User talk:Rehmanian

Welcome!

Hello, Rehmanian!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Doug Weller talk 08:55, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

Hello, I'm Abo Yemen. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 10:57, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In 2025 Maha Kumbh ?? I explained that. Rehmanian (talk) 11:00, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, in that article. You shouldn't remove cited content from an article, even if you disagree with it. Next time start a discussion on the talk page to gain consensus and then if people agree, you can remove it 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 11:15, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Doug Weller talk 08:57, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller Ohhhhh!!! So only leftists propogandist will edit 1992 politics of US.

OK sir Rehmanian (talk) 09:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

leftists propogandist
@Toddy1 loveforwiki duck? 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 09:14, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Abo Yemen You should take care of Yaman pages.. You are literally 2007 born and trying to write the article which world read. You should be banned. Don't know why nobody is taking care of you. By the way who Loveforwiki. Toddy should look after you. Rehmanian (talk) 09:24, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are literally 2007 born
the exact same irrelevant arguement from this discussion by notatall00. Expect a SPI 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 09:28, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Abo Yemen Get a life. You are stalking every user who oppose you. @Toddy please look into him. Rehmanian (talk) 09:31, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to disappoint you but toddy is the one who filed the SPI on you 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 09:57, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Abo Yemen toddy seems stupid, who doesn't under the basics and common sense.

By the way, you can't change the fact. Wikipedia today or tomorrow will be banned in India for it's ideological propoganda. Rehmanian (talk) 10:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:Rehmanian. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 10:07, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stop acting like you are a senior editor here. 😂 Rehmanian (talk) 10:08, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. JensonSL (SilverLocust) 11:03, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Rahil1610 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Loveforwiki. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 21:40, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]