User talk:Frap

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by .

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

AfD nomination of List of computer standards

BitCraft Online moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, BitCraft Online, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 11:13, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: BitCraft Online (March 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jeraxmoira was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BitCraft Online and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 17:46, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Some parts of the article are unsourced. Adding sources and including one more indepth review from a reliable source can help establish notability. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 17:52, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Frap! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 17:46, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edition : Vastav AI

Hi, I come cross you recently framed Vastav AI with valid changes, can you again check if everything is fine?

Also you supports free open source stuffs , really great 👍🏻

Thank you. Ismadexbypeople (talk) 07:58, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Article speedied, user GLOCKed) -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:46, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: BitCraft Online (March 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Vrxces were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Hey, some constructive advice - the approach taken to BitCraft Online is not ideal and is improperly sourced to create the illusion of a well-sourced article. Each sentence is a short snippet copypasted verbatim from a random part of a different source. There's no synthesis or summary of sources at all. Many of the sentences don't really describe the subject matter, focusing on unclear or inessential parts of their source - such as talking about "write-ahead logging", or what other games reviewers compared it to. It has the appearance of churning these sources into gAI to ask for a key point and stringing that together into an article. I really appreciate you have done some work here but you need to be able to properly describe the content of the game and its reception to substantiate notability and create encyclopedic sourcing. Check out the manual of style for pointers.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BitCraft Online and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 08:05, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia, and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Boeing F-47. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use your sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 22:30, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Boeing F-47

I noticed your edit on Boeing F-47. In your edit, you wrote "Boeing F-47 Trumpster" yet no secondary sources called it that and you didn't cite a source (you don't really need one in the lead). May you explain where you got this name from? Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 22:30, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Becoming Wikifriends

Hello there @Frap!. I saw your recent contributions to the first article I created MakeCode, and I wanna say thank you! Also, I found out that you and I are basically interested in the same subject, technology and computing. Would you mind becoming a wikifriend with me? Vinizex94 (talk) 12:10, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure! Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for creating articles and improving Wikipedia! I noticed that one of the GitHub link points a 404 though. -- Frap (talk) 12:17, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the warm welcome, User:Frap. Glad to connect with a fellow tech enthusiast here. 🙌

Ah—got it now. When you mentioned the GitHub link returning a 404, you meant it's pointing to a non-existent or broken page. I’ll take a look and fix it or replace it with a working link if I can find one. Appreciate you catching that!

And yes, I’d be happy to be wikifriends—always great to build with others who love tech and computing too. See you around the namespace! Vinizex94 (talk) 12:56, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

Thank you sincerely for your contributions! :) x RozuRozu • ^tea _cups 20:55, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A fox for you!

You've been working so hard. Here, pet this cute fella'

Vinizex94🌍 06:49, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Frap (talk) 11:41, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]