User talk:Rohit Mahra

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, Rohit Mahra, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to Violence against Christians in India seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Introduction and Getting started
Contributing to Wikipedia
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! AntiDionysius (talk) 22:11, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you sir , I was face problems that time , because I wanted to link it but I can't Rohit Mahra (talk) 22:38, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

AntiDionysius (talk) 22:11, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Hello, I'm AntiDionysius. An edit that you recently made to Violence against Christians in India seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! AntiDionysius (talk) 22:21, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Your edits have been misspelled, and you're also trying to link a page to itself. AntiDionysius (talk) 22:28, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:29, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rohit Mahra! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Rajbanshi people that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Ekdalian (talk) 07:08, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i read the page and sub ethnic group koch are muslims in majority, I see in box u can check iy Rohit Mahra (talk) 08:01, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Northeast Muslims Communities moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Northeast Muslims Communities. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it needs more context and better formatting. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:49, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Islam in Indian States moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Islam in Indian States. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and this failed WP:NLIST. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:36, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Islam In Karnataka moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Islam In Karnataka. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:29, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Islam In Karnataka (December 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://muslimsofindia.com/2022/03/30/islam-in-karnataka/. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

Draft:Islam In Karnataka may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:45, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rohit Mahra! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:45, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Islam In Karnataka (December 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Islam In Karnataka and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 08:28, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024 - again

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Religion in Karnataka, you may be blocked from editing.
Please do not delete deadlinks - as the bot can probably find them - more importantly, in this case, the archived link is not dead - Arjayay (talk) 17:14, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for this action😔 Rohit Mahra (talk) 11:07, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hussaini Brahmin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gujarati. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Khawla Nakata Kaori (January 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Brachy0008 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Khawla Nakata Kaori and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 03:02, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i not understand properly plz explain reason further Rohit Mahra (talk) 01:28, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Christianity in Nagaland. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 17:10, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Khawla Nakata Kaori (January 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Taabii was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Khawla Nakata Kaori and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Taabii (talk) 10:10, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Arab-Israeli Conflict

You have recently made edits related to the Arab–Israeli conflict. This is a standard message to inform you that the Arab–Israeli conflict is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Additionally, editors must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert on the same page within 24 hours for pages within this topic. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. MolecularPilot ^{🧪️✈️} 03:35, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that the AN thread you have started violates this rule, as you are not extended confirmed. Thank you. :) MolecularPilot ^{🧪️✈️} 03:39, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i not talking about any conflict but I raised questions about page style or neutrality, because it's totally based on jewish perspective not a neutral Rohit Mahra (talk) 03:44, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your complaint is about Zionism, which is obviously related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. If you continue to make edits about that page, or anything else related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, before your account reaches 500 edits and 30 days, you will be blocked from editing. This is an across-the-board rule we apply to all new users, regardless of their political views. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 03:55, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i does not mean about race or religion or anything which can leads to hate , I am talking about perspective on seeing things. I am not taking rt wing not left wing. I just questions page neutrality but it's includes favour on single ideology. If I use the name , I know, it's very sensitive topic but I not want to it , it's title is Islamic and jewish both r related to religion not on racial conflict.

Or it's title should be israel-Arab nation Relation.

And I was not know about issued guide lines on this conflict. Rohit Mahra (talk) 04:05, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It does not matter what change you want to make to the page. It does not matter why you want to make it. It's good that your goal is neutrality—one of our pillars—but the rule is the same either way. Please stop talking about this topic, including on this user talk page, until you have reached 500 edits.

Also, please stop making logged-out edits to pages you have also edited while logged-in, as you have been doing on this IP range. Please see WP:LOUTSOCK for more information on why this violates policy. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 04:08, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I want u plz modify as it because it may lead other to to think in a religious perspective but it is written in a political personalitie Rohit Mahra (talk) 04:24, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025: Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 04:41, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Rohit. Based on the above conversation, it appears you're having difficulty following instructions, and other things like your move log show general issues in English proficiency. While the English Wikipedia is very much open to non-fluent speakers, we need to be able to have meaningful conversations with editors, and in this case I don't think that's possible. I would encourage you to contribute to the Wikipedia for your native language. I'm sure they'd be grateful to have you. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 04:41, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i am admit my weak vocabulary, due to my Indian diaspora. But now it is rising through the research of article or page of Wikipedia.

About my move logs i shifted her just 6 month ago and I accept , I was do log out edit only less than 10 times.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rohit Mahra (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i was miserable about my acts but if you give a second chance to be an editor, I will much More sincere for my actions and edits. Rohit Mahra (talk) 08:53, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I would encourage you to edit the Wikipedia of your primary language- the English Wikipedia is not better than others- until your English skills improve. There is also the Simple English Wikipedia for those who are working on their English skills- perhaps that will help you improve as well. Good luck, but I must decline your request. 331dot (talk) 09:10, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rohit Mahra (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I admit I was wrong, and I feel bad about my actions. After reading the Wikipedia guidelines, I contritution for skimming through your instructions as the administrator and made edits without logging in, which is a great fault of mine. :I promise this will not happen again. I will make sure to follow the rules and contribute to Wikipedia properly from now on.

Decline reason:

You lack sufficient ability to communicate in English to edit here. Please see WP:CIR. Yamla (talk) 19:43, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.