Jump to content

User talk:Warudo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Nickps)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work on your speedy tagging this morning

[edit]

I should call it redirect repair, which is important work. Wikipedia's eyes are everywhere! Thanks for your efforts! BusterD (talk) 12:57, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! I plan to keep going since I'm guessing that my earlier run barely put a dent in the number of X3 redirects but it's always good to see that my efforts are appreciated. Nickps (talk) 14:22, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

G4 of redirects.

[edit]

It comes up every month or two. See Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2025 April 7 although I should have actually said 'categories' so this needed to be reverted anyways. But yes, people G4 things that cannot be changed regularly, and it's been a problem for some months now. Jclemens (talk) 00:08, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well, your wording wouldn't change anything about that even if it said "categories" because, again, category pages are pages. I'm honestly not sure I understand what the bug in G4 you're talking about even is. G4 says that if the deletion rationale no longer applies then it can't be used. So any page that is correctly deleted per G4 would never survive XfD in the first place. If people are deleting categories even when the CFD rationale does not apply then that's not a bug in G4, that's just misuse of G4 and should be overturned on DRV. If such misuse is happening then you should probably raise the issue on WT:SD. Warudo (talk) 01:49, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It's coming up in DRV, and a lot of contributors there don't see it the way you (and I, for that matter) do. You're probably right on next steps. Jclemens (talk) 06:38, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unichar

[edit]

If you are feeling generous, would you modify the template so that it is possible to make dotted circle the default for cwith if no argument is given, since this is by far the most common use of it. For example {{unichar|0303|cwith=|nlink=}}

(I don't think there is an obvious default for suffix= yet.) 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 22:40, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the default from the non-breaking space to the dotted circle as you asked. I hope that doesn't break anything. As for |suffix=, there really isn't an obvious default because it's not really in use yet other than 42355 Typhon and a few instances of |cwith=◌◌ that I've corrected. I'm assuming that its use will remain so rare that we might not even need a default. Warudo (talk) 23:04, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon The page Template:Bar box/sandbox/styles.css has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done for the following reason:

WP:G8: Template:Bar box/styles.css

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sohom (talk) 00:05, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]