User talk:Rikker04

Welcome!

Hello, Rikker04, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

As I am writing mostly about Thai topics I really enjoy your additions to these articles, especially all those things which cannot be found in English yet, like the histories of the Khet/Amphoe. When I try to write such an article it so difficult to research with my nearly nonexistent knowledge of Thai. Some useful links for these may be Portal:Thailand, Wikipedia:Thailand-related topics notice board, Wikipedia:WikiProject Thai districts and List of Thailand-related topics. andy 11:25, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, andy. I've been a lurker for a while now, and I'm finally getting involved. It's hard to adapt without errors to the style and conventions which you and others have already developed for all the Thai pages, so be bold in editing my articles. I'm trying to be bold in creating them. I'm a decent copycat, so I made a navigation box for Amphoe of Yasothon, and I'm trying my best to keep the style consistent. Let me know any bad habits I have so I can curb them early. I'm very open to guidance and assistance. I also have contributed a bit on the Thai Wikipedia, mostly with interlinking and whatnot, as I don't trust myself to write actual content in the language. Thanks for the welcome! rikker04 14:12, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Those Amphoe article you created are already very good. The only thing I would change after the quick look is the sorting in the category - you'd have to do something like [[Category:Amphoe Khlang|Khlang]], as otherwise all is sorted by the letter A. For the photos of the district offices I would prefer them to be our own photos (there are a few at Commons) and avoiding to use anything copyrighted. For the tambon table I usually also include the number of villages and the population (see e.g. Amphoe Mueang Surat Thani), but when I don't have enough time I also do the plain table like you did. BTW: Feel free to suggest changes to the style of these articles in the Wikiproject - the style is not fixed, it's just what was so far the consensus of the few Wikipedians active in the project. andy 11:24, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I once lived in Mueang Yasothon for several months, so I figured I'd jump in there. Thanks for the tip on category sorting--I couldn't figure out how to get it to do that.

As for district office pictures, you're right. Now, I'm sure you know better than I do: are government works copyrightable in Thailand? In the U.S. they're automatically public domain, so I ask. But looking around at some of the images of official seals and things, it seems like they must be copyrightable. Anyhow, I won't be in Yasothon anytime soon, so we can always get rid of those pictures if they're inessential. I'm pretty sure I don't have any of my own, but maybe I do for other parts of Yasothon.

With population tables, I've copied your style on a couple of the Amphoe. See Sai Mun, for example. Although I did change Nr. to No., because No. is the standard abbreviation for "Number" in English, assuming that's what Nr. is supposed to stand for. Is that something I should mention on the project? I haven't studied the style too closely, but I should, before I get even further off. I think Sai Mun has the most info of any of them, even though I'd like to turn the economy section into real content, not just lists.

Finally, do you think the list of Nai Amphoe should still go on the main page when it's quite long, as with the older Amphoe like Mueang Yasothon itself, which has a history as an Amphoe back before Yasothon became a province? If so, I'll put that info up. Oddly, this morning I'm getting a broken link to the Amphoe Mueang page on yasothon.go.th. sure hope that comes back up! rikker04 13:34, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Any photos you have which would fit into an article - even if it not yet written - can be uploaded to commons. Of course the district offices aren't the most popular things to take photos, especially as they usually look quite similar to each other. I did a few for fun last time in Thailand, hoping others may help to fill it. For the Nr. vs No. - seems like the Nr. used in German did slip into my template. I will at least use the correct one from now, the existing ones can be changed with time as well. Right now I am quite busy to fill the short Amphoe articles of User:Oatz into a bit more complete ones. Which sections a "complete" Amphoe article should have isn't fixed yet, so far I rarely found enough info to do much more than a short geography and history section, and the tabular things like the tambon list. The outline in the project is more like a suggestion, it's not a fixed one which needs to be followed in every case. For the Nai Amphoe I rarely found these lists before (the govenors of the provinces are also only rarely listed anywhere online, seem like the Yasothon website is one of the better ones), for those in Surat Thani (my focus province) I found some lists, but most apparently not up-to-date, so I haven't yet added them. We can do similar like I did for the province infobox - list the current Nai Amphoe with an optional field infobox, and if present link to articles like List of district officers of Sai Mun (like the List of governors of Surat Thani). As the Nai Amphoe are reshuffled similar often like the province governors the lists will get long quite fast anyway. andy 20:41, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Thailand

Hi there!!! You are welcome to join the new WikiProject Thailand, please sign in. We need as many editors from Thailand as possible!!! ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 10:30, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kung Fu Tootsie

There's no mention in the article Kung Fu Tootsie about *why* it's "LGBT-related". There's info about the title, but not about the content. Please expand? Or the cats should be removed. Thanks! -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 01:42, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films roll call and coordinator elections

Roll call and Coordinator nominations

It's that time of year again – we're wiping everyone's name off of the active members list and doing a project roll call. Your username is listed on the WikiProject Films participants list, but we are unsure as to which editors are still active on the project. If you still consider yourself an active WP:FILM editor, please add your name back to the Active Members list. You can also add your name to any of our many task forces!

It's also time to start the WikiProject Films coordinator selection process! We are aiming to elect seven coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on September 14!

Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 08:26, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films August 2008 Newsletter

The August 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:08, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films coordinator elections - voting now open!

Roll call and Coordinator nominations

The September 2008 WikiProject Films coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of candidates. Additionally, we are keeping nominations open during the voting period, in case any additional editors wish to nominate themselves. Please vote here by September 28!

Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 01:25, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Template:HW-startCollapsible"

A page you created, Template:HW-startCollapsible, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is a test page. Use the sandbox for testing.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 03:47, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:HW

Another editor attempted to nominate Template:HW for speedy deletion on the grounds that you had blanked it or requested deletion. While the template itself does not display anything, I couldn't confirm whether you had requested deletion. Also, I do not know what the template is intended to do. Can you confirm whether you want to keep this template, and, if so, what it is supposed to do? --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:23, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm creating the Thai highway infobox in English wikipedia, which is a modification of the German railroad line infobox. Work in progress. --rikker (talk) 04:38, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just wondering: why not use an existing highway infobox from Category:Highway infobox templates as the basis for the Thai highway infobox, rather than a railroad infobox template? --Metropolitan90 (talk) 07:26, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's a visual route infobox. The Thai one is customized based on the German railroad version, and there's nothing like it that I can find in English or anywhere else. Here's an example: th:แม่แบบ:ถนนพหลโยธิน. Existing ones are textual, like this: Template:Thailand motorway routebox. --rikker (talk) 07:53, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I saw a glimpse of your work on {{Sukhumvit Road}} and {{HW}}. I love the way it's heading. Why are you saying the HW template is specific for Thailand? It looks rather generally applicable. It will need some documentation however to be used by others. Keep up the work. −Woodstone (talk) 20:35, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'm sure it will be generally applicable, and I'll generalize the descriptions when I can. I've already started to do so with the icons. I moved them to Commons and put them in commons:Category:Icons for highway descriptions. The icons were customized for Thai Wikipedia by a user there, so that's my starting point. I'll get on the documentation right away. I appreciate the feedback! --rikker (talk) 00:06, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thai highway network

The Thai highway network is looking much better with your added explanation of its numbering system. Would you mind tweaking it a bit, to say routes 1, 2, 3 and 4 link Bangkok to the hinterlands? And that the ##, ### and #### scheme is a principle that sometimes falls to the wayside in practice?

You may have noticed from the images I've recently posted that I now live in Ampur Meuang Yasothon (Tambon Tadthong) AND that I'm not a very good photographer. I noticed that you said you lived here once (and your user page says you're still in the time zone), but that you can't take pictures you'd like to have at present. I can do that for you, if you'll leave a note of what you want on my talk page.

I live by Hwy 202, and it has a peculiarity. At the Technic Intersection with 23, continuing straight ahead puts you on 23-bypass. That leads to the Don Ma Yang Intersection with 202 again, about 2 km from where it resumed at the Yasothon Hospital Intersection with 23-main. The U.S. custom would be to have put both route markers together (there's one street in Chattanooga where North, South, East and West-bound highways all proceed together in one direction!) And, minor roads share sign space with the majors. Obviously, Thailand only wants one route number per section.

As for Named Intersections, that seems to be a common practice these days all over Thailand (at least the parts I'v been to) but only in Yasothon have I seen them with GPS coordinates.

You will have noticed that I added the section on milestones, but I have yet to meet a Thai who can read one (or an American who could read a mile post in that country.) Pawyilee (talk) 18:00, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to make the changes you suggested, but feel free to tweak the phrasing yourself. I'm just going from the info on the DOH website--I don't really know a lot of exceptions to the regional numbering scheme in real life.

One thing, though--on the DOH website there's a page where you can type in a highway number for details about that highway. It breaks it down into quite small sections, with very precise lengths (three decimal places!) for each section, but they don't give a sum length. For the length of the highways, I've just been adding up all of the lengths. It occurred to me, though, that this includes bypass highways. In summing the total length of a highway, should the bypass and the city route both be included? Just a thought. --rikker (talk) 03:42, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Amphoe Kut Chum

Amphoe Kut Chum is a hotbed of organic farming, and has foreigners traipsing there from as far away as Canada. I don't know how to add that without OR, and I'm not trained in research any way. I did add the Boon Kut Chum. Pawyilee (talk) 18:00, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've only passed through Kut Chum, and it's been five years since I've been to Yasothon anyway, so I don't know anything about the organic farming there. Have you seen any articles online or other references to it? --rikker (talk) 03:42, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Amphoe Kut Chum ref. 3 is a HUGE file of hundreds if not 1000s of citations, so huge that it choked up my poor little laptop -- I had to ctrl+alt+del outta there and start over. If yours can handle it, Ctrl+f

organic foods; specifically, organic farming of rice and chemical-free rice cultivation

then copy and paste that as a ref, instead. In the immediate vicinity, you'll find citations for Bia Gut Chum, and for Yasothon General Hospital. Go ogle up "organic thailand" and score 3.8M hits; +organic +kut +chum scores 1K. I also have on my 'puter as .txt an October 22, 1997 Bangkok Post Outlook article, RURAL DEVELOPMENT "Old wives' tales" byline Sanitsuda Ekachai, that doesn't mention Kut Chum, either, but tags women as the driving force, as does a technical report from Laos. This "Asok" movement organic farm is just east of me on 202, but I only know that Santi Asoke offers shelter to women, and don't know if it listens to them. If you've been five years away from Yasothon, be advised the province has not been standing still. Pawyilee (talk) 09:49, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thetsagan Sart

This is the only article I've started, mainly because I added the section Public_holidays in Thailand#Other national observances and Thetsagan Sart didn't have an article.

Sart Chin has grown from its Phuket vegetarian Festival roots to be quite a big deal among the Thai Chinese, with ghosts from the Mid Autumn Festival and the Nine Emperor Gods Festival in attendance: Thetsagan Sart Chin Kin Che lasts nine days to honor said gods!

Sart Thai seems to have toned down to purely local observances at the nearest wat, except in Phetchabun Province with its Um Phra Dam Nam, when the governor, himself, bears the image under water. But the article I started really sucks, and even its trademark picture comes from the US! I just can't get as good a one, myself, and now it's too late in the season (if seasons mean anything anymore. Pawyilee (talk) 18:00, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Thetsagan Sart is also languishing in my User:Pawyilee/Sandbox. Pawyilee (talk) 18:06, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know anything about this festival, really, but I'll look around and see what I can add. --rikker (talk) 03:42, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thai 101

Titles in Thailand

File:MaePhloyBrandChiliSauce.jpg

Don't know how to post to your blog so will leave comment here:

Mae Ploy (แม่พลอย) is the lead character in M.R. Kukrit Pramoj's novel, Si Phaendin (สี่แผ่นดิน). Her brother is similarly called Paw (พ่อ). M.R. Kukrit began the novel has a continuing series of short stories in his newspaper, Thai Rath (ไทยรัฐ) specifically to preserve a record of vanishing customs -- such as addressing little children as Paw-Mae. นำพริก ตราแม่พลอย seems to have been named after her (if you can see it before it's deleted.)

(สี่แผ่นดิน ม.ร.ว.คึกฤทธิ์ ปราโมช ISBN 9749906209; translated into English as Four Reigns by Tulachandra (ISBN 9747100665.) Pawyilee (talk) 16:57, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comment. I have that book (in both Thai and English), but haven't read it yet. Sitting neglected in a box in the U.S. at the moment, sadly. That's an interesting connection with the chili sauce. Just goes to show how much allusion there is to literature/culture that goes over our heads (just as there is in English). พ่อ/แม่ used with children is really a term of address, though, rather than a title. Calling kids พ่อหนู and แม่หนู is a vestige of this practice you'll still run into. --rikker (talk) 03:42, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll watch for "Terms of address" on my RSS feed from Thai 101! Pawyilee (talk) 09:56, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Foreign stuff

Farang stuff is a good article, and you could add one just as good on foreign stuff associated with เทศ Thet. Etymology for Thet as a single word, or Thetsa- if compounded, is in my sandbox, where I've played with Thetsagan Sart; down below, I've just added that for -บาล. That เทศบาล originated as a powerful foreign concept shouldn't be surprising, give that municipality is not exact English. Arguably the funniest compound comes from นกกระจอก sparrow: นกกระจอกเทศ is officially an ostrich and, by extension, also an emu! Pawyilee (talk) 08:20, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We think alike, I see, because I have a "sequel" article about เทศ half-written at the moment. Things have stalled on the blog for a few weeks, unfortunately. I'll try to kick things back into gear. Thanks for reading! --rikker (talk) 08:28, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thesaban

Can you help here - is it thesaban or thetsaban? andy (talk) 23:27, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me for butting in: it's Thetsaban. See the entry [I'm going to add], above, for etymology of Thetsa-; -ban is from bála, page 517 entry 9161.

No problem with the butting in, of course. But bála corresponds to Thai พล /phon/ and พละ /phala/ "strength", not บาล /baan/ "protect" (see pālá. I see that's you, Pawyilee (checked the history), but let's continue this conversation on andy's talk page --rikker (talk) 07:55, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I call myself Pawyilee, not just because my middle name is Lee, is easier to pronounce than first name Richard, and is shorter when transcribed into Thai than is the initial, L., but also to honor the Isan village chief who was quite sure that สุกร are หมาน่อย ธรรมดา Pawyilee (talk) 08:33, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since we seem to agree the correct romanisation according to RTGS is thetsaban, why is the article not yet given that name? −woodstone (talk) 15:12, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't think we'd agreed -- I think it's best to keep thesaban, as I wrote on Andy's talk page, for reasons of etymological transparency/consistency with thesaphiban, and because it's closer to how the word is actually pronounced. Plus, it's a well-established spelling, with more web hits than Thetsaban. --rikker (talk) 15:42, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gidday Rikker...

...and very pleased to meet you. It's always nice (and a little reassuring) to meet a fellow niche editor. Any chance we could get you to add the user box {{User WP Cambodia}} to your user page as well the Thai wikiproject box? It's only a small step over the border and It would be great to have your enthusiasm in Wikiproject Cambodia - I don't know what else to say to tempt you except, "C'mon over, our script is even older" ;) Cheers, Paxse (talk) 14:23, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I enjoyed your blog, by the way - language IS fascinating. Paxse (talk) 14:26, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, pleased to meet you, too. Certainly seen your name on plenty of edits. I added the WP Cambodia user box, and I'll help out where I can. It was your line about the script that tipped the scales. :P --rikker (talk) 08:25, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The line about the script tipped me into asking you both to help me out with Thai numerals, PLEASE! Pawyilee (talk) 09:27, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thesaban laws

As you just added the laws into the thesaban article - have you seen anything in these laws about the drop of the population density as a necessary qualification for the thesaban tambon? See this blog posting, the TAO upgraded to thesaban in the last two years never had the 1500 per km², and some even did not have the 5000 people either. And also Ko Samui, which was upgraded to thesaban mueang (at first was even planned to become thesaban nakhon) does not qualify for the population density. andy (talk) 10:02, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The pop. density requirements were dropped in 2000, as noted in the article now. Good catch. Got me to go through and carefully read the requirements in the different editions. --rikker (talk) 12:39, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another one - as you added the Gazette citations for the cities, I guess you already know that I am processing all those announcements into a more machine readable form, so in case the simple search for the announcement title fails chances are good that you'd find the right one in those XML files in my tambon project. andy (talk) 11:45, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I knew you were, but I hadn't looked in much detail. Looking more closely, you're doing fantastic work with the processing. Have you downloaded the entire archive? I'm working on it myself, using browser plug-ins to automate things, but with my limited prowess I can only do batches of 100 PDFs at a time, so I don't have the full set yet. I'd like to help with your project, if I can. I noticed you have corrected errors in the typed names from the Ratchakitcha site, too, such as พระราชบัญญัติัจัดตั้งเทศบาลนครศรีธรรมราช corrected to พระราชกฤษฎีกาจัดตั้งเทศบาลนครนครนครศรีธรรมราช (the title in the underlying PDF is correct, of course). You have a great eye for detail!

Also, continuing from the Thesaban topic above, I don't know how familiar you are with the naming conventions of these Thai laws, but this might prove useful for you with your XML-ifying of the data: When an Act is sub-numbered (ฉบับที่ X) before the year, it's a revision of a previous Act. It will specify which articles (มาตรา) of the original act it supersedes, but it will not give a full version of the law. So sometimes you have to check several revisions to find the most recent changes of the particular article you're interested in. If an act is released with no sub-number, then it is wholly supersedes any previously passed Acts with the same name.

To illustrate: First there was the Thesaban Organization Act of 1934. Then there is the Thesaban Act of 1939 (different names, but the latter still superseded the former). The Thesaban Act of 1939 was superseded by the Thesaban Act of 1943. Later, the Thesaban Act (No. 2) of 1944 modified portions of the 1943 act (the original act is considered No. 1). An entirely new law was passed as the Thesaban Act of 1953, entirely superseding all previous acts and amendments. When the 1953 act is later modified, the numbering starts over with No. 2, which was the Thesaban Act (No. 2) of 1955. These modifications have continued up through the present, with the most recent being the Thesaban Act (No. 12) of 2003.

If you don't already know this (but maybe you do), you should be able to process this naming scheme to determine which is the most recent "full" act, and how many modifications there have been to it. --rikker (talk) 12:39, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I only downloaded those announcements I also have in the XML by now, which are those which are on the specific entities, as my aim for now is to be able to have solid references for the history - you know all this Royal Gazette stuff was started because I was so annoyed by a troll who placed the {{unreferenced}} on a Amphoe article, and the search for references then made me discover the Royal Gazette database. The rest is history...

So for now, I have left out the general laws like the municipal act, but of course these can be placed in yet another XML file as well. If you want to join in, all you need is a XML editor (but even notepad would do) and a SVN client. If you also want to use the software (which does the downloading and caching of the PDF, makes the search a bit more comfortable, and also allows to search for topics or news) you'd need MS C# Visual Studio, that has a free express version which would be enough - I am using that one at home as well. And it includes a good XML editor as well. Only other thing you need is an account at http://code.google.com.

I clearly did not check all Thai titles, only when I notice them to be wrong because my automatic tools placed them wrong, or like that Nakhon Si Thammarat one I knew must have a wrong header because I knew I searched for that town before and did not find that one. andy (talk) 15:28, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Honorifics

Please read honorifics, then initiate the very badly needed Thai honorifics! Pawyilee (talk) 14:38, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal for new Manual of Style for Thailand-related articles

A drafted new version of the Manual of Style for Thailand-related articles has been started here. Still at issue are specific naming conventions for Thai royals and nobles and settlements. As a member of WikiProject Thailand, you are welcome to contribute to the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Thailand#Updating the Manual of Style (part 2). Paul_012 ^(talk) 18:29, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to Meetup/Seattle6, a focus group

Hello. I'm part of a research group at the University of Washington (Seattle campus), and my group is reaching out to Wikipedians in the Puget Sound area. We're hosting a focus group designed to gather information on what Wikipedians would like to know about each other when interacting on Wikipedia. Our end goal is to create an embedded application that helps people quickly know more about others' history and activity on Wikipedia, and we feel our design will be much more useful if it's based on insights of users like you.

I'm hoping that the chance to help out local researchers, to engage in lively face-to-face discussion with other Seattle Wikipedians, and to contribute to Wikipedia in a new way will entice you to join us. The session lasts 2 hours and snacks are provided. Sessions will be held on UW Seattle campus - directions will be sent after registration. Your contribution will be greatly appreciated!

Willing and able to help us out? RSVP here. Want to know more? Visit our user talk page . Please help us contact other local Wikipedians, too! Commprac01 (talk) 00:50, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Pa_Tio_District_Office.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Pa_Tio_District_Office.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 14:22, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thai language talk page response

Dear Rikker,

As a courtesy, I'm leaving a message on both your talk page and Woodstone's talk page to let you know that I've written something in response to a discussion between the two of you on the Thai language discussion page.

(Feel free to delete this courtesy message from your talk page after you've read it.)

63.214.229.41 (talk) 21:03, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NEW CATEGORY PAGE

Hello Washington-user!! What do you think of this category?
Either on a scale of 1-10 or with commentary.
Let me know through the "Special:EmailUser/" section. #TTiT# 13:14, 14 August 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by The-Traveller-in-Tacoma (talk • contribs)

Thai MoS proposal, naming of settlements

Hi. The proposed Thai MoS is currently under discussion (again—hoping to finally have this finalised), and the naming of settlements still needs to be settled. As a major contributor to Thai province and district articles, your input would be greatly appreciated at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (Thailand-related articles)/Draft. Thanks. --Paul_012 ^(talk) 11:36, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Rikker04! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 331 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Naowarat Yuktanan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Nidhi Eoseewong - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:25, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of TEDxBKK

I have nominated TEDxBKK, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TEDxBKK. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Paul_012 ^(talk) 05:33, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can't really be bothered to fight you on this. It's stuff like this why I don't really participate in Wikipedia anymore. Time should be spent being constructive. Meh. --rikker (talk) 06:48, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Sukhumvit Road

Template:Sukhumvit Road has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Imzadi 1979 → 12:10, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Phahonyothin Road

Template:Phahonyothin Road has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Imzadi 1979 → 12:11, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Lat Phrao Road

Template:Lat Phrao Road has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Imzadi 1979 → 12:12, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Phaya Thai Road

Template:Phaya Thai Road has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Imzadi 1979 → 12:12, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Prasoet Manukit Road

Template:Prasoet Manukit Road has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Imzadi 1979 → 12:12, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for Thai commemorative medals

G'day Rikker04, I have recently being revamping the category structure for Thai Orders, decorations and medals as part of WP:ODM. I notice that you were responsible for the initial establishment of most of the category structure for Thai ODM - good work! Just to give you a heads up, as part of the revamp I am splitting the orders into separate categories for each grade and distinguishing between Knights and Dames (these have separate thread links to parent categories at an international level). These changes are in accordance with WP:ODM's view of best practice. On a separate note, I notice that in addition to the categories you created for the various orders, decorations and service medals, you created a number of categories for commemorative medals. General consensus on WP:ODM when the issue has been raised in other contexts has been that service medals and commemorative medals are non-notable for the purposes of categorisation. They are also inherently problematic as there are potentially large numbers of recipients who may or may not have the medals listed on their page. Categorising recipients is therefore likely to be very haphazard and the utility of having people categorised for this type of award is questionable. Consequently, I am proposing to remove these categories. The specific affected categories contain few pages and are as follows:

Please note that this does not affect detailing applicable medals on the recipients' page - that is an entirely appropriate practice where the information is known. Cheers, AusTerrapin (talk) 18:07, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Recipients of the 150 Years Commemoration of Bangkok Medal

Category:Recipients of the 150 Years Commemoration of Bangkok Medal, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Paul_012 (talk) 03:32, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Recipients of the Red Cross Medal of Appreciation (Thailand)

Category:Recipients of the Red Cross Medal of Appreciation (Thailand), which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Paul_012 (talk) 03:43, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rikker04. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Category:Recipients of the King Rama IX Coronation Medal

Category:Recipients of the King Rama IX Coronation Medal, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Paul_012 (talk) 15:09, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:RID 1950.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RID 1950.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:53, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 02:25, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:RID 1950.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RID 1950.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:50, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity

Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Rikker04. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Thai Charoen District Office.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Thai Charoen District Office.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:16, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:25 satang Obverse (2009).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:25 satang Obverse (2009).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:25 satang Reverse (2009).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:25 satang Reverse (2009).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mueang Yasothon District Office.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mueang Yasothon District Office.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:50, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Video Clip

The article Video Clip has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of meeting WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:23, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Rikker04 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am using university internet on a university campus and am not connected with whatever activity led to the IP block. I have created and expanded many Wikipedia articles in the past and seek an exemption so I can make further contributions. IP address is 130.132.173.216 (but presumably changes by time and location on campus)

Accept reason:

I have granted IP block exemption for three months. That should resolve the issue. Huon (talk) 02:55, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"The royaly academy of Thailand" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect The royaly academy of Thailand. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 5#The royaly academy of Thailand until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 23:02, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Highway route diagram templates

Hi. I wanted to let you know that I'm planning to nominate the highway route diagram templates which you created back in 2008 for deletion, since they haven't been widely adopted and don't fit in with how most highway articles are laid out. --Paul_012 (talk) 14:48, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:HW

Template:HW has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Paul_012 (talk) 20:16, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:HW warning

Template:HW warning has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 13:31, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Siyama

The article Siyama has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help it pass WP:NFILM. Tagged for notability since August 2017.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 02:28, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Beautiful Wonderful Perfect for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beautiful Wonderful Perfect is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beautiful Wonderful Perfect until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Donaldd23 (talk) 14:22, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RID 1982.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RID 1982.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:44, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RID 1999.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RID 1999.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:45, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Edward Sapir

added a link pointing to Stanley Newman

Wallace Chafe

added a link pointing to Bernard Bloch

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Edward Sapir, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stanley Newman.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Grass greener septic.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Grass greener septic.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:31, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Grass is Always Greener Over the Septic Tank (1978 film) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to The Grass is Always Greener Over the Septic Tank (1978 film). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Significa liberdade (talk) 15:23, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Grass is Always Greener Over the Septic Tank (1978 film)

Hello, Rikker04. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Grass is Always Greener Over the Septic Tank (1978 film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ace Trucking Company moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ace Trucking Company. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and References are in an exceedingly poor state. . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. scope_creep^Talk 11:44, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And you wonder why only 1200 people write most of Wikipedia. The rest of the world puts in good faith efforts and you shunt it to drafts where it will eventually get deleted. -r04 (talk) 11:47, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ace Trucking Company (August 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OhHaiMark was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

YouTube and Discogs aren't reliable sources. Additionally, Wikipedia itself can't be its own source. However, I'd encourage you to see if you could find newspaper archives around that time, as if they were relevant enough to be on The Tonight Show and The Ed Sullivan Show, they must have had some news coverage, probably enough to satisfy notability guideline for bands and the general notability guideline.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ace Trucking Company and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

OhHaiMark (talk) 03:09, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rikker04! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! OhHaiMark (talk) 03:09, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cracking Up (1977 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cracking Up (1977 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cracking Up (1977 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

StewdioMACK (talk) 03:48, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ace Trucking Company (September 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ace Trucking Company and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 14:39, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I added 3 published books, multiple published magazine articles, Billboard info for the album, interviews conducted by the Television Academy about the group, etc. What gives? -r04 (talk) 14:47, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ace Trucking Company has been accepted

Ace Trucking Company, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 06:15, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]