User talk:Sammyjankis88

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cinematic style of Christopher Nolan

Hi, I did the GAN review for this a while back and was just thinking about it today. It looks like it hasn't been re-nominated since, so I thought I'd ask about that, if you were planning on doing it. I'm not saying I'd necessarily take the review on, but I remember the review quite fondly despite disagreements because of how it made me think about the broad criteria in relating to film topics. Even if you aren't taking it back to GANR soon, I'd be interested in discussions of the content, etc. Thanks, Kingsif (talk) 05:54, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Kingsif; Hi there, thanks for following up! I've been meaning to do a thorough copy edit and look at the ref layout (I think it should be GA with those in check), but life and other things have gotten in the way. If no one else steps up I might do some work and re-nominate later this year. All the best, Sammyjankis88 (talk) 13:33, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pittsburgh Pernguins

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Pittsburgh Penguins has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

I've put a citation tag at the end of Playoff runs and a uniform change (1974–1982) and I see you have taken care of the other one. I would say the article is in very good shape. Not a hint of trivia anywhere! Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:21, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Twofingered Typist; Thank you very much, great work indeed! Removed most of the trivia before submitting. :) I'll take a look at the citation tag. All the best, Sammyjankis88 (talk) 13:30, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

"Tenet is a 2020 science fiction action thriller film written" is the wording used at the film page, with no "spy film" mentioned. I think "sci fi" is ok if that's your preference on the Nolan biography page. I'm presently considering moving this film article toward peer review promotion. Any interest in a co-nomination for the "Tenet" peer review upgrade? ErnestKrause (talk) 18:11, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Nolan

Hi there. Three years ago, you asked me if I would be interested in working on Nolan-related articles for GA/FA. I have recently decided that I'll probably give his biography a go at FAC. From a quick scan, it looks pretty comprehensive but I noticed that it does not employ many literary sources (some of which are even listed in "Further reading"), e.g. The Fictional Christopher Nolan, which has some good stuff. I'll use these books to make the article more engaging and comprehensive, and will see how far I come. Checking your activity, I see you last edited in February so I don't know if you'll be reading this but I would love to see what you think. Regards, FrB.TG (talk) 17:55, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Million Award

	The Million Award
	For your contributions to bring Christopher Nolan (estimated annual readership: 3,000,000) to Featured Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! FrB.TG (talk) 13:52, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Nolan

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 12 March 2023. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/March 2023, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/March 2023. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work!—Wehwalt (talk) 17:00, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Nolan scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the Christopher Nolan article has been scheduled as today's featured article for July 30, 2023. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page blurb, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/July 30, 2023, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. If you wish to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article, you can do so at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/July 2023.

I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:14, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you today for the article, introduced: "Christopher Nolan is one of those rare filmmakers who make highly intelligent blockbusters, which ponder the bigger philosophical questions. His films leave you thinking for days. Nolan's work with IMAX technology and insistence on minimalising the use of CGI have been highly influential. One of his films (which BTW is also at FAC currently) redefined the modern superhero genre as we know today and is the third highest-rated film on IMDb. I could go on and on, but I think you get the point."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:00, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]