User talk:Mattamatician

       _.---._    /\\
    ./'       "--`\//
  ./              o \          .-----.
 /./\  )______   \__ \        ( help! )
./  / /\ \   | \ \  \ \       /`-----'
   / /  \ \  | |\ \  \7--- *** *** *** *** *** ***

January 2025

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Electric displacement field, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. It is inappropriate to revert without attempting to justify the change first on the talk page and obtain concensus. You version "important" is scientifically inaccurate; it is "major". You incivility has already received a warning from another editor, please check the five pillars of Wikipedia WP:5P. Ldm1954 (talk) 03:31, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're wrong. It is completely appropriate to revert without attempting to justify the change first on the talk page. Being scientifically accurate has nothing to do with it. My version reads better, making the article open to a wider audience. Your version is awkward to read. Mattamatician (talk) 03:37, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. UtherSRG (talk) 12:11, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your block is incorrect, because I have not persistently made disruptive edits. You misused the block function. Mattamatician (talk) 12:18, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the history of your talk, I see that I am correct. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:44, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Look again, more closely this time. You'll see that the first time you looked, you misread the situation. Mattamatician (talk) 14:12, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]