User talk:Krancky410

This user hopes that in light of massive media coverage of the blackout that SOPA and PIPA will not become a law.

Sandbox

Krancky, I have polished the content of your sandbox a bit and moved it to mainspace, at James Cimino. It was either that or revert your addition of a redlink to List of NYU School of Medicine people ("no article, no entry"). Thanks for your contribution, Drmies (talk) 20:43, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Thanks Drmies. I'll flush that page out so it isn't just a stub. I'm pretty new to using wiki so if you see me doing something I shouldn't be doing, let me know! Krancky410 (talk) 00:37, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Krancky410 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Unsure why I was blocked. Only created one new page and only edited one page. The page I edited was just to connect the page I made to it. I definitely don't have multiple accounts. Maybe someone figured out my password? I could change my password/username if that would help the situation. As you can see above I commented I'm new to editing wikipedia in feburary.

Decline reason:

The combination of behavioural evidence and the checkuser report make it clear that this account is one of your many sockpuppets. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:24, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Could someone elaborate on this situation more? Specifically what the "behavioural evidence" is that makes my account look suspicious. Also what is a checkuser report and how do I look at it? I really would like to keep my privilege of editing articles and I don't want to abuse the unblock request tool.

Thanks for your time and understanding! Krancky410 (talk) 14:15, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is this because my account has been relatively dormant?

Additionally could someone tell me how to view my own Wikipedia:CheckUser report(I don't even know where to look) and how to interpret it I could maybe get a better understanding of what is going on? I would be very grateful. Maybe it is an IP Range issue?

I really don't know how to prove my innocence. I am willing to meet face to face to prove I am indeed a person and not a giant sock!

Krancky410 (talk) 18:48, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]