User talk:Sagette

Welcome!

Hello, Sagette, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!--MollyPollyRolly (talk) 00:59, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Walter Archer

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Walter Archer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Htanaungg (talk) 11:36, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bare URLs

Hi. Thanks for adding urls to the Ian Bradley article. When you have a moment, would you kindly add the author name, title, publisher, date of publication and access date to these refs?. See Wikipedia:Bare URLs#Helping to prevent future link rot. An easy way to format them is like this:

<ref>Smith, John. [url "Article title"], Publisher, Date, Access Date.</ref>

Thanks! -- Ssilvers (talk) 17:57, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pease family

In regards to the Pease family article, a lot of editors frown upon articles that look more like genealogy than encyclopedia entries. Adding lots of family members who are not notable (and note National Portrait gallery or on the Peerage website doesn't count) except by being related to more famous people is likely to get the entire article deleted rapidly. The article should concentrate on the family's 19th century power. See WP:NOTGENEALOGY --Erp (talk) 05:28, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrew David Bradley (October 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Wingwatchers were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Should be expanded, some of the sources, like IMDB and Youtube, are not reliable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andrew David Bradley and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Andrew David Bradley, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wingwatchers (talk) 21:33, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sagette! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Wingwatchers (talk) 21:33, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

William Ewart Bradley moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, William Ewart Bradley, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 04:39, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Andrew David Bradley

Hello, Sagette. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Andrew David Bradley, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:59, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Alice Lima Murray

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Alice Lima Murray, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://fotonettverk-rogaland.no/alice-archer/. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pikavoom ^Talk 09:51, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Norman Ernest Archer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Norman Ernest Archer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norman Ernest Archer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Pikavoom ^Talk 09:59, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hugh Archer ("Sagette") for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hugh Archer ("Sagette") is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hugh Archer ("Sagette") until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Pikavoom ^Talk 10:02, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Andrew David Bradley

Hello, Sagette. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Andrew David Bradley".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:26, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:William Ewart Bradley

Hello, Sagette. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:William Ewart Bradley, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:05, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:V

Hi. All facts that are added to an article must be supported by sources that state the facts. Please review WP:V and WP:RS. Please let me know if you have any questions, preferably by posting on the appropriate article's Talk page. -- Ssilvers (talk) 05:05, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Adding photos of yourself

Thanks for the additions to Dryrobe and Lomond Hills of you and your red jackets, but in the latter case there were already photos on Commons of the same trig point without anybody sitting on it and waving at the camera. I don't think we need a human for scale in this case. Belbury (talk) 09:44, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ian Bradley

You added a photo with his father. Then you deleted it. Would you please explain? -- Ssilvers (talk) 17:32, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Initially I thought it added to the profile but on reflection and discussion I feel it best left out. Sagette (talk) 21:44, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I liked the photo, and if it is a free image, I think it adds to the article. Did you take the photo? If not, who took the photo? -- Ssilvers (talk) 22:45, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, possibly my grandmother or uncle or someone else. Sagette (talk) 23:06, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. The image pages for family photos that you own should not say "own work". Check with permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, as they can advise you how to properly label (and upload any more) family photos to Commons. -- Ssilvers (talk) 23:23, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Sagette (talk) 23:31, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew David Bradley

I have removed your changes at Andrew David Bradley for the time being, because they were just absolutely filled with errors. You can retrieve your changes in the page history, but please spend considerable time cleaning up this text before resubmitting it. In particular, there was a ton of incorrect nowiki that left the page a mess. I'll attach an automated message with some helpful links below. Thank you, Jessicapierce (talk) 01:40, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

The *Show preview* button is right next to the *Publish changes* button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 01:40, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Andrew David Bradley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ITV. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Preview and sandbox

Hello, can I please ask you to get in the habit of using the Preview function and your sandbox to work on your text before submitting it? It's pretty crazy that 191 of the last 200 edits to Andrew David Bradley have been made by you in the last few days. I appreciate that you have added a lot of content, and that it's relative error-free, but please do read the following automated message and follow the links.

In addition, if you have a personal or professional connection with the subject, you need to disclose that. I would appreciate a reply to indicate you are willing to work within Wikipedia guidelines. Thank you, Jessicapierce (talk) 13:59, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Andrew David Bradley, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 13:59, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Andrew David Bradley. When removing a maintenance template, please either ensure that the problem that the template refers to has been resolved, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as this change has been reverted. Take a look at getting started to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 22:00, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Paternal Sagette (talk) 22:39, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

To be more clear, please do not remove the "clarification needed" tag at the word "parenteral" until you have actually clarified what is meant there. "Parental" or "paternal" would both make sense.

Hello, I'm Jessicapierce. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the main body of Andrew David Bradley. Generally, any relevant external links should be listed in an "External links" section at the end of the article and meet the external links guidelines. Links within the body of an article should be internal wikilinks. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 22:00, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Andrew David Bradley, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 01:37, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Jessicapierce (talk) 01:37, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Andrew David Bradley

The article Andrew David Bradley has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No WP:SIGCOV found to demonstrate notability for WP:ANYBIO or WP:JOURNALIST. Article was previously moved per WP:DRAFTIFY back in March 2025, but was moved back to mainspace with insufficient sourcing, and unreliable sources, that establish that the BLP meets notability criteria.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Isaidnoway (talk) 06:38, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You can ignore this message, the article has instead been nominated for deletion. Isaidnoway (talk) 06:44, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Andrew David Bradley for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrew David Bradley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew David Bradley until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Isaidnoway (talk) 06:41, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]