User talk:RecycledPixels

Archives

Four Award for Paradise Airlines Flight 901A

		Four Award
		Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on Paradise Airlines Flight 901A. You may also be interested in claiming a Triple Crown, which is awarded for getting a DYK, GA, and FA. 3C doesn't require it to be the same article, but meeting the criteria for 4A means you also meet the 3C criteria :) ♠PMC♠ (talk) 09:35, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you today for the article, "about an airline flight from Oakland to South Lake Tahoe that never reached its destination. The article describes the flight, the aircraft, and the aftermath of the investigations that were launched when the aircraft crashed into a mountain"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:37, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

flights

Thank you for quality articles about individual flights such as Paradise Airlines Flight 901A, Pan Am Flight 7 and American Airlines Flight 320, for people like Francesco Zirano, for quality reviewing, for "You'll probably learn something you didn't know", - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2917 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:03, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promotion of Pan Am Flight 214

Congratulations, RecycledPixels! The article you nominated, Pan Am Flight 214, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 19:45, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pan Am Flight 214 scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 17 August 2024. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 2024, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/August 2024. Please keep an eye on that page, as comments regarding the draft blurb may be left there by user:dying, who assists the coordinators by making suggestions on the blurbs, or by others. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks, and congratulations on your work! Gog the Mild (talk) 14:18, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you today for the article, introduced as "a Pan Am flight that crashed in December 1963 while flying between Baltimore, Maryland and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. It was the first time that a jet aircraft operated by Pan Am had crashed in the five years that they had been flying, and the crash highlighted the previously unknown risks of lightning strikes on aircraft in flight, leading to new safety parameters in aircraft design."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:12, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Western Air Lines Flight 636

On 8 November 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Western Air Lines Flight 636, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that two of the victims and much of the aircraft involved in the crash of Western Air Lines Flight 636 were never removed from San Francisco Bay? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Western Air Lines Flight 636. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Western Air Lines Flight 636), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 16,138 views (672.4 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of November 2024 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In appreciation

		The Good Article Rescue Barnstar
		This is presented to you by the GAR process in recognition of your sterling work in helping Swissair Flight 111 retain its Good Article status. Please feel free to display the GA icon on your userpage. Keep up the good work! ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:00, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Page numbers

Hi @RecycledPixels: Regarding the page numbers of investigative reports, should I be using the page numbers on the final report or on the PDF sidebar? For example, what would be "page 6" of this final report? Would it be page 6 as written on the report itself or page 6 as shown on the sidebar of the PDF? Aviationwikiflight (talk) 02:43, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Aviationwikiflight: Even though it's a PDF, the accident report was typically originally distributed as a printed document, so you would treat it like you would a PDF of a printed book- use the original page numbers, not the page number of the PDF. So in that example, a 1982 report, made long before PDF format existed, you would use the page numbers that appear on the printed pages. "page 6" is the 7th page of the PDF. RecycledPixels (talk) 14:54, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thanks for the explanation. That clears it all up for me. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 18:07, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Western Air Lines Flight 34

The article Western Air Lines Flight 34 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Western Air Lines Flight 34 for comments about the article, and Talk:Western Air Lines Flight 34/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Warriorglance -- Warriorglance (talk) 13:04, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Hello, I'm Patar knight. I noticed that you have been adding short descriptions to articles. However, the short descriptions you added are too long to be effective, such as at Lockheed Electra wing failure investigation. The guideline is that short descriptions should ideally be under 40 characters long, and no longer than needed. For more information, see the short description guidelines. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thank you. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 01:45, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]