User talk:Foox123456789

Welcome!

Hi Foox123456789! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 18:26, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don Rathbone moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Don Rathbone. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 18:26, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that Discogs is not a reliable source. For a band member to be notable, they need to meet the notability guidelines for musicians on their own, separate from the band. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 18:29, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia

You did not identify the source of the material in your edit. It appears to be MC5. Copying within Wikipedia is acceptable but it must be attributed.

This type of edit does get picked up by Copy Patrol and a good edit summary helps to make sure we don't accidentally revert it. However, for future use, would you note the best practices wording as outlined at Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia? In particular, linking to the source article and adding the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved.

While best practices are that attribution should be added to the edit summary at the time the edit is made, the linked article on best practices describes the appropriate steps to add attribution after the fact. I hope you will do so.

I've noticed that this guideline is not very well known, even among editors with tens of thousands of edits, so it isn't surprising that I point this out to some veteran editors, but there are some t's that need to be crossed.S Philbrick (Talk) 16:27, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello, I'm Binksternet. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Association, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 20:22, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Chris Furrh, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 11:05, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Don Rathbone for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Don Rathbone is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don Rathbone until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Eagleash (talk) 21:36, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jules Alexander moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jules Alexander, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:26, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Four Seasons artists

Hello, I've undone your edits to the Four Seasons artist pages, because we prefer to centralise discographies where we can to make it easier to update information when necessary. Also, I noticed that you didn't note that you probably copied your info from The Four Seasons discography page. You have been warned about this sort of thing above. Failure to follow instructions on your talk page will get you blocked. Graham87 05:27, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Asja Łamtiugina moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Asja Łamtiugina. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Razer(talk) 17:01, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Roger Hills for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roger Hills is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Hills until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bearcat (talk) 13:45, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for your contributions. I love White Plains and im so glad you helped make articles for them Gardengnomescdefg (talk) 21:04, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Hello, I'm Magical Golden Whip. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to The Association‎ have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 22:44, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		The Stub Barnstar
		Thank you for working on expanding stubs

Gardengnomescdefg (talk) 00:02, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Len Garry has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 03:43, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ricky Wolff moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ricky Wolff, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:34, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asja Łamtiugina (April 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Asja Łamtiugina instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Asja Łamtiugina and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:39, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Foox123456789! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 22:39, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chris Britton (musician) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris Britton (musician), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Britton (musician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Robin Shaw moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Robin Shaw, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:51, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pete Nelson (musician) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Pete Nelson (musician), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:01, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jules Alexander (April 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jules Alexander and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 04:46, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Robin Box moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Robin Box, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:00, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Marty Sanders moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Marty Sanders, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:04, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (second request)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from The Association into Jim Yester. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:23, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Templates on redirects

Hello. I was reviewing recent redirect creations as page ofNew Page Patrol and I found that you were adding templates to redirects for members of bands. Please do not add templates or navboxes to redirect pages, they do not belong on those pages. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:41, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thanks for the heads up, I didn't know. Foox123456789 (talk) 18:42, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Biographies of living persons are taken very seriously

Hello. Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons is intentionally a very strict policy due to legal issues and past mistakes. Please cite your sources especially when making contentious edits like this (you may re-add content if you cite [preferably multiple] high-quality reliable sources). Thanks! ~~lol1 VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me) 23:53, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Jim Yester

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Jim Yester, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:05, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Terry Kirkman

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Terry Kirkman, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:08, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Brian Cole (musician)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Brian Cole (musician), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:08, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Foox123456789. Thank you for your work on Guillermo Calabrese. User:Tails Wx, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good work on the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Tails Wx}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Tails Wx 21:33, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Tripplehorn moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tom Tripplehorn, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:28, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mick Clarke (bassist) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mick Clarke (bassist), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:04, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Foundations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steve Bingham. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rusty Stevens

Hello Foox123456789, I appreciate your recent edits of the Rusty Stevens article. I have made some revisions which removed some of your material. There were a couple reasons. You used IMDb as a source. IMDb is not considered a reliable source for Wikipedia because its content is user contributed. I backed off what you added base on that source. You also introduced mention of notoriety which has negative connotations. That doesn't seem to be supported by the sources so I backed that off also. I merged the 'Later life' section with 'Career' because although it was about later years it was still primarily about his career. Finally, I dropped mention of his living a private life and current location being unknown. I agree that we don't know much about how he is living his life or where he is. On the other hand we should include what published sources support and leave out our own speculation. You found some new source material and that is a big help. Gab4gab (talk) 17:13, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Colin Pattenden, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Farnborough.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects to article where the topic is not mentioned

Please check that the topic of a redirect is actually mentioned in the target article before creating a redirect, as the reader generally expects to find something about the search term, and its complete absence can be confusing and a waste of time searching for something which is not there. Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 05:39, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Gregory (musician) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mike Gregory (musician), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:25, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Otis Williams

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Otis Williams, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:13, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Melvin Franklin

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Melvin Franklin, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:13, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Paul Williams (The Temptations singer)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Paul Williams (The Temptations singer), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:13, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Eddie Kendricks

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Eddie Kendricks, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:13, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on David Ruffin

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page David Ruffin, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:13, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 23:17, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|I believe there is a misunderstanding, this is not a sockpuppet account as this is the first account I have ever made on Wikipedia}} Foox123456789 (talk) 14:26, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Foox123456789 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe there is a misunderstanding, this is not a sockpuppet account as this is the first account I have ever made on Wikipedia

Decline reason:

Confirmed to Ddctd.fllwr.f.fshn, which I will go and block now. Yamla (talk) 14:49, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Concern regarding Draft:Marty Sanders

Hello, Foox123456789. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Marty Sanders, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]