User talk:Oblivy
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Your reversion at Quill and Dagger
[edit]Hi, I noticed you reverted my edit at Quill and Dagger where I added a section unreferenced tag, with the edit summary apparent vandalism. I have reverted your revert, as I believe this was a mistake (I had already reverted the vandalism). If this wasn't an error, please let me know why you felt it was vandalism. Adam Black talk • contribs 04:06, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry about that. I think we had an edit clash as I was working from "restore this version" and didn't see your edit. Certainly didn't mean to label it as vandalism. Oblivy (talk) 04:19, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
- No worries, I thought that might be the case. Just wanted to double check. Adam Black talk • contribs 04:20, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Civility Barnstar |
| For your good faith engagement at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Nations Security Council Resolution 600 and kind words. Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 06:49, 11 February 2025 (UTC) |
March 2025
[edit]
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Sivasagar Sivadol: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. PEPSI697 💬 | 📝 08:54, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks. I generally consider it a judgment call when it's an IP address as these tend to be dynamically assigned and easy to change. But I do recognize other editors benefit and this delays bringing the hammer down on a repeat offender. Oblivy (talk) 12:49, 4 March 2025 (UTC)