Jump to content

User talk:Saruthino

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A belated welcome!

[edit]
The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Saruthino! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you have questions, just use this link to ask for help; a volunteer will visit you here shortly!

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! guninvalid (talk) 05:34, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tham Nimal-Raj moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Tham Nimal-Raj. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and you need to establish the subject's notability, either through the general notability guideline, for which you need three or more reliable independent sources with significant coverage of the subject (there's useful information about how to choose good sources and avoid bad sources here), or through the academic subject-specific notability guideline. Please also take into account the policy about biographies of living persons. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. SunloungerFrog (talk) 07:48, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tham Nimal-Raj moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Tham Nimal-Raj. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 15:15, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tham Nimal-Raj for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tham Nimal-Raj is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tham Nimal-Raj until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SunloungerFrog (talk) 19:55, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Timtrent. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Derek Ramsay in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 16:27, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page The Emperor's Candlesticks (1936 film) has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 16:29, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tham Nimal-Raj

[edit]

Hello Saruthino,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Tham Nimal-Raj for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Tham Nimal-Raj to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

AstrooKai (Talk) 10:30, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you either removed an Articles for deletion notice from an article, Tham Nimal-Raj, or removed another person's comment(s) in an Articles for deletion debate. Removing AfD templates or editing others comments might make it difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment on the AfD discussion instead. Thank you. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 17:52, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you move a page disruptively again, as you did at Tham Nimal-Raj, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Do not move an article which is subject to a deletion discussion. This is highly disruptive, and you already have a history of disruptive editing, hence this single warning.
🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 17:55, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Dr Tham Nimal-Raj has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to have no meaningful content or history, and the text was unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:23, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]