User talk:EvergreenFir
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:ONE Championship on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:31, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
FYI
[edit]103.5.25.61 (talk · contribs) Jfire (talk) 05:05, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks EvergreenFir (talk) 05:07, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
- IP hopping clearly. 49.229.150.238 (talk · contribs) Jfire (talk) 05:09, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:31, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia style and naming request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biography on a "Wikipedia style and naming" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:30, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
IP user 38.32.74.138
[edit]I noticed you reverted their edit on Clifford the Big Red Dog; I have been trying to get that IP blocked as it is a sock of blocked user GabrielCollier (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and, by extension, the range 2600:6c5d:5200::/40 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)). Note the similar geolocation (Ringgold, Georgia). wizzito | say hello! 07:06, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
accusations
[edit]buddy why are you accused of like a thousand things KallebTigray (talk) 05:33, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Talk:Secondary School Certificate on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:30, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
[edit] | Happy First Edit Day! Hi EvergreenFir! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 05:26, 18 February 2025 (UTC) |  |
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:30, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
Trans*
[edit]
Courtesy link: Trans*
Hi, EvergreenFir. Can you have a look at Trans*? I was going to add something at Talk, but I have so many problems with the article that I hardly know where to begin. It purports to be an article about the word trans* (recently added to OED; did not know that), at least it starts out that way, but it is questionable whether it surpasses WP:NOTDICT to be one of the rare articles about a word, like LGBTQ, Gay, and Cisgender, that have plenty of sources about the word, exclusive of the concept and are clearly notable. A lot of the article however is not about the word, but about the concept (or purports to be) so to that extent the article should be tagged {{Unfocused}} as it is unclear whether it is about the word, or the concept.
If the latter, what there is about the concept goes beyond opaque {{jargon}} to Sokalian gobbledygook; if there is anything in there that isn't gobbledygook, it is probably a WP:POVFORK, and should probably be merged into section Transgender#Terminology. Some of the sources are opinion pieces with a creative writing style verging on poetry, e.g., Lopez (2023), cited 16 times in the article. The article was created by Wiki Ed student editor Kstantont (talk · contribs).[noping] Speaking of gobbledygook, here are some samples:
- They posit that writing Trans rather than trans* centers a Western academic perspective to create a genealogy of transness that fits within hegemonic frameworks of colonialist power.[3] Trans*, as Lopez describes, recenters gender expansive people to allow them to express their experience while remaining detached from hegemonic epistemologies of evidence.[3]
- Green builds off this personal anecdote to detail how trans* allows for the creation of a framework to deconstruct the policing of trans bodies and to decolonize space.[4]
- The piece additionally navigates trans* through language as pieces of the literature are written in Spanish without an English translation, creatively demonstrating Lopez’s point that trans* describes the state of just existing.[3] This also ignites epistemology outside of hegemonic frameworks allowing for space of the knowledge creation for marginalized people.[3]
I find it difficult to believe that a 20-ish newbie editor in a Wiki Ed course writes like this. If this isn't plagiarism or LLM-generated, it's one of those fake, Sokal paper-generators, and the surface similarity with Sokal's original hoax article is just serendipity. Or maybe it's even this. Some academics do write like that (way too many, imho), but afaic, it is unencyclopedic for Wikipoedia and does virtually nothing for our readers, other than confuse them.
I don't know where to even begin to discuss this on the Talk page, and I don't know if it's even worth writing much of anything there; seems like this article ought to be deleted. As far as the purported subject of trans* as a word, it seems like the Wiktionary definition wikt:trans* is sufficient. As far as what the rest of this article seems to be about, namely the opinions of two writers, Alan Pelaez Lopez has a Wikipedia article and Kai M. Green does not, but I don't know that a separate WP article is needed to highlight their opinions on trans topics. That leaves the question, is there something about the concept of trans* topics that is different enough from trans topics (without the asterisk) that a separate article about it is justifiable? The fact that the article is sprinkled with terms like trans*ness and trans*feminine and trans*imagination does not convince. The only saving grace is that it is an orphan. Do you think any of this is worth raising at Talk, or should it be tagged for merging with Transgender#Terminology, or for deletion? Adding Wiki Ed expert User:Brianda (Wiki Ed) for the Conn College course. Mathglot (talk) 00:23, 22 February 2025 (UTC)