User talk:Matthewvetter
Talkback
[edit]Hello, Matthewvetter, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
I'm Steven, a Wikipedia editor like you, and I noticed that you made a helpful change to Occupy movement. Thank you for your contributions. Wikipedia is a community of volunteers who want to build a great free encyclopedia, and we need your help. We have five simple rules, but other than that, we just need people like you to be bold and edit.
If you have questions of any kind, feel free to ask me on my Wikipedia talk page or by email.
Best regards, Steven Walling • talk 05:53, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Message added 15:03, 29 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Saw your message for La Pianista
[edit]Hi! I'm a friend of Pianista's and a fellow ambassador, based in New Zealand. Your class sounds like one I'd love to be an ambassador for, if you need any further help. Do let me know! sonia♫ 06:51, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- New message at my talk. In short, I'd be glad to help out. sonia♫ 23:14, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- And another. Cheers. sonia♫ 02:30, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
- I've moved the drafts to User:Sonia/Writing and Rhetoric drafts, where I intend to review them all today. Apologies for the delay and the lack of notification; I've just returned from a conference to a pile of real-world work. sonia♫ 00:54, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
- And another. Cheers. sonia♫ 02:30, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Newly minted Campus Ambassador!
[edit]
|
Campus Ambassador |
| Thanks for participating in the Indianapolis training! Pongr (talk) 21:02, 20 January 2012 (UTC) |
- Here's the info on the Wikipedia trademarks. Nikkimaria (talk) 16:17, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]
- The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
- You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the Help desk or on the reviewer's talk page
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Kevin Rutherford (talk) 05:16, 4 February 2012 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]
{{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Charles J. Ping.
- To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Bryce (talk | contribs) 07:32, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Green Goat.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk or via live help
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Nolelover Talk·Contribs 02:35, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
Thanks!
[edit]
|
Thanks for editing students participating this semester! JMathewson (WMF) (talk) 19:39, 6 March 2012 (UTC) |
ping
[edit]Message added 07:13, 19 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Forgot to leave you a note that I'd replied, sorry! sonia♫ 07:13, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia Ambassadors update
[edit]Hi! You're getting this message because you are or have been a Wikipedia Ambassador. A new term is beginning for the United States and Canada Education Programs, and I wanted to give you an update on some important new information if you're interested in continuing your work this term as a Wikipedia Ambassador.
You may have heard a reference to a transition the education program is going through. This is the last term that the Wikimedia Foundation will directly run the U.S. and Canada programs; beginning in June, a proposed thematic organization is likely to take over organizing the program. You can read more about the proposal here.
Another major change in the program will take effect immediately. Beginning this term, a new MediaWiki education extension will replace all course pages and Ambassador lists. (See Wikipedia:Course pages and Help:Education Program extension for more details.) Included in the extension are online volunteer and campus volunteer user rights, which let you create and edit course pages and sign up as an ambassador for a particular course.
If you would like to continue serving as a Wikipedia Ambassador — even if you do not support a class this term — you must create an ambassador profile. If you're no longer interested in being a Wikipedia Ambassador, you don't need to do anything.
- Please do these steps as soon as possible
First, you need the relevant user rights for Online and/or Campus Ambassadors. (If you are an admin, you can grant the rights yourself, for you as well as other ambassadors.) Just post your rights request here, and we'll get you set up as quickly as possible.
Once you've got the ambassador rights, please set up at a Campus and/or Online Ambassador profile. You can do so at:
Going forward, the lists of Ambassadors at Special:CampusAmbassadors and Special:OnlineAmbassadors will be the official roster of who is an active Ambassador. If you would like to be an Ambassador but not ready to serve this term, you can un-check the option in your profile to publicly list it (which will remove your profile from the list).
After that, you can sign on to support courses. The list of courses will be at Special:Courses. (By default, this lists "Current" courses, but you can change the Status filter to "Planned" to see courses for this term that haven't reached their listed start date yet.)
As this is the first term we have used the extension, we know there will be some bugs, and we know the feature set is not as rich as it could be. (A big wave of improvements is already in the pipeline. And if you know MediaWiki and could help with code review, we'd love to have your help!) Please reach out to me (Sage Ross) with any complaints, bug reports, and feature suggestions. The basic features of the extension are documented at Wikipedia:Course pages, and you can see a tutorial for setting up and using them here.
- Communication and keeping up to date
In the past, the Education Program has had a pretty fragmented set of communication channels. We're trying to fix that. These are the recommended places to discuss and stay up-to-date on the education program:
- The education noticeboard has become the main on-wiki location for discussion of the Education Program. You can post there about broad education program issues as well as issues with individual courses.
- The Ambassadors Announce email list is a very low-traffic announcements list of important information all Ambassadors need to be aware of. We encourage all Ambassadors (and other interested Wikipedians) to subscribe to the list; follow the instructions on the link to add your email address.
- If you use IRC regularly, or need to try to reach someone immediately, the #wikipedia-en-ambassadors connect IRC channel is the place to find me and fellow Ambassadors.
- Ambassador training and resources
We now have an online training for Ambassadors, which is intended to be both an orientation about the Wikipedia Ambassador role for newcomers and the manual for how to do the role. (There are parallel trainings for students and for educators as well.)
Please go through the training if you feel like you need a refresher on how a typical class is supposed to go and where the Ambassadors fit in, or if you want to review and help improve it. If there's something you'd like to see added, or other suggestions you have for it, feel free to edit the training and/or leave feedback. A primer on setting up and using course pages is included in the educators' training.
The Resources page of the training is the main place for Ambassador-related resources. If there's something you think is important as a resource that's not on there, please add it.
Finally, whether or not you work with any classes this term, I encourage you to post entries to the Trophy Case whenever you see excellent work from students or if you have great examples from past semesters. And, as always, let students (and other editors!) know when they do things well; a little WikiLove goes a long way!
--Sage Ross (WMF) (talk) 20:48, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hollis Summers, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 05:14, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
Your article submission Hollis Summers
[edit]
Hello Matthewvetter. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Hollis Summers.
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hollis Summers}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 09:20, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Writing Course
[edit]Hi Matthew,
Thank you for inviting me to be an online ambassador for your writing course. I would normally be glad to accept, but the specific time you need reviews is going to be an exceptionally busy time for me outside of Wikipedia, most notably because of a wedding I am standing in and helping prepare for in early August. For this reason, I will have to decline. I hope you are successful in securing two online ambassadors for the course.
Neelix (talk) 19:42, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]Message added 07:32, 30 June 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Yunshui 雲水 07:32, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Nice work!
[edit]
|
The WikiCookie | |
| You've learned how to use basic wikicode in your sandbox. You can always return there to experiment more. |
Posted automatically via sandbox guided tour. Matthewvetter (talk) 20:54, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Wikiproject Appalachia
[edit]Hi, Matthew.
I'm pleased to see that Wikipedia's Appalachia articles are going to be a focus for some student attention. Several years ago, WikiProject Appalachia was organized as a focus for cooperation (and hand-wringing, at times) in improving Wikipedia coverage of topics related to Appalachia. A couple of the students seem to have found their way to the wikiproject talk page.
I invite you and the students involved in this activity to interact on the wikiproject talk page, review past discussions, look at resources like most-viewed pages in the wikiproject, and otherwise engage with project members. (Maybe some students will want to join the Wikiproject and continue contributing after the class ends!). --Orlady (talk) 17:27, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi [reply to|Orlady]! Thanks so much! Wikiproject Appalachia has been such a useful source for. I will definitely encourage students to get involved! Matthewvetter (talk) 13:16, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]Message added 08:08, 6 August 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Yunshui 雲水 08:08, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
Writer Biographies for Creative Nonfiction
[edit]Matt,
Thanks for agreeing to help out with our class project to create Wikipedia entries for CNF authors. I'll set up the course page today, and do the tutorials over the course of next week. I'm so excited about this! Thank you for all your help. I would never dare to try this without your support. Wikipedia is intimidating! — Preceding unsigned comment added by SarahEMC2 (talk • contribs) 11:46, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- @SarahEMC2: I am totally excited too. I will see what I can do as campus volunteer to help with the Course page. Don't hesitate to message me if you want to get together over the weekend. All of this stuff can be intimidating at first, but also really fun! Don't forget to sign your talk page posts with four tildes! Matthewvetter (talk) 12:28, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
The info box claims she died in 2009, but articles on the web indicate she has been alive since then ([1]). Please explain and revise article as necessary. Antrocent (♫♬) 02:21, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks @Antrocent: I was in the process of correcting this when you patrolled. Matthewvetter (talk) 02:25, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Topic
[edit]Hello,
You recently subbed for Sarah in our class. I am still having a hard time coming up with a topic/person to edit on Wikipedia. I was wondering if you had any suggestions. Thank you!
Ashleynoelle1 (talk) 20:51, 23 March 2015 (UTC)Ashley
- @Ashleynoelle1: Definitely. What are you interested in? What do you study? Let's start from there.
Matthewvetter (talk) 21:07, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
I am interested in women's health and fitness. Also, in women scientists. I am studying Biology here at OU with a pre-medical pathway. I have looked at a few women scientists, but cannot seem to find much info about them on the web. Thanks!
````Ashley — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.41.224.103 (talk) 21:13, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- @Ashleynoelle1:OK I remember talking to you now. Give me an hour or two and I will see what I can come up with. I'll leave you some possibilities on your Talk page. Don't forget to sign your talk comments with four tildes- you can also use a colon (:) to indent a reply. Matthewvetter (talk) 21:19, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Women in Jazz(festival)
[edit]
The article Women in Jazz(festival) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- The article needs to be filled in and filled out. As it stands, there is nothing here.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. And Adoil Descended (talk) 19:36, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 24
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Women in nursing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mary Breckinridge. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
May 2015
[edit]
Your addition to Harvey Milk High School has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:29, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
- Hi! I understand you are using Wikipedia as a teaching aid. The first thing your students will need to know here is that we do not tolerate copyright violations. As an aid to identifying those, we often use a couple of tools, this and this. The latter gives very clear results when a page is compared with a known or suspected source, the former scans more widely. Had you known of them, either would have told you that the content added to Harvey Milk High School was lifted pretty much word-for-word from the two newspaper articles cited as sources; a quick visual inspection of the student's sandbox would have told you the same. Your re-addition of the copyvio to the article after it had been very correctly removed was not acceptable; please make sure you do not do that again. You were also edit-warring at that page, which again is not acceptable behaviour here. You could now help the project by checking all contributions made by any student of yours, and completely removing any other copyright violations. If you have questions about this and ask them here, I should see that you have done so, and will answer if I can. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:44, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks Justlettersandnumbers. I am aware of the policies on copyright. I do spend considerable time talking with my students about this. Of course, students sometimes still misunderstand. I apologize for adding some of the material back. The student in question was also being censured for adding queer/lgbtq content and I was trying to help ensure that his first experience editing wasn't one of complete redaction and erasure (when not all of his contribution was problematic). In my attempt to protect my student, I may have gotten a bit zealous. Apologies for that. Thanks for working with us to improve the article. Matthewvetter (talk) 20:30, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Change in your user rights
[edit]Your Wikipedia account was previously granted a user right called "course instructor" by the Wiki Education Foundation. That right enabled you to create a course page through the EducationProgram MediaWiki extension. Starting in fall 2015, the Wiki Education Foundation has discontinued its use of this extension. Going forward, users should create course pages through the Wiki Education Foundation website. That application is more user-friendly, and any content is automatically mirrored to Wikipedia. To prevent confusion, we'll be removing your "course instructor" user right, as it is not needed with the new system. This is simply a notification of the technical change to your account. No action is needed from you at this time.
If you plan on teaching with Wikipedia for the fall 2015 term, please email me (helaine
wikiedu.org) for instructions how to create your next course page using our new system. --Helaine (Wiki Ed) (talk), sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Research paper
[edit]Hello there! I have written a chapter of my PhD on the Oral Citations Project (https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Oral_Citations) and your username appears in the chapter as having made an edit to the article. Please let me know if you would like me to send you a draft of the chapter before Wednesday 12 August for you to review it. Many thanks! --hfordsa (talk) 11:18, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
@Hfordsa: Yes, I would really like to take a look. Thanks! Matthewvetter (talk) 16:58, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
You've got mail!
[edit]
Message added 20:10, 13 January 2016 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
AddisWang (talk) 20:10, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
It's not the job of WP editors to rewrite unusable student contribs
[edit]Copied here from the student page where you asked:[2]
- Hi Matt, looking over your talk page I see this has come up before, so I'm going to copy this there as well. My priority is the 'pedia, not test edits by students. I've usually cut students more slack, but if the edits aren't improvements, the student status of the editor is not a reason to keep them in the articles. Recently the Indigenous articles have been hit by quite a few edits that show a lack of understanding of the subject matter. In many cases it is clear that the student editor didn't even read the article they are trying to change. There have been many copyvios. As I said above, it is not our job to rewrite this stuff. Either the students learn to function like any Wikipedian or they don't edit. The 'pedia is more important than their course grade. - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 17:17, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- Hi@CorbieVreccan: I think you are misunderstanding my comment. I'm not worried about the student's course grade, and certainly not placing more value on that than the content or quality of the new content being added. Rather, I am interested in an encyclopedia that might work with novice editors. That's all I am asking, is that you work more with the student rather than reverting their edits wholesale. In any case, this student has expressed a desire to work with you, so she will be trying to re-write her additions with the suggestions you made about tense. Maybe you can use this as an opportunity to collaborate and even teach a newcomer to the Wikipedia community. I would never ask WP editors to rewrite student content and I am slightly disappointed by your heading line. New editors are also editors, not only students. Thanks! Matthewvetter (talk) 17:50, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- Matt, we help out new editors every day here. But everyone has their limits. We can't individually tutor every single one who messes up an article. Like any new user, they need to read the policies and other links we post for them. In many cases it is clear they are not doing so. Now and then a student editor does a good job and becomes a Wikipedian. But lately we've just seen too many who are clearly only trying to get their grade and don't care one bit about the quality or integrity of the 'pedia. This is a serious problem and if you haven't noticed it in the areas where you work, I suggest you look at some of the other edits that are coming from these courses. If some of the editors you've responded to sound annoyed... Matt, they have every reason to be. Articles are being damaged, and when you champion edits that are unusable, it makes it harder on everyone. - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 22:47, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
- Hi@CorbieVreccan:. Thank you for you your response. Again, I am not asking anyone to "individually tutor every single" student. I am a bit confused on why you continue to repeat that idea. All I was asking, originally, was whether it was possible to work with student edits rather than reverting them wholesale. If you have no interest in doing that, I can't convince you to collaborate with novices. I'm sorry you have had negative experiences with Wiki Ed in the past. If there are specific articles "being damaged" that I can help improve, let me know. You can email me at vetter@ohio.edu. I am not trying to "champion edits that are unusuable," but rather to help new editors have something of a voice. Matthewvetter (talk) 12:57, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
- Matt, we help out new editors every day here. But everyone has their limits. We can't individually tutor every single one who messes up an article. Like any new user, they need to read the policies and other links we post for them. In many cases it is clear they are not doing so. Now and then a student editor does a good job and becomes a Wikipedian. But lately we've just seen too many who are clearly only trying to get their grade and don't care one bit about the quality or integrity of the 'pedia. This is a serious problem and if you haven't noticed it in the areas where you work, I suggest you look at some of the other edits that are coming from these courses. If some of the editors you've responded to sound annoyed... Matt, they have every reason to be. Articles are being damaged, and when you champion edits that are unusable, it makes it harder on everyone. - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 22:47, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
April 2016
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Indigenous Peoples of North America, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Diff:[3] - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 19:06, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
- Hi@CorbieVreccan:- Thank you for your welcome. I am confused by your advice about editing comments on Talk:Indigenous Peoples of North America, though.. The edit you refer to is simply the removal of a student assignment working with Wiki Ed and was performed from the Wiki Ed dashboard that give instructors permissions to add and remove student assignments. The student in question did not end up working with this article, so it doesn't make sense to leave that assignment. I am posting this on your Talk page as well. This is beginning to feel spiteful. Matthewvetter (talk) 19:26, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
- From here, your interactions with other editors are looking to me like a serious case of WP:IDONTHEARYOU. There have been a handful of incidents now where other editors have explained something to you, and you respond in a manner that seems you did not read their explanations. You again ask the same questions that have already been answered for you in multiple places. This has the effect of wasting editors' time and causing annoyance and friction with people who would rather be doing productive work. You still don't seem to realize that the "article" you refer to[4] is a redirect, and that trying to place an article there would be going against WP consensus. This again shows you are not paying attention. Rather than striking the text and disabling the template, you removed someone's edit that already had a reply, rendering the talk page nonsensical, so I informed you of the policy and provided the diffs. Again, this was all explained to you already. You need to get a grasp of basic policy because right now your actions are not helping the 'pedia or the editors here. You don't need to have the same conversation in three or four places, by the way. - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 19:50, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
- Hi@CorbieVreccan:-By all means, please don't waste your time on my talk page anymore. I don't find your explanations especially helpful, rather they tend to be condescending and hostile. I was trying to remove the student assignment from the redirect, as explained above, because the student did not do editing work on page. This is performed from the Wiki Ed dashboard, which does not show the previous edits. Please wp:assumegoodfaith. If we are wasting your time, don't engage. As I said on the article on gender roles, the student has given up on trying to work with the particular editor culture of that article. Thank you. Matthewvetter (talk) 20:08, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
- From here, your interactions with other editors are looking to me like a serious case of WP:IDONTHEARYOU. There have been a handful of incidents now where other editors have explained something to you, and you respond in a manner that seems you did not read their explanations. You again ask the same questions that have already been answered for you in multiple places. This has the effect of wasting editors' time and causing annoyance and friction with people who would rather be doing productive work. You still don't seem to realize that the "article" you refer to[4] is a redirect, and that trying to place an article there would be going against WP consensus. This again shows you are not paying attention. Rather than striking the text and disabling the template, you removed someone's edit that already had a reply, rendering the talk page nonsensical, so I informed you of the policy and provided the diffs. Again, this was all explained to you already. You need to get a grasp of basic policy because right now your actions are not helping the 'pedia or the editors here. You don't need to have the same conversation in three or four places, by the way. - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 19:50, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:Je717811/sandbox/Women In Country Music
[edit]
User:Je717811/sandbox/Women In Country Music, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Je717811/sandbox/Women In Country Music and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Je717811/sandbox/Women In Country Music during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 19:52, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Matthewvetter. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Courses Modules are being deprecated
[edit]Hello,
Your account is currently configured with an education program flag. This system (the Courses system) is being deprecated. As such, your account will soon be updated to remove these no longer supported flags. For details on the changes, and how to migrate to using the replacement system (the Programs and Events Dashboard) please see Wikipedia:Education noticeboard/Archive 18#NOTICE: EducationProgram extension is being deprecated.
Thank you! Sent by: xaosflux 20:28, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Matthewvetter. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Women in Red
[edit]Hi there, Matthewvetter, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to have someone genuinely interested in education and in attracting new Wikipedians as a member of our project. I see you have already created a few informative women's biographies as well as an interesting article on Women in nursing. Keep up the good work.--Ipigott (talk) 09:54, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you so much for the kind welcome, Ipigott! I look forward to working with you and other active editors in WiR. Best, -Matthewvetter (talk) 00:38, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
June events with WIR
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
July events from Women in Red!
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:40, 25 June 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August 2019 at Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 06:45, 29 July 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2019 at Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:24, 27 August 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October Events from Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:35, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
November 2019 at Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:58, 29 October 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
December events with WIR
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:43, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
January 2020 at Women in Red
[edit]
|
February with Women in Red
[edit]
.jpg)
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
March 2020 at Women in Red
[edit]
   Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 19:33, 23 February 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April 2020 at Women in Red
[edit]
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:59, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May 2020 at Women in Red
[edit]
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 20:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June 2020 at Women in Red
[edit]June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 17:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
July 2020 at Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:11, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August 2020 at Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:50, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September Women in Red edithons
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October editathons from Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
November edit-a-thons from Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:51, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
December with Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A New Year With Women in Red!
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
February 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:59, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
March 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:48, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April editathons from Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:16, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:36, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:50, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
July 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:05, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August Editathons from Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:26, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:30, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]
Special event:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 01:36, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
November 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 21:30, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
December 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:12, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
January 2022 with Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
WikiProject Writing's January Events
[edit]
We want to highlight the #1Lib1Ref campaign going on right now. This is an easy way to get involved with Wikipedia editing by contributing one citation.
Other ways to participate:
|
February with Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
March editathons
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April Editathons from Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:45, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Guidance Barnstar | |
| Thank you for your work during the Native American Women Activists Editathon, especially your helpfulness to other editors. Nice to see you today! PacificWonderland (talk) 23:18, 29 March 2022 (UTC) |
May Women in Red events
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:53, 30 April 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June events from Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:21, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in July 2022
[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:48, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2022
[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:59, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in September 2022
[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:36, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2022
[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:00, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red November 2022
[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:34, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in December 2022
[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:55, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red January 2023
[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:02, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in February 2023
[edit]
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:28, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red March 2023
[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:54, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red April 2023
[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Signature
[edit]I figured I"d tel you this here but your signature doesn't necessarily comply with the signature policy which states "A customised signature should make it easy to identify your username." which yours doesn't since it's "DarthVetter". Just figured I'd let you know. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:05, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- Also there was an unclosed small tag on your talk page which was screwing with the formatting so I fixed it for you. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:07, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @Blaze Wolf Thanks for the suggestion! Will change it right away so you can find me easier. ; ) Also, I'm working with the student who is editing Clarinet to find some better sources. If they post again, will you give us a little time to improve the existing content instead of immediate revert? This would be aligned with WP:NOBITING. Thanks - Matthewvetter (talk) 20:20, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- Really that should be done in the sandbox but I'll leave it be since you asked And I really don't understand how the WikiEd sandbox works. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 03:01, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
I'm really not sure leaving it be will help in this case. I appreciate the enthusiasm, but really, very little of what is being added is in the encyclopedic tone we expect (NOTHOWTO has been cited correctly in some of the reverts), and adding sources will not save that problem. --130.111.39.47 (talk) 17:45, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
- Tbh WikiEd is a mess anyway. I've never really seen anything meaningful come from it in recent years. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:57, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
ReferenceExpander
[edit]Just a friendly heads-up in case you weren't already aware, since it's installed on your common.js: Careless use of ReferenceExpander has caused serious problems. It's currently at MFD, and a large cleanup project is underway to repair the citations damaged by the script. I and several other users have !voted that the script be deleted or disabled, and I wouldn't recommend using it at all unless you thoroughly check every reference it modifies against the previous revision. If you're interested in a more detailed explanation of the script's issues, Folly Mox has provided an excellent summary at the MFD. — SamX [talk · contribs] 05:12, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
- Hey @SamX - thanks for the heads-up. I will look into more. Matthewvetter (talk) 12:52, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Prism Bitch
[edit]Hello, Matthewvetter. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Prism Bitch".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 01:11, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Matthewvetter. Thank you for your work on George Eklund. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Nice work
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 21:08, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Paid editing
[edit]Hi Matt. Hope all is well. I can see that you are offering Wikipedia editing service for pay on Upwork (there is no outing because you edit under your real name). I'm sure that you are doing it as a research project to gauge how paid editors are treated by volunteers.
Regardless of that, you might want to do it in the true spirit and as per Wikimedia Foundation's guidelines, i.e., keep the disclosure permanently either on your user page or talk page of the draft/article you edited for pay and use the WP:AFC process if it is a new entry; otherwise, use the WP:EDITREQUEST for paid editing requests. Paid editors' work must be reviewed by a volunteer after a disclosure, and they cannot delete the disclosure after completion of the contract. Also, you have to link your Upwork profile on your user page as it is required by WP:PAID, e.g. User:Jhofferman. 163.47.119.24 (talk) 04:27, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Jhofferman
- Thanks for the guidance! This is a new venture for me so I appreciate your feedback. I am committed to only the most ethical editing on behalf of my clients and seek to follow all required policy. I've updated my user page accordingly. Matthewvetter (talk) 14:35, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Matt - the disclosure is not a license to add puffery, unsourced material, and advertorials to the draft at Draft:Johnny La. I'm not clear how this is aligned to your pledge of ethical editing. Sam Kuru (talk) 20:13, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Kuru Thanks for the feedback. I appreciate your guidance as I am navigating the line between representing the subject with the sources that are available and avoiding WP:NOT/WP:PROMO. Do you have any specific feedback on the use of the LAWeekly source? Thanks again, - Matt Matthewvetter (talk) 20:23, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- You are being paid to edit Dana Klisanin you should NOT be editing the article directly, but should use the request edits process with the template {{edit COI}} Theroadislong (talk) 20:37, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Theroadislong thanks for this guidance. I can certainly use the edit request in the future, though my reading of WP:COI was that it was a recommendation rather than a hard/fast rule. Matthewvetter (talk) 20:47, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- The guideline says "that those with a conflict of interest, including paid editors, are strongly discouraged from directly editing affected articles, but should post content proposals on the talk pages of existing articles, and should put new articles through the articles for creation process, so they can be reviewed prior to being published" Theroadislong (talk) 21:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks @Theroadislong - that's the passage I had interpreted as a recommendation rather than a rule. But again, I am happy to abide by the recommendation. I appreciate your quoting the guideline. Matthewvetter (talk) 21:58, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- The guideline says "that those with a conflict of interest, including paid editors, are strongly discouraged from directly editing affected articles, but should post content proposals on the talk pages of existing articles, and should put new articles through the articles for creation process, so they can be reviewed prior to being published" Theroadislong (talk) 21:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Theroadislong thanks for this guidance. I can certainly use the edit request in the future, though my reading of WP:COI was that it was a recommendation rather than a hard/fast rule. Matthewvetter (talk) 20:47, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- I'm usually happy to walk good-faith editors through the accidental use of junk/vanity sources, but I'm not volunteering my time here to guide you through your paid gig. Please carefully evaluate the sources you are using, especially when you know the subject has engaged in paid placement. Sam Kuru (talk) 20:39, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you Kuru - I did see your edit history comment after I posted this. I am glad we are having this conversation. - Matthewvetter (talk) 20:44, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- You are being paid to edit Dana Klisanin you should NOT be editing the article directly, but should use the request edits process with the template {{edit COI}} Theroadislong (talk) 20:37, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C
[edit]- You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.
This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.
On behalf of the UCoC project team,
RamzyM (WMF) 23:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red June 2024
[edit]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:05, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Deletion discussion about Barry Gough (businessman)
[edit]Hello Matthewvetter, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Barry Gough (businessman), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barry Gough (businessman).
Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Dclemens1971}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:01, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Memento Exclusives
[edit]Hello Matthewvetter, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Memento Exclusives, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Memento Exclusives.
Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Dclemens1971}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:10, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red August 2024
[edit]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 14:28, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2024
[edit]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:58, 25 July 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2024 at Women in Red
[edit]
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 19:00, 26 August 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2024
[edit]
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 08:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red November 2024
[edit]
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:45, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Orphaned non-free image File:CCC 75.4 front cover no cropmarks (1).png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:CCC 75.4 front cover no cropmarks (1).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
.png){kind=link}
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}