User talk:Paul-mcdevil
December 2024
[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chikara. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 14:21, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- clearly not an WP:DAB outlet, I thinks you might undertook the embodiment of this article i have some readable ref which might be factitious page and even this doesn't contain and (dismabiguation) perimeter hope it explain this resentment @GhostInTheMachine Paul-mcdevil (talk) 14:25, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- and still assumably it roughly commotion the sublet thats the point you should not miss out so i generically don't feel such epithetic revert is necessary anyway@GhostInTheMachine Paul-mcdevil (talk) 14:29, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Adding to the "standard" notice about unconstructive edits — The purpose of a disambiguation page is to provide a simple list of existing articles. See Help:Disambiguation and Wikipedia:Disambiguation for more information. The stringed instrument from India already has an article at Chikara (instrument). The caste does not seem to have an article, but maybe you could add something to the Jats article or perhaps somewhere else more suitable - I know nothing about the subject. However, please do not edit Chikara again, the recent changes have not been helpful — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 14:35, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- I acknowledge and partially agree with your bold conclusions; however, they could be more coherent and refined. While the discussion pertains to the primary topic, I believe it surpasses the established standards for disambiguation. To address this low-priority, yet resolvable issue, I propose the following course of action: moving the page and
.” This approach practically seems to be the most consensual and effective solution to resolve the matter without causing further confusion or discontent.@GhostInTheMachine Paul-mcdevil (talk) 14:51, 31 December 2024 (UTC)permanently assigning it the title “Chikara (disambiguation)
- So what do you have to say over this lethal accommodation because it should be in basic orientation of how disambig page work other way around it might also encroach the observance of WP:PRIMARY Paul-mcdevil (talk) 14:55, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- I acknowledge and partially agree with your bold conclusions; however, they could be more coherent and refined. While the discussion pertains to the primary topic, I believe it surpasses the established standards for disambiguation. To address this low-priority, yet resolvable issue, I propose the following course of action: moving the page and
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chikara, you may be blocked from editing. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 14:39, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- If you believe that the disambiguation page Chikara should be moved and replaced with a more suitable primary topic, please start a discussion on the talk page at talk:Chikara with an explanation of your proposal and details of the primary topic — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 15:04, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Truthfindervert per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Truthfindervert. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped. Izno (talk) 19:30, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.