User talk:M.casanova

it:Utente:M.casanova
This page is a soft redirect.

Please read this

The Fondazione Cariplo - upon request of the "Share Your Knowledge" initiative (linked to italian GLAM) - released all contents about his artwork gallery from august 2011. The footer on their website means:

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, M.casanova, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Guido Marussig. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 16:41, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Enrico Coleman

Hi! Thank you for your contributions to the article on Enrico Coleman. A couple of things:

would you please in future make quite sure that you do not delete properly referenced material from any article without prior discussion on the talk-page? The biography you have copy-pasted into the article, while useful in some ways, is both incomplete and inaccurate, and specifically does not include the information on Coleman's parents that you deleted.
would you please make sure you do not delete properly formatted and reliable references from any article without prior discussion?
when adding to an article, would you please use the referencing system already in place there? Changing the referencing system without prior discussion is regarded as poor manners.

Thank you, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:15, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Giovanni Antonio Emanueli

(Removed CSD Notification) I'm still worried about the situation, but after looking further, it is clear that WP:CSD G12 is not applicable. Monty ₈₄₅ 16:21, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ottone Rosai copyright concerns

Hi, I very much appreciate all the work you've been doing on Italian artist articles today, but do you have permission to use the copyrighted text you've used for your article on Ottone Rosai? If not, it is likely that the article will be deleted as a violation of copyright . TheMadBaron (talk) 14:35, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying. If the text is in the Public Domain, it might be worth noting that in the article to avoid further confusion. Keep up the good work! TheMadBaron (talk) 14:47, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Painters

Congratulations on your work here. Please add the Visual arts project banner as well as, or instead of, the Biography one - it is more relevant. For minor figures even 6+ lines is a "start" class in my view - I've moved some of yours from Stub to C class. Johnbod (talk) 16:50, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 2a3f010965e8259a6f413df5dd2175f1

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Reply

Just a note to say that I replied to you on Wikipedia talk:GLAM getting started. Thanks for your great work! LoriLee (talk) 22:16, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

African films

Nice work on creating all those African films. Please can you ensure that you add the three main categories (Year, Country and Language) at the bottom of each article, per WP:FILMCAT. I know the infobox can trasclude them, but they should also be added into the body of the article. There is also the {{Africa-film-stub}} tag too. Thanks again! Lugnuts (talk) 08:48, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Good to see some of these lesser-known films being created in the first place. Lugnuts (talk) 09:01, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:African Film Festival of Cordoba-FCAT

Category:African Film Festival of Cordoba-FCAT, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:10, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sous l'Emprise des esprits

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Sous l'Emprise des esprits, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.fcat.es/FCAT/index.php?option=com_zoo&task=item&item_id=785&Itemid=37.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 07:10, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FCAT released contents undel CC BY-SA license. --M.casanova (talk) 10:02, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For your efforts starting missing articles on African films. Can you add the crew details inside the infoboxes though? ♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:22, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent! You can also add things like Category:2000s documentary films and Category:Spanish documentary films.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:07, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Artesanos

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Artesanos, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Inlandmamba (talk) 08:10, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Les Indépendantristes

The article Les Indépendantristes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable unfinished film

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gaijin42 (talk) 16:52, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Les Accords de Bella

The article Les Accords de Bella has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable film

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gaijin42 (talk) 16:53, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. please read WP:NFILM and make sure pages you are creating meet this criteria Gaijin42 (talk) 16:54, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Le Mythe de la 5ème île

The article Le Mythe de la 5ème île has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable film, does not meet WP:NFILM

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gaijin42 (talk) 16:54, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Les Accords de Bella for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Les Accords de Bella is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Les Accords de Bella until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:04, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Les Indépendantristes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Les Indépendantristes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Les Indépendantristes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:05, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Le Mythe de la 5ème île for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Le Mythe de la 5ème île is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Le Mythe de la 5ème île until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:05, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Les larmes de l’émigration for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Les larmes de l’émigration is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Les larmes de l’émigration until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:05, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Le Congo, quel cinéma! for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Le Congo, quel cinéma! is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Le Congo, quel cinéma! until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:06, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Le Beurre et l'argent du beurre for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Le Beurre et l'argent du beurre is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Le Beurre et l'argent du beurre until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:06, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of La Robe du temps for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article La Robe du temps is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La Robe du temps until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:07, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of La Mémoire du Congo en péril for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article La Mémoire du Congo en péril is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La Mémoire du Congo en péril until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:07, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of La Gran final for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article La Gran final is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La Gran final until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:07, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of La Caravana del manuscrito andalusí for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article La Caravana del manuscrito andalusí is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La Caravana del manuscrito andalusí until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:07, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of L'Afrique en morceaux for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article L'Afrique en morceaux is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L'Afrique en morceaux until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:08, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Memoria negra for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Memoria negra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Memoria negra until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:11, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Marrabenta Stories for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marrabenta Stories is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marrabenta Stories until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:11, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mariem Hassan, la voz del Sáhara for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mariem Hassan, la voz del Sáhara is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mariem Hassan, la voz del Sáhara until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:11, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of One Goal (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article One Goal (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One Goal (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:13, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of On-Yaramá for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article On-Yaramá is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/On-Yaramá until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:13, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of O meu marido esta a negar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article O meu marido esta a negar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/O meu marido esta a negar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:13, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Admin notification

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

I see you have asked a few admins to comment on my AFD submissions, This is to notify that I have mentioned you as posibly violating the mass creation policy. We should probably direct all conversation to the same location for ease of communication. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:21, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you could find some additional sources to back up the articles they should be kept.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:47, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not really. If you can inline citations like I've added to Les Accords de Bella this should make it OK. I'll vote to keep the articles if you can do this to the others to demonstrate coverage in other sources..Like this ♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:17, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ideally like La Robe du temps if you can. That article now doesn't stand a chance of being deleted♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:33, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Try to add publisher if you can like [1]] and month always in capital letter. It is the publisher info which will allow editors to assess notability.♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:47, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ref after punctuation. Thanks!♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:55, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles were kept! You can return now!♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:45, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I would get OTRS confirmation as you did with the last batch. As long as you also create with another source or two they should be fine.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:26, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would not that the articles were all kept - after significant research and editing to find additional sources. If you are being honest about not creating these automatically, then spend the 5 min to validate each film is actually notable and add some additional sourcing. I agree 100% that additional coverage of these topics is valuable, but notability standards must still be adhered to. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:44, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As a bare minimum yes that's fine as you've indicated multiple sources. It would be nice if you can find any production or background info too but I personally have no complaints if you create them like that. Good luck and happy editing!♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:03, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Africa through a Lens

Hi Casanova. Great that you're interested in those images. There are a few things I can suggest at this stage.

The first thing is about licensing. These images are not really public domain. That tag is incorrect in most cases. Most of the images are from the 1950s, 60s and 70s. Some are by living photographers. Because these photographers were carying out official work for the British government they are Crown Copyright. There are two ways to deal with this.

One is to just use the {{Flickr-no known copyright restrictions}} tag. This lets people know the the images are from Flickr Commons and their use on Wiki Commons is legitimate. You could also use the Open Government Licence {{OGL}} tag to define their exact copyright status. I'm quite happy to release these images under the Open Government Licence (equivalent to CC-BY).

The second thing is to try and improve the relationship between the original object and the scanned image. This might not seem very important but without the original archival context, the image is much less useful for research.

We are using the {{TNA-image}} tag to make links between our catalogue and images on Commons. (I hope in time, users will be able to move directly from our Catalogue to Commons to see the images.)

In order to make this work, the link to Flickr needs to be the link directly to the image itself, not the set it is in. (This also lets us update the metadata on Commons if Africa Through a Lens users add more accurate descriptions to the image on Flickr - and vice versa, potentially).

Then the {{TNA-image}} tag is given the catalogue reference from the Flickr image - e.g. {{TNA-image|CO1069/20}}. We're still working on this system but it's a good start.

I'd really like to have another info box explaining the Africa Through a Lens project (more information at www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/africa) and how we're trying to gather more information about the images but maybe that isn't necessary.

Anyway, thank you again for getting involved with these images. Let me know if I've explained any of this badly. I'm working on an upload myself and using [[2]] as a test of what the files should look like, if that's helpful and you can see the Flickr tag in use at [[3]].

(Some of those tags are displaying strangely here on Wikipedia but if you look at them as I've typed them in edit mode you should get the idea. Sorry, my Wiki markup is a little rough round the edges.)

--Mr impossible (talk) 21:43, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That all looks fantastic. Thank you so much for taking the time to add those tags. The only other thing I can think of is perhaps adding the country (from the Flickr set) to the categories on Commons. If you're adding a lot of images that might be helpful for other users.--Mr impossible (talk) 10:13, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have raised an OTRS ticket for the entire upload. I will post notification. --Mr impossible (talk) 13:43, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry Casanova, you'll have to revert that edit to TNA-image. That OTRS ticket only covers the Africa Through a Lens material. We can't have something where every time anybody gives an image one of our catalogue references, it appears to have its copyright status covered by that ticket. Could you not attach it to the WikiAfrica/TNA template you created instead? That way it will only cover the Flickr images you have uploaded. Would that be okay?

I need to raise a separate ticket to cover my own upload of images of WWII artworks from our collection and the terms will be quite different. --Mr impossible (talk) 11:11, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers for sorting that so quickly! --Mr impossible (talk) 11:34, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Creative Commons licensed category

Hi! I've noticed you've added a lot of documentaries which are Creative Commons licensed. You might want to add them to Category:Creative Commons-licensed films. I'll try to help you do that. CC-BY-SA is a great license and will allow the largest number of people to see the films! And to remix them. Thanks for your work. 212.226.64.54 (talk) 10:54, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiAfrica/Artgate

Template:WikiAfrica/Artgate has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:56, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiAfrica/Griot

Template:WikiAfrica/Griot has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:01, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiAfrica/Share Your Knowledge

Template:WikiAfrica/Share Your Knowledge has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:04, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiAfrica/Festival Milano

Template:WikiAfrica/Festival Milano has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:04, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:RefFCAAAL

Template:RefFCAAAL has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ricky81682 (talk) 11:17, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ki l'ambouba

The article Ki l'ambouba has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Film with little notability with just a short plot summary and that's it

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 23:47, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Give Me Spray

The article Give Me Spray has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Film that does not seem to pass wiki film guidelines.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 02:12, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tebraa, retratos de mujeres saharauis

The article Tebraa, retratos de mujeres saharauis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Film that does not seem to meet wiki guidelines for films.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 02:19, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sur le fil

The article Sur le fil has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Film that does not seem to meet wiki guidelines for films.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 02:20, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Forest Chainsaw Massacre for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Forest Chainsaw Massacre is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forest Chainsaw Massacre until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 02:29, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Les Fils de la vie et de la mort

The article Les Fils de la vie et de la mort has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Film that does not seem to meet wiki guidelines for films.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 17:47, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ouled Lenine

The article Ouled Lenine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film that does not seem to meet guidelines for films on here.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 00:16, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yoole

The article Yoole has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film with no reliable sources at all.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 01:45, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Estas são as armas

The article Estas são as armas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Film with very little info that does not seem to pass wiki guidelines for films.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 02:09, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, M.casanova. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, M.casanova. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fleur de pierre for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fleur de pierre is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fleur de pierre until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:51, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

article for improvement

In Wikipedia:Today's articles for improvement/Nominations puoi chiedere che un articolo su Leonardo venga segnalato per essere migliorato. Non tutto il lavoro viene per essere tradotto, ma qualcosa di buono puoi ottenere alla fine del processo di revisione. La pagina su meta servirà a coordinare questi sforzi interlingua.--Alexmar983 (talk) 03:59, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ovviamente scegline uno alla volta, non ti preoccupare se viene scartato, prediligi articoli su cui si trovi abbastanza materiale in rete. Ma qualche utente più esperto dalla segnalazione globale ci finisce sopra. E tu imposti in italiano dopo che quello inglese è stato un po' ripulito e meigliorato.--Alexmar983 (talk) 04:58, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, M.casanova. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Les larmes de l'émigration

An article that you have been involved in editing—Les larmes de l'émigration—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Noah Kastin (talk) (🖋) 20:57, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Humburgun for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Humburgun is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Humburgun until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 23:52, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of J'ai bu du café dans un café for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article J'ai bu du café dans un café is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J'ai bu du café dans un café until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 23:54, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Le Guerbag

The article Le Guerbag has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Short film with questionable notability with no reliable sources to be found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 23:58, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Revolution (2009 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Revolution (2009 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revolution (2009 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 00:18, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Temporary Freedom for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Temporary Freedom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Temporary Freedom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 04:25, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Day and Night (2006 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Day and Night (2006 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Day and Night (2006 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 04:29, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Blad schizophrène for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Blad schizophrène is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blad schizophrène until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 04:43, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Le Quotidien des automates for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Le Quotidien des automates is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Le Quotidien des automates until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 04:59, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Varavarankely for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Varavarankely is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Varavarankely until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 05:05, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sekalli le Meokgo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sekalli le Meokgo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sekalli le Meokgo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 16:17, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of La Fenêtre for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article La Fenêtre is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La Fenêtre until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 19:21, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of A Season Between Heaven and Hell for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article A Season Between Heaven and Hell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Season Between Heaven and Hell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 19:28, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of La cita (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article La cita (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La cita (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 23:34, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Warda (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Warda (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warda (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 00:53, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Agaïssa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Agaïssa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agaïssa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 00:29, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sekalli le Meokgo

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sekalli le Meokgo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from fcat.es/peliculas/sekhalli-le-meokgo. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Atlantic306 (talk) 21:59, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ibo, o sangue do silêncio for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ibo, o sangue do silêncio is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ibo, o sangue do silêncio until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 00:19, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Die Hel (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Die Hel (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Die Hel (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 00:21, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tabou (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tabou (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tabou (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 00:24, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dix mille ans de cinéma for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dix mille ans de cinéma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dix mille ans de cinéma until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 23:41, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Game (1991 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Game (1991 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Game (1991 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 03:21, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of This Is Not a Crocodile Tear for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article This Is Not a Crocodile Tear is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/This Is Not a Crocodile Tear until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 03:57, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Le Rêve de Tiya for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Le Rêve de Tiya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Le Rêve de Tiya until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 03:09, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chouïa cinema for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chouïa cinema is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chouïa cinema until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:11, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Winners (film)

The article Winners (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable film, cannot find independent secondary coverage, per WP:NF

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY2008 20:46, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tendid

The article Tendid has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film with no known actors or explanation as to why this film deserves its own article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 03:55, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of If You Only Knew (film)

The article If You Only Knew (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film with no know actors/directors/etc. No notable reviews.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 18:57, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 942 Dakar, historia de una familia

The article 942 Dakar, historia de una familia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film with nothing to support it having its own article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 20:32, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Amour, sexe et mobylette

The article Amour, sexe et mobylette has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film with nothing to support it having its own article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 02:05, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anomalías eléctricas

The article Anomalías eléctricas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film with nothing to support it having its own article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 02:11, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of L'Arbre aux esprits

The article L'Arbre aux esprits has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film with nothing to support it having its own article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 02:16, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Au-délà de Cap-Noir

The article Au-délà de Cap-Noir has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film with nothing to support it having its own article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 02:25, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Basra (2008 film)

The article Basra (2008 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film with no coverage as to why it should have its own article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 16:49, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sur les murs de la ville

The article Sur les murs de la ville has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film with no independent, verifiable reviews.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 01:07, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Le Temps d'un film

The article Le Temps d'un film has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film with no independent, verifiable reviews.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 01:08, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tiga guérisseur

The article Tiga guérisseur has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film with no independent, verifiable reviews.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 01:09, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sektou

The article Sektou has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film with no independent, verifiable reviews.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 01:12, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sous l'Emprise des esprits

The article Sous l'Emprise des esprits has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film with no independent, verifiable reviews.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 01:14, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dakar cherche de l'oxygène

The article Dakar cherche de l'oxygène has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film with nothing to support it having its own article. Sourced only to non-WP:RS IMDb, a search turned up nothing better.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 23:53, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of La Jeune femme et l'instit

The article La Jeune femme et l'instit has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film with nothing to support it having its own article. Sourced only to non-WP:RS IMDb, a search turned up nothing better.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 00:00, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Street Is Ours!

The article The Street Is Ours! has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable short film with no known actors or independent reviews.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 20:08, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Trip (film)

The article Trip (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable short film with no known actors or independent reviews.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 01:59, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Usuku Lwan

The article Usuku Lwan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film with no known actors or independent reviews.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 02:01, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Trilogia das novas familias

The article Trilogia das novas familias has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable documentary, with no independent reviews found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 23:42, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Famila

The article Famila has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable short film with no known actors and no citations found to support.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 00:05, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Harga (film)

The article Harga (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film with no known actors and no citations found to support.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 00:15, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copyvio on Movement (R)evolution Africa

Your addition to Movement (R)evolution Africa has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. The content in potential copyright violation has not yet been removed, as this would leave effectively no article remaining, but may be deleted at any point.

OTRS permission

Hi! I'm trying to understand how you were able to add an {{OTRS permission}} template to pages such as this, when I would have expected an edit filter to prevent you from doing so – that template is for the use of OTRS agents. Were you on the OTRS team at the time, perhaps? Is there somewhere where your use of the template was discussed or authorised? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:51, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Famila for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Famila is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Famila until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lightburst (talk) 21:07, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Le Voyageur (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Le Voyageur (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Le Voyageur (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 01:40, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bougafer 33

The article Bougafer 33 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

likely copyvio, unreferenced, fails WP:GNG / WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:48, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 21ème Siècle

The article 21ème Siècle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Zero indication of notability. Sources are not independent - appear to be film festivals it screened at. No reviews located on a search.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:36, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Silence's Echo

The article The Silence's Echo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable documentary with nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help it pass WP:NFILM. Tagged for notability for 5 years.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 04:21, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Les Écuelles

The article Les Écuelles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable short film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help it pass WP:NFILM.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 12:24, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cayuco (film)

The article Cayuco (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable documentary. Nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help it pass WP:NFILM. Tagged for over a year for notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 17:39, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Le Fil vert

The article Le Fil vert has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable documentary. Claims of Award not found during a WP:BEFORE search. Nothing of substance found to help it pass WP:NFILM.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 13:04, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aicha è tornata

The article Aicha è tornata has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable documentary. Nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help it pass WP:NFILM. Only things found were videos, film database sites, and mentions that it was entered in a lot of festivals. Nothing found to support the claim of Award winner, nor to validate the importance of said awards. Tagged for notability since 2015.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 20:43, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stories on Human Rights

The article Stories on Human Rights has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable short film, tagged since 2019. Nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help it pass WP:NFILM.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 19:44, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Movement (R)evolution Africa

The article Movement (R)evolution Africa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unreferenced stub about a non-notable film, fails WP:GNG / WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:17, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tafasiry

The article Tafasiry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable short film, won a minor award but nothing found in a WP:BEFORE can even support that claim. Tagged since 2019.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 13:27, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of One and Five

The article One and Five has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable short film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to establish notability. Tagged since 2019.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 20:03, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paris by the Sea

The article Paris by the Sea has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable short film, apparent winner of obscure award. Nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help it pass WP:NFILM. Tagged since June 2019.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 20:37, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kinshasa Septembre noir

The article Kinshasa Septembre noir has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable short documentary, with nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help it pass WP:NFILM. Tagged for notability since 2012.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 12:49, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Le Temps d'un film for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Le Temps d'un film is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Le Temps d'un film until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Donaldd23 (talk) 15:26, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Syntoniser Amani

The article Syntoniser Amani has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable documentary, tagged since May 2019. Nothing found in a WP:BEFORE except film database sites, videos, and other wikis.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 23:48, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dakar cherche de l'oxygène for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dakar cherche de l'oxygène is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dakar cherche de l'oxygène until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Donaldd23 (talk) 15:29, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yesterday Still Hoping

The article Yesterday Still Hoping has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help it pass WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 13:22, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Victimes de nos richesses

The article Victimes de nos richesses has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help it pass WP:NFILM. Minor awards, but nothing of value. Tagged for notability since February 2017.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 14:59, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tinye So for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tinye So is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tinye So until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BOVINEBOY2008 01:25, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Au-délà de Cap-Noir for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Au-délà de Cap-Noir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Au-délà de Cap-Noir until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Donaldd23 (talk) 20:32, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bajo el mismo Cielo (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bajo el mismo Cielo (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bajo el mismo Cielo (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BOVINEBOY2008 14:05, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ahmed (film)

The article Ahmed (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as no reviews or significant coverage was found in a WP:BEFORE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 14:25, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of La Brèche

The article La Brèche has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

per WP:NF, lacking significant coverage by independent sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY2008 00:29, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Abandon de poste

The article Abandon de poste has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication this meets WP:NFILM. No in-depth independent coverage located on a search.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:58, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fatma (film)

The article Fatma (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable film

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sro23 (talk) 02:22, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of C'est dimanche!

The article C'est dimanche! has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 17:01, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Denké-Denké

The article Denké-Denké has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable documentary

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 13:46, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Desert Blues

The article Desert Blues has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable documentary, appears to fail WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 18:20, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Desarrollo humano

The article Desarrollo humano has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Film appears to fail WP:NFILM as nothing was found in a BEFORE to meets the notability guidelines.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 00:42, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Le Dernier cri

The article Le Dernier cri has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DavidEfraim (talk) 10:35, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Love in the Time of Gum

The article Love in the Time of Gum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A short film that does not appear to pass the WP:GNG or WP:NFILM. I searched for sources under both given titles, and was unable to find any coverage in reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rorshacma (talk) 07:04, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anger of the Gods

The article Anger of the Gods has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:50, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of A ponte: uma história do ferryboat Bagamoyo

The article A ponte: uma história do ferryboat Bagamoyo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A short film that does not appear to pass the WP:GNG or WP:NFILM. There are no valid sources in the article and no claim of notability. Searches did not produce any significant coverage or reviews in reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rorshacma (talk) 19:42, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ryeh

The article Ryeh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable short film that fails the WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. There are no valid sources currently in the article and no claim of notability. Searches brought up only very brief mentions, and no significant coverage in reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rorshacma (talk) 17:30, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fissures (film)

The article Fissures (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NF

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mike Allen 16:02, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gabbla for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gabbla is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabbla until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

NP83 (talk) 02:35, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kuxa kanema, capítulos 1, 63, 262

The article Kuxa kanema, capítulos 1, 63, 262 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

lacks citations to reliable sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Humanitaire!

The article Humanitaire! has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not pass WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 09:51, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]