal F1 (talk) 14:03, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Seems reasonable to me. Could you try discussion with the protecting admin first? If they decline or take more than a few days to respond, your welcome to ask me to review or re-request here. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:26, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Hi. The administrator who protected that page has made only a few edits over the past month — all of them related to "cleaning up" their talk page, so I'm not sure if this is a good idea. That's why Im asking here.The Seal F1 (talk) 15:52, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
It's not uncommon for admins to be inactive for a month but still respondent to pings. I figured we should attempt a ping. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:58, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Ok. I'll try. The Seal F1 (talk) 16:03, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Unprotected The protecting admin hasn't responded in four days. Per logic of request, this is really a no-brainer. Daniel Case (talk) 03:37, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Republican Party (United States)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – As a contentious topic this should really be reserved for experienced editors. Moxy🍁 16:54, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:07, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
It's already semi-protected. Thepharoah17 (talk) 20:19, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
@Moxy: Thepharoah17 (talk) 20:19, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Oops I meant for an increase in protection..... my bad. Moxy🍁 20:49, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Declined per above. Daniel Case (talk) 03:34, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Super Smash Bros. Melee

Unprotection: No need for move protection. Also protecting admin (NawlinsWiki) hasn’t been active for four months. Thepharoah17 (talk) 20:14, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to have already been unprotected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:23, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
    Unprotected Daniel Case (talk) 03:39, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Shortcut

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Further information: Wikipedia:Edit requests


Handled requests

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Protected edit requests

0 protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Updated as needed. Last updated: 19:02, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
8 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Merged-from (request) 2025-04-02 03:42 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Module:Copied (request) 2025-04-02 03:43 Template-protected (log) Protected by Newslinger on 2020-06-14: "Highly visible template"
Template:Rail-interchange (request) 2025-04-02 23:47 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:IPA pulmonic consonants/table (request) 2025-05-01 20:01 Template-protected (log) Protected by Ivanvector on 2020-02-13: "Highly visible template"
Module:TaxonList (request) 2025-05-21 10:58 Template-protected (log) Protected by Samsara on 2017-11-15: "High-risk Lua module: currently about 2500 transclusions; via RfPP"
Module:College color (request) 2025-05-28 21:08 Template-protected (log) Protected by The Earwig on 2015-12-14: "High-risk Lua module: over 55,000 mainspace transclusions"
Template:JSTOR (request) 2025-05-30 15:12 Template-protected (log) Modified by Oshwah on 2021-08-18: "High risk template."
Module:Road data (request) 2025-05-30 18:12 Template-protected (log) Modified by Lectonar on 2023-05-30: "High-risk template or module"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 17:08, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

WP:PERM

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:BullDawg2021

Hello, I have started 300+ pages and have been editing for over three and a half years consistently. Early on, I struggled with notability, but I have since demonstrated an understanding for the notability guidelines. I would like to have autopatrol rights, please. Thanks, Bulldawg (talk) 06:48, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

 Done You've created an astonishing 80+ articles in the last two years, none of which have been deleted. A cursory review of a sample of BLPs finds no issues. You have a clean block log. In my opinion, granting Autopatrolled will benefit the workload of the NPP. Chetsford (talk) 16:13, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Throughthemind

I have created a large number of articles, all without any significant issues. Another user proposed on my talk page that I request to be Autopatrolled. Throughthemind (talk) 15:10, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

Throughthemind I think this would be a good idea to grant you Autopatrolled and you pass all the checks except one: I need to look at a sample of BLPs you've created. You're such a prolific writer, however, that I can't really comb through all your articles. Can you identify 3-5 BLPs you created in response to this message and ping me? Chetsford (talk) 19:19, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
 Done Disregard, I found. Chetsford (talk) 19:40, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

User:IvanScrooge98

Been around for 10 years. A new page reviewer (see here) encouraged me to request the autopatrolled rights over my page and redirect creation record. ~ IvanScrooge98 (talk) 22:42, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Some of your given name and surname pages lack citations for the origins/meanings of the names. For example, the first sentence of Cencio has substantive information that requires a reference. voorts (talk/contributions) 18:59, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
Added refs for Cencio. I’ll be more careful about sourcing info in lists. ~ IvanScrooge98 (talk) 20:57, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

User:JohnMizuki

I came across this user in New Page Review. They are a prolific translator (with attribution!) of es-wiki pages on notable topics. Creates talk pages and problem-free articles. 76 mainspace articles created with no deletions. With JohnMizuki continuing to create new pages, granting the autopatrolled flag would help reduce the backlog of unreviewed articles. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:58, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

 Done Looks good. Chetsford (talk) 16:05, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

User:FromCzech

Came across FromCzech in New Page Review and I wondered how this user is not already autopatrolled! Has created 165 mainspace pages with none deleted. Creates problem-free pages on notable topics with appropriate sources, including SIGCOV for athletes. Creates talk pages and selects useful categories. Already has the Page Mover perm; I think granting AP will assist with reducing the backlog for reviewers. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:25, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

 Done Yes, I'm familiar with FromCzech's work and granting them Autopatrolled (whether they want it or not) would cut down NPP workload as their contributions are always par superior. (Indeed, they've improved many of my own articles.) Thank you for observing this oversight, Dclemens1971. Chetsford (talk) 16:02, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Carigval.97

The user has created an impressive total of 834 articles so far, with only five deletions. Given this strong track record, I believe they fully deserve autopatrolled rights. Thank you. Baqi:) (talk) 20:11, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access

AutoWikiBrowser

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.


User:VortexPhantom

Requesting the AWB to perform repetitive tasks. I will mainly use it for adding categories to AFd debates, fixing grammatical error, fixing abuse of tags. Thanks for considering my request. VortexPhantom🔥 (talk) 07:33, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

User:PunjabiEditor69

Hello, I'm doing a lot of repetitive edits on articles, fixing typos, improving grammar and adding consistent info across pages, so I need AutoWikiBrowser to make the process smoother. I especially need it for pages related to railway stations and Chak villages, where I've been working on adding almost same information. - PunjabiEditor69 (talk) 17:38, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Actualcreature

Requesting access to make minor edits like typos and formatting less tedious, and more efficiently find issues Actualcreature (talk) 16:52, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag.

Confirmed

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Requests for extended confirmation

Extended confirmed

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Supreme Rankling

I have lost access to my original accounts, User:Linkin Prankster and User:Roman Reigns Fanboy. Wikimedia asked me to enter a verification code it sent to my account yesterday, something it never did before. Unfortunately I don't remember the email addresses I used to register those accounts and now I'm unable to recover them

I talked to admins at WP:AN#Lost access to all my account and they suggested that I try requesting extended confirmed rights here. I request that you grant me the permission so I can go back to editing articles requiring EC level permissions I could normally, instead of having to wait a month for it.

Thank you. Supreme Rankling (talk) 07:02, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Supreme Rankling -- This is a relatively low-risk right to extend to a single user, as its utility is primarily in mass application. Ergo, I have no problem granting this to your new account on an accelerated basis with only minor precaution.
  • Once you're WP:Autoconfirmed, which will occur about June 2, please ping me in this thread. Assuming neither of the aforementioned accounts have edited by that point (and assuming neither have replied to the emails I'll send them), I'll then grant you Extended Confirmed for 45 days which will be long enough for you to naturally reacquire the right at your previous editing cadence.
  • This account (Supreme Ranking) will be indefinitely blocked if either User:Linkin Prankster or User:Roman Reigns Fanboy become active during that period so please take care to ensure you have completely abandoned those accounts and don't have any autosaved passwords on your device(s).
Thanks, in advance, for your patience.Chetsford (talk) 09:24, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
I mostly edit articles with EC-level ranking. Especially Israel-Palestine conflict related. I have no problem in other accounts being blocked User:Chetsford. Supreme Rankling (talk) 11:59, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
Sorry, to clarify, I mean if Linkin Prankster or Roman Reigns Fanboy come online we'll have to block Supreme Rankling (not Linkin Prankster or Roman Reigns). So just make sure you don't have any autofill passwords for either of those accounts on your devices. In any case, please ping me on or after June 2 and I'll add EC to your account as per above. Chetsford (talk) 14:41, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
Okay, I'm sorry for the misunderstanding. Thanks. I contacted Wikimedia but they told me they can't help me recover my account. I have no way to regain access. Supreme Rankling (talk) 15:31, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
Yes, I understand that. So just ping me on or after June 2 and we'll go from there. Chetsford (talk) 15:44, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
@Chetsford: just curious - why are you planning to do a temporary grant? Are you planning to review before re-granting permanently? stwalkerster (talk) 16:14, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
A cursory review. I just want to make sure the account doesn't become a sleeper after getting EC. Chetsford (talk) 16:38, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
Sounds good - it initially sounded like you were going to do a temporary grant then allow the automatic grant to occur (which wouldn't actually work due to how EC is configured). Seems like you have a plan though :) stwalkerster (talk) 17:00, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
No, that was me - I probably didn't word it very coherently! Chetsford (talk) 17:07, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

@Chetsford: 2 June has arrived and I've kept editing articles since then. I request that you please grant me access to extended-confirmed permissions so I can edit articles that require such permissions. I've tried everything but it looks like I'll never be able to recover my old accounts. Also please block both User:Linkin Prankster and User:Roman Reigns Fanboy if you think it is necessary. Thanks in advance. Supreme Rankling (talk) 01:49, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Broskalitre


Reason for requesting extended confirmed rights


Dear administrators,

I am requesting extended confirmed rights. Since being unblocked, I have made over 500 edits, including the creation and improvement of several articles with a focus on building content, adding citations, and correcting issues

I want to acknowledge that I was previously blocked for gaming the system. At the time, I misunderstood the importance of acting in good faith and respecting community norms. Since the block, I’ve taken time to understand policies like WP:CONSENSUS, WP:NOTHERE, and WP:GAME. I now realize that trying to “work around” the rules damages trust and collaboration.

I’ve worked to improve not just the quantity, but the quality of my contributions. I will avoid contentious edits, engage constructively on talk pages when needed, and take care to follow Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines.

I am committed to editing in good faith and maintaining a respectful and policy-compliant presence on Wikipedia going forward.

Thank you for considering my request.


Thank you, @Broskalitre

 Automated comment This user has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([1]). — MusikBot talk 08:50, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag.

Event coordinator

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Requests for file mover

File mover

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Polygnotus

I see a lot of typos in filenames and when fixing typos I normally skip them when they are in filenames. I don't expect to use it for anything but simple typofixes. See here. Thanks, Polygnotus (talk) 00:30, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

 Done Experienced editor, no red flags seen. --PresN 17:11, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
Requests for mass message sender

Mass message sender

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Dr. Blofeld

I am running contests like Wikipedia:The World Destubathon. It is a big attempt to eliminate thousands of stubs for every country and topic and want to invite a lot of project members personally with a message. User:DreamRimmer and User:Polygnotus have been very helpful, but it would greatly help me if I was given formal mass message rights as I will likely be running more contests in the future and need the easiest outlet to contact relevant projects and participants who would potentially be interested without having to spend ages doing it manually! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 06:51, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Requests for new page reviewer

New page reviewer

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Như Gây Mê

Recently beside to anti-vandalism, I have also been interested in resolving the page backlog. Looking at the huge backlog of new pages, I'd greatly appreciate the opportunity to contribute and help alleviate the backlog. Thanks! Halley luv Filipino ❤ (Talk) 15:27, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

 Done for 1 month as a trial run, after which you may reapply signed, Rosguill talk 16:40, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Bunnypranav

I would like to request permanent NPR rights. My trial is due on 31st May and started back in late December 2024. I would love to continue contributing in this space and help reduce the ever-growing backlog. I believe my quality of reviewing has improved since the last trial. Thanks! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 11:36, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 15:52, 31 May 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 11:40, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
 Done trial track record looks good, thank you for your work. signed, Rosguill talk 16:44, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
Thank you so much! :D ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 16:48, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Afstromen

Hi, I’d like to request New Page Patroller rights. I’ve created 24 articles, all of which meet Wikipedia’s notability guidelines, and I have a solid understanding of notability across a range of topics. I was recently granted AfC reviewer rights and have begun actively reviewing drafts. While my reviews aren’t high in quantity yet, I believe they reflect careful, quality work aligned with Wikipedia policies. I also participate in AfD discussions and have experience in both deletions and retentions based on consensus and policy. Additionally, I’ve improved a number of unsourced articles by adding reliable citations. I’d like to disclose that, if granted NPP rights, I will primarily focus on India-related topics, as I have strong familiarity with reliable Indian sources and local context. I believe it’s best to patrol within areas where I can apply sound judgment and avoid risky decisions. I’m open to feedback or a trial period. Thank you. Afstromen (talk) 12:49, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

Recreating Spinny (company) despite Spinny being salted seems like something that should be a total deal-breaker here. But I don't normally get involved in this area so will let another admin make a final decision. * Pppery * it has begun... 14:41, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
@Pppery, I’ve posted a note on the talk page of Spinny (company) to clarify my intention. I genuinely believe the subject is notable, based on significant coverage in reliable, independent sources.
To be honest, I wasn’t aware that when a title is protected, there are specific procedures to follow before recreating the article. As soon as I realized the situation, I added a note on the talk page to be transparent and open to community input.
I’d appreciate any guidance on what the appropriate process is in such cases especially when a title has been salted. My goal is to contribute constructively and in line with Wikipedia’s policies
Afstromen (talk) 15:13, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
Frankly, this isn't convincing. The mindset that one sees that one is prohibited from doing something, and then tries to do it anyway through the back door is not the mindset we want to have in new page reviewers. It gives the appearance of being holier-than-thou. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:16, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
I shared my intentions honestly, and I truly didn’t realize that what I did was against the guidelines. If this has caused any concern about trust, I understand, but I want to make it clear that it wasn’t intentional. I know how important it is that all contributions follow policy and are made in good faith. I respect your decision and will be more careful in the future.
Afstromen (talk) 16:03, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
In the future, the WP:SALTing needs to be removed (via asking the protecting admin on their user talk, or via WP:RFUP) rather than putting an article at a non-ideal title. The title is non ideal because "(company)" is an unnecessary disambiguator in this case. Disambiguators should only be used if there are multiple articles with the same name. –Novem Linguae (talk) 04:52, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
I’ll make sure to be more careful about this in the future. Thank you for pointing it out.
Afstromen (talk) 07:40, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
 Request withdrawn I believe I should gain more experience through the Articles for Creation (AfC) process at this time. Access to these rights is not only a privilege, but also a responsibility to uphold Wikipedia’s standards and contribute constructively.Thank you to Pppery and Novem Linguae for their guidance. Afstromen (talk) 04:52, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Moritoriko

Hello, I am requesting rights be extended after a one month trial so that I can participate in the June backlog event that showed up on my watchlist page :) Moritoriko (talk) 04:59, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 2 June 2025 (UTC)) and has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([2]). — MusikBot talk 05:00, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
 Done for a further month as a trial run, as you only appear to have reviewed one article during this first trial. signed, Rosguill talk 18:42, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

User:CherryPie94

I would like to continue reviewing new pages and also accept/deny AFC pages. I've created 90+ pages and am familiar with content policies. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 14:15, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions and your interest in this permission. Unfortunately, while your understanding of notability guidelines seems strong, you approved several articles with clear signs of COI editing without identifying it: Kirkland Smith, NoBudge, and Ken Nohara. At a minimum, you should have left a notice for the article creator, and possibly further tagging or draftifying may have been warranted.  Not done, but do consider reapplying for a trial in the future. signed, Rosguill talk 17:20, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
Understood, thanks. But Kirkland Smith was created by a 2012-registered user with 19 page creations, NoBudge was written promotionally, but that's because it was AI-generated (100% on GPTZero). I cleaned it up and then accepted as it meets our notability requirements. The account for Ken Nohara was also not compromised at the time. None of these seemed clear COI to me, so just wanted to ask where you're coming from for future reference. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 10:30, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
CherryPie94, the main tipoff for Kirkland Smith is the infobox image credit, whereas for NoBudge the creator's edit history is textbook WP:SPA. On review, you're right that at the time you reviewed Ken Nohara, the account had not yet been globally locked (although my understanding is that the global lock was itself in response to the creation of that article after an extended period of inactivity). signed, Rosguill talk 16:20, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
@Rosguill: I'm more on the side of AGF, Aaton LTR 54 has since been contributing to other film-related articles, I've seen many innocently AI-generated articles, and Strongsolar is likely from South Carolina, maybe took the shot at an event etc., and regardless isn't violating WP:NOT. I'll take more care into image credits in the future though. Totally chill without the role, happy with a trial if that's more comfortable, just want to gauge how strict reviewing should be. Also just FYI I think the global lock was a part of this. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 18:01, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
those seem like fair justifications, I'll go ahead and extend another month of trial Done signed, Rosguill talk 19:22, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

User:MWFwiki

Hello,
Requesting New Page Patroller permissions. I have over a decade of activity on Wikipedia, with 4,400+ live edits (99.4% of my edits are "live"). I have created three (proper) articles. I became more active in the last 1-2 years. I believe I meet and exceed the minimum criteria.

That said, my weakest areas would probably be CSD and PROD. However, I am familiar with both, I've just had my hands full with AfC reviews and AfD contributions. I otherwise have relatively extensive discussion experience with no disciplinary action taken against me. Thank you for your time and consideration. MWFwiki (talk) 20:28, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

 Done for 1 month as a trial run, after which you may reapply. signed, Rosguill talk 17:08, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Vrxces

Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 04:35, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi there - seeking a third renewal of the expired patrolled status. I understand my patrol activity has been light so no issues with it being time limited. I have much more experience in AFC and AFD, which is hopefully some reassurance that I'm familiar with policy by this point. Let me know if you need any more details! ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 04:35, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by HJ Mitchell (expires 00:00, 1 June 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 04:40, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
Track record looks good,  Done signed, Rosguill talk 18:45, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Rahmatula786

I am requesting for New Page Reviewer right which is about to expire in few days. I have reviewed new pages and have been working for few months as AFC reviewer. Have been contributing regularly in AFD discussion. I am also participating in upcoming JUNE AFC Backlog Drive . Would appreciate the opportunity to contribute here. Thank You. Rahmatula786 (talk) 11:28, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 2 June 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 11:30, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions and your interest in this permission. On reviewing your track record, while your understanding of notability guidelines is strong, I'm concerned by some neutrality and COI concerns you let slip by. Srideep Bhattacharya, Swami Medhananda, Bishwambhar Pyakurel, Tej Narayan Singh (social worker), Nima Rinji Sherpa, Kaushala Prasad Mishra, and Pandit Pradeep Mishra all appear to have signs of COI which you do not appear to have tagged or otherwise followed up on during review. Nandan Van Zoo, meanwhile, has pretty serious neutrality issues that are apparent from just a quick glance at the article's text and references. Thus, I'm going to mark this  Not done, but do consider reapplying for a trial in the future. signed, Rosguill talk 19:14, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
I do respect your decision. Can you extend a month trial so that I can improve on the issue you have mentioned. I will try my best to meet the standard. Rahmatula786 (talk) 00:36, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Rahmatula786, you can persuade me to extend a trial run if you can fix up Nandan Van Zoo to better represent the coverage of the subject in RS. Feel free to follow up on my talk page whenever you have the time to get to it. signed, Rosguill talk 19:31, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

User:WormEater13

Hello! I'm requesting a extension of my NPP rights after a original 1-month trial. I find that NPP is something that I like doing alongside with the article domain (e.g AfC/AfD) and would love to continue contributing within the NPP space. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 01:19, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 3 June 2025 (UTC)) and has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([3]). — MusikBot talk 01:20, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Track record looks good,  Done signed, Rosguill talk 20:47, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Aŭstriano

I would like to help alleviate the backlog. I think that my contributions on Wikipedia thus far have been constructive. I have successfully proposed 10 articles for deletion, and I am familiar with notability policies. Aŭstriano (talk) 17:58, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

 Done for 1month as a trial run, after which you may reapply. signed, Rosguill talk 19:38, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Ambrosiawater

My trial is set to end on June 3, 2025. I would like to request permanent NPR rights if possible, as I have greatly enjoyed contributing in this capacity and I am eager to help reduce the growing backlog. Thank you for considering my request! Ambrosiawater (talk) 08:44, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 3 June 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 08:50, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
I noted in my prior extension of the trial run that there were issues with spotting promotional articles, and this is a concern in this trial run as well, in particular City Sightseeing Cape Town and CambriLearn. It's a rather small proportion of your reviewed articles, so I'm going to extend the trial again, but I specifically want to see improvement in this area.  Done signed, Rosguill talk 20:01, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

User:JustARandomEditor123

I am requesting an extension of the New Page Reviewer permissions, as they are about to expire on the 2nd of June. I believe that during my trial, I have immensely improved my page reviewing abilities and wish to continue working on the constantly growing backlog. JustARandomEditor123 (talk) 14:20, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 2 June 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 14:30, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
Extending for another month. I think you missed some clearly promotional language and weak case for notability at Ampli Energy, but your AfD record makes up for this.  Done signed, Rosguill talk 20:14, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Wikirapguru

Hello, I’m requesting the New Page Reviewer right as I’ve become increasingly active in creating and improving Wikipedia articles—especially within the music and hip-hop categories. I’m familiar with notability guidelines (WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO), reliable sources policies, and standards around promotional tone and sourcing.

I’ve already made several constructive contributions to new pages, and I’d like to help with patrolling to ensure that new content meets Wikipedia’s quality standards. I understand the importance of identifying spam, copyright violations, and non-notable subjects early on. I also want to support new editors by providing constructive feedback where possible.

Please consider my request for this permission so I can contribute more effectively to Wikipedia’s maintenance efforts. Thank you!

— wikirapguru Wikirapguru (talk) 19:58, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 401 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 20:00, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
Okay, I will work on making/contributing 100 more edits to the mainspace, thanks. Wikirapguru (talk) 20:33, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
Wikirapguru, do be mindful of WP:GAME as well, which I fully recognize was probably not your intent by the above comment. I'd recommend taking your time, rather than rushing. For now,  Not done signed, Rosguill talk 20:49, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
Could you please clarify which of my actions seem to fall under WP:Game tactics? Wikirapguru (talk) 02:23, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Wikirapguru, none of your actions thus far, but it seemed like you were potentially planning to go make a bunch of rapidfire edits in response to the bot prompt, which would have been GAMEing, and I wanted to ward you off from doing that. signed, Rosguill talk 19:34, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
That was not my intent, but thanks for the heads-up. Wikirapguru (talk) 22:51, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

User:2RDD

Please, I've been actively contributing to Wikipedia for a year now. I'm interested in becoming a New Page Reviewer to help ensure the quality and accuracy of new content on Wikipedia. I've demonstrated my ability to review and improve articles, and I'm committed to using my New Page Reviewer tools responsibly. I'm looking forward to the opportunity to contribute to Wikipedia's quality control efforts. Thank You. 2RDD (talk) 21:58, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Requests for page mover

Page mover

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Plantdrew

The primary case where I want to move pages that I am unable to move with my current permissions is to bring them to the title preferred under the guideline WP:MONOTYPICFAUNA (in a nutshell: when a genus has a single species, Wikipedia covers the genus and species in a single article under the genus title). I regularly come across animal articles where a monotypic genus redirects to a species title, and there are just 2-3 edits to the genus title (generally the second edit is adding {{R from monotypic taxon}} and then maybe another edit adding other categories to the genus redirect). Plantdrew (talk) 02:18, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Requests for pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:JamesEMonroe

Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights:

To expand my tool belt as an extended confirmed recent changes patroller, and to more quickly afford new users their non policy breaking contribution. I have currently no sanctions against me and I think I understand wiki policy well enough for it. Thank you JamesEMonroe (talk) 20:02, 22 May 2025 (UTC) (Post edit) When using this perm, I will take extra care. I think I have met requirements in WP:PCCRITERIA and have reviewed Wikipedia policy. Also please consider older reverts as well or when I took the time to explain things to new users. JamesEMonroe (talk) 21:27, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi JamesEMonroe! I am not formally granting this permission (nor am I denying it), but I do think you should cut back a bit on the WP:STICKYDECO stuff on your userpage. While I have added the applicable CSS class to make the gadget function, many newbies—who frequently will have complaints when you revert their edits—will be unaware of the ability to tick the box to disable them, and they can be highly annoying/distracting/problematic for editors with sensory issues.

I wouldn't object if another admin chooses to grant the permission, but I wouldn't personally feel comfortable assigning newbie-interaction-heavy advanced permissions with the current amount of sticky decorations. Best regards, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:55, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Ah, Thank you! As you saw, I tried to add the collapsible boxes as a way for people to disable them (like the "clutter clear ->") as collapsing it would disable the code within. I was planning on making some changes actually, such as rearranging things and improving accessibility a bit, while always importantly keeping the talk page free from anything as it is. I hope it didn't appear unprofessional on me or too annoying.
But I see what you mean as some newer people might not see the boxes. and ill see what I could do. JamesEMonroe (talk) 04:15, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Arc Rev

I want to have this permission to reduce the pending changes backlog. I reviewed all the guidelines, such as BLP and the guideline for referencing. I revert good faiths and obvious vandalism and warn the user right after. Although I cannot perform a rollback to the recent changes page to have a consecutive track record due to my device's limited capabilities. I would rather choose pending changes over rollback; with rollback, I must have track records of mass rollback vandalism. But since I understood the guideline of rollback and pending changes, I can assure you that I will be responsible for having this permission. — ArćRèv • talk 10:38, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had an account for 29 days. — MusikBot talk 10:40, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Wieditor25

I've made 200+ edits and created over 40 mainspace articles. I'm familiar with core content policies and would like to help review pending edits. Thank you! Wieditor25 (talk) 22:14, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 99 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 22:20, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Danners430

A few pages which I watch were tagged for pending changes protection, and I would like to assist in reviewing the changes to share the workload. Danners430 (talk) 05:14, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Weirdguyz

Most of my editing is in recent changes patrolling, and I understand the policies regarding vandalism, BLP, NPOV, copyright, etc. and apply them appropriately. Weirdguyz (talk) 06:55, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

User:MouseCursor

I'm requesting pending changes reviewer as a current often-active extended-confirmed pending changes reviewer who wants to combat vandalism on pending changes-protected pages. I have read the guideline on reviewing and understand the policies on BLP, copyright, etc. Thanks! MouseCursor or a keyboard? 13:35, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Element10101

Hello; I wish to request pending changes reviewer rights.

By now, I have been editing Wikipedia for a month, more or less. I have extended-confirmed permissions on Wikipedia. I have done some work in cleaning up new pages and recent changes and I am ready to start taking on a larger task of reviewing pending changes. Element10101 T ~ C 20:56, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

User:2RDD

Please, I've been actively contributing to Wikipedia and have a good understanding of its policies and guidelines. I'm interested in becoming a Pending Changes Reviewer to help ensure the quality and accuracy of Wikipedia's content. I've demonstrated my ability to review and improve articles, and I'm committed to using my Pending Changes Reviewer tools responsibly. I'm looking forward to the opportunity to contribute to Wikipedia's quality control efforts 2RDD (talk) 22:05, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Cameremote

Hi there, I have been creating articles for the Nigerian Portal on Wikipedia for over five months now. I'd like to have this role to expand my editing jurisdiction. Thanks Cameremote (talk) I came from a remote place 00:26, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Requests for rollback

Rollback

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:PunjabiEditor69

Hello, I need rollback rights to revert vandalism. I have reverted some vandalism attempts. - PunjabiEditor69 (talk) 11:04, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 165 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 11:10, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
I have 216 edits now. - PunjabiEditor69 (talk) 15:04, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment): Hello, @PunjabiEditor69! I've checked your contributions was 16 undo edits and 444 namespace articles. I'm not ready to grant the permission. Next time you spend at least a month of experience patrolling; see Special:RecentChanges. Thanks! –HirowoWiki (📝) 10:49, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
Okay, I will apply after at least 30 days of experience patrolling. - PunjabiEditor69 (talk) 11:55, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
I'm going to treat that as  Request withdrawn * Pppery * it has begun... 19:10, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

User:2RDD

I'm 2RDD, I've been actively contributing to Wikipedia for a year and have a good understanding of its policies and guidelines. I'm interested in becoming a rollbacker to help maintain the quality and integrity of Wikipedia's content. I've demonstrated my ability to resolve conflicts and address vandalism in a constructive manner. I'm committed to using my rollbacker tools responsibly and in accordance with Wikipedia's policies. I'm looking forward to the opportunity to contribute to Wikipedia's maintenance and upkeep. Thank you 2RDD (talk) 21:53, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Cameremote

Hello, I'm dropping a request here aswell. Please do consider me request for the Rollback Permission. Thanks. Cameremote (talk) I came from a remote place 00:46, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

    .

    Template:Centralized discussion – Current discussions
    Expired PRODs (2)
    Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
    User requested 1
    Empty articles 0
    Nonsense pages 0
    Spam pages 3
    Importance or significance not asserted 0
    Other candidates 11
    RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
    RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

    No RfXs since 19:36, 23 April 2025 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online

    Barnstars

    The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
    For adhereing to Wikipedia policies, professionalism, providing answers when needed, and for your help even though we do not agree on every detail. Thank you!
    Dr. Persi (talk) 05:09, 25 January 2011 (UTC)


    The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
    for consistently prompt action against miscreants. The Gnome (talk) 11:41, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
    The Barnstar of Diligence
    I award you this barnstar in recognition of a combination of extraordinary scrutiny, precision and community service for Wikipedia's Caucasus related topics.--Yacatisma (talk) 16:55, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Doug_Weller&oldid=1274803980"