User talk:MikeJanetta

Welcome, MikeJanetta!

Welcome to Wikipedia, MikeJanetta! I'm I dream of horses, and I've been assigned as your mentor. About half of new Wikipedia accounts receive a mentor chosen randomly from a list of volunteers. It just means I'm here to help with anything you need! We need to have all kinds of people working together to create an online encyclopedia, so I'm glad you're here. Over time, you will figure out what you enjoy doing the most on Wikipedia.

You might have noticed that you have access to a tutorial and suggested edits. It's recommended that you take advantage of this, as it'll make learning how to edit Wikipedia easier.

If you need assistance with anything or have any questions, click on the "Get editing help" button on the bottom right corner of your screen. This will open up a module with links to help pages and a place to ask me questions. You can also ask me questions directly on my talk page, or go here to get help from the wider community.

Again, welcome to Wikipedia! I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 19:55, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

British Spring College, Awka moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, British Spring College, Awka, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 08:52, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: British Spring College, Awka (December 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please correctly use in-line citations by following the tutorial at WP:INTREFVE.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:British Spring College, Awka and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 09:55, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MikeJanetta! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 09:55, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: British Spring College, Awka (December 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NSCHOOL, requires significant coverage (not mentions in passing, inclusion in lists/directories) in multiple independent secondary sources. The college’s website is a primary source and therefore not independent.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:British Spring College, Awka and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 12:01, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:British Spring College, Awka has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:British Spring College, Awka. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:37, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on St. Charles College, Onitsha

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page St. Charles College, Onitsha, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:43, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Carol Standard Convent, Ichi

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Carol Standard Convent, Ichi, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:55, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on St. John's Science & Technical College, Alor

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page St. John's Science & Technical College, Alor, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:59, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello MikeJanetta! Your additions to Onitsha Stock Exchange have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 22:43, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Wow, Welcome to Wikipedia. I have seen your recent article and citations and I must say it's good but remember that not all schools are notable. Otherwise see, WP: ORG. Once more, welcome and Happy Editing. Best, Mastashat (talk) 00:51, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public. You may instead email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-enwikimedia.org with your username and appeal.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Yamla (talk) 11:48, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You guys are nothing but headless mob! Why did you block me and on whose permission ? MikeJanetta (talk) 14:02, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Go and get a real job lowlife! MikeJanetta (talk) 14:05, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you ain’t telling why you blocked me, you are getting sacked by Wikipedia to go and get a real job.

I am taking this case up!!! MikeJanetta (talk) 14:07, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You joined Wikipedia in 2004, yet you don’t have wisdom. You must be a sad old hag! MikeJanetta (talk) 14:13, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla, an Indian pauper. Old sad Hag! MikeJanetta (talk) 14:14, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that's quite enough of that. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 15:35, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Move

I reverted your move of User:MikeJanetta/Onitsha Metropolitan Area. Please do not move it to MikeJanetta/Onitsha Metropolitan Area. When you think it's ready for article space, please submit it for review as per WP:AFC. This will ensure it has met the appropriate standards for article space and will ensure it is properly moved to article space. --Yamla (talk) 12:22, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted more of your malformed moves. Please stop. --Yamla (talk) 12:24, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla Out of interest, howcome this user is no longer blocked or TPAed? qcne (talk) 13:05, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The ban on their original account was lifted. See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Unban_request_from_Elpresidente360. They then chose to give up that account and use this one (and only this one) going forward. --Yamla (talk) 13:48, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh. qcne (talk) 13:50, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

okay thanks. MikeJanetta (talk) 12:24, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: British Spring College, Awka (March 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:British Spring College, Awka and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

qcne (talk) 13:04, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your AfC Submission has been moved

Hello, I'm Deepfriedokra. I wanted to let you know that one of your submissions to the Articles for Creation (AfC) project has been moved and is now located at Draft:All Saints Cathedral (Onitsha), which is the preferred namespace for AfC submissions. It has not yet been accepted for publication and you may continue to work on it in its new location. If you have already submitted the draft for review, then nothing has changed and if it has not already been rejected it will be reviewed by a volunteer who will offer feedback for improvement, or accept and publish it as an article. If you have not already submitted it for review, you may do so when you are ready. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or at the AfC Help Desk. Thanks. Sophisticatedevening ^(talk) 21:45, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your AfC Submission has been moved

Hello, I'm Deepfriedokra. I wanted to let you know that one of your submissions to the Articles for Creation (AfC) project has been moved and is now located at Draft:Dennis Memorial Grammar School, which is the preferred namespace for AfC submissions. It has not yet been accepted for publication and you may continue to work on it in its new location. If you have already submitted the draft for review, then nothing has changed and if it has not already been rejected it will be reviewed by a volunteer who will offer feedback for improvement, or accept and publish it as an article. If you have not already submitted it for review, you may do so when you are ready. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or at the AfC Help Desk. Thanks. Also User:MikeJanetta/DMGS Roundabout, Onitsha has been moved to Draft:DMGS Roundabout. Sophisticatedevening ^(talk) 22:38, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Regina Pacis Model Secondary School, from its old location at User:MikeJanetta/Regina Pacis Model Secondary School. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. ~Liance^talk 01:39, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Queen Of The Rosary College, from its old location at User:MikeJanetta/Queen Of The Rosary College, Onitsha. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. ~Liance^talk 01:40, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Queen Of The Rosary College has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Queen Of The Rosary College. Thanks! Sophisticatedevening ^(talk) 01:53, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Regina Pacis Model Secondary School (March 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Regina Pacis Model Secondary School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:26, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:DMGS Roundabout has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:DMGS Roundabout. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:36, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed! MikeJanetta (talk) 09:41, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Advice r.e. referencing

Hi @MikeJanetta, just some advice regarding referencing. We usually much prefer a few really strong sources - maybe a minimum of three - vs 20+ poor sources. You also don't need multiple citations for every single piece of information, and you can re-use references if they are supporting multiple pieces of information. qcne (talk) 11:17, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your suggestion! MikeJanetta (talk) 11:39, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation

You submitted Draft:Regina Pacis Model Secondary School via the WP:AFC process. This is deeply, deeply concerning. That page was a blatant copyright violation, taking content from the school's official site without permission. You cannot do this. I want to be clear, this is a massive problem and you are placing the entire wikipedia project in jeopardy. Any other article you've submitted which contains content taken illicitly from an external site, you must immediately go and rescind the submission and request the draft article be deleted. Wikipedia cannot use such content. See WP:COPYRIGHT. This is more important than you working to improve any other drafts, this is more important than you submitting any other drafts. This must be the thing you work on now. If I see even one more instance of this, you'll be blocked indefinitely. Please read and make sure you thoroughly understand WP:COPYRIGHT and WP:FAIRUSE. Any other draft that contains content you didn't entirely write yourself, use Template:Db-g7 or Template:Db-g12 to get it deleted, noting that you violated copyright. --Yamla (talk) 11:47, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I do appreciate your concern. Going forward, I will ensure I have understood every aspect of copyright and fair use before submitting any draft! MikeJanetta (talk) 12:07, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I expect to see zero further edits except for deleting content you illicitly took from other sites, until this is completely cleaned up. --Yamla (talk) 12:10, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is not sufficient. We cannot allow the copyrighted content to exist even in the history. If the draft has copyrighted content, follow the instructions I gave (db-g7 or db-12) to get the draft deleted, then recreate it from scratch, in your own words. --Yamla (talk) 21:41, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you are not willing to expeditiously deal with your numerous copyright violations, I'll block you indefinitely. Please let me know one way or another. I'll give you 48 hours to respond. --Yamla (talk) 12:17, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What do you want me to let you know in 48 hours?
I don’t know about other editors, but I took time to create pages in my own words from scratch and credible sources, with no intention to violate any copyright. And when I use their exact wordings I put them in quote while citing the creator(s). Although, I found out that sometimes that there might be overlapping or error of omission.
I am going through those drafts, and the ones with ‘copyrighted content’ will be deleted, but I am not sure I will have time to create them again. Working on 17 pages is no easy task, especially when 99% of the sentences were structured in my own wordings.

MikeJanetta (talk) 16:05, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is not the case that you put content you copied and pasted in quotes. At least, not in any of the pages I looked at. Nor were the pages anywhere close to 99% of your own wording, not that it would be acceptable even if they were. If this applies to all the pages you worked on, you need to tag all of them with Template:Db-g7 or Template:Db-g12 and I expect you to do so immediately. I do not need you to ever recreate those pages, only that you commit to doing so completely and entirely in your own words if you ever do. You seem to be significantly underestimating the seriousness here. I need you to commit to expeditiously cleaning up the copyright violations you've committed, across all of the accounts you've used. Not just removing the infringing sentences or paragraphs, deleting the articles. --Yamla (talk) 16:11, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done, as per db-g7
I have not had any copyrighted material used on any accounts I previously owned.

MikeJanetta (talk) 16:57, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So, to be absolutely completely clear, your claim is the following. I will find no other copyright violations in any other pages you have worked on. Is that accurate? --Yamla (talk) 18:11, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

From the superficial checks, I couldn’t agree more. MikeJanetta (talk) 19:53, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the Draft:Queen of the Rosary College article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include on the external site this statement (or something similar): "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License".

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the Teahouse. You can also leave a message on my talk page.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the Draft:Mater Amabilis Secondary School, Umuoji article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include on the external site this statement (or something similar): "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License".

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the Teahouse. You can also leave a message on my talk page.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the Draft:All Saints Cathedral (Onitsha) article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include on the external site this statement (or something similar): "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License".

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the Teahouse. You can also leave a message on my talk page. --Yamla (talk) 12:14, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the Draft:Onitsha Metropolitan Area article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include on the external site this statement (or something similar): "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License".

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the Teahouse. You can also leave a message on my talk page. --Yamla (talk) 12:16, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely

You have been blocked from editing for a period of indefinite for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Despite your claim above, there are numerous instances of copyright violations. As such, I have blocked you indefinitely. --Yamla (talk) 20:46, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations include:

I am not yet finished this investigation. --Yamla (talk) 20:48, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's all for now, though I have little doubt there are other copyright violations I missed. --Yamla (talk) 21:13, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Onitsha Stock Exchange (April 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was:

Several user-generated sources and empty or pointless sections.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Onitsha Stock Exchange and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 11:01, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DMGS Roundabout (April 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not only is the draft bombarded with excessive footnotes, it also cites Wikipedia, which is not acceptable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DMGS Roundabout and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 11:02, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

MikeJanetta (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am requesting to be unblocked for the following reason.

The statement that prompted Yamla to block me for copyright use was not subjected to any deeper motive and scrutiny by me. I said “from the superficial checks”.

Though Yamla gave me benefit of the doubt to clear any copyrighted material, I did the best I can to vet through the pages I was working on to remove the ones I could recognize.

When I found out that I was blocked I did not object it immediately because I defaulted the community’s rule. I have taken time to review the rules pertaining copyright use, and going forward I will pay utmost attention in that aspect. I look forward to your positive consideration. Thank you.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= I am requesting to be unblocked for the following reason.

The statement that prompted Yamla to block me for copyright use was not subjected to any deeper motive and scrutiny by me. I said “from the superficial checks”.

Though Yamla gave me benefit of the doubt to clear any copyrighted material, I did the best I can to vet through the pages I was working on to remove the ones I could recognize.

When I found out that I was blocked I did not object it immediately because I defaulted the community’s rule. I have taken time to review the rules pertaining copyright use, and going forward I will pay utmost attention in that aspect. I look forward to your positive consideration. Thank you. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1= I am requesting to be unblocked for the following reason.

The statement that prompted Yamla to block me for copyright use was not subjected to any deeper motive and scrutiny by me. I said “from the superficial checks”.

Though Yamla gave me benefit of the doubt to clear any copyrighted material, I did the best I can to vet through the pages I was working on to remove the ones I could recognize.

When I found out that I was blocked I did not object it immediately because I defaulted the community’s rule. I have taken time to review the rules pertaining copyright use, and going forward I will pay utmost attention in that aspect. I look forward to your positive consideration. Thank you. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1= I am requesting to be unblocked for the following reason.

The statement that prompted Yamla to block me for copyright use was not subjected to any deeper motive and scrutiny by me. I said “from the superficial checks”.

Though Yamla gave me benefit of the doubt to clear any copyrighted material, I did the best I can to vet through the pages I was working on to remove the ones I could recognize.

When I found out that I was blocked I did not object it immediately because I defaulted the community’s rule. I have taken time to review the rules pertaining copyright use, and going forward I will pay utmost attention in that aspect. I look forward to your positive consideration. Thank you. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

MikeJanetta (talk) 16:00, 24 May 2025 (UTC)<nowiki> }}[reply]

@Yamla attention needed! MikeJanetta (talk) 16:16, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No. I will not be lifting your block. Copyright violation is very serious. You were given a chance. You blew it. Your actions placed the entire project in jeopardy and you've been incredibly rude. Don't ping me again. --Yamla (talk) 16:18, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]