Jump to content

User talk:Saimmx

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: SM-A136B (December 29)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JJPMaster was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
JJPMaster (she/they) 14:44, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Saimmx! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! JJPMaster (she/they) 14:44, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve SM-A135F

[edit]

Hello, Saimmx,

Thank you for creating SM-A135F.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

I'm glad to see you making your own redirects these days.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|JJPMaster}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JJPMaster (she/they) 05:46, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, and happy new year! Saimmx (talk) 05:47, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
For the record, there aren't actually any problems with the redirect. This message was automatically placed by the tool I was using to mark the pages as reviewed. I'm still glad to see you making your own redirects these days. JJPMaster (she/they) 05:47, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, G-Mode, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 17:02, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I am sorry to that. Is Steam a reliable source from the way you see? Saimmx (talk) 16:17, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Secondary sourcing would be better, but a primary source like that would be fine. Waxworker (talk) 13:52, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

[edit]

Information icon You have recently made edits related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them. This is a standard message to inform you that gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. User:Bluethricecreamman (Talk·Contribs) 13:51, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Censorship in Taiwan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thediplomat.com. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

By saying sock puppets in my summary, I meant Poiwert1 and DirectorSteveScott, who restored all of the reverted edits in 1252382103 and again 1249223553. Akishima Yuka (talk) 11:50, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for providing the context. However, I must say I was still unhappy with the revert since many (to say at least) constructive edits were just... disappeared. And the resorted version had some issues - But since suckpuppets is not tolerated on Wikipedia, maybe I should stop complaining. Saimmx (talk) 15:48, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kitamura Sae has been accepted

[edit]
Kitamura Sae, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 12:57, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]